trinitystudio
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 32
- Joined: 7/22/2006
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
- Status: offline
Picture Cache - HUGE
There is nothing on my 500 gig drive but the OS, SONAR X1a and the three previous versions of sonar. I have just noticed that the drive has 18% free space left. The audio is on a seperate drive. THe picture cache has tons of files in it. Many from old dead sessions. Can the picture cache be emptied? Any clues to what else might be eating the HD space? Any reson to leave version 7 , 8 & 8.5 on the PC? FX etc.
Jim Wilken - Trinity Recording Studio Corpus Christi,TX http://www.trinitystudio.com/ ASUS Sabertooth motherboard, AMD 3.1 gHz 8 core 16gHz RAM EVGA GT 610 1GB DDR3 PCIE Video Card RME HDSP9652 audio interface C: Drive Plextor SSD D; E: Drives Maxtor Hybrid SSD Windows 7 Home, SONAR Platinum, Waves Silver Bundle, Autotune7,Lexicon reverb, several SONAR plug-ins
|
JonD
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3617
- Joined: 12/9/2003
- Location: East of Santa Monica
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 01, 11 8:32 PM
(permalink)
Yes, you can empty the picture cache (unless X1 is somehow different in that regard. I'm still on 8.5). As far as keeping older versions of Sonar, that's up to you. Personally I'd keep 8.5 and dump the older ones... especially if you're having a disk space issue.
SonarPlat/CWbBL, Win 10 Pro, i7 2600K, Asus P8Z68 Deluxe, 16GB DDR3, Radeon HD5450, TC Electronic Impact Twin, Kawai MP11 Piano, Event ALP Monitors, Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro, Too Many Plugins, My lucky hat.
|
stonehedge
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 215
- Joined: 5/22/2008
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 01, 11 10:35 PM
(permalink)
How many times have you used system restore? Around 200meg each time you use it
Home built i7 6850k Broadwell, 16GB corsair RAM, Asus X99 Deluxe II/Gen 3, EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 6gig, Win 10 creators with no windows updates since jan 2018, Sonar Platinium, Sony Vegas Pro 15, Sound Forge 11, Pro Tools 10, Superior Drummer 3, Easy Keys, Melodyne Studio 4, MOTU 2408, Motu MTPav, midisport 4X4,Behringer X32 Compact with X-Adat and (2) ada8000 strips,Mackie Control Universal, Monitors by JBL, Tannoy, Fostex.
|
Brandon Ryan [Roland]
Max Output Level: -40.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3458
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 02, 11 2:05 AM
(permalink)
I would absolutely dump and clean out every version of SONAR previous to 8.5. The picture cache can certainly be deleted. The picture cache will be rebuilt for a particular project when it is opened the next time.
"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." WG SONAR Platinum | VS-700 | A-800 PRO | PCAL i7 with SSD running Windows 8 x64 | Samsung 27" LCD @ 1920x1080 | Blue Sky monitors with BMC | All kinds of other stuff
|
slartabartfast
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5289
- Joined: 10/30/2005
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 02, 11 3:02 AM
(permalink)
How many times have you used system restore? Around 200meg each time you use it Most users will not know the answer to that question. By default restore points are created automatically on a schedule and when certain operations (most commonly installation of programs or drivers) are performed. You can limit the amount of space available for restore points. http://mintywhite.com/windows-7/7maintenance/change-limit-system-restore-windows-7/ Once that space is filled new restore points replace old ones.
|
IndustryStandard
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18
- Joined: 1/28/2011
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 02, 11 12:49 AM
(permalink)
According to the Sonar Tech clean the Picture Cache regularly as it will use gigs of memory on your HD.
|
listen
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 593
- Joined: 9/12/2008
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 02, 11 6:48 PM
(permalink)
Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk ] I would absolutely dump and clean out every version of SONAR previous to 8.5. The picture cache can certainly be deleted. The picture cache will be rebuilt for a particular project when it is opened the next time. This is good to know information
- Listen - FOH Mixer & Recording Studio Manager Nothing but the grace of God - mggtg. VS 700C - R / CONSOLE 1 / NEVE PORTICO 5017 / TASCAM UH-7000 / SONAR PLATINUM / REASON RECORD 9 / VMP 2 / UREI 7110's / UA LA-610 MkII / AUDIENT ASP 880 / CREATION STATION 450 V 5 WINDOWS 10 / HOME 64 - BIT / SKYLAKE CORE i7 (i7 - 6700, 4 CORES/8 THREADS)
|
timidi
Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5449
- Joined: 4/11/2006
- Location: SE Florida
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 02, 11 7:18 PM
(permalink)
would absolutely dump and clean out every Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk ] I would absolutely dump and clean out every version of SONAR previous to 8.5.
Could you please elaborate Brandon? In particular, "dump"? Do you mean uninstall using the Cakewalk uninstall program or using Windows uninstall? Or? "clean out"? I don't know what that means? Ajax? Pressure washer? Clorox? how about the registry? Reason I ask is, I still have Pro Audio 9.03 installed (and Sonar 4). Mostly because I've still got tons of things in *.wrk format, and the migration of *.wrk to *.cwp has always been less than desirable. So, If I need something from a wrk file, I have to export all the waves from Pro Audio and import to Sonar. Thanks
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 10/8/2007
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 03, 11 4:20 AM
(permalink)
- Leave the registry alone
- Navigate (in Windows Explorer) to the picture cache folder
- DELETE every file in the folder
- Use the Sonar "Uninstall Program" utility to remove previous versions
- Again, in Windows Explorer, delete all remaining folders & references to previous Sonar installations
- Read this: http://www.digifreq.com/digifreq/discuss/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1106 for instructions on how to safely remove unwanted registry entries
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
timidi
Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5449
- Joined: 4/11/2006
- Location: SE Florida
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 03, 11 10:12 AM
(permalink)
Sorry I've highjacked the thread. As, I understand how to delete picture Cache files. To the OP, just delete them. As far as uninstalling previous Cake versions, The problem for me when uninstalling anything in Windows is how stupid the uninstall program seems to be. what usually happens during a typical 'uninstall' where there are related applications is that, as the uninstall progresses, little windows pop up saying something like 'this is a shared file, do you want to delelte it'. Usually, I say 'No' . But, by saying no I may be fragmenting something which in turn screws something else up. (like the registry will always be looking for whatever it is I delete/uninstall) But, saying yes to the pop ups may cause worse problems (if any). Plus, by deleting all traces of previous versions, I don't know which plugs or synths would be lost along the way. So, bottom line is, I'm too chicken to uninstall anything. Help..
|
Jumbicat
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 406
- Joined: 11/11/2010
- Location: Texas, Earth
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 03, 11 10:32 AM
(permalink)
The question that comes to mind... does X1 have an option to clear picture cache file upon exit? Like Internet Explore does? Would that be something to consider if it doesn't? Edit - I'm powering up my notebook to check if that is an option... Found under configuration settings - PicCacheMB set to 500 MB. Would changing this to a lower number impact performance?
post edited by Jumbicat - February 03, 11 10:45 AM
Win7Pro64Bit-AMD-1090t -4 GIG OC DDR3-2k-GTX-465-C300 SATA6-SSD 64G-Sonar 8.5,X2a - Pro Tools Digi-001, a few Axon controllers http://soundcloud.com/jumbicat
|
codamedia
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1185
- Joined: 1/24/2005
- Location: Winnipeg Canada
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 03, 11 10:55 AM
(permalink)
timidi So, bottom line is, I'm too chicken to uninstall anything. Help.. That's how I get too :) Doing some house keeping isn't a bad thing though. If you uninstall old versions and accidentally zap a plug in you use regularly, you can always get that back if you have the original disks. Just do a custom install, and only choose the plug in you want. The hardest part is knowing what plug in came from which version. I only keep the two latest versions of Sonar installed at any given time, but I'm sure I have some old plugs in there (ie: timeworks)
Don't fix it in the mix ... Fix it in the take! Desktop: Win 7 Pro 64 Bit , ASUS MB w/Intel Chipset, INTEL Q9300 Quad Core, 2.5 GHz, 8 GB RAM, ATI 5450 Video Laptop: Windows 7 Pro, i5, 8 Gig Ram Hardware: Presonus FP10 (Firepod), FaderPort, M-Audio Axiom 49, Mackie 1202 VLZ, POD X3 Live, Variax 600, etc... etc...
|
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14250
- Joined: 9/14/2007
- Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 03, 11 11:56 AM
(permalink)
Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk ] I would absolutely dump and clean out every version of SONAR previous to 8.5. I'm really surprised to see this advice posted without any caveats or details. It's well-established that uninstalling older versions of SONAR can take shared content with it that new versions are still using, even if you answer "no" to all the shared files prompts. I once did a successful uninstall of 8.0 to prove that an 8.5 install from download would continue working without it, but I had to back up all the Shared folders, and restore lost content after the uninstall to get everything back. If you back up and restore the shared content, older versions can be safely uninstalled, but it's hardly worth the trouble for the small amount of disk space saved and the loss of access to older versions when you get errors opening or editing old projects in newer versions. Also, it's necessary to manually remove registry branches and AppData content to really get things completely cleaned up, providing more opportunities for making costly mistakes. IMO, it's just not worth the trouble and the risk unless maybe you're running an SSD with space at a premium.
post edited by brundlefly - February 03, 11 11:57 AM
|
Brandon Ryan [Roland]
Max Output Level: -40.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3458
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 03, 11 1:44 PM
(permalink)
brundlefly Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk ] I would absolutely dump and clean out every version of SONAR previous to 8.5. I'm really surprised to see this advice posted without any caveats or details. It's well-established that uninstalling older versions of SONAR can take shared content with it that new versions are still using, even if you answer "no" to all the shared files prompts. I once did a successful uninstall of 8.0 to prove that an 8.5 install from download would continue working without it, but I had to back up all the Shared folders, and restore lost content after the uninstall to get everything back. If you back up and restore the shared content, older versions can be safely uninstalled, but it's hardly worth the trouble for the small amount of disk space saved and the loss of access to older versions when you get errors opening or editing old projects in newer versions. Also, it's necessary to manually remove registry branches and AppData content to really get things completely cleaned up, providing more opportunities for making costly mistakes. IMO, it's just not worth the trouble and the risk unless maybe you're running an SSD with space at a premium. Yes you do need to manually remove registry branches (less important) and definitely AppData content to get things completely cleaned up. Unless you're running a good sized system drive the amount of space in total can be significant. I guess I don't see the risk the same as you, but perhaps I was a bit hasty in my response and could have offered some more explanation. Unless we're talking about going back to versions that perhaps included the TImeworks stuff I'm not really sure what's going to get removed that would mess anything up. For instance I just had a system where I removed both 8.5 and 8.0 and didn't experience any problems with projects nor could I see any changes to any shared folders. The content in these folders generally stays the same from version to version. What did you find got ripped out? Either way, saying "no" should safeguard this and the worst case scenario is you install a particular plugin or element from the older DVD, which to me is cleaner than having so many version of SONAR on a particular computer. It just seems to me that having 5 versions of SONAR on a system is just a bit messy. No harm done in doing so, but I personally wouldn't do it. I'll keep maybe one older version, but that's my cutoff.
post edited by Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk] - February 03, 11 1:54 PM
"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." WG SONAR Platinum | VS-700 | A-800 PRO | PCAL i7 with SSD running Windows 8 x64 | Samsung 27" LCD @ 1920x1080 | Blue Sky monitors with BMC | All kinds of other stuff
|
DeeS
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 228
- Joined: 9/16/2009
- Location: Deep South Mississippi
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
February 03, 11 2:39 PM
(permalink)
I seem to remember some posts of problems removing 8.0 and leaving 8.5. Things 8.5 needed were tied to 8.0. Or maybe it was 8.3 instead of 8.5.
post edited by DeeS - February 03, 11 2:43 PM
Vista Business x64 Service pack 2 - Intel Xeon X5472 @ 3.0 GHz processors (2) Quad Core - 8.0 GB ram - Creative SB X-Fi - Nvidia Quadro 5600 - Sonar 8.5 & X1a Producer The problem with perfection is that it has no limits. Normally, once you obtain perfection, you realize how it could be better. David Gibson - The Art of Mixing
|
newdreamstudio
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86
- Joined: 12/15/2006
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
October 23, 16 3:31 PM
(permalink)
location of picture cache folder? Rusty
rusty kirkland Studiocat, Intel i7-8th gen/Coffee Lake @ 5.0GHz, 32 gigs RAM, SONAR Platinum 64bit, Motu 2408, 24 I/O and 8pre CbB
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 7/27/2005
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
October 23, 16 3:33 PM
(permalink)
the path is set in SONAR Preference > File > Audio Data "Picture Folder"
|
newdreamstudio
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86
- Joined: 12/15/2006
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
October 23, 16 3:34 PM
(permalink)
rusty kirkland Studiocat, Intel i7-8th gen/Coffee Lake @ 5.0GHz, 32 gigs RAM, SONAR Platinum 64bit, Motu 2408, 24 I/O and 8pre CbB
|
PeterMc
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 504
- Joined: 11/12/2003
- Location: Tasmania
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
October 23, 16 4:18 PM
(permalink)
You can set the maximum size of the picture cache. Once this is reached, the oldest files are deleted to make way for the new. There's a setting in the AUD.INI file called PicCacheMB that sets the maximum. I think the default is 500MB. This can be changed in Preferences/Audio/Configuration File in SPlat. From memory this setting has been around quite a while so should apply to older versions of Sonar (although the way to change it might be slightly different). Cheers, Peter.
i5 6500, H170M, Intel HD 530, 16GB, Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, Win 10 Pro (1803) (64 bit), Cakewalk by Bandlab
|
robert_e_bone
Moderator
- Total Posts : 8968
- Joined: 12/26/2007
- Location: Palatine, IL
- Status: offline
Re:Picture Cache - HUGE
October 23, 16 6:49 PM
(permalink)
Just thought I would mention that while the subject of the thread is certainly valid - the thread is from 2011, until the last couple of posts. Bob Bone
Wisdom is a giant accumulation of "DOH!" Sonar: Platinum (x64), X3 (x64) Audio Interfaces: AudioBox 1818VSL, Steinberg UR-22 Computers: 1) i7-2600 k, 32 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 2) AMD A-10 7850 32 GB RAM Windows 10 Pro x64 Soft Synths: NI Komplete 8 Ultimate, Arturia V Collection, many others MIDI Controllers: M-Audio Axiom Pro 61, Keystation 88es Settings: 24-Bit, Sample Rate 48k, ASIO Buffer Size 128, Total Round Trip Latency 9.7 ms
|