New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton

Author
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
2010/07/21 08:27:46 (permalink)

New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton


Wow, they are still out there.

I just got my 1969 Fender Princeton via UPS last night. I waited til this morning to open the carton.

Yikes, the seller described it simply with the phrase "We have always taken good care of it". I had to ask them for a date code to learn what year it was. The price was fair to great. The photos were blurry but it looked right.

The darn thing is 100% original and clean clean clean.

It's gonna hurts my feeling to put a 3 prong power cord on it.

It seems to be having a reunion with one of my Stratocasters.

These things are still out there kids...  :-) I suggest you get one while the price is still reasonable.

Can you guess what I'm gonna do today?


best regards,
mike


#1

26 Replies Related Threads

    skullsession
    Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1765
    • Joined: 2006/12/05 10:32:06
    • Location: Houston, TX, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/07/21 09:05:05 (permalink)
    LOL @ "reasonable"

    HOOK:  Skullsessions.com  / Darwins God Album

    "Without a doubt I would have far greater listening and aural skills than most of the forum members here. Not all but many I am sure....I have done more listening than most people." - Jeff Evans on how awesome Jeff Evans is.
    #2
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/07/21 09:26:00 (permalink)
    :-)

    I know what you mean, but if you shop carefully for a Silverface you can still pay a price that has been dragged up by the price of replacement parts or a cheaper made recent PCB reissue.

    The point is... you are still paying used price rather than a collectors price.

    e.g I have  a silverface Champ I paid $90 years ago that now goes for $500. The price of parts is about $600 and a "new" Fender brand hand wired tweed Champ is $1k.  A 1964 Blackface Champ with virtually the same parts as the Silverface goes for $2k.

    The smaller Silverface amps are nearly identical to the holy grail 1964/65 variants that trade for thousands of dollars. The "used" silverfaces can be quite a bargain... you get an amp that easy to service, made to last for ever, and sounds great.


    The cool new amps that have all the features and PCBs are no fun to work on after you get used to point to point style assemblies.

    anyways,

    all the best,
    mike
    post edited by mike_mccue - 2010/07/21 09:30:42


    #3
    skullsession
    Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1765
    • Joined: 2006/12/05 10:32:06
    • Location: Houston, TX, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/07/21 10:57:51 (permalink)
    There you go AGAIN...opening things up when you have no business "in there".

    I don't work on amps.

    I buy Chinese amps knowing they're disposable - like all other things Chinese.  Except women.  Well....wait.......ehh, nevermind.

    (I'm kidding....I actually have a great guy about 10 minutes from my house.  I take anything I buy used straight to him to be sure it's "firing on all cylinders".)

    I'm confident that I can get anything I want from my Egnater 4212 that I would want out of an old Fender.  And since I can get all that and more out of the Egnater, I have thus-far talked myself out of an old Fender.

    I record a guy who will typically use only Fender Twins...and always has because he love the tone.  He's typically been very picky about his tone.  The last time he was over, I laid out the AC30, Marshall JMP50, and my Egnater 4212 next to his Twin and asked him to give them all a listen to see if he wanted to double up on any tracks.

    I already knew he loved the JMP, because we had used it before.  But I walked down the hall to a thunderous roar....just sounded killer.  I was SURE he was in the Egnager.  It actually was the AC30...and I was like DAMN!  He pulled the plug a couple of minutes later and said...."NEXT".  I had to giggle, because I would have recorded that AC30 tone he had all day, every day....but you know picky players.

    Next up was the Egnater.  About ten minutes later, he told me that he wanted to use his Twin, my JMP, and my Egnater.  He loved them all.  We miked up all three for all of the rythm tracks....and it just sounded killer....like a big-ol pissed off Fender.

    Good stuff!

    Maybe someday, Mike...but so far, Fender  has escaped my first-pick list as I collect different amps along the way.

    HOOK:  Skullsessions.com  / Darwins God Album

    "Without a doubt I would have far greater listening and aural skills than most of the forum members here. Not all but many I am sure....I have done more listening than most people." - Jeff Evans on how awesome Jeff Evans is.
    #4
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/07/21 11:11:01 (permalink)
    :-)

    I love them all too.

    Contrary to what it may appear... I didn't start on Fenders.... I grew fond of them later.

    :-)


    #5
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/07/21 13:07:01 (permalink)
    Last summer I walked into the GC store in Fountain Valley, Ca. As I am heading for the pro audio center, out of the corner of my eye, I spot a small, old Fender amp sitting low and inconspicuous on the floor against a stack of guitar cases. I took about 2 more steps and my vintage gear alarm went off. I suddenly stopped in my tracks which caused my son to plow in the back of me. "What?" he said stopping in his tracks. "Just a second" I told him.

    I leaned down and there is a mint mid 70s Princeton. I looked in the back of the amp and it had the original speaker and a small zip lock bag with one ceramic capacitor which had been replaced.

    The Princeton line is the only Fender amp which had virtually the same schematic from inception to close out. There were a few small variations but essentially the same sounding amp regardless of the year. So any year from the 60s or 70s is a killer amp.

    The guy at the GC desk said the price was $500 and I talked him down to $400 because of the capacitor. (I would have paid $500). You just don't see these things very often so you have to strike while the iron is hot. 

    Congratulations on your Princeton. Best recording amp I own.  

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #6
    Ron Vogel
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1074
    • Joined: 2008/07/18 14:14:40
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/07/21 13:20:35 (permalink)
    Along the same lines, I saw a Silverface Vibrochamp at GC earlier this year for $350...I wish I would have jumped on it. I had just bought a Univox u45b, and was restoring it to flip it. I sold that Univox for $425...which is more than I had ever seen one go for (guess I did a decent job)!

    The amp prices go up and down, but $300 for a Princeton is stealing! My Champ cost me $200, but I dropped at least another $200 rebuilding it the right way, with the best components.

    I'm always on the lookout for another Princeton; like you said, it IS an awesome recording amp!

    I'm stuck in the past, but my foot's tapping forward 
    Ron Vogel Soundclick page
    #7
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/07/21 20:42:49 (permalink)

    Here is a blues jam over a Guitar Center Blues Guitar Contest backing track. The backing track is from Guitar Centers website and it was produced by Pete Anderson.

    I simply recorded a lead guitar part over it.

    http://www.harmoniccycle....Slow%20Blues%2004a.mp3

    This is my crude attempt at finger style riffing on a Hamer Artist with a Seymour Duncan PAF into the 1969/70 Fender Princeton. I have a ancient 12" EV Model 12W 25watt alnico woofer in an open back extension cabinet. I hooked it up to temporarily replace the stock Fender speaker.


    Here's a photo of a pair of that type of speaker that I found on ebay a moment ago:


    The amp really opened up and starting growling and stuff once I hooked up a real speaker. It's hard to describe the difference. I'm gonna hook it up to a D130 tomorrow.

    This is a straight guitar cord.. everything is on 10... no pedals etc.

    I recorded it with a pair of SM57s in X/Y into a Great River MP-2NV.

    I mixed the guitar hot and in your face just to highlight the really straight forward tube distortion tone when it's pushing hard into a speaker that is acting springy and ringy.

    best regards,
    mike




    post edited by mike_mccue - 2010/07/24 07:30:35


    #8
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/07/21 23:26:04 (permalink)
    I have never had the nerve to try out for the GC blues contest. Would like to try that some day. Try some chicken pickin with that amp. It really shines for that.

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #9
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/07/22 06:51:09 (permalink)
    Yes, I don't really have the nerve either... I like to jam over the tracks they have available for download.

    I'm not a good enough player to chicken pick, :-)


    #10
    mgreene
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 148
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 09:54:39
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/08/06 11:34:26 (permalink)
    I got a '71 Princeton off ebay last year for ~$300. Excellent condit, kind of minty actually. The only thing was that it was only the chassis and baffle w/speaker. I wasnt even really trying to win it. I built a cab for it out of birch ply w/ walnut trim. Looks cool.
     
    The best thing about the deal was that the guy sent it with nos looking/testing vintage RCA tubes! That's at least $150 worth right there
    post edited by mgreene - 2010/08/06 11:35:57
    #11
    skullsession
    Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1765
    • Joined: 2006/12/05 10:32:06
    • Location: Houston, TX, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/08/07 21:03:51 (permalink)
    So....just as I thought my lust for a Fender was gone.

    Last night, a friend called me to see if I wanted to meet him at a club here in Houston to see Marcy Playground.  I don't really know their music, but I certainly felt like a night out...so I went.

    They were a very tight 3 piece band.  Excellent mix.  But from where I was, I couldn't see what the guitarist was playing through.  But it sounded KILLER.  It sounded BOUTIQUE good.  I was expecting to see a Matchless or a Bogner combo up there.  And finally, it got the best of me...I had to sneak up closer for a look.

    Fender Blues Deville 2x12.  A couple of thin-line Tele's, a Line6 delay, a Line6 Chorus, and a wah.

    Just KILLED it all night long.

    So....tonight on Craigslist....I've made a couple of offers.  :o)  But after this amp...I swear...no more.

    HOOK:  Skullsessions.com  / Darwins God Album

    "Without a doubt I would have far greater listening and aural skills than most of the forum members here. Not all but many I am sure....I have done more listening than most people." - Jeff Evans on how awesome Jeff Evans is.
    #12
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/08/08 09:19:53 (permalink)
    It's five o'clock somewhere. :-)




    #13
    skullsession
    Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1765
    • Joined: 2006/12/05 10:32:06
    • Location: Houston, TX, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/08/09 09:27:23 (permalink)
    Well...I did it.

    Yesterday afternoon, a kid dropped off his 2003 Fender Hot Rod Deville 2x12.  It's in amazing shape.  A couple of dings in the tolex, and that's it.  Freshly tubed and biased, and a bag full of the tubes he just took out.  Footswitch and cover came with it.

    I slapped some casters on it last night and spend a couple of hours with workin' it over.

    Very nice amp indeed.  Of course, it loved my Tele and Strat.  My bassist says its his favorite amp that I've got.

    I giggled a couple of times as well.....I dig it.

    HOOK:  Skullsessions.com  / Darwins God Album

    "Without a doubt I would have far greater listening and aural skills than most of the forum members here. Not all but many I am sure....I have done more listening than most people." - Jeff Evans on how awesome Jeff Evans is.
    #14
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/08/09 09:32:47 (permalink)
    NICE!!!

    Of course I wish you bought an old hand wired unit... but the circuit on the power section of the new stuff is pretty much the same as the old.

    Have fun.


    #15
    skullsession
    Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1765
    • Joined: 2006/12/05 10:32:06
    • Location: Houston, TX, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/08/09 14:33:19 (permalink)
    I was QUITE impressed with this amp's clean channel on about 9.  It REALLY rocked.

    HOOK:  Skullsessions.com  / Darwins God Album

    "Without a doubt I would have far greater listening and aural skills than most of the forum members here. Not all but many I am sure....I have done more listening than most people." - Jeff Evans on how awesome Jeff Evans is.
    #16
    droddey
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5147
    • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
    • Location: Mountain View, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/12/03 01:48:08 (permalink)
    So I finally was able to pick up an early 70s Vibrochamp. It's one that has a little more visible wear, so it was only $350. But sound-wise it's all there, and it's all original, down to the tubes as best I can tell.

    And it sounds freaking great. The thing is, for someone like me in an apartment, this 6 watt guy has almost the kind of clean headroom that most folks probably get a Twin for. Since I work at low volumes in the apartment, I'll just be using it mostly for cleans and slight breakup, and using my Effectrode Tube Drive tube based overdrive pedal for the more edge of breakup and beyond stuff.

    But it definitely is a great amp for just letting the guitar and pedals shine through when working at those low volumes, and every nuance of picking and volume/tone changes on the guitar or pickup position changes are so clearly hearable.

    I've been playing around with it tonight, and it's going to record so well. It definitely loves my Strat, and why wouldn't it of course. And the Vibrato is mesmerizing. I was seriously in Rain Man mode while playing around with that. I'll be using that for some nice Radiohead type stuff I bet.

    I set up the Retrosonic comp -> Effectrode Tube Drive -> Red Witch Phaser -> EH Cathedral verb and it was definitely sounding righteous.

    The thing for me is that this guy has a tone that's both fairly light (only 8" speaker), but not at all harsh (probably partly due to mellowing with age I guess.) So I think it's going to be a great recording amp for me and the kind of stuff I like to do.

    Dean Roddey
    Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
    www.charmedquark.com
    #17
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/12/03 07:03:06 (permalink)
    Great News Dean!!!

    I have 3 and love them all.

    Back when I was playing big 100watt switching channel amps and searching for a good disto tone I stumbled upon a Vibro Champ and instantly recognized the "tone" was right there... and I have been a fan ever since.

    That's why I continually recommend them regardless of how resistant people are to the idea of buying a boring old amp. :-)

    I hope you keep it forever!!!

    best regards,
    mike


    #18
    DeeringAmps
    Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2614
    • Joined: 2005/10/03 10:29:25
    • Location: Seattle area
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/12/03 09:51:26 (permalink)
    "I'm gonna hook it up to a D130 tomorrow"

    Mike, try to play pretty much the same thing, I know you like the JBL's, I'd go with the alnico myself.

    Only thing with the Princeton; that's all the drive you're ever gonna get.

    Sounds good, but what if I want to go to 11???

    Tom


    Tom Deering
    Tascam FW-1884 User Resources Page
    Firewire "Legacy" Tutorial, Service Manual, Schematic, and Service Bulletins

    Win10x64
    StudioCat Pro Studio Coffee Lake 8086k 32gb RAM

    RME UFX (Audio)
    Tascam FW-1884 (Control) in Win 10x64 Pro
    #19
    Mully
    Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1545
    • Joined: 2004/09/15 02:08:05
    • Location: Adelaide, Oztralia
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/12/04 06:03:47 (permalink)
    ...stop. Stop.... please?

    ASUS H270, i7-7700, JLM BA & 1290, LA2A Opto4, loads of guff.
    #20
    Ron Vogel
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1074
    • Joined: 2008/07/18 14:14:40
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/12/06 22:18:49 (permalink)
    droddey


    So I finally was able to pick up an early 70s Vibrochamp. It's one that has a little more visible wear, so it was only $350. But sound-wise it's all there, and it's all original, down to the tubes as best I can tell.

    And it sounds freaking great. The thing is, for someone like me in an apartment, this 6 watt guy has almost the kind of clean headroom that most folks probably get a Twin for. Since I work at low volumes in the apartment, I'll just be using it mostly for cleans and slight breakup, and using my Effectrode Tube Drive tube based overdrive pedal for the more edge of breakup and beyond stuff.

    But it definitely is a great amp for just letting the guitar and pedals shine through when working at those low volumes, and every nuance of picking and volume/tone changes on the guitar or pickup position changes are so clearly hearable.

    I've been playing around with it tonight, and it's going to record so well. It definitely loves my Strat, and why wouldn't it of course. And the Vibrato is mesmerizing. I was seriously in Rain Man mode while playing around with that. I'll be using that for some nice Radiohead type stuff I bet.

    I set up the Retrosonic comp -> Effectrode Tube Drive -> Red Witch Phaser -> EH Cathedral verb and it was definitely sounding righteous.

    The thing for me is that this guy has a tone that's both fairly light (only 8" speaker), but not at all harsh (probably partly due to mellowing with age I guess.) So I think it's going to be a great recording amp for me and the kind of stuff I like to do.

     
    Dean, if the stock speaker is in there, pull it out and put it in a box. I took a leap of faith based of recomendations...I picked up the Weber alnico suggessted for the Champ...it's not even that expensive....but MAN WHAT A SOUND. I've had Weber's in other amps, and eventually replaced them with their real vintage counterparts, but this one is a keeper.
     
    Also, it does record well, but consider an extension cab for it with a 12" speaker. I can fit the Champ in a mix no matter what, but it is lacking bass which sometimes can be a problem with some arrangements. When I know I'll need grunt, I prop a '57 on the grille with the amp in a corner, and face a condenser towards the corner to beef it up.
     
    I did a tune just to try out different tones with it, and I highly suggest you try it...twas a learning experience. It responds very well to mic placement, and you can pull off tones you wouldn't believe if you get the mics right.

    I'm stuck in the past, but my foot's tapping forward 
    Ron Vogel Soundclick page
    #21
    droddey
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5147
    • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
    • Location: Mountain View, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/12/07 03:20:42 (permalink)
    I also have a Night Train and Microbaby for other varietals where needed, which I run through a 1x12 Avatar cab with a Greeback. I'll take a look at the Weber at some point. But, for now I'll stick with the stock speaker given that I can't afford to spend no monies.

    I also have a Weber Blue Dog in a 1x12 Weber mini-cabinet, but I don't pull it out and try it much. I need to experiment more with that. Though I may just sell it off to finance something else, I dunno.

    Dean Roddey
    Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
    www.charmedquark.com
    #22
    Ron Vogel
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1074
    • Joined: 2008/07/18 14:14:40
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/12/07 10:32:06 (permalink)
    For most "Fenderish" amps, I prefer late '50s Wurlitzer or mid '60s Jensens...so I've turned into somwhat of a vintage alnico snob!

    If you have the other options that's good, but for resale value alone is the reason I pulled the stock speaker from the get-go. I figured with my luck I'd blow the speaker diming the amp and be hard-pressed to find a replacement with correct EIA's when I sell it. I set the amp up the way I wanted, then bagged and tagged all the original stuff for a "rainy day"

    There are some cool mods that are reversable for that amp you should look into since you are handy with a soldering iron. The main one being a push-pull switch on one of the tone pots to bypass the tone stack for a tweed voicing. Amp gets much rowdier, which is good for lower-output guitars. I don't get much break-up with my tele on a stock champ, but bypassing the tone stack is really fun.

    I'm stuck in the past, but my foot's tapping forward 
    Ron Vogel Soundclick page
    #23
    Ron Vogel
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1074
    • Joined: 2008/07/18 14:14:40
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/12/09 12:07:44 (permalink)
    Dean...one more thing!

    CBS-era Champs forward were retrofitted with Princeton PT's...they are finiky with new production tubes because of insanely high voltages to the 6V6's. On some amps, tubes don't play as big of a role as the champs...so a good tube is paramount.

    I recently popped the original RCA in my Champ...and during diagnosing popped in a Sovtek 6v6. It was OK, but didn't have the luster the RCA had. The original tube was a '71 RCA 6V6 GTA, I usually try to stay away from 70's tubes, but the amp sounded good before I popped the tube.

    I bought a late 50's RCA JAN VT107 this past week, and dropped it in. The very first chord was a wow moment...amp has never sounded this good...and I mean REALLY good! Way better than the original RCA even. I'm thinking of keeping it now, and selling the new amp I'm building instead. Tube prices are on a MAJOR dip right now, buy all the JAN's you can find...I got this one for $8+4 shipping!

    I'm stuck in the past, but my foot's tapping forward 
    Ron Vogel Soundclick page
    #24
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2010/12/09 17:57:23 (permalink)
    The higher voltage results in more headroom... it sounds cleaner.

    When I think of hot voltages I think of the Deluxe Reverb.

    Also, a lot of 1950's amps were designed for lower AC wall power, 100-110 rather than 110-120 and so all the power transformers built to 1950's specs put out a bit more voltage than planned for.


    #25
    droddey
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5147
    • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
    • Location: Mountain View, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2011/01/02 14:47:25 (permalink)
    I just posted a new song over in the Songs section. All of the guitars were done with the new Vibrochamp, and I think it records extremely well, for my type of music anyway:

    http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=2179958

    I split the speaker cable and put female jacks on each end so that I could patch my Weber MiniMass attenuator into it when I want, and it sounds great cranked up. So you can get the super-hard cleans or that great 'breakup on tap' with softer cleans just depending on how hard you pick. It's quite excellent.

    Dean Roddey
    Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
    www.charmedquark.com
    #26
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:New (for me) 1969 Fender Princeton 2011/01/02 14:53:11 (permalink)
    Thanks Dean!


    #27
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1