Re: Oh-no. I think I've been 'pop-ized'
2014/12/29 18:50:39
(permalink)
Not a fan, but it's nothing to be ashamed of. I think we sometimes get the hypocritical notion that it is bad to like pop and , worse yet, pretend the stuff we do like is somehow better and any less contrived. Every now and then I hear something catchy on the radio and find myself bopping along even though i know it was some formulaic hit churned out en masse by the hot producer of the moment. There are tons of young capable performers out there. i have even argued that there is probably more musical talent than at any point in history due to exponential increase in accessibility to instruments, instruction and recording that did not exist when i was a child. Show me your favorite classic guitar solo and I can likely find a pre-teen Korean that can play it lick for lick on Youtube. I find , at least in my experience, the differences between pop of yesteryear and pop from now is more of a degree of how it is produced and marketed rather than a difference in raw talent. From a purely technical stance, is Justin Bieber a measurably worse singer than say, Shaun Cassidy or even Paul McCartney? Are the lyrics to your typical pop hit that more inane than such "classics" as "my dingaling", "The lemon song", "tooti fruiti", "open the door Richard" etc? The glut of available pop may make it seem like there is more garbage than ever before but I believe that we just have more access to everything now and thus the amount of what we don't like is increased along with what we do like. Humans are more likely to harp on the negative without objectively measuring the ratio of actual change. I think I got off to a bad start with Charli, because her big break was doing a song with Iggy Azalea and I just can't shake the connection lol.