trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6348
- Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
- Location: London ON
- Status: offline
OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
And how does one achieve this so that it works in all set ups? Or rather, should it work in all set ups? I'm a conflixxed puppy here....
The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate. Bushpianos
|
alexoosthoek
Max Output Level: -23 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5238
- Joined: 2008/11/12 11:20:51
- Location: A'gus
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 18:10:15
(permalink)
I guess it depends on who's talking :)
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 18:27:44
(permalink)
☄ Helpful
Well... A useful place to start thinking from is this: you actually can't "have" loudness at all. The listener controls loudness with their volume knob. So literally all you have is dynamics. That's not to say that overall levelling doesn't have its place; of course it does, and few of the tools at our disposal provide so much of the "making it sound like a real record" stuff as compression (both in this sense and in general application) does. The prosaic reality is that part of mixing is making the right judgment calls on your compromises between level and dynamics in a way that's appropriate to the material. I may be wrong, but your question reads like you're asking if there's an approach that always works. If that's what you're asking, then the answer is no.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6348
- Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
- Location: London ON
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 18:29:49
(permalink)
That's what I thought. My head was confused with all this maximizing stuff.... Thanks for the head straightening!
The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate. Bushpianos
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 18:31:11
(permalink)
i believe having LOUDNESS and DYNAMICS together, at the same time, is strictly a function of song arrangement and songwriting skills, not what an engineer does.
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 18:35:52
(permalink)
I wouldn't say "strictly" but that's certainly the foundation and substance of it. There are various tricks for getting a bit of fake dynamism out of a flat performance, but they're nowhere near as effective as just having a good arrangement.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 18:38:42
(permalink)
For example, you might have a song that doesn't pick up much in the chorus. So the mix engineer could find an element to make louder or change the tone of or whatever. I quite often boost all the drums a tiny amount when a chorus hits. Or take something that's awash with reverb and suddenly make it a lot drier. There are things that can be done. Bet nobody's ever had to do them on AC/DC mixes though.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 18:42:34
(permalink)
☄ Helpful
trimph1 That's what I thought. My head was confused with all this maximizing stuff.... Thanks for the head straightening! Maximising is a bad word in this context. I've just answered why in the trolls thread that precipitated the confusion you are having. Say if you recorded a live perfomance of Rachmaninov's piano concerto number 2, big crescendo's and fragile passages. If you were to maximise that it would be ruined. The dynamic differences between those passages would be skewed if they were all brought up to the same RMS levels it would sound ridiculous.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/05/21 18:51:12
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 18:44:28
(permalink)
☄ Helpful
Well there is nothing to stop you from creating dynamic material to start with. I think a lot of lack of dynamics is in the original material. You can go from very soft passages to full on loud parts. It can sound great. Why not build more dynmaics into your music. You can also get pretty loud levels during the masteing stage but for this you need a quality limiter. Limiters are not all created equal. The PSP Xenon is one serious limiter and at $250 I suppose it needs to be. It can add a lot of loudness to your mixes and still maintain reasonable transients and punch but it comes at a price. It won't change the dynamics of your material either but simply make your very dynamic track way louder. There is a great feature in the PSP that keeps an eye on quieter sections and it can raise those levels slowly and smoothly automatically as well. It does not have to either you can turn it off too. This is one part of the limiter I am still learning about. Unlike a lot of limiters there are a lot of adjustments available in the PSP (10 to be exact) and you can really effect how it sounds during limiting which is powerful but also tricky at the same time. You really need to understand what each control actually does. They do explain it well in the manual though.
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 18:46:48
(permalink)
☄ Helpful
A useful place to start thinking from is this: you actually can't "have" loudness at all. The listener controls loudness with their volume knob. So literally all you have is dynamics. Very well said, John! Think of "loudness" as the converse of "dynamics". The louder it is, the less dynamic, and vice versa. So what about all the limiter vendors who make claims of preserving dynamics while increasing loudness? What they're selling is "intelligent" release algorithms, such as those used in Ozone and other better limiters. What they do is lengthen or shorten the release times automatically based on the incoming material, which tends to squash the micro-dynamics less and allows better definition of transients. This mitigates some of the worst side-effects of excessive limiting such as making music sound dull and lacking "punch".
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6348
- Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
- Location: London ON
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 18:55:40
(permalink)
Great stuff guys!! Yeah, my pieces have a fair bit of dynamics in them as I seem to be getting more into the acoustic side of things...I'm still pretty primitive with my song writing skills though...lol!
The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate. Bushpianos
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 19:01:42
(permalink)
Normalization is what was being talked about there. Where the relative levels are maintained as in the original recording only the loudest peak reaches the ceiling level everything else maintains the same relative (normal) levels as the performance. Maximisation was the OP's term made, I would guess in some perverse hope of feeling superior to those who fell into the, use a limiter to push the levels up to a constant RMS level trap. Normalisation gets a bad press, often because it is misunderstood and consequently misused, but it has its use, and this is it.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/05/21 19:10:04
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 19:15:19
(permalink)
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 19:40:49
(permalink)
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/21 22:48:38
(permalink)
Is it possible to have "loudness" reinforced with ample bass or low end response while having wide range dynamics in the mids and upper mids? It seems like some types of music pull that off. On the latest two songs I worked on, I will probably continue to second guess myself... should I have pumped up the quiet passages a bit as I did? Should I have fully exploited the available dynamic range and left the quiet passages quiet so the loud sections sounded even louder? I kept reminding myself that I enjoyed the widest dynamic range in a quiet studio setting but that it seemed impractical in car with noisy tires and air conditioning. So I choose to suggest that we make a compromise and bump up the quiet passages a bit. best regards, mike
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/22 01:22:20
(permalink)
So I choose to suggest that we make a compromise and bump up the quiet passages a bit. Which is a completely different to pitching a rhetorical question whether it's a good idea to 'maximise' to -14db RMS. All of a sudden it changes to a suggestion to bump up the quiet passages a bit... The Piano concerto I referred to wasn't designed to be listened to in a car nor a busy environment, it was designed to be listened to in a concert hall and the listener giving it full attention. Any bumping up of the quiet passages would have been written into the piece differently if that was what was required. What was the term you used? Jousting at windmills I beleive. Nice to see a humble suggestion for a change though, it's a step in the right direction at least. It will likely take you much further than snarkiness such as this. http://forum.cakewalk.com/fb.ashx?m=2575612
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/05/22 01:58:39
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/22 02:26:46
(permalink)
Normalisation gets a bad press, often because it is misunderstood and consequently misused, but it has its use, and this is it. Certainly something I've mis-understood and as a result rarely used it rather than misuse. Thanks for the straightforward explanation.
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/22 04:12:21
(permalink)
An interesting place we've landed up at here. Either the maximising question in the other thread is, as people have suggested, an insincere snarky one, and Mike's post above is part of an attempt to cover that by pretending it's on the level. Or... it's actually a sincere question, but one about something so novice-level, it seriously throws into doubt Mike's claims of... let's call it adequacy. Which would YOU choose? It's a knotty one.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
Chappel
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2300
- Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/22 04:29:54
(permalink)
John T An interesting place we've landed up at here. Either the maximising question in the other thread is, as people have suggested, an insincere snarky one, and Mike's post above is part of an attempt to cover that by pretending it's on the level. Or... it's actually a sincere question, but one about something so novice-level, it seriously throws into doubt Mike's claims of... let's call it adequacy. Which would YOU choose? It's a knotty one. I don't have a dog in this hunt but it sure is entertaining to watch.
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/22 04:36:34
(permalink)
I guess I find it hard to square Mike's constant claims of expertise and years of experience with the idea that he's encountered a quiet / loud mixing problem for the first time in May 2012. One element or another of this is bullsh!t.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/22 04:38:57
(permalink)
Chappel John T An interesting place we've landed up at here. Either the maximising question in the other thread is, as people have suggested, an insincere snarky one, and Mike's post above is part of an attempt to cover that by pretending it's on the level. Or... it's actually a sincere question, but one about something so novice-level, it seriously throws into doubt Mike's claims of... let's call it adequacy. Which would YOU choose? It's a knotty one. I don't have a dog in this hunt but it sure is entertaining to watch. +1
|
Danny Danzi
Moderator
- Total Posts : 5810
- Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
- Location: DanziLand, NJ
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/22 06:11:19
(permalink)
☄ Helpful
trimph1 And how does one achieve this so that it works in all set ups? Or rather, should it work in all set ups? I'm a conflixxed puppy here.... Most certainly you can. First off, it starts with how and what you record. The print is important as well as how dynamic the instrument is to begin with. If you have a loud distorted guitar, well, it was made to be that way. However, with the right set-up...say Eddie Van Halen, rolling off the volume knob allows that particular sound to change dynamically. Ed's volume knob is literally a volume knob with a bit of gain wrapped up into one. Other guys that use insane gain lose the volume knob part of their sound. The knob becomes strictly a gain knob and controls the gain in the sound more-so than the actual volume. You'll notice with any extreme, high gain sound, that when you do turn down the volume knob on your guitar, that you actually don't lose much volume at all. It's really close to being all full out yet the gain diminishes. Now if we take piano as our test subject, and the player is tickling the ivories like a pro, you're going to definitely get some quiet passages and some that are hammered. If the piece was tracked with a band, 9 out of 10 times the band is going to adjust their playing and dymanics to this piano because they know the part if coming up and that's what pro bands do. If it's recorded at a later time after the band has recorded and they don't take these dynamic changes into account, you're going to have to automate. Automation with a bit of compression fixes all this stuff really. Sometimes the automation needs to be done to the other instruments though instead of the instrument you may THINK needs to come up a bit. For example, let's take this piano test in the other direction I mentioned. A band tracks bass, guitar and drums. Their piano player can't make it that night. He comes later and lays his part down. It's very dynamic...the band forgot about this and sort of played all out. Do you raise the piano in the spots where it drops? Or do you drop the band? I drop the band so that they accommodate this piano IF indeed it sounds like the right thing to do. Other times, bringing up the piano is the right touch on those super soft passages. Now...the key to loud is to have the mix right first. The biggest problem with mixes today is people keep relying too much on their compressors and limiters to do all the work. This is why you get the sound of @ss, over compression, excessive limiting, choked off instruments, pumping, loss of snare drum crack, even-ness withing the music...all this stems from relying too much in comps and limiters. I shared some of my methods months ago on how I manually level my mixes. This is crucial to maintaining your dynamics as well as being able to go loud without artifacts. By the time I kick my limiter in...it doesn't matter if I use my PSP, the Waves or the X1 Concrete Limiter, nothing is ever going to suffer dynamically. People always think because something is loud that it loses dynamics instantly as soon as they hear it come on and scare them. This is not always the case. Something may look and sound like it's going to be loud, but if you analyze a wave form that is done right, you'll notice that it's NOT always full bore at -0.3dB or wherever you set it. There's a difference between loud and done correctly and loud and squashed to heck. Most mixes should average out to be from about -15 to -12 RMS. That said, something loud may peak at -7 RMS. That doesn't make that mix bad or too crushed. You see, when things are limited right AFTER you've leveled the mix correctly, the over-all volume just changes...not the dynamics. When I drop to a clean part in my mixes...the volume drops no matter how much limiting I'm using. But, you have to understand that the extra volume is an "over-all" thing...it's not losing as much dynamics as you think. If we did a mix that peaked at -10 RMS and averaged out to -18 RMS, and then redid the same mix to where we peaked at -5 RMS and averaged -13 RMS...the dynamics are exactly the same...the over-all mix is just louder. How you automate and level you instruments and then your mix decides what you can get away with when you get to the limiting stage. If you skip these important steps and just jump to the limiter, you're going to over-use it and it's going to over-compensate and give you artifacts. The reason being, it reacts to the peaks in your material. When it grabs a peak, it's going to try and make everything else stay along the lines of that peak. If you don't have those types of peaks BEFORE you limit, this allows for less limiting and a smoother end result. Hope this clears some of it up for you trimph. :) -Danny
My Site Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
|
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6348
- Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
- Location: London ON
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/22 07:13:48
(permalink)
Thanks for that info...certainly clears a lot of the curiosum that was going through my beakus!! I think I need a little work on my arrangements some before I do any recording, lol!!
The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate. Bushpianos
|
foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8256
- Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/22 13:25:17
(permalink)
This question would take an essay to answer fully. Simply put, you certainly can. "Loudness" in an audio recording represents the peak voltages of a source within the context of the envelope. Dynamics are the change in amplitude of the softer passages "as recorded" in relation to the the passages with louder. Live, non-amplified instruments are always fully dynamic; they can use the entire "envelope", as it is theoretically infinite. Recording media and equipment is not. It has a maximum amount of information that can be stored or reproduced without added noise in the form of clipping. The idea behind "loudness" in this context is that the envelope contain the maximum voltages of all present frequencies. This presents an illusion of an overall "louder" song.
A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything. Composers Forum
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/22 14:55:59
(permalink)
JUST TO BE CLEAR.. when I say 'dynamics', i'm talking about actual performance. not what an engineer can do with fader rides and whatnot. for example, you can play a very soft acoustic guitar part.... but mic it super hot, with super hot signal... run it thru a limiter..... and have it peak at -0.1db. so, is that dynamic, or is it loud?
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re:OK...Can One Have Loudness And Dynamics Together?
2012/05/22 20:56:33
(permalink)
Dynamics aren't static, they're the difference from moment to moment. Which can either be the performance, or the mixing. But certainly can't be described in terms of a single db number.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|