Perfect Space VS Altiverb

Author
mixmkr
Max Output Level: -43.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3169
  • Joined: 2007/03/05 22:23:43
  • Status: offline
2009/04/21 23:14:28 (permalink)

Perfect Space VS Altiverb

given using quality IR, is there really a difference between the two? Shoot, Altiverb is selling alone for about the cost of Sonar8PE.

Personally I like Perfect Space and the IR that have been available to us from a very kind forum member here sounds great... at least to these ears.

some tunes: --->        www.masonharwoodproject.bandcamp.com 
StudioCat i7 4770k 3.5gHz, 16 RAM,  Sonar Platinum, CD Arch 5.2, Steinberg UR-44
videos--->https://www.youtube.com/user/mixmkr
 
#1

28 Replies Related Threads

    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 00:29:39 (permalink)
    I've got PS and Sony's. I don't think the engines are the big difference - it is the impulse libraries they come with. Altverb has a ton of good ones - perfect space has a few good ones. Sony has a bigger one.

    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #2
    mixmkr
    Max Output Level: -43.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3169
    • Joined: 2007/03/05 22:23:43
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 00:39:07 (permalink)
    That's kinda what I figured.

    But $400 sounds kinda excessive for some IR. But I suppose I really need to hear some in my own studio to make that assumption.

    I thought some of the [free] Lexicon ones offered here (in past threads) were pretty amazing

    some tunes: --->        www.masonharwoodproject.bandcamp.com 
    StudioCat i7 4770k 3.5gHz, 16 RAM,  Sonar Platinum, CD Arch 5.2, Steinberg UR-44
    videos--->https://www.youtube.com/user/mixmkr
     
    #3
    dexterflex
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 291
    • Joined: 2008/07/27 23:24:55
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 00:46:56 (permalink)
    Has anyone tired the waves IR-1? And how does it compare to Altiverb 6?
    #4
    CJaysMusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 30423
    • Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
    • Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 08:09:45 (permalink)
    Has anyone tired the waves IR-1? And how does it compare to Altiverb 6?

    I have tried the Waves IR's and they kick boots, but i have not Tired them as you said.. They sound great. I dont have altiverb, so i cannot compare
    The thing with Impulse reverbs is that they are all good. They have there own uses. Ill use Perfect space for some tracks and Waves IR for others. Its up to interpitation from each song and track
    post edited by CJaysMusic - 2009/04/22 08:18:55

    www.audio-mastering-mixing.com - A Professional Worldwide Audio Mixing & Mastering Studio, Providing Online And Attended Sessions. We also do TV commercials, Radio spots & spoken word books
    Audio Blog
    #5
    MatsonMusicBox
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 879
    • Joined: 2008/07/09 10:56:31
    • Location: Hanover, PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 09:29:12 (permalink)
    Perfect Space vs Alti Verb is not a fair comparison. You should be comparing Pristine Space (Perfect Space's big brother) to Alti-verb.

    Perfect Space is not a true stereo convolution reverb. The others are (including IR-1 too)
    post edited by MatsonMusicBox - 2009/04/22 09:36:50
    #6
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 10:00:59 (permalink)
    here's my book report about stereo and true stereo:

    http://harmoniccycle.com/hc/sounds/mp3/Kalimba_convolution_reverb.mp3


    #7
    dexterflex
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 291
    • Joined: 2008/07/27 23:24:55
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 11:21:04 (permalink)
    Thanks CJaysMusic,

    Do you notice a lot of sound difference when using the low CPU mode in IR-1? I've recently read people use 1 reverb for Early Reflections than it's sent to another bus which has reverb tail or a bigger hall reverb is added.

    I'm not really sure how to set this up? If anyone can explain that would be great.
    #8
    pdarg
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2265
    • Joined: 2004/03/26 17:52:53
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 11:41:58 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: MatsonMusicBox

    Perfect Space vs Alti Verb is not a fair comparison. You should be comparing Pristine Space (Perfect Space's big brother) to Alti-verb.

    Perfect Space is not a true stereo convolution reverb. The others are (including IR-1 too)


    I have been trying to discover the difference between PerfectSpace and Pristine Space. Pristine sound better in its demo, but I can't quite explain why. In any case, I think I will be upgrading to the Voxengo version soon.
    #9
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 11:44:49 (permalink)
    Did you happen to listen to my "book report" posted above?

    It answers your question. :-)


    #10
    MatsonMusicBox
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 879
    • Joined: 2008/07/09 10:56:31
    • Location: Hanover, PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 11:52:09 (permalink)
    see next ....
    post edited by MatsonMusicBox - 2009/04/22 12:01:20
    #11
    MatsonMusicBox
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 879
    • Joined: 2008/07/09 10:56:31
    • Location: Hanover, PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 11:53:09 (permalink)


    Huh? you copied the reason in your post! .... Pristine is true stereo .. Perfect is not ... that and other advanced features

    post edited by MatsonMusicBox - 2009/04/22 12:00:51
    #12
    Blades
    Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3246
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 08:22:52
    • Location: Georgia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 11:56:09 (permalink)
    Hey Mike - what about the differences when a mono source is being fed into the two? The stereo source being audible in the left or right (pitch dependant) makes it hard to tell if a mono track would have the same apparent difference. Can you give a mono example (with the stereo vs. mono treatment of course)

    Blades
    www.blades.technology  - Technology Info and Tutorials for Music and Web
    #13
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 12:07:18 (permalink)
    I don't have one handy... but bear in mind that most people use Convolution on a stereo bus.

    The convolution isn't moving in the image... I think the reverb part of the mix will exhibit the same differences when you compare stereo to true stereo processes. If you can hear the livelier more subtle sense of space in True Stereo example... you will hear that on a mono source as well... as long as the output IS stereo.

    I do use Pristine on mono tracks frequently but the signal is set to interleave OR Pristine Space is on a stereo bus.

    best regards,
    mike


    #14
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 12:10:43 (permalink)
    Mike I remember your thread on this subject. It was outstanding work you did. I learned a lot. Those asking about this stuff would do well in finding that thread and reading up on what was found out.

    Best
    John
    #15
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 12:12:30 (permalink)
    Thanks John, but let's give credit where it is due... I was just asking questions... it was the people answering them that provided the enlightenment. I think Dave Clark is the leader of that pack. :-)


    #16
    Giannis
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 489
    • Joined: 2007/04/12 09:58:19
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 12:24:41 (permalink)
    ... how do I upgrade to Pristine Space? Or do I have to purchase the full version?

    Sonica Audio Labs Quad Core,8 Gb RAM, Win 7 Pro 64,Sonar X1d, Sound Forge 9
    #17
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 12:50:57 (permalink)
    Full version.


    #18
    Giannis
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 489
    • Joined: 2007/04/12 09:58:19
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 12:55:05 (permalink)
    Ok, thanks.

    Sonica Audio Labs Quad Core,8 Gb RAM, Win 7 Pro 64,Sonar X1d, Sound Forge 9
    #19
    dmbaer
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2585
    • Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
    • Location: Concord CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 14:03:01 (permalink)
    Perfect Space and the IR that have been available to us from a very kind forum member here


    This is an ideal opportunity to ask about something I've been wondering about. I assume the "kind forum member" cited is the gentleman who has offered several Lexicon IR libraries for download. I've downloaded them but am just at the beginning of the Sonar learning curve. It will take some time before I'm ready to make meaningful use of any such thing.

    Here're my questions. Are IRs program specific? In other words, Pristine Space is routinely touted as superior to Perfect Space ... so would the IRs even work in Pristine Space. If they did, would the effect be identical in both reverbs, or would one expect the Pristine Space treatment to sound better than Perfect Space with the same IR file? For that matter, are IR files interchangable between reverbs from different software vendors?
    #20
    plectrumpusher
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 479
    • Joined: 2007/10/22 04:29:27
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 14:35:00 (permalink)
    The Irony is that (at least in ver 7 ) , I found some nice stereo pair IR's marked L and right . omni and cardioid. I guess they were for putting reverb in one side cause thats all you can do with them using perfect Space.

    The true stereo thing ( or dual mono , as it's called in my hwd box) is nice for panning , but it's not like perfect space is total chopped liver .......: how long ago was it that a convo reverb like that INCLUDED with your DAW was a pipe dream ??????

    If you haven't got a smile on your face and laughter in your heart.......Then you are just an old sour fart!!
    #21
    CJaysMusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 30423
    • Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
    • Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 17:21:28 (permalink)
    ?
    I've recently read people use 1 reverb for Early Reflections than it's sent to another bus which has reverb tail or a bigger hall reverb is added.

    just make to sends on the tracks and 2 bus's with one reverb on each bus. soanrs console view is just like an analog mixer. Or you can have one send going to one bus withone reverb and then make a send on that bus to another reverb.
    Cj

    www.audio-mastering-mixing.com - A Professional Worldwide Audio Mixing & Mastering Studio, Providing Online And Attended Sessions. We also do TV commercials, Radio spots & spoken word books
    Audio Blog
    #22
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 18:42:59 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: dmbaer

    Are IRs program specific?


    Most programs use basic sound files with familiar formats. PC apps use .wav files and Altiverb (I believe) uses .aiff.

    The I.R.s you downloaded are .wav files. each one is an "impulse" that IIRC were produced using a sweep method and a special deconvolution program that converts a recorded sweep into an impulse reminiscent of a gunshot.

    So for all intents and purposes the IRs can be used by most programs.

    The diffrence between Stereo and True Stereo is that the True Stereo method uses 2 different stereo IRs... one for the left and for the right of your mix.

    The effect sounds different... take a quick listen to the .mp3 above.

    Perfect Space will only do stereo.

    If you have extra IRs (hopefully collected just for True Stereo) you can use Pristine Space as well as other apps to get the "True Stereo" effect.

    Pristine Space will also let you do sophisticated multichannel surround with mutliple IRs.

    That's a very basic run down.

    best regards,
    mike


    #23
    mixmkr
    Max Output Level: -43.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3169
    • Joined: 2007/03/05 22:23:43
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 22:06:20 (permalink)
    wow...what a difference Mike... Thanks for the MP3 and the explanation. The learning never stops!!

    but still a little confused...
    so as asked earlier, these free IR from place like NoiseVault, Echo canyon, the Lexicon (from our kind forum member), freebie Voxengo, etc...
    Will these fare better in Pristine Space and/or ...by looking at the .wav file (for the impulse)...if it IS stereo.... you're good to go?
    post edited by mixmkr - 2009/04/22 22:14:57

    some tunes: --->        www.masonharwoodproject.bandcamp.com 
    StudioCat i7 4770k 3.5gHz, 16 RAM,  Sonar Platinum, CD Arch 5.2, Steinberg UR-44
    videos--->https://www.youtube.com/user/mixmkr
     
    #24
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/22 22:39:30 (permalink)
    You need two stereo IRs to have the True Stereo effect.

    Many collections have a left, center, right examples to choose from... e.g. Perfect Space came with some. You just have to look thru each collection.


    #25
    AJ_0000
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 738
    • Joined: 2007/05/05 01:32:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/23 01:43:12 (permalink)
    I knew something was lacking, now I know what it is.

    Let me ask this: Can you set up multiple instances of Perfect Space and pan them out to achieve the same thing, or does it have to happen within a program designed for true stereo?
    #26
    musicroom
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2421
    • Joined: 2004/04/26 22:31:02
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/23 02:19:31 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: CJaysMusic

    ?
    I've recently read people use 1 reverb for Early Reflections than it's sent to another bus which has reverb tail or a bigger hall reverb is added.

    just make to sends on the tracks and 2 bus's with one reverb on each bus. soanrs console view is just like an analog mixer. Or you can have one send going to one bus withone reverb and then make a send on that bus to another reverb.
    Cj


    This sounds like a work around to using both the L and R sides of the convolution files. I may have to give this a try. Thanks.

    BTW - WizooVerb W2 operates in true stereo as well. Now sells through M-Audio I believe. I have and I like it.




    post edited by musicroom - 2009/04/23 02:51:45

     
    Dave
    Songs
    ___________________________________
    Desktop: Platinum / RME Multiface II / Purrfect Audio DAW  I7-3770 / 16 GB RAM / Win 10 Pro / Remote Laptop i7 6500U / 12GB RAM /  RME Babyface



     
     
    #27
    Dozer
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 37
    • Joined: 2007/06/03 16:51:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/23 02:22:34 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: John

    Mike I remember your thread on this subject. It was outstanding work you did. I learned a lot. Those asking about this stuff would do well in finding that thread and reading up on what was found out.

    Got a link to that thread perhaps.
    Thanks.

    http://dozermayne.tripod.com
    Vista 64bit - Intel Quad Core Q6600-8Gigs RAM-Sonar 7-
    Adobe Audition 3.0-Emu 1820M-(2)KRK Rokit RP5's-(1)KRK RP10S Active Powered Sub-Various Mics-Oldschool Yamaha DJX Keyboard
    #28
    thomasabarnes
    Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3234
    • Joined: 2003/11/11 03:19:17
    • Location: Milwaukee, WI USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Perfect Space VS Altiverb 2009/04/23 05:09:34 (permalink)
    I think this may be the tread:

    http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=1423225&mpage=1&key=
    post edited by thomasabarnes - 2009/04/23 05:19:04


    "It's not a song till it touches your heart. It's not a song till it tears you apart!" Lyrics of Amy Grant.

    SONAR Platinum X64 (jBridge), Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit, Core i7 990X Extreme Edition Processor 3.46 GHz 6 Cores, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, Crucial Ballistix 24GB 1333MHz DDR3 @1333 MHz, TASCAM UH-7000, Behringer X-Touch, EVGA GTX 980TI Superclocked 6GB, 1TB Samsung EVO 850 SSD, 150GB, 320GB, 1TB 7200rpm HDDs
    #29
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1