Normalising question ...

Author
ULTRABRA
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 484
  • Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
  • Location: Helsinki, Finland
  • Status: offline
2012/08/08 05:10:21 (permalink)

Normalising question ...

I just read in Computer Music magazine, in a song they put together using just soft synths, they suggested bouncing each soft synth to an audio track as a WAV, then normalising each WAV before mixing ............ is this a good technique, to normalise each track?   

HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM,  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3    
My Soundcloud
#1

22 Replies Related Threads

    cake2010
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 83
    • Joined: 2010/06/18 11:55:00
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 05:42:35 (permalink)
    A complete waste of time. Use 24 bits and forget about it.
    #2
    SToons
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 478
    • Joined: 2012/05/14 15:21:14
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 05:51:08 (permalink)
    It would be easier to answer if the statement was put in context. Computer Music usually has decent advice, knowing the full context might put it in perspective. Nonetheless I'm sure many will be happy to answer without knowing the reason it was suggested.
     
    Personally, as with cake2010, I'm not sure I see any benefit in normalizing, but knowing the magazine there is likely a reason it was suggested.
    #3
    Kalle Rantaaho
    Max Output Level: -5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7005
    • Joined: 2006/01/09 13:07:59
    • Location: Finland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 05:52:36 (permalink)
    I think it's a "whatever suits you"-question. Using normalisation as a routine isn't fruitfull IMO, but it does have it's uses.

    Say, in the example you mention: The bounced audio tracks in this case have no problems with background noises, so normalisation is quite acceptable. The soft synth sounds used may be very different by nature, one is ambient, one is lead, so normalising them may simply make mixing a little tad easier. So, no harm done by normalising, but propably not very much gained either.

    Educate me, please: Does the better dynamics/ headroom of a 24 bit environment actually bring any advantage in a synth bounce situation? I somehow thought it only matters when recording audio.

    SONAR PE 8.5.3, Asus P5B, 2,4 Ghz Dual Core, 4 Gb RAM, GF 7300, EMU 1820, Bluetube Pre  -  Kontakt4, Ozone, Addictive Drums, PSP Mixpack2, Melda Creative Pack, Melodyne Plugin etc.
    The benefit of being a middle aged amateur is the low number of years of frustration ahead of you.
    #4
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 05:59:12 (permalink)
    The trouble is, if you do normalize all of your tracks, when they summed at your main outs, there's a very good chance you'll get digital clipping.

    "Normalize BEFORE mixing"? - so what happens if, as is quite normal, your mixing raises the overall level of the track(s)?

    I'm with Cake2010, absolutely no point in normalizing if you're recording @ 24 bit.

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #5
    SToons
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 478
    • Joined: 2012/05/14 15:21:14
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 06:04:08 (permalink)
    Bristol_Jonesey


    "Normalize BEFORE mixing"? - so what happens if, as is quite normal, your mixing raises the overall level of the track(s)?

    You lower the level(s) of the track(s). ;-p
    #6
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 06:04:58 (permalink)
    Negating the effect of normalizing.

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #7
    SToons
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 478
    • Joined: 2012/05/14 15:21:14
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 06:05:58 (permalink)
    Bristol_Jonesey


    Negating the effect of normalizing.


    Well, this we can't say for sure if we don't know the context.
    #8
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 06:20:48 (permalink)
    I am a little confused about what CM is suggesting. If one is working with soft synths wouldn't we balance levels before we freeze? I do. To than normalize seems counter productive. 

    I also agree with using 24 bits. I can see normalizing if after the freeze a track or two is not fitting right. But that should not happen if you are watching your levels before a freeze. 

    Also I don't bounce anymore I freeze.

    Bristol is right.

    Also CM is not the most accurate publication. If this were in SOS I would want to read the whole thing to find why. Being in CM I am not going to listen to it.

    BTW what else would one create but a wav file through a bounce or freeze?

    "they suggested bouncing each soft synth to an audio track as a WAV, then normalising each WAV before mixing"

    Best
    John
    #9
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 06:29:43 (permalink)
    One last point. If one records well normalizing should not be necessary. Working with soft synths than if one needs to normalize I think you don't know what you are doing.

    Best
    John
    #10
    Linear Phase
    Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2201
    • Joined: 2012/04/15 02:21:15
    • Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 06:39:16 (permalink)
    swim at your own risk imho...  if the OP is relaying the article correctly, than the advice is pretty bad

    too many lasers...






    Sonar = audio editing ninja of a music software!

    #11
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 06:42:04 (permalink)
    Another thing, as soon as you insert a soft synth you should know immediately what sort of level you're dealing with and you should address that right there and then, by raising or lowering the synth output, way before you even consider mixing/freezing.

    I am of the opinion that people who need to normalize are not gain-staging properly throughout the project.

    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #12
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 06:46:34 (permalink)
    Bristol_Jonesey


    Another thing, as soon as you insert a soft synth you should know immediately what sort of level you're dealing with and you should address that right there and then, by raising or lowering the synth output, way before you even consider mixing/freezing.

    I am of the opinion that people who need to normalize are not gain-staging properly throughout the project.

    Or know what the heck they are doing. Much like CM.

    Best
    John
    #13
    SToons
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 478
    • Joined: 2012/05/14 15:21:14
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 07:01:20 (permalink)
    Right, why even consider the possibility that a comment that was written by a paid professional, printed in a well known magazine, and taken out of it's context, might have some merit? None of you even seem to feel the author has any right to benefit of the doubt nor shows any interest in what could be a learning situation. Interesting.
    #14
    equality
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 716
    • Joined: 2007/01/20 19:55:57
    • Location: Sweden
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 07:11:01 (permalink)
    I agree with Bristol and Cake2010. If you are concerned with S/N-ratio, you don't solve this by normalizing every single track since the noise is augmented accordingly. Use a decent audio signal to the system instead by correcting the distance to the mikes and adjust the volume levels on the amps. 24 bit gives a lot and sufficient headroom. Also never normalize to 0 dB since some systems (MP3-players, CD-players...) render digital clipping even though it sounds correct in Sonar. I usually go to minus 0.5 dB.
    #15
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 07:11:04 (permalink)
    SToons


    Right, why even consider the possibility that a comment that was written by a paid professional, printed in a well known magazine, and taken out of it's context, might have some merit? None of you even seem to feel the author has any right to benefit of the doubt nor shows any interest in what could be a learning situation. Interesting.
    It could be taken out of context. But I was responding to what is presented. I can't know what is missing in the op from the article.


    Beside I think I was clear in my post about why I thought it is wrong. 



    Best
    John
    #16
    ULTRABRA
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 484
    • Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
    • Location: Helsinki, Finland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 07:35:25 (permalink)
    Its an old article - from this issue  http://www.musicradar.com/computermusic/computer-music-166-july-issue-on-sale-now-455790

    The magazine was making a "chill out" track from scratch, using soft synths (and one vocal sample).  They got each sound (piano, drums, bass, pads, guitar etc) ready, with effects etc, and tracked out the song.  They also added some effects to the master bus.  

    Then, to the mixing, and here I use their words :

    "Let's get mixing!   With our master bus effects bypassed, we bounce each of our seperate parts down as WAV files and normalise them all."

    They then set up a new DAW project, and re-loaded the master bus effects.  Then, in their words :

    "We set the mixer faders for the stems to -5.0dB".    And way they went in the mixing process.


    HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM,  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3    
    My Soundcloud
    #17
    cake2010
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 83
    • Joined: 2010/06/18 11:55:00
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 08:15:32 (permalink)
    They really work hard to waste time.
    #18
    ULTRABRA
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 484
    • Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
    • Location: Helsinki, Finland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 08:22:29 (permalink)
    So, the way I work is the balance my relative volumes before bouncing, or at least I would balance the volumes of the bounced tracks without normalising them.   I'd get my Master bus around the -3dB level for all the (un-normalised) tracks together, then export the final stereo wave for mastering.

    As far as I see it, if I normalised all the tracks, I'd just end up lowering their relative levels, and come up with the same -3dB result for the whole song together anyway ...



    HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM,  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3    
    My Soundcloud
    #19
    Linear Phase
    Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2201
    • Joined: 2012/04/15 02:21:15
    • Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 08:23:28 (permalink)
    cake2010


    They really work hard to waste time.

    lol...

    too many lasers...






    Sonar = audio editing ninja of a music software!

    #20
    Guitarhacker
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 24398
    • Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
    • Location: NC
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 08:31:02 (permalink)
    When I work with synths, I rarely have any sort of level problems. 99% of the time a synth track renders out at decent levels.

    Occasionally, an audio track from guitar may not record with a strong level even though the input is showing it to be robust..... with a bit of red showing in the input meters.  So if the wave is a bit anemic, I will normalize it. 

    I almost always run a 96% normalization on all my tracks AFTER I have exported the final mix into my wave editor. The tracks are lightly compressed at this point and have many peaks that are not exceeding 0db. 

    Normalize simply raises the overall level a tiny bit in most cases with out changing the ratio like a compressor would do to achieve a few db more out of the track. 

    this mp3 wave pic: which has been normalized




    is this song:  http://www.soundclick.com...34&songID=10369122

    Using Normalization is just like any other tool in the DAW.... it is there to be used, and it is possible to abuse it. 

    My website & music: www.herbhartley.com

    MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW   
    Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface


    BMI/NSAI

    "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer 
    #21
    LpMike75
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1621
    • Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/08 19:42:37 (permalink)
    Ignoring Normalising for a moment, there are some benifits to bouncing your synths to audio before mixing...

    - Less CPU
    - I find working with an audio track can be easier and more flexible to mix
                   THe BIG ONE
    - Years down the road, you may want to revisit the mix, but you no longer have the Synth, License or it's not compatible with your new 84 bit system...you will always have the audio track.


    - Mike
    Sonar Platinum - M-Audio Profire 2626 , Pro Tools 11 HD Omni - PC I7 6850K - 64 G RAM - GeForce GTX 970
    http://www.soundcloud.com/michael-lizotte 
    Http://WWW.HomeRecordingWizard.Com
    HTTP://WWW.Facebook.com/HomeRecordingWizard
    Http://www.mjlmusic.com 
    #22
    Bristol_Jonesey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 16775
    • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
    • Location: Bristol, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Normalising question ... 2012/08/09 04:01:56 (permalink)
    Yes Mike, I usually save 2 "final" copies - one with synths frozen, one without.



    CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
    Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
    #23
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1