BobF
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8124
- Joined: 11/5/2003
- Location: Missouri - USA
- Status: offline
Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
But first, Cambridge is good stuff guys - congrats on getting the new stuff out the door with a ton of fixes. The '57 samples sound cool and I like the way the eZine told what to download for those of us not using CCC. Here's a toast for ya'!  Probably an artifact of working on the Control Bar problems, but now the custom button widget insists on being all the way to the right no matter where it is placed prior to exiting Sonar.
Bob -- Angels are crying because truth has died ...Illegitimi non carborundum --Studio One Pro / i7-6700@3.80GHZ, 32GB Win 10 Pro x64 Roland FA06, LX61+, Fishman Tripleplay, FaderPort, US-16x08 + ARC2.5/Event PS8s Waves Gold/IKM Max/Nomad Factory IS3/K11U
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 10/28/2006
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 26, 15 5:01 PM
(permalink)
I can confirm this behaviour. Anderton Can you give steps to reproduce?
Method: - Open SONAR - Custom Module appears at right end:
 - Move Custom Module to preferred slot
 - Close SONAR
- Open SONAR - Custom Module has moved back to right hand end again:
 - Reposition Custom Module:
 - Right Click and check Lock Module Order option:
 - Close SONAR
- Open SONAR - Custom Module has moved back to right hand end again

...etc No biggie, more of a mild inconvenience at worse.
post edited by SteveStrummerUK - March 26, 15 5:34 PM
|
noonie
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 68
- Joined: 12/4/2007
- Location: Watertown, CT
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 26, 15 5:25 PM
(permalink)
Same problem here...but not just the custom widget. it rearranges everything (back to same order every try). I tried locking toolbar, same results. tried within a project, both saving and not saving. Also tried with no project loaded. I also tried by first selecting "all modules visible", and then rearranging. And also with empty bar and inserting one by one and rearranging....same results. It always goes back to the same original order after restarting Sonar (32-bit).
Dell Latitude E6500 P9700 2.8Ghz Core 2 Duo 4GB RAM MOTU Ultralite mkIII Hybrid Win 7 32-bit Sonar Platinum
|
noonie
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 68
- Joined: 12/4/2007
- Location: Watertown, CT
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 26, 15 5:27 PM
(permalink)
PS ..... it does remember the widget size I set.
Dell Latitude E6500 P9700 2.8Ghz Core 2 Duo 4GB RAM MOTU Ultralite mkIII Hybrid Win 7 32-bit Sonar Platinum
|
cowboydan
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 908
- Joined: 1/13/2012
- Location: Asperen, Netherlands
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 26, 15 5:30 PM
(permalink)
I also have the same behavior here. Everything goes back to default.
|
BobF
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8124
- Joined: 11/5/2003
- Location: Missouri - USA
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 26, 15 5:35 PM
(permalink)
Bob -- Angels are crying because truth has died ...Illegitimi non carborundum --Studio One Pro / i7-6700@3.80GHZ, 32GB Win 10 Pro x64 Roland FA06, LX61+, Fishman Tripleplay, FaderPort, US-16x08 + ARC2.5/Event PS8s Waves Gold/IKM Max/Nomad Factory IS3/K11U
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 26, 15 5:38 PM
(permalink)
Yes, now I see what you're talking about and I was able to confirm. Maybe we'll get a hotfix in a few days
|
meh
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 431
- Joined: 6/11/2005
- Location: Tempe, Az
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 26, 15 5:47 PM
(permalink)
SONAR Version 2017.09 HP Z-420 Workstation Intel Xeon W3680 @3.50ghz 32g memory 2tb disk space Win2008 Server R2 Standard 64-bit TASCAM US-1641 interface
|
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2685
- Joined: 12/8/2012
- Location: Montreal
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 26, 15 6:38 PM
(permalink)
Did anyone actually try this thing before sending it out ?
Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 26, 15 6:44 PM
(permalink)
Paul P Did anyone actually try this thing before sending it out ?
If out of all the features, fixes, and additions in the update this is the only significant issue people have uncovered so far, I'd say the answer is yes.
|
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4294
- Joined: 3/26/2015
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 26, 15 7:14 PM
(permalink)
Anderton If out of all the features, fixes, and additions in the update this is the only significant issue people have uncovered so far, I'd say the answer is yes.
Check post #30 on topic "Cambridge is here" (I can't post URL's). You could argue it is less significant if you like (but not insignificant).
post edited by Doktor Avalanche - March 26, 15 7:20 PM
|
jeff oliver
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 122
- Joined: 1/20/2015
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 3:38 AM
(permalink)
I have the same issue. I made sure that my screenshots were not locked but nothing has helped. Its already been said that its not a big issue and I agree. CW has done a wonderful job that I feel like we're getting spoiled a bit. The system has been stable for the most part and I'm sure that with all the new features that's not easy. CW we're not complaining... we just want more of a good thing :) I said in the survey that stability was the most important thing. So lets not forget where we come from. When its all said and done I can make music without leaving my home!!!!
|
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12010
- Joined: 8/13/2004
- Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 4:26 AM
(permalink)
Another one here. Just going from bad to worse after my plugin problems after installing Cambridge. I had such hope.
Mike V. (MUDGEL) STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64, PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz. Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2. Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub. Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX. Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor. Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
|
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2685
- Joined: 12/8/2012
- Location: Montreal
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 8:50 AM
(permalink)
Anderton
Paul P Did anyone actually try this thing before sending it out ?
If out of all the features, fixes, and additions in the update this is the only significant issue people have uncovered so far, I'd say the answer is yes.
Let me be more specific : Did anyone actually try using the Control Bar after changes were made to it ? Someone might also have tried intalling and using your DimPro programs. It used to be bad enough that early adopters had to beta test a new version every year and a half, now everyone has to beta test every month. If I were using Sonar in a professional setting, I'd be scared to death.
post edited by Paul P - March 27, 15 8:56 AM
Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
|
Wookiee
Rrrrugh arah-ah-woof?
- Total Posts : 13306
- Joined: 1/16/2007
- Location: Akahaocwora - Village Yoh Kay
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 8:53 AM
(permalink)
I can confirm this as a problem also tried different start methods i.e. as admin or from the CCC or just as a user happens for every launch My number for report is CWBRN-32199
Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain. Karma has a way of finding its own way home.
Primary, i7 8700K 16Gigs Ram, 3x500gb SSD's 2TB Backup HHD Saffire Pro 40. Win 10 64Bit Secondary i7 4790K, 32GB Ram, 500Gb SSD OS/Prog's, 1TB Audio, 1TB Samples HHD AudioBox USB, Win 10 64Bit CbB, Adam's A7x's - Event 20/20's, Arturia V6, Korg Digital Legacy, Softube Modular, Arturia Keylab-88, USB-MidiSport 8x8
|
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 9:02 AM
(permalink)
Thank you for reporting the issue, and sorry for any inconvenience caused. I can't make any promises, but know that we're aware of the problem, are taking it seriously, and have a fix in progress.
|
BobF
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8124
- Joined: 11/5/2003
- Location: Missouri - USA
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 9:11 AM
(permalink)
Ben Staton [Cakewalk] Thank you for reporting the issue, and sorry for any inconvenience caused. I can't make any promises, but know that we're aware of the problem, are taking it seriously, and have a fix in progress.
Thanks for the acknowledgement Ben. Having one of you folks do a quick note like this is very helpful. At least it is for me.
post edited by BobF - March 27, 15 9:57 AM
Bob -- Angels are crying because truth has died ...Illegitimi non carborundum --Studio One Pro / i7-6700@3.80GHZ, 32GB Win 10 Pro x64 Roland FA06, LX61+, Fishman Tripleplay, FaderPort, US-16x08 + ARC2.5/Event PS8s Waves Gold/IKM Max/Nomad Factory IS3/K11U
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 10/28/2006
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 9:46 AM
(permalink)
Why has reply #2 of this thread been removed? It makes my quote in post#3 (now promoted to post #2) look rather ridiculous. Or even that I'd fabricated it. I don't understand the motive here, anyone care to enlighten me?
|
Grumbleweed_
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 915
- Joined: 11/1/2007
- Location: Southampton, England
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 10:06 AM
(permalink)
SteveStrummerUK Why has reply #2 of this thread been removed? It makes my quote in post#3 (now promoted to post #2) look rather ridiculous. Or even that I'd fabricated it. I don't understand the motive here, anyone care to enlighten me?
I figured you just kept the quoted quote handy for occasions when such a quote wasn't actually quoted. Grum.
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 10/28/2006
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 10:27 AM
(permalink)
Just out of interest, do we know yet if this is a universal problem with Cambridge or is it just affecting some users?
|
pwalpwal
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3249
- Joined: 1/17/2015
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 12:16 AM
(permalink)
SteveStrummerUK Why has reply #2 of this thread been removed?
the anderton's gone rogue! (or rouge if you're dyslexic)
|
Brando
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2776
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Location: Canada
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 1:02 PM
(permalink)
noonie PS ..... it does remember the widget size I set.
Yes - correct here to. The layout always reverts to the "Cambridge way", but it does seem to remember the module sizes I set in Braintree.
Brando Cakewalk, Studio One Pro, Reaper Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL ASUS Prime Z370-A LGA1151, 32GB DDR4, Intel 8700K i7, 500 GB SSD, 3 x 1TB HDD, Windows 10 Pro 64
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 1:53 PM
(permalink)
Paul P It used to be bad enough that early adopters had to beta test a new version every year and a half, now everyone has to beta test every month. If I were using Sonar in a professional setting, I'd be scared to death.
You can update whenever you want - you don't have to update the day it's released - and roll back to a previous version if you have a problem until there's a fix. If you use SONAR in a professional setting, the Dim Pro sounds do work, it's just that the SFZ files are placed inelegantly but that can be fixed and doesn't impact performance...and I don't see the Control Bar issue as so serious it can't be coped with for a while until a patch happens but if so, just hold off on the update. Given how much stuff has worked properly in the two releases so far, I really don't think they qualify as "beta tests."
|
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4294
- Joined: 3/26/2015
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 2:01 PM
(permalink)
Also ...
* The hardgrove collection just copies to the default area and does not honour the folder path for rapture in the registry. You need to move it to the multisamples folder manually afterwards (if it is in a different place).
* Boost 11 appears to be installed on every update is also hard coded and does not honour the existing file path. The version keeps incrementing.
Seems to me that they need sorting out on the emergency update too.
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 2:09 PM
(permalink)
pwalpwal
SteveStrummerUK Why has reply #2 of this thread been removed?
the anderton's gone rogue! (or rouge if you're dyslexic)
Because I tested the control bar without realizing I hadn't finished downloading Cambridge, so I thought it worked. After I realized my error, I removed the post because I didn't want to give the impression I had gotten it working in Cambridge. I then posted later to confirm that I did experience the same bug in Cambridge.
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 10/28/2006
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 2:15 PM
(permalink)
Craig, do you know yet if this is universal in Cambridge, or is it just affecting some of us?
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 11/6/2003
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 2:20 PM
(permalink)
SteveStrummerUK Craig, do you know yet if this is universal in Cambridge, or is it just affecting some of us?
I don't know, sorry. Cakewalk is aware of the issue.
|
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4294
- Joined: 3/26/2015
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 27, 15 2:48 PM
(permalink)
The great thing about it is that I know Cakewalk will sort this out soon with a follow up emergency fix. It is inevitable there will be bugs. I'm going to wait two weeks after every release before upgrading (in fact I might just install one month behind). It really is an excellent way of shifting software if it continues this way and they fix regression bugs rapidly.
post edited by Doktor Avalanche - March 27, 15 2:57 PM
|
GregGraves
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 282
- Joined: 11/14/2014
- Location: florida usa
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 28, 15 4:01 PM
(permalink)
Me too have problem. Just saying.....
|
Resonant Serpent
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 463
- Joined: 9/26/2014
- Location: Austin, Texas
- Status: offline
Re: Problem with Cambridge Control Bar
March 28, 15 5:28 PM
(permalink)
Just to confirm. Put me on the list of the control bar error after Cambridge.
A deep chesty bawl echoes from rimrock to rimrock, rolls down the mountain, and fades into the far blackness of the night. It is an outburst of wild defiant sorrow, and of contempt for all the adversities of the world. - Aldo Leopold
|