djoni
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1974
- Joined: 2003/12/17 11:10:44
- Location: Mozambique
- Status: offline
OT: Mastering chain
I wonder what you guys are using in your mastering chain. I am currently experimenting with UAD Neve 88RS and UAD Precision Maximizer and getting great results. Look forward to see what is everybody using. kind regards joni
Ekaya Productions
Sonar Platinum, Intel - 6 Core i7 overclocked 4.5GHz with HT 12meg cache w/ 32GB RAM, UAD-2 QUAD & OCTO, Tascam DM-4800, 1xMackie CU & 2xExtenders...
|
djoni
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1974
- Joined: 2003/12/17 11:10:44
- Location: Mozambique
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 13:11:17
(permalink)
No one comes in? I am sure there was a couple a threads on this but I just can't find them. Just wanna try different combinations. kind regards joni
Ekaya Productions
Sonar Platinum, Intel - 6 Core i7 overclocked 4.5GHz with HT 12meg cache w/ 32GB RAM, UAD-2 QUAD & OCTO, Tascam DM-4800, 1xMackie CU & 2xExtenders...
|
pdarg
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2265
- Joined: 2004/03/26 17:52:53
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 13:47:56
(permalink)
There are lots of different opinions on this, and you will hear many suggestions ranging from the excessive extreme to the absolute minimalist. Me, I have tried many methods and plugs over the years, but now tend to just use Voxengo Elephant in the mastering buss, and change the sound of the mix by changing the levels/processing of the individual tracks only. In the past, I have used: Ozone Waves Masters Bundle Har-Bal Many other individual plug-ins To me, given my limited listening situation and sonic input quality to begin with, it seems that the less I mess with the master mix in terms of compression, EQ, etc. the better it sounds - as long as the mix itself is well-balanced (much harder to do than it sounds).
|
djoni
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1974
- Joined: 2003/12/17 11:10:44
- Location: Mozambique
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 15:00:29
(permalink)
yes, I hae used lots of things in the past too like': tapesim fairchild lin eq precision limiter (or L2) But I thing that with the 88RS I get the light compression I want, the eq along the hipass at 30hz, analog warmth etc, and with the precision maximizer I get a good and transparent boost in volume. The only think I might change now is to split L&R channels and process them separately before the main out. kind regards
post edited by djoni - 2008/04/03 13:51:20
Ekaya Productions
Sonar Platinum, Intel - 6 Core i7 overclocked 4.5GHz with HT 12meg cache w/ 32GB RAM, UAD-2 QUAD & OCTO, Tascam DM-4800, 1xMackie CU & 2xExtenders...
|
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 30423
- Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
- Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 15:11:46
(permalink)
You can put almost anything on the master bus, as long as it suits your song. I usually put a linear phase EQ and a Multi band conmpressor (LP). Sometimes i use the linear phase EQ with just the waves L1, L2, or L3. Sometimes i use the waves multiband Limiter instead of the multiband compressor. Sometimes i dont need to use a linear EQ and just put a multiband limiter or multiband compressor.. Sometimes i just throw on izotope and sometimes i use ther izotope with a multiband limiter. I never know what im going to be putting on the master bus until i try a few different things or if i can hear something that needs to be adressed, ill use the right tool to fix it Cj
|
pdarg
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2265
- Joined: 2004/03/26 17:52:53
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 15:50:38
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: djoni yes, I have used lots of things in the past too like': tapesim fairchild lin eq precision meter (or L2) But I thing that with the 88RS I get the light compression I want, the eq along the hipass at 30hz, analog warmth etc, and with the precision maximizer I get a good and transparent boost in volume. The only think I might change now is to split L&R channels and process them separately before the main out. kind regards Yes, I have tried all those plug too. So you say that this 88RS plug is better?
|
bunnyfluffer
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 674
- Joined: 2007/08/11 03:23:57
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 15:59:27
(permalink)
There are so many options, for me it's case by case. right now I'm using the Waves SSL 4000 series stuff. But to be honest I've grown really fond of the VC64. I tend to go light on the master bus as far as compression and EQ go - and then if I'm going to give people MP3s I slam it with some leveler in Wavelab - these are for iPOD mixes - not critical listening mixes. -b
|
Dave King
Max Output Level: -46.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2862
- Joined: 2005/11/13 14:19:48
- Location: Connecticut, USA
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 16:16:45
(permalink)
There are so many options, for me it's case by case. right now I'm using the Waves SSL 4000 series stuff. But to be honest I've grown really fond of the VC64. I tend to go light on the master bus as far as compression and EQ go - and then if I'm going to give people MP3s I slam it with some leveler in Wavelab - these are for iPOD mixes - not critical listening mixes. Do you guys mix with these plugs enabled on the Master bus (a la Charles Dye) or use them after your mix is basically complete?
Dave King www.davekingmusic.com SONAR X2 Producer 64-Bit StudioCat PC Windows 7 Home Premium, Service Pack 1 Intel Corel i5 3450 CPU @3.10 GHz RAM 8 GB M-Audio Delta 44 M-Audio MidiSport 2x2
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 16:33:02
(permalink)
It just depends on the song. If I'm doing a mix that someone else did and is a mess I might have to do more then I would with my stuff. I used to do a lot more in mastering but since I got Sonar I'm finding ways to get the mix right the first time so there is little to do in mastering. In most cases I can get by with almost any compressor plugin on the main bus effects bin. I try not to use too much anyway so doing "light" compression is an easy job for most plugins.
|
tor
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 852
- Joined: 2003/11/06 23:32:59
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 16:34:43
(permalink)
ADAT into TC Electronic Finalizer 96K, unbeatable....
|
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4397
- Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 17:30:50
(permalink)
Whatever works really. I truly am starting to not be interested in mastering because most of the people doing it have really great sounding electronics (which I don't have ) at a reasonable price. Plus it goes to an environment designed to average the sound for use on many speakers. I can do all this at home but another environment to hear things is so much better at the end of the day. I usually use the 88RS on the master buss of my mix but not later in mastering. I also might run the final mix out to external preamps and the occasional external compressor with very little compression (Just for the sound) For mastering the Precision EQ followed by the Cambridge EQ for its wonderful sharp angle cut ability at 30Hz and 17kHz. The Cambridge adds a little harsh upper range to the sound so this is not always desirable. For clarity and if the mix has decent volume (depends on the music too) I go to the Precision Limiter next. Optionally, and most of the time, any of the following will be next after EQ: External Neve 5043 compressor, Neve 33609 plugin, Fairchild plugin in the neutral mode setting documented at the UAD site (warms things and puts a nice level on a track with minimum compression artifacts). Precision Limiter is last or the extenal Neve 5043 in limit mode (high ratio).
|
AJ_0000
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
- Total Posts : 738
- Joined: 2007/05/05 01:32:03
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 18:12:11
(permalink)
LP64 EQ -> LP64 Multiband -> Boost 11 is not bad at all, although I'm far from an expert. I'm still experimenting with it and learning. I use the EQ to chop off everything below 40Hz and maybe add a little high end, then adjust the bands in the compressor to fit the main frequencies of the song and adjust them relative to each other. Then I use a combination of boosting the output from the compressor and "boost" in Boost 11 to bring up the volume. Boost 11 has to be used pretty carefully, though.
|
bunnyfluffer
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 674
- Joined: 2007/08/11 03:23:57
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/02 19:34:17
(permalink)
I like a little "glue" so I have something on the master bus - very subtle though... I like to use compression to just give a little bit of a "tape" feel - and almost never use EQ on a master/main mix bus. Ultimately I'd want someone else to master my tracks so I'd like to leave them with enough dynamic range and frequency depth to work with. ORIGINAL: Dave King There are so many options, for me it's case by case. right now I'm using the Waves SSL 4000 series stuff. But to be honest I've grown really fond of the VC64. I tend to go light on the master bus as far as compression and EQ go - and then if I'm going to give people MP3s I slam it with some leveler in Wavelab - these are for iPOD mixes - not critical listening mixes. Do you guys mix with these plugs enabled on the Master bus (a la Charles Dye) or use them after your mix is basically complete?
|
SpanknCrank
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 47
- Joined: 2007/11/30 10:33:42
- Location: The Shire
- Status: offline
RE: OT: Mastering chain
2008/04/03 00:37:29
(permalink)
Sonar >>> Lavry DA >>> (System 6000) >>> (E.L. Distressor) >>> Lavry AD [sometimes i'll go back in digital and use the 6000's AES outputs >>> SPLIT back into Sonar and also into an Alesis Master Link. Often times I'll switch the System 6000 and the Distressor depending on the source material. If I'm not using the Distressor, I'll go into the System 6000 digitally and avoid any extra conversion.
|