OT: Time Factory 2 or Melodyne?

Author
javahut
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 361
  • Joined: 2005/11/25 19:35:23
  • Status: offline
2006/05/25 15:56:00 (permalink)

OT: Time Factory 2 or Melodyne?

OK... I really need (want) a good time/pitch shifting tool, and apparently Cake is not gonna get their's functioning correctly with a decent interface any time soon. So... I'm a previous Serato Pitch N Time user with Pro Tools. It had a cool dynamic easy to use interface that worked within the host so that you could edit, audition, and immediately bounce to the correct spot in the project to audition. Unfortumately, Pitch N Time is only for Pro Tools (or also Logic now).

The only thing resembling Pitch N Time's interface is Prosoniq Time Factory 2. The interface looks very uncluttered and easy to use. However, I'm thinking this will not work within Sonar... it will have to be used as an external app, which I'll have to export files to, edit, then import back into Sonar and place at the correct location. This would be pretty much a PITA. Not to mention if it only accepts a single file to work on so that no reference can be listened to while editing. However, if it does work within the host so that the rest of the track could be listened to while editing, or if multiple files could be played in the Time Factory 2 interface so that the rest of the music could be referenced while editing, this would work pretty much exactly like I want. Does anyone know if this is the case with Time Factory 2?

The alternative, for a few more $$, Melodyne, looks totaly interesting, and I've demoed it a little. It's got tons of capabilities that Time Factory doesn't have. However, it does cost a little more, and the interface is not as simple as Time Factory 2. Also, there's one feature that I liked with Pitch N Time, that I think would also be available with Time Factory 2, and that I think I read is not possible (yet) with Melodyne3. That is, the ability to dynamically modulate speed and time at any point regardless of the tuning or note placement. For instance, with Pitch N Time, I could simulate wacky record scratches by simply pulling the pitch envelope to 0 and then up to 100%, and back down again very quickly. I'm thinking this is not possible in Melodyne... that Melodyne analyzes the note, and places it, so that dynamically pulling the speed and pitch down to 0 and back up within the same note or group of notes is not really possible... basically that Melodyne works on a note basis, where Time Factory works on a dynamic time and pitch envelope. Does anyone know if this is correct or not? I know Melodyne does so much more, that it would probably be worth it for the other things it does. I just really would like to have the "record scratch", tape speeding up/slowing down effect capability. I don't think Melodyne does that (yet).

Thanks for the info. Sorry for the way OT, but like someone recently posted... hardly anyone hangs out in the other forums here.
#1

7 Replies Related Threads

    Richard Brian
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3519
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 11:16:38
    • Status: offline
    RE: OT: Time Factory 2 or Melodyne? 2006/05/25 16:29:10 (permalink)
    apparently Cake is not gonna get their's functioning correctly with a decent interface any time soon


    Works perfectly here. I never leave any VV clips around, so I can't speak to how well it works if you don't bounce the clip right after manipulation.
    #2
    javahut
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 361
    • Joined: 2005/11/25 19:35:23
    • Status: offline
    RE: OT: Time Factory 2 or Melodyne? 2006/05/25 16:51:08 (permalink)
    So you can cut a note in a clip in the middle of a track that you played, say, too short... bounce in place to a little short clip as long as the note, then time stretch to fit the gap to the next note... and the stretched note shows up in place at the correct spot? This hasn't worked properly for me since I started using Cakewalk. The note shows up at the beginning of the track if I remeber right. As long as the note starts on beat one, it's placed at the proper place. Other than that, it disappears to the beginning of the track. If you just try to stretch just a clip... it stretches the whole wave, not just the clip. I contacted Cakewalk long ago... they said it was a known bug they would be fixing in an upcoming release. It wasn't fixed in 5.2.
    #3
    javahut
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 361
    • Joined: 2005/11/25 19:35:23
    • Status: offline
    RE: OT: Time Factory 2 or Melodyne? 2006/05/25 16:53:42 (permalink)
    Not to mention that the interface to do this is a little archaic compared to some other audio sequencers and time stretch tools.
    #4
    Richard Brian
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3519
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 11:16:38
    • Status: offline
    RE: OT: Time Factory 2 or Melodyne? 2006/05/25 16:57:33 (permalink)
    I read your entire message and got the impression you are talking about V-Vocal. It stretches flawlessly.

    Which process are you using that doesn't work? I know Process/Fit to time can misplace the clip.
    post edited by Richard Brian - 2006/05/25 17:13:40
    #5
    MArwood
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1816
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 20:04:42
    • Status: offline
    RE: OT: Time Factory 2 or Melodyne? 2006/05/25 19:48:59 (permalink)
    Time Factory 2 is not built for single notes or for fixing meoldies that are out of tune. Time factory 2 is for changing the tempo or pitch of the whole song. We use it for radio spots that have to be 30 sec or 60 sec. Sometimes the spots are given to use are 33,37 sec or 66,57 sec. Timefactory 2 is the best there is for use on a PC. These adjustments are inaudible! The programming part or Time factory 1 is in the MPEX of cakes pitch time plugin. You should play with VVocal before you buy anything. If your computer does not crash with it, VVocal is probably all you need.
    Max Arwood

    #6
    javahut
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 361
    • Joined: 2005/11/25 19:35:23
    • Status: offline
    RE: OT: Time Factory 2 or Melodyne? 2006/05/25 22:29:14 (permalink)
    Yeah, I'm not really refering to V Vocal... rather the MPEX function in Sonar.

    I'm not necessarily trying to fix out of tune notes, but stretching notes and parts of phrases. I know Time Factory 2 is not just for entire songs... the purpose of being able to use the envelopes dynamically over the waveform is to change just the parts of the wavform you want.

    Thanks for reminding me about V Vocal, though. I had tried it previously and thought the interface was a little on the clumsy side... not nearly as easy to manipulate as Pitch N Time was. I'll give it another shot and see if it does what I want.

    Does anyone know if V Vocal is made for or does a good job at stretching polyphonic sounds?... or is it mainly for monophonic sound sources.

    I'll check it out again. Thanks for you guys' input.
    #7
    MArwood
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1816
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 20:04:42
    • Status: offline
    RE: OT: Time Factory 2 or Melodyne? 2006/05/26 12:26:33 (permalink)
    You mentioned this before:
    envelopes dynamically over the waveform is to change just the parts of the wavform you want


    There are no envelopes in Timefactory 1 or TF2. It is standalone you simply tell it the wave file and choose to time or pitch stretch or both. VVocal does a fair job on all types of stretching. I'm not sure just what you are doing, but last night I did quite a bit of editing on phrases that were too short (vocals did not all stop at the same time) I just cut the short parts into and scooted out the endl of the audio, crossfaded the middle parts to fill the gaps. This will sound better than the best time stretch most of the time.
    Max Arwood

    #8
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1