Multiple EQ Flyouts Simultaneosly?

That would be very nice.
Let the pin button pin the EQ until you unpin it (is "unpin" a word?)    

CakeAlexS
I agree, I suggest throwing it into Cakewalk problem reporter and identify it as a feature request
(feature requests have been disabled for a while now).
 
I would like an additional feature to (optionally) mouseover and it pops up myself.
Cheers..

Good thought Alex...
 
I just found the request page still down and realized that I had some other issues to post there and now I've already forgotten what they are... ;-)
 
But I would hate to bog down the developement with a lot of extra posts to this entryway...
 
Maybe one of The Bakers will step in and tell us if it's ok for us to do that for now?
 
Roger?
 
Are you saying that they do pin like that now and I didn't know or that they should? ;-)
 
Thanks...
Keni
 

Great idea, Keni.  Throw a solo button on the flyout EQs, and you're there.

Well... is it worth making it sizable as well, dragging a corner?  
 
and drag/copy too...to another EQ...like the older versions could

You can open 2 instances but its tricky. I'm not at the computer just now but as I recall: if you have the doc floated on a second monitor with the CV open you cane open one there and pin it. Then on the first monitor using the TV with the inspector open to the pro-channel you can open the fly out for a second track or bus there.
 
You can also open 2 in the CV but you have to be careful about the position left or right of center when you open the fly out so that one opens left and the other right of center.
 
I agree it would be a great advantage to improve it by allowing the fly out to float and be resized. 
 
edit:SP

@CW: Sell all ProChannel plugins separately as VSTs.

I know, it won't happen.

How about a separate "Quad" Quadcurve.
 
A flyout that has four real time spectrographs stacked on top of each other. Underneath each graph a straight row of EQ dials (to save space). Have a dropdown menu for a track picker so you can load specific tracks or busses into each of the four spectro/EQ's.
 
Then you can compare and tweak up to four track's PC EQ's at a time. That would be awesome for mixing Bass and kick.
 
Any larger than four though I think the graphs would be too short and the graphical resource consumption a little too high. Four seems like a good number and would keep with the "Quad" marketing.
 
Just a thought.
 
Cheers, Keni.

Four is kind of a personal thing because I tend to have two double tracks a lot of times (for instance bass or a double sampled kick). That way I can tweak the doubled tracks directly while viewing them in relation to another double set of tracks instead of doing it at the buss stage.
 
So yeah... kind of specific to me but I think there are others who work this way. It's an unfortunate consequence of not always having a great signal due to gear or sample bank limitations. I'm also not the greatest engineer yet so it's easier to blend multiple sounds/tracks to get a full/superior tone than working with one source.
 
I'm hoping with X4 some of these more luxury features and final interface tweaks get some attention now it's not a game of fixing bugs and oddities.
 
We really need them to hammer down the last bit of the Take Lane stuff first though like the minimum height, more extensive parent track editing options and adding a Hide Lane type system (I think a Lanes Manager would be great) but that is all woefully off topic. Those are the types of things (as well as some of the suggestions you've been making lately) that would make me upgrade sooner than later because I'm more or less happy with X3e as is.
 
Cheers.

Beepster
Four is kind of a personal thing because I tend to have two double tracks a lot of times (for instance bass or a double sampled kick). That way I can tweak the doubled tracks directly while viewing them in relation to another double set of tracks instead of doing it at the buss stage.
 
So yeah... kind of specific to me but I think there are others who work this way. It's an unfortunate consequence of not always having a great signal due to gear or sample bank limitations. I'm also not the greatest engineer yet so it's easier to blend multiple sounds/tracks to get a full/superior tone than working with one source.
 
I'm hoping with X4 some of these more luxury features and final interface tweaks get some attention now it's not a game of fixing bugs and oddities.
 
We really need them to hammer down the last bit of the Take Lane stuff first though like the minimum height, more extensive parent track editing options and adding a Hide Lane type system (I think a Lanes Manager would be great) but that is all woefully off topic. Those are the types of things (as well as some of the suggestions you've been making lately) that would make me upgrade sooner than later because I'm more or less happy with X3e as is.
 
Cheers.

I understand... We each work as we do... And find the solutions we can...

Minimum Lane height? Maximum too! I won't dig into this one here as it's already been hammered on by me and others since the inception of Lanes... It's my biggest issue... Zoom stuff! I spend far too long shuffling things around when I need to zoom a Lane or even a track when folders or hidden tracks exist in a project... I sorely hope The Bakers surprise me with some wonderful new way to deal with these issues... ;-)

Keni

Beepster
The max height restriction doesn't bother me as much but it should go too and for goodness sakes they need to make it so you can drag out a lane without ALL of them expanding. I always disable Auto Track Zoom and dislike having it thrust on me in the lanes area.
 
I think I have the opposite concerns in a way. I want to see less of the lanes except for the one(s) I'm working with.
 
But yeah... totally different topic.

Hi Beepster...

No I think we're on a similar page here... I need to see more Lanes on screen at one time and I need to zoom a single Lane to a larger size than currently set by the Max limit... There are occassions when I want to zoom a couple of Lanes, but that should be made possible as well... I should be given the ability to select what I wish to zoom and how large/small I want to go. I don't see enough reason to set these limits at all...

Keni