PAGING " JAY DRAKE " x2 4800 owner .....

Author
timboe
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 760
  • Joined: 2004/01/07 09:01:29
  • Status: offline
2005/08/10 05:12:10 (permalink)

PAGING " JAY DRAKE " x2 4800 owner .....

Hi Jay

I noticed you have just gone to a A64 x2 4800 - monster CPU !!!!

If you dont mind, I'd **really** love to know the CPU results for that cpu using Scott's Sonar3 Test File from here:-

http://www.roadrec.com/Sonar3Test.zip


If you could post results at all latencies that would be GREAT !!

1.5ms [64 samples]
2.9ms [128 samples]
5.8ms [256 samples]
11.6ms [512 samples]
23.2ms [1024 samples]
46.4ms [2048 samples]


Many thanks and hoping this wasant a big ask.

Tim
#1

2 Replies Related Threads

    jaydrake
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 183
    • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:20:46
    • Status: offline
    RE: PAGING " JAY DRAKE " x2 4800 owner ..... 2005/08/10 05:50:13 (permalink)
    Timboe,
    Here goes....

    1.5ms [64 samples] 43% (jumps to 93%)
    2.9ms [128 samples] 25%
    5.8ms [256 samples] 18%
    11.6ms [512 samples] 14%
    23.2ms [1024 samples] 12%
    46.4ms [2048 samples] 10%

    Does this seem right?

    Jay Drake
    www.drums2b.com
    Win XP Professional
    Sonar 8.53
    Asus A8V Deluxe w/Athlon 64 X2 4800+
    2 Gig DDR 400 Ram
    RME Hammerfall 9652
    2 UAD-1's, version 4.8
    MTPAV usb Midi Interface
    10k rpm sata Audio Drive
    ATI Radeon 9200SE 128MB Dual
    #2
    timboe
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 760
    • Joined: 2004/01/07 09:01:29
    • Status: offline
    RE: PAGING " JAY DRAKE " x2 4800 owner ..... 2005/08/10 07:37:33 (permalink)
    Hi Jay

    All I can say is WOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    => Is your x2 4800 running at stock speed or have you overclocked it at all ?

    => Did you run the test with ASIO or WDM drivers ?

    => Does the CPU bounce around at the 2.9ms setting, or just mainly at the 1.5ms setting ?

    I have an O/C SD3700+ A64 running at 2.8gig with 1mb cache [effectively an FX57], and my results are:-

    1.5ms 50%
    2.9ms 35%
    5.8ms 29%
    11.6ms 24%
    23.2ms 22%
    46.4ms 20%

    Scott Reams just posted a dual-CPU dual-core Opteron 275 system (four cores) - [2.2gig with 1mb cache per core] x 4 and those results are:-

    1.5ms 39%
    2.9ms 25%
    5.8ms 16%
    11.6ms 13%
    23.2ms 12%
    46.4ms 11%

    Now Jay ...... your x2 4800 [ 2.4gig 1mb cache @ ] x 2

    1.5ms 43% (jumps to 93%)
    2.9ms 25%
    5.8ms 18%
    11.6ms 14%
    23.2ms 12%
    46.4ms 10%

    So …… with the exception of the 1.5ms setting, your A64 x2 4800 is EQUAL to a dual-cpu –dual-core opteron system !!!

    That is FREAKIN AWESOME !!!!!!!

    Now, for a bit of economics ..... using prices off www.froogle.com:

    Jay's DAW
    1 x A64 x2 4800 cpu approx. 1 x $917US = $917US
    Socket 939 Dual Core Board ie: Asus A8V = $79

    Scott's Clients DAW
    2 x Opteron Dual Core 275 approx 2 x $1322 = $2644US
    Dual Core Opteron 275 Board ie: Tyan Tiger K8W 8151 = $223

    Jays' DAW = $996US
    Scotts Clients DAW = $2867US

    Now …… unless (a) you have a LOT of cash to burn OR (b) you just HAVE TO HAVE the quicker DAW, why anyone would spend nearly 3x the price for a
    %10 lower CPU reading at 1.5ms [ ie: 39% vs %43 ] is beyond me.

    Jay, you have made me want to go out and get a x2 Dual Core cpu

    Damn … I had a feeling those X2 A64’s were going to be better than my FX57 equivilent, but I had no idea just how much better they would be !!

    Thanks again Jay,
    Tim
    post edited by timboe - 2005/08/10 08:52:23
    #3
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1