Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D]

Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
Author
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
2013/02/28 12:20:53 (permalink)

Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=twcrcv-vCTw#! 
  
 

 
+ 15years after with floating points...How many years will it take before they have x64 support? 30 years?


-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
#1

77 Replies Related Threads

    bobvila
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 102
    • Joined: 2008/08/29 12:56:58
    • Location: Montana
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 12:31:46 (permalink)
    Where can I get a plugin that does that smooth overdrive sound ProTools has?

    www.stumblingfree.com
    www.facebook.com/stumblingfree

    Sonary X3 Producer Edition 64 bit, Windows 7 64, bit, Intel Q9660, 8 GB Ram, Echo Audiofire 12, Edirol PCR-M80, Groove Tubes The Brick, MAudio DMP3, Shure SM7B, Rode NT2A
    #2
    CJaysMusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 30423
    • Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
    • Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 12:38:21 (permalink)

    Where can I get a plugin that does that smooth overdrive sound ProTools has?

    Pro tools captures and record exaclty what you put into it, just like sonar does. Pro tools has effects, just like Sonar does.

    All you need is a vocal that was recorded decently, EQ, compressors, saturation effetcs, may some tape sat or distortion effects. 
    Sonar has all these. Use your ears and mix to taste bro


    CJ

    www.audio-mastering-mixing.com - A Professional Worldwide Audio Mixing & Mastering Studio, Providing Online And Attended Sessions. We also do TV commercials, Radio spots & spoken word books
    Audio Blog
    #3
    Beepster
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 12:45:27 (permalink)
    Well I hope this doesn't turn into another poop flinging festival. Things have been reasonably calm around here lately.
    #4
    clintmartin
    Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3893
    • Joined: 2009/10/11 12:16:43
    • Location: Fort Smith, AR
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 12:49:25 (permalink)
    Don't underestimate a good poop fling.

    Cakewalk, Harrison Mixbus 4, Waveform 9, ADK intel i7 2600 3.40 ghz, 8gb Ram, Win 7, Presonus Audiobox 44VSL. 
    http://www.youtube.com/c/clintmartinmusic
    https://itunes.apple.com/...lint-martin/1010966023
    https://open.spotify.com/artist/4x4TBz32i56bTJkgu7b4tN
     
     
     
    #5
    redbarchetta
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 534
    • Joined: 2013/02/16 21:01:12
    • Location: Portland Oregon
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 12:54:55 (permalink)
    clintmartin


    Don't underestimate a good poop fling.

    Ha, now that's damn funny!
    #6
    mmorgan
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 676
    • Joined: 2013/02/19 23:39:05
    • Location: Bellingham, WA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 12:55:54 (permalink)
    Oddly a great many people use, and like, ProTools.

    Regards


    Mike

    Win8(64), Sonar X3e(64) w/ RME Fireface UFX.
    #7
    bobvila
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 102
    • Joined: 2008/08/29 12:56:58
    • Location: Montana
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 12:57:08 (permalink)
    I was joking CJ :)

    www.stumblingfree.com
    www.facebook.com/stumblingfree

    Sonary X3 Producer Edition 64 bit, Windows 7 64, bit, Intel Q9660, 8 GB Ram, Echo Audiofire 12, Edirol PCR-M80, Groove Tubes The Brick, MAudio DMP3, Shure SM7B, Rode NT2A
    #8
    Beepster
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 13:02:41 (permalink)
    clintmartin


    Don't underestimate a good poop fling.


    I'm filling a bucket right now... just in case. ;-)
    #9
    sharke
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13933
    • Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
    • Location: NYC
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 13:18:02 (permalink)
    There were some things I liked about Pro Tools, it's interface is very good (and far less buggy than Sonar's) and it's editing and clip management functionality is great, and again is less problematic than Sonar's. But damn I just could not work with a VSTi heavy project without the thing choking on me all the time, and on a couple of occasions it just randomly decided to "corrupt" MIDI data in projects I was working on, making them unusable. I could not wait to ditch it and move into the 64-bitosphere. 

    James
    Windows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
    #10
    frankandfree
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 447
    • Joined: 2008/04/26 11:56:32
    • Location: Norddeutschland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 13:28:02 (permalink)
    Beepster


    Well I hope this doesn't turn into another poop flinging festival. Things have been reasonably calm around here lately.
    Turn into? The opening post is already nothing but just that. Why someone feels compelled to post a link to this ridiculous video on the X2 forum is completely beyond me. This thread should go into the trash bin asap.



    #11
    emwhy
    Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1402
    • Joined: 2006/01/03 15:09:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 13:29:10 (permalink)
    I have no issues with pro Tools either, but the older versions, in terms of work flow are a pain. I've used version 6 and found it beyond clunky. Version 9 was a much needed improvement. The hardest thing for me at first was to get used to the MAC way of doing things after years of nothing but Windows.
    #12
    guitardood
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 413
    • Joined: 2004/08/02 21:12:50
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 13:38:19 (permalink)
    You couldn't of posted that vid a few weeks ago? :)

    Would have saved me quite a bit of wasted time adding Pro Tools to my mix environment.
    I've experienced some of the gain-staging issues they talk about and have spent more time nudging tracks back and forth into time and/or calculating the additional manual delay-compensation to correct the flaws in what PT ironically calls AUTO-delay-compensation.

    An example: I've got my buffer at 1024, mix some tracks.  Switch buffer to 128 to record a few more tracks, drums and bass are no longer lined up.  Line them up and record my tracks.  Push buffer back to 1024 to avoid the dreaded 'overload' message.  Guitar, bass, and drums are all out of time. Re-line up the tracks, rinse, repeat.

    So far the best thing I've noticed about PT10 is the B3-Emulation is pretty killer.  That's about it.

    Just goes to show like I said in another post, the grass is not greener.  I will say this though, I'd rather have an occasional crash here or there rather than to spend all my creative time on re-lining up transients.



    Best,
    Guitardood 

    Reverb Nation: http://www.reverbnation.com/ChuckFletcher


    "Life is like a box of chocolates.  You know, eventually you're going to get the one filled with alien-like nasty tasting goo and have to spit it out and say YUCK"
    #13
    Beepster
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 13:49:00 (permalink)
    Turn into? The opening post is already nothing but just that. Why someone feels compelled to post a link to this ridiculous video on the X2 forum is completely beyond me. This thread should go into the trash bin asap.

    Eh that's just Freddie for ya. 

    What's more important here is your avatar. I used to love that little dude as a kid but totally forget what the name of the cartoon is. Help a Beepster out? I wanna see if there are any on youtube. 

    ;-)
    #14
    stevec
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11546
    • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
    • Location: Parkesburg, PA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 14:37:59 (permalink)
    So far the best thing I've noticed about PT10 is the B3-Emulation is pretty killer.

     
    I only have PTLE 7.4 running on a Vista partition, but I also like some of the instruments.   I believe the AIR group left Avid and were acquired by MAudio, maybe, and if so there coulp be some nice stuff coming out of that.
     
    Personally, the PTLE interface just never clicked with me.  I tried just so I could say I did, but it never really panned out.   At this point I'd have to be paid to work in PTLE. 
     

    SteveC
    https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
     
    SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
    Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
    Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
     
    #15
    Frostysnake
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 722
    • Joined: 2006/10/26 14:31:38
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 15:08:17 (permalink)
    Ahhh...yessss....I needed to have a brown out today...

    Sonar Platinum Windows 7 64-bit
    1 TB Hard Drive\Seagate 500 GB Slave
    VS-100
    MOTU 2408 MK3
    A-Pro 800
    #16
    Beepster
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 18001
    • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 15:10:50 (permalink)
    Frostysnake


    Ahhh...yessss....I needed to have a brown out today...


    I just played a Brown Note Symphony for ya. Unfortunately Smellovision technology has not advanced enough for you to enjoy it fully over the internet.

    And now if you'll excuse me... I need to open some windows. ;-)
    #17
    frankandfree
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 447
    • Joined: 2008/04/26 11:56:32
    • Location: Norddeutschland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 15:20:24 (permalink)
    Beepster



    Turn into? The opening post is already nothing but just that. Why someone feels compelled to post a link to this ridiculous video on the X2 forum is completely beyond me. This thread should go into the trash bin asap.

    Eh that's just Freddie for ya. 

    What's more important here is your avatar. I used to love that little dude as a kid but totally forget what the name of the cartoon is. Help a Beepster out? I wanna see if there are any on youtube. 

    ;-)

    There's lots and lots of them . Watching that guy is a much better waste of time than this thread. Plus he's got hillarious music going with his banter.
    I think in the english world the cartoon was called "The Line", but you probably find more videos searching for "La Linea" (no need to look for english versions, as the guy's gibberish is understood fluently in the whole galaxy).  If you need a break from his brabbling and the backing tunes, but still want to watch the guy, watch this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWaUbcUXMLY
    #18
    guitardood
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 413
    • Joined: 2004/08/02 21:12:50
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 15:24:55 (permalink)
    Beepster


    Frostysnake


    Ahhh...yessss....I needed to have a brown out today...


    I just played a Brown Note Symphony for ya. Unfortunately Smellovision technology has not advanced enough for you to enjoy it fully over the internet.

    And now if you'll excuse me... I need to open some windows. ;-)

    LOL!


    I just finished reading "The Spot On The Wall" by Hugh Phlung Pooh :)


    You know what they say, "If it's brown, flush it down".






    Best,
    Guitardood 

    Reverb Nation: http://www.reverbnation.com/ChuckFletcher


    "Life is like a box of chocolates.  You know, eventually you're going to get the one filled with alien-like nasty tasting goo and have to spit it out and say YUCK"
    #19
    WDI
    Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2069
    • Joined: 2007/08/28 02:31:11
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 15:50:46 (permalink)
    Well it says PT has floating point now anyways. But who cares. I mean just turn down where your clipping so not really a big deal either way. These kind of posts beg trollers to come reek havoc here. Which isn't to hard to get people started around here. 

    Sonar 7 PE
    Windows XP Pofessional (SP3)
    MSI K8N Neo4-F
    AMD Athlon 64 3500+
    2 GB PC 3200 Ram
    RME Fireface 800
    Edirol FA-66
    CM Labs MotorMix

    Old stuff: ARJO
    #20
    frankandfree
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 447
    • Joined: 2008/04/26 11:56:32
    • Location: Norddeutschland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 16:34:04 (permalink)
    WDI


    Well it says PT has floating point now anyways. But who cares. I mean just turn down where your clipping so not really a big deal either way. These kind of posts beg trollers to come reek havoc here. Which isn't to hard to get people started around here. 

    Yes. What makes the linked vid so hillarious is that the dude intenionally raises the track input gain to make the track go into the red, finds out (ooooh) that >0dB in PT actually (formerly) meant clipping and deduces that there is a flaw in the gain staging of the DAW, not in the "gain staging" he does there. Yeah, right...

    YouTube expertise for the win.

    #21
    guitardood
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 413
    • Joined: 2004/08/02 21:12:50
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 17:55:58 (permalink)
    frankandfree


    WDI


    Well it says PT has floating point now anyways. But who cares. I mean just turn down where your clipping so not really a big deal either way. These kind of posts beg trollers to come reek havoc here. Which isn't to hard to get people started around here. 

    Yes. What makes the linked vid so hillarious is that the dude intenionally raises the track input gain to make the track go into the red, finds out (ooooh) that >0dB in PT actually (formerly) meant clipping and deduces that there is a flaw in the gain staging of the DAW, not in the "gain staging" he does there. Yeah, right...

    YouTube expertise for the win.



    I don't want to start an argument, but the vid guy does make a valid point.  If you send 3 tracks at -3db simultaneously into a single bus (in PT, there are no "busses" per say, they are aux tracks without input gain adjustment or input meters for that matter), it is possible that the bus input breaches 0db (ever so subtly) once they're summed and then dropping the output volume of the "buss" to bring the levels back to <0db doesn't resolve the clipping between the in and out (as neither does inserting a trim plug as the first insert in the buss).  I guess Nuendo handles this differently (as does Sonar I believe). 

    Granted that the example is a bit over the top, but I think he was exaggerating the problem simply to illustrate that the clipping is there.   Is it a flaw in PT or in the person using PT is debatable, but it is a flaw just the same.
       




    Best,
    Guitardood 

    Reverb Nation: http://www.reverbnation.com/ChuckFletcher


    "Life is like a box of chocolates.  You know, eventually you're going to get the one filled with alien-like nasty tasting goo and have to spit it out and say YUCK"
    #22
    soens
    Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5154
    • Joined: 2005/09/16 03:19:55
    • Location: Location: Location
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 19:59:40 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by soens - 2013/04/17 23:39:00
    #23
    Rain
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9736
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
    • Location: Las Vegas
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 20:27:04 (permalink)
    I've mentioned it before but my brother-in-law runs a commercial studio - he's still using Pro Tool TDM 5.x on a 10 years old Mac G4. 

    The recordings I've heard coming out of that place are absolutely top notch, as good and often better than some commercial recordings. 

    The thing is, Pro Tools is only one of the tools that he uses. He has great live room, an adequate collection of mics and preamps, quality outboard gear, a first class control room w/ high quality monitors.

    All of that has a lot more influence on the end product than 32 bit floating point.

    Pro Tools is only used to record, edit, process and mix.

    More often than not, it's the little guys like myself and I guess many of us here who have to rely extensively on their DAW software and its features that will agonize over what otherwise might not even come into play. 

    It also needs to be said that Pro Tools native is something entirely different.

    TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
    #24
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 21:43:04 (permalink)
    In typical Freddie style that video is confusing and not necessarily correct at all. Problems are all in the user, not the DAW I can assure you.

    Firstly if you monitor your track rms levels with something like K system and using VU meters you will never have any clipping on tracks, ever. Same as buses, if you maintain the correct mix on a bus but still maintain the reference rms level using a VU meter you will also never clip a bus either. You will be well clear of 0 dB FS by the amount of headroom built into your chosen reference level. It will sound excellent.

    I attended an Avid Pro Tools course (for Instructors as well as Experts etc part of my teacher's training) and we had a whole bunch of tracks feeding to the Masterbus set at 0 dB or unity gain. We then started overloading all the tracks up by major amounts but we also reduced the Masterbus to keep the signal clean. Even when the Masterbus was right down at - 30 dB or so and the tracks were smashing the Masterbus,  the sound was still perfect and clean.

    Sorry, nothing like the video. The video guy is not even very clear at what stage the distortion is occurring in the signal flow. That needs to be fully explained, it is not.  Also in Pro Tools Buses can be turned into a Masterbuss so you can have many Masterbuses in PT. When you do this you get the high signal overload capability if you need it. 

    There are many excellent things about Pro Tools. The colour coding scheme in the mixer for one. Also clip gain is just great, to be able to alter the amplitude of any clip waveform so easily on your main edit page. Once you have this you will never go back, it is such a time saver. Kills using automation. Luckily Studio One has it too. Xpand is a great sounding instrument. And you stack or layer up the four parts to make killer complex soundscape patches. It sounds huge and the library for it is great. PT is way too expensive though and horribly expensive to upgarde from PT8 to PT10 even, outrageous. 
     
    Pro Tools does not sound bad period. It is up the person driving it. If you are making a bad sound from Pro Tools it is your fault, not the DAW. I still prefer Studio One over PT even. I think the workflow is better overall and it handles midi much better. Audio capabilities are the same (as also with most DAW's) now compared to PT. I have used both a lot. 

    post edited by Jeff Evans - 2013/02/28 22:01:23

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #25
    markyzno
    Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1216
    • Joined: 2011/02/08 06:40:20
    • Location: UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 21:49:52 (permalink)
    PT's editing functionailty and smart tools are WAY better than Sonars......

    As long as you know the shortcuts..... 

    Sonar Platinum 64 bit > Pro tools 10.3.2 >Intel i7 3770K > 16Gb Ram > Gigabyte Z77-D3H Motherboard> NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 2 GB > ATi RADEON HD5700 > 240GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD> Win 10 home 64 bit> Delta 1010 > MOTU Audio Express > MA-15D's > NI Ultimate 9 > NI Kontrol S61 1.1 > NI MAschine Studio 2.3 / KORG MS-20 Mini - Arturia MicroBrute > KORG SQ1 - KORG Kaoss Pad KP3 > iPad and IO Dock 2 running various bits > Bunch of guitars >

    Sound Design on IMDB --
     
    #26
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 22:04:53 (permalink)
    When I watched that video I wasn't thinking how bad PT was rather how idiotic the person was in using it that way.


    If he is trying to convince us that PT is a poor DAW he wont get far doing it that way. I am no fan of PT but reason tells me that a lot of people have done a lot of good work using it. All he proved to me was he doesn't know how to use it. 

    I have nothing against any DAW. I prefer Sonar. Its my choice to make and that is the one I have chosen. I don't care what the other guy uses at this point. In the same way I don't care what a Sonar user choses for his/her plugins. Or whether they built there DAW had it built or bought it off a shelf. It is not important to me.  

    I don't envy another's studio or what they may or may not have in it.

    I know my DAW and am happy with it. I know what I can do and how to do it.

    Anything else is ridiculous and not worthy of discussion. We can debate the fine points between various DAWs for fun but in the end its meaningless and shouldn't be taken seriously. You choose what you want to choose for your own reasons. No one can tell you that you made the wrong choice. Not even me! 

    Best
    John
    #27
    guitardood
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 413
    • Joined: 2004/08/02 21:12:50
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 23:20:04 (permalink)
    FWIW, this video illustrates a little of what I was talking about above regarding bussing and buss input levels.  Perhaps the person in the vid posted by the OP doesn't understand this (late in the video talking about master fader attached to submix buss).  Not necessarily a problem with ProTools, but a concept to be aware of to help keep an eye on and prevent buss input clipping.



    post edited by guitardood - 2013/02/28 23:30:02


    Best,
    Guitardood 

    Reverb Nation: http://www.reverbnation.com/ChuckFletcher


    "Life is like a box of chocolates.  You know, eventually you're going to get the one filled with alien-like nasty tasting goo and have to spit it out and say YUCK"
    #28
    aleef
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 431
    • Joined: 2006/09/14 20:02:26
    • Location: la/ca
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/02/28 23:51:08 (permalink)
    my initial reaction to first working in Pro Tools was .."wow" this is clunky". and i could not wait to tell everyone here how much it sucked. but after really sitting down for a week getting to know the program i found it to be quite nice and fun to work in. my only gripe with it (which is big) is.. it can be finicky with alot of hardware within your system on Windows. it requires quite a bit of optimizing to get and remain stable. as far as recording, mixing, and editing its still just as good if not better than anything out there.  yeah its short on some cool features, but its short on half-baked ones though too. 




    Intel i7 3820 3.6 GHz
    ASUS Sabertooth X79 16Gb   
    SonarX2PE ProTools 11 
    RME HDSP9632
    #29
    Keysman
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 79
    • Joined: 2008/01/15 16:41:00
    • Location: Hollywood, Ca.
    • Status: offline
    Re:Pro Tools HD "stone age" VS any other DAW. [:D] 2013/03/01 02:21:14 (permalink)
    Using PT 10, Sonar X1-2, and Nuendo here at work so I have to say, I hate these kind of videos that provide comparisons based on very misleading context. All DAWS have good and bad points but mostly its what your used to working with or what you first learned on and from that point on, it becomes your reference.

    The most common misconception about PT, especial PT10 is the master fader concept. It's not a Master fader at all but rather, the trim input to the DAC of your soundcard and its PRE not POST like the Sonar concept of a Master Fader. Thats why gain staging is so important on all versions of PT prior to 10 and its higher floating point engine. And what the PT world calls AUX sends, everyone else calls BUSSES....big whoop.

    Of the three, I think Sonar is by far the most intuitive to work with from a music creation standpoint. Things make more musical sense, less keyboard shortcuts to memorize. Workflow is awesome and you get stuck in the 'Tech" zone less often. Screensets RULE THE WORLD, one big screen LCD to run everything, awesome and most useful feature to date! If they would simply stop adding new Gee Wiz features every fiscal quarter to entice the already ADHD driven market and make the thing more stable, I would be doing backflips.

    But in fairness, PT 10 does have some very strong features as well. Elastic Audio simply kicks ass period. No comparison on anything else. Audio snap isn't even in the same universe. Try it once and you'll agree. Its fast, simple, and it actually works. Track a Drummer, lay in a MIDI bass line via soft synth, then track live keys and real vocals and the PA on the project comes in and says its all has to be 7bpm  slower....done and the results dont sound like they are on crack.

    Nuendo simply kills for post work...period. It is unbeleivably stable under conditions that would choke both PT and Sonar and it handles Video like a dream. Its Bussing structure is fast, deals well with external hardware and SMPTE like a dream and dosn't try to re-invent the post production world by calling normal mixer related functions something completely different just because it was the first kid on the block.

    The point being they all have their strengths and weakness. Its up to you to pick the best tool for the job...your job.  Who cares who is using it...if you cant get what your after with ANY of the big powerful DAWS out there now....your probably not trying very hard.
    post edited by Keysman - 2013/03/01 04:05:53
    #30
    Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1