Helpful ReplyNO VCA'S YET ?

Author
Frequency Studios
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18
  • Joined: 2014/04/07 00:12:48
  • Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
  • Status: offline
2016/01/31 19:24:46 (permalink)
4.5 (6)

NO VCA'S YET ?

Not having VCA's is going to be a dealbreaker When will this be implemented ?  moving to Cubase very soon if this doesn't get sorted 
post edited by Frequency Studios - 2016/01/31 19:39:33

Sabertooth x79 3930k 3.2GHz 32GB DDR3 2X 500Gb SSD working drives 3TB Raid 10 Win 8.1x64 Tascam DM4800 32ch i/o via FW SSL Sigma Heaps o' outboard etc etc 
Sonar X1P, X2P,X3P, Platinum 
 
#1
dwardzala
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1470
  • Joined: 2008/05/26 19:18:33
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/01/31 19:37:07 (permalink)
0
What part of this functionality is so critical to your workstream?

Dave
Main Studio- Core i5 @2.67GHz, 16Gb Ram, (2) 500Gb HDs, (1) 360 Gb HD
MotU Ultralite AVB, Axiom 49 Midi Controller, Akai MPD18 Midi Controller
Win10 x64 Home
Sonar 2017.06 Platinum (and X3e, X2c, X1d)
 
Mobile Studio - Sager NP8677 (i7-6700HQ @2.67MHz, 16G Ram, 250G SSD, 1T HD)
M-Box Mini v. 2
Win 10 x64 Home
Sonar 2016.10 Platinum
 
Check out my original music:
https://soundcloud.com/d-wardzala/sets/d-wardzala-original-music
 
 
#2
Frequency Studios
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18
  • Joined: 2014/04/07 00:12:48
  • Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/01/31 20:10:30 (permalink)
0
Hi Dave, Good name !  For one having the ability to ride individual fades in a group during automation, maintaining a proper ratio of post fader effect send signals, amongst others necessary to an efficient professional workflow 
 
Cheers, Dave 

Sabertooth x79 3930k 3.2GHz 32GB DDR3 2X 500Gb SSD working drives 3TB Raid 10 Win 8.1x64 Tascam DM4800 32ch i/o via FW SSL Sigma Heaps o' outboard etc etc 
Sonar X1P, X2P,X3P, Platinum 
 
#3
dcumpian
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4124
  • Joined: 2005/11/03 15:50:51
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/01 08:39:41 (permalink)
0
Agreed. VCA's have a place and can be very useful in a complex mix.
 
Regards,
Dan

Mixing is all about control.
 
My music:
http://dancumpian.bandcamp.com/ or https://soundcloud.com/dcumpian Studiocat Advanced Studio DAW (Intel i5 3550 @ 3.7GHz, Z77 motherboard, 16GB Ram, lots of HDDs), Sonar Plat, Mackie 1604, PreSonus Audiobox 44VSL, ESI 4x4 Midi Interface, Ibanez Bass, Custom Fender Mexi-Strat, NI S88, Roland JV-2080 & MDB-1, Komplete, Omnisphere, Lots o' plugins.    
#4
Alex Elzer
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 78
  • Joined: 2015/02/02 06:18:57
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/05 06:48:29 (permalink)
0
Sorry  for my ignorance, but why not use group manager?

Alex von Elzer
Dark music (www.secretdemo.nl)
#5
jpetersen
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1499
  • Joined: 2015/07/11 20:22:53
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/05 17:34:34 (permalink)
0
Pardon my even greater ignorance, but:
VCA = Voltage Controlled Amplifier?
#6
Frequency Studios
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18
  • Joined: 2014/04/07 00:12:48
  • Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/05 21:22:50 (permalink)
0
Correct  While not an entirely accurate term in this instance DCA or digitally controlled amplifier would be more accurate  VCA"s are a throwback to analog consoles same concept though 
 

Sabertooth x79 3930k 3.2GHz 32GB DDR3 2X 500Gb SSD working drives 3TB Raid 10 Win 8.1x64 Tascam DM4800 32ch i/o via FW SSL Sigma Heaps o' outboard etc etc 
Sonar X1P, X2P,X3P, Platinum 
 
#7
Frequency Studios
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18
  • Joined: 2014/04/07 00:12:48
  • Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/05 21:39:47 (permalink)
0
Alex von Elzer
Sorry  for my ignorance, but why not use group manager?




Please do some research on VCA's or DCA's (same thing different tech) if it is still not apparent I will explain. Quickly though for one example groups as they exist currently in Sonar will not allow you to automate individual tracks inside the group without deselecting that track from the group(and no easy way to do that even )amongst other things groups are not the same as VCA/DCA's  in that a VCA is really a way to remotely control the level of a channel or group of channels from a single fader Whereas a group is a place to send channels post-fader. Groups are useful for applying the same processing to a group of inputs VCA's are useful for mixing similar types of instruments 
 
It's not uncommon for people to confuse VCAs and Groups or not fully understand their uses/functions Which is why I strongly suggest some due diligence in the research department before jumping into the conversation 
 
Cheers, D

Sabertooth x79 3930k 3.2GHz 32GB DDR3 2X 500Gb SSD working drives 3TB Raid 10 Win 8.1x64 Tascam DM4800 32ch i/o via FW SSL Sigma Heaps o' outboard etc etc 
Sonar X1P, X2P,X3P, Platinum 
 
#8
Kev999
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3922
  • Joined: 2007/05/01 14:22:54
  • Location: Victoria, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/05 22:15:13 (permalink)
+2 (2)
Frequency Studios
...I strongly suggest some due diligence in the research department before jumping into the conversation...

 
I disagree. I believe that the onus is on the individual who is putting forward the proposal to explain what it means and how it would be beneficial.

SonarPlatinum(22.11.0.111)|Mixbus32C(4.3.19)|DigitalPerformer(9.5.1)|Reaper(5.77)
FractalDesign:DefineR5|i7-6850k@4.1GHz|16GB@2666MHz-DDR4|MSI:GamingProCarbonX99a|Matrox:M9148(x2)|UAD2solo(6.5.2)|W7Ult-x64-SP1
Audient:iD22+ASP800|KRK:VXT6|+various-outboard-gear|+guitars&basses, etc.
Having fun at work lately
#9
Hatstand
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 597
  • Joined: 2013/02/26 11:33:22
  • Location: London England
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/08 05:17:14 (permalink)
+1 (1)
perhaps you could explain the scenarios where the current track automation grouping falls short of your needs? it might help your fellow forum contributors understand what you think is missing in the current functionality. The manual information is here;
https://www.cakewalk.com/Documentation?product=SONAR&language=3&help=Mixing.43.html

Sonar Platinum - Windows 10 Pro 64bit - AMD FX 8150 processor - 16Gb RAM - 27" Monitor (it's not the size that counts, it's what you do with it)
#10
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/08 10:19:20 (permalink)
0
I have VCA in Samplitude and have no use for it. I understand the ability to have a proportional control over many tracks but Sonar has that. Always has. There maybe some other feature they offer but its seem a bit obscure. 
 
Further leaving a DAW for a single feature that only recently became available seems silly. A threat that doesn't look like a threat but a relief to CW.  

Best
John
#11
mesayre
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 195
  • Joined: 2012/07/07 09:29:57
  • Location: New York, NY
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/09 10:02:43 (permalink)
+1 (1)
Frequency Studios
 
 
Quickly though for one example groups as they exist currently in Sonar will not allow you to automate individual tracks inside the group without deselecting that track from the group...



If you hold the control key while moving a fader (or any control), it's grouping is temporarily suspended, allowing you to automate just that track. Once control key is released, it'll resume moving proportionally to the others, assuming you've set them up for relative movement. Does that achieve your goal?

Mike Sayre
Composer, Horn Player
 
Sonar Platinum, Win10x64
 
My new album, Music for Icebergs, is now on iTunes
#12
...wicked
Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7360
  • Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
  • Location: Seattle
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/09 10:42:26 (permalink)
+1 (1)
What's also weird is that it sounds like the OP might be confusing Groups with Buses. Grouping channel faders together does not apply the same processing to the channels, which can still be routed to any bus (and now maybe aux tracks?) you want. I'll have to sit down to confirm this but the only thing they don't do which VCAs do is give you a dedicated track fader to represent the group. I wonder if you can create a dummy Aux track and add it to a group and have it be your VCA? I suspect there'd still be missing some slightly more elegant tools for managing them (like a dedicated track picker for example)
 
 

===========
The Fog People
===========

Intel i7-4790 
16GB RAM
ASUS Z97 
Roland OctaCapture
Win10/64   

SONAR Platinum 64-bit    
billions VSTs, some of which work    
#13
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/15 06:33:24 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby Kamikaze 2016/03/15 01:44:39
0
With DCAs you could have a particular fader/track/channel present in several groups.

In Sonar a fader can only be in any one group. I haven't tested this. It's not expressly mentioned in the manual whether a control element can be in only one or more than one.

It allows you to create sub mixes for monitoring groups against each other.

Setup a drums DCA group then setup a Rhythms DCA group. The Rhythm DCA includes all the elements in the Drums DCA as well as the Bass track. You could have a Bass DCA that includes the Kick drum and toms along with bass guitar. Now you have 3 DCA groups with some over lap of group membership.

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#14
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11546
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
  • Location: Parkesburg, PA
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/15 10:15:10 (permalink)
0
mudgel
With DCAs you could have a particular fader/track/channel present in several groups.

In Sonar a fader can only be in any one group. I haven't tested this. It's not expressly mentioned in the manual whether a control element can be in only one or more than one.

It allows you to create sub mixes for monitoring groups against each other.

Setup a drums DCA group then setup a Rhythms DCA group. The Rhythm DCA includes all the elements in the Drums DCA as well as the Bass track. You could have a Bass DCA that includes the Kick drum and toms along with bass guitar. Now you have 3 DCA groups with some over lap of group membership.



Nice description of what they can add to the party, Mike.      Voted.
 
 

SteveC
https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
 
SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
 
#15
...wicked
Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7360
  • Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
  • Location: Seattle
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/15 15:29:31 (permalink)
0
mudgel
With DCAs you could have a particular fader/track/channel present in several groups.



Ahhhhhh, right! Good reminder.

===========
The Fog People
===========

Intel i7-4790 
16GB RAM
ASUS Z97 
Roland OctaCapture
Win10/64   

SONAR Platinum 64-bit    
billions VSTs, some of which work    
#16
lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2216
  • Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
  • Location: Sweden
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/23 07:22:16 (permalink)
0
Hatstand
perhaps you could explain the scenarios where the current track automation grouping falls short of your
needs? it might help your fellow forum contributors understand what you think is missing in the current
functionality. The manual information is here;
https://www.cakewalk.com/...mp;help=Mixing.43.html

If doing any relative movement of a control like fader involving sends - then VCA may be useful.
The fader change which also include a change in return from sends should maintain the same sum of wet from returns and dry signal - or it will sound different.
 
Let's say we have reference level of 100 on fader and 50% of that amount, level 50 below fader through a send. Sum is 150 and wet is 1/3 of total.
 
Then lower fader to 90 and send is 45 and sum is 135 and wet is 1/3 of total - this is what we want.
 
What normal sends do is not percentage change but a fixed amount of fader - meaning lowering fader to 90 send becomes 40 - which is 50 below fader and does not sound the same 90+40=130 and wet is 40/130 and 30.8% instead of 33.3% and will sound different.
 
In theory you can do this in Sonar through grouping controls and percentage change - but involves a
calculation of separate percentage every relative change of fader automation. So in real life not very
practical. A VCA fader handles that for you.
 
Better way in Sonar would be to automate a bus fader and see to that any returns are into that bus as
well - then you can change level of bus fader and ratio wet&dry is the same. Through patch points you
can do this. But it gives less freedom than VCA grouping does.
 
Samplitude has VCA faders but they do not allow nested in many levels - so very limited.
ProTools and Cubase Pro allow nested VCA grouping.
 
Limitations of VCA grouping is always if sends involve any non-linear effects in chain - this cannot be
handled and result will sound different. This could be doing NY style parallell compression with a
compressor - and there VCA is not any help.
 
For me other things are top priority to move back from Cubase, but vote for VCA now will take a good while to implement - so voting.
#17
Hatstand
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 597
  • Joined: 2013/02/26 11:33:22
  • Location: London England
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/02/23 08:15:21 (permalink)
0
Perhaps I have this wrong, but if you have a pre fade send from the main track to an aux track and group the two tracks would this not resolve the scenario above where moving one fader moves the other?
 
I guess different people have different preferred ways of working. I must admit I usually sum to busses and automate from there.

Sonar Platinum - Windows 10 Pro 64bit - AMD FX 8150 processor - 16Gb RAM - 27" Monitor (it's not the size that counts, it's what you do with it)
#18
Vlar
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 189
  • Joined: 2003/11/11 11:28:16
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/03/07 11:36:27 (permalink)
0
Is there a way one automation lane could control multiple volume faders in a VCA-like fashion? Lets say you wanted to have vocals, drums, etc. grouped together, so you could automate a complex mix, but have it to where the group "masters" (and their automation lanes) remote controlled the individual channel volumes, preserving their relationship to aux sends. I don't think busses work this way, do they?
#19
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/03/07 13:37:04 (permalink)
0
In answer to the question posed in the post above.
From the page 1070 of the manual.
Using control groups
SONAR lets you link faders, knobs, or buttons in the Track view, Track Inspector and Console view into groups.
Groups are collections of controls whose movements are linked together. For example:
Two Volume faders or controls can be grouped so that when you increase or decrease the volume of one track,
the volume of the other track changes in exactly the same way.
Four Mute buttons can be grouped so that when you click on the Mute button to mute track 1, tracks 1 and 2
are muted and tracks 3 and 4 are un-muted.
The Console view and Track view identify controls, knobs and faders that are grouped using a colored group
indicator that is displayed on the controls in each group. The controls in group A are displayed with a red indicator,
the controls in group B with a green indicator, and so on. Controls, faders and knobs can be grouped together.
When you group buttons together, the way they work is based on their position when you create the group:
Buttons that are in the same position when grouped will turn on and off together at all times.
Buttons that are in opposite positions when grouped will always remain in opposite positions.
When you group buttons with knobs or faders, the button turns on/off when the knob or fader reaches its halfway
point.
You have several additional options. There are three general types of groups: absolute, relative, and custom.
Here’s how they work.
Absolute
The range of motion in all controls in the group is identical. When you move one control in the group, all other
controls in the group move the same amount in the same direction. The controls do not necessarily need to start at
the same level.
Relative
The range of motion for controls in the group is not the same. All controls in the group have the same value at one
point—the lowest level for send, return, and volume levels, and zero for pan controls.
Custom
Sometimes you want to define a more complex relationship between the controls in a group. For example:
You want two controls to operate in reverse—when one fader drops, the other increases (cross fade).
You want two volume faders grouped so that they are locked together at maximum level, but drop at different
rates.
You want two faders to be locked together with the same range of motion, but a third fader grouped with them
to have a different rang

Best
John
#20
bvideo
Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1707
  • Joined: 2006/09/02 22:20:02
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/03/12 23:58:36 (permalink)
0
Also from the manual:
To override a control’s grouping
Hold down the CTRL key while moving the control.
The control remains part of the group and functions as such once the CTRL key is lifted.

W10 pro, Sonar Platinum, Alesis Multimix 16 FW, MOTU Express 128, Gigabyte Z370 HD3P, i7 8700K, 16 Gigs, ssd + 2 X 2T disks, D50-MEX, JV80, A90EX, M1REX
#21
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5139
  • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
  • Location: Ballarat, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/03/13 00:23:49 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby pwalpwal 2016/03/14 15:18:56
0
Read this:
 
https://www.soundonsound.com/sos/sep08/articles/vcagroups.htm
 
It is related to Pro Tools but it gives you insight as to why VCA faders are better than most grouping options.
 
You can send individual tracks within a group to a VCA fader including tracks from other groups and then control those tracks all at once too.  Individual levels with a VCA group can be tweaked at any time too.  Handy for drum buss mixes.
 
Studio One has just got them.  I used to wonder what all the hoopla was about but once you start using them you begin to realise how powerful they are and they are much more powerful than groups etc..
 
When you are controlling a group of tracks via a VCA fader the levels going into any side chain affects are also effected so they maintain the right wet/dry balance all the time.
 
You can even use a VCA fader to control a group of VCA faders as well in Studio One.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
 
Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
#22
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/03/14 14:59:05 (permalink)
0
I do not dispute the added functionally VCAs may give but I do dispute how often they are really needed especially considering what is already available. 

Best
John
#23
lfm
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2216
  • Joined: 2005/01/24 05:35:33
  • Location: Sweden
  • Status: offline
Re: NO VCA'S YET ? 2016/03/16 11:48:14 (permalink)
0
John
I do not dispute the added functionally VCAs may give but I do dispute how often they are really needed especially considering what is already available. 


I watched S1 3.2 video the other day - and those folks were just blabbing about grouping stuff, and did not quite get it as I heard their explanations. Just ran the VCA fader and you could see the other fader go with it - but no explanation how it differs from ordinary grouping, so their demo was not the best.
 
But really good tools provide headroom with things there if you need them.
There is a reason if aiming for professional mixers that ProTools, Samplitude, Cubase, Reaper and now also StudioOne implemented it - four of them in the last year or so - was removed from standard ProTools for a while but now moved from ProTools HD again just six months ago, so Avid probably felt they would loose out to other daws not needing hardware acceleration so they moved it back to standard ProTools.
 
The more professionals that use a tool the more spinoff in consumer homestudio market too.
It does rank a tool depending on having VCA's or not.
Gibson Pro Audio - but no VCA's - don't think so.
#24
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1