LKane
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 314
- Joined: 2007/12/09 22:05:14
- Status: offline
|
lhansen
Max Output Level: -27.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4765
- Joined: 2005/09/21 09:02:33
- Location: CT, USA
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/13 13:20:27
(permalink)
I like this tune. Your daughter has that Bonnie Riatt vibe to her voice. I hate critiquing mixes, but I'll do my best. The piano seems more dominant on the left, sooo, I would take the crunchy guitar and bring that over to the right a bit for a nice sonic seperation. At times it sounded a little mid-rangy, but some slight eq'ing would fix that. Other than those minor tweaks, this is a very good song Larry! Good to have you back in these parts again bro'.
Slow Marching Band Win 7 x64, Sonar X1E x64, Studio One v2, Focusrite Saffire 24 DSP Pro, Genelec 8030a, True Systems P-Solo, Focusrite ISA One, FMR RNP, GAP-73. "Someone to watch over me".
|
foxwolfen
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8256
- Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/13 13:47:53
(permalink)
Jeeze, she has a great voice. Must be nice to have talent. I think Larry summed it up nicely ... er... Larry. Cheers Shad
A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything. Composers Forum
|
Mamabear
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8954
- Joined: 2006/12/01 18:03:09
- Location: Missouri
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/13 14:18:49
(permalink)
Yes, she does have a great voice and yes, I'm jealous! Great job on this!
|
thepogue
Max Output Level: -50.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2458
- Joined: 2007/11/08 20:34:09
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/13 15:35:33
(permalink)
cool song...the keys sound a tad bit behind you daughters voice on the chours...sounds like they could be slide up (forward in the mix NOT higher volume) a tad...but you girl did a great job. I'd also not have you vox so wet...sounds like it would do well to be a bit dryer. Love the work you guys did here! very well written song!
post edited by thepogue - 2008/06/13 16:19:47
|
Mike Kohlgraf
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 344
- Joined: 2008/02/18 15:08:10
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/13 15:56:33
(permalink)
Sounds got via my monitor speakers. The piano ought to be a bit more centered and bit deeper in the mix. The vocals are sounding great! The rest of the mix sits nice and tight. I like the tune! Mike
|
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 50621
- Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/13 16:13:55
(permalink)
Great song, great voice, great mix! something about the bass I'm not fond of, don't know if you've got it running thru an amp or what, and that may be the sound you really want on it, if so, just ignore my comments. i'd have gone for something a little cleaner, tho.
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/13 22:17:05
(permalink)
Dammit!!! Soundclick is out again!!
|
robby
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5819
- Joined: 2006/05/13 15:53:45
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/13 23:33:22
(permalink)
yeah, I can't hit it either?
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/14 04:12:09
(permalink)
Sounds really good! During the start of the song I thought the verb on the vocals was too short, and too wet. It's a nice verb to use, but I though it died unnaturally quickly and was just a little too saturated. Once the song got going though I thought it fit in very well in terms of decay time and wetness. Any longer decay and it would just get all muddy in the mix. Maybe some automation on it could even it out a little? Just an idea, but otherwise it sounds great! Good job! And I probably wouldn't be too fussed on that verb, if you like it like that, go with it, that's just what I would do. Actually no, just listened again, would really like the wetness to go down a bit.. I think the decay time would sound fine with that wetness down, then bring it up a bit when the song gets going. Maybe cut some of the highs just a little bit with an eq shelving on the wet part of the verb. I think it's the highs that need a faster decay time, but the lows are decaying alright. Either way, good job!
|
tdye
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1926
- Joined: 2007/04/21 12:13:37
- Location: Oklahoma, USA
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/14 08:36:01
(permalink)
Larry, a great song with wonderful vocals, good lyrics. A little busy in the chorus and I agree about the piano pan. Drums are terrible, where did you find those? A well written song.
|
LKane
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 314
- Joined: 2007/12/09 22:05:14
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/14 10:23:03
(permalink)
Hi all Thanks for your helpful ears. I'll automate the verb, and sync the piano. I also found an out of sync spot in the vocal comps. The bass is supposed to be string bass, Beagle, kinda wanted it to start a bit cabaret and get more rock as it progresses. Tom the drums are sampletank and I kinda like the sterile drum charichature (sp?) especially the snare. I thought about re- amping them , them had a real drummer over for some songs and he was cool but for this one I thought the obviously dry in the box thing may be a nice contrast to some other songs in the project. The congas are real, and last night I re- posted the song with some spots where the congas stick out more. Thanks so much everybody. I'll dial it in some more and bump the thread when that occurs. LK
|
LKane
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 314
- Joined: 2007/12/09 22:05:14
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/14 16:56:13
(permalink)
OK I DID as many of the suggested tweaks as I could. I think the mastering process will do some good on sitting the lead vox into the tracks etc. If it's not too much trouble maybe re visit the song and see if it's better. Thanks again larry
|
spacey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8769
- Joined: 2004/05/03 18:53:44
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/14 17:02:56
(permalink)
Larry I didn't hear it before the changes but sure liked what I heard. I think the mix showcases her voice and that's good. Michael
|
smaltonian
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 93
- Joined: 2007/09/14 02:17:41
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/14 17:48:03
(permalink)
LKANE Sounds like a "retro-current" vibe.........Like it alot......The vocalist did a great job.....Gave it that 60's vibe too.... Nice job.....
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/14 20:41:17
(permalink)
Nice tune and vocals too.... I'd like to hear more deeper bass. The drums were a bit boring.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
qiitxx
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 51
- Joined: 2007/12/23 08:21:22
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/14 21:15:19
(permalink)
Critique: Musically::Very Very Nice. But, The congas didn't fit that genre of music, and they actually cluttered the track and conflited with the drum track. Vocalist pitch was impecible and her tone was great. Mix.. Crazy that was just and awsome mix too. However, I thought there was a little too much reverb on the guitar. and when it went to a more rhythem feel instead of a rock feel, I thought that it could have been a little less reverb and then more panning proably would have worked. Nice placement of male background vocal in the mix... What you did with the mix would have taken me a whole week to get it to sound half as good.. Please receprecate by critiquting one of my songs.. if I ever get one up
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/14 22:36:06
(permalink)
The reverb at the start sounds much better. I liked it like that, very good! Didn't like that one random delay on the vocals though.. Sounded a little cheezy... I am thinking maybe there is too much reverb on the vocals in the mix once it gets going now.. I know I said I liked it before, but there is definitely too much now (I don't know if you actually did change that or not.. I am listening to it on fresh ears now..). Hmm, maybe automation is not required, maybe just keep the verb as you have it at the start now... Oh and I like the congas!
|
Crg
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7719
- Joined: 2007/11/15 07:59:17
- Status: offline
RE: PLEASE CRITIQUE THIS MIX AND VOCALIST
2008/06/15 07:01:24
(permalink)
Good Song. Good vocals. She sounds a little nervous. Vocals are right out front. Some of the instrumental solos could come up front a little more for their duration nad then go back to mix level.
|