Re: Narrowed it down for an interface....your opinions...?
2013/08/27 20:06:46
(permalink)
USB vs FW vs TB... oh the decisions.....
Just to chime in, if you work in 24 bit and 44K USB2 should be fine for tracking a few audio tracks at a time....
However, if you want to move up the audio stream to higher sample rates and bit depths, you might want to look for something with more bandwidth.
I am not a tech geek so I don't know the whys but I do know that my DAW started to choke with USB2 at higher resolutions, tracking with 4 or 5 mics at once and trying to monitor in real time within a SONAR project.... spitter spatter, delay delay... same system with a TB audio card connection (APOLLO) and no issues running in WINDOWS 8.0 with very low settings for audio buffers.... funny thing was though, that the CPU couldn't keep up with the DATA STREAMS and I had to set the number of threads for SONAR to be limited at 5 so the other 3 were available of the OS for housekeeping (and moving all this data around quickly). Now my system screams but only because I track in 24bit 96K but like I said for a couple of tracks at lower resolution, USB2 is fine with a modern DAW computer (quad core running x64).
Jim
The Lamb Laid Down on MIDI
www.lldom.com Studio Cat Custom i7 with Thunderbolt (wonderful system built and configured by our own Jim R)
Apollo Duo (via TB)
UAD Quad
UAD Duo
WIN 8.1 x64 with 32 GB Ram
4 SSD for programs and sample libraries
Splat (latest version)