Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 13:04:23 (permalink)
Mooch4056


So Karyn ......what is it exactly that you are saying?

I think she's saying "use it or don't" it probably will never matter anyway. It comes down to "if you like it".


I sort of did both sides of what Karyn is saying. I did a mix of a song using Slate's VCC on every channel and bus. I liked it. Then I went to an existing mix and added VCC to every channel and bus. It did not really change the "shound" of that other song. I believe it was because I did not EQ or FX to the VCC.


#31
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 14:04:27 (permalink)
bapu


Mooch4056


So Karyn ......what is it exactly that you are saying?

I think she's saying "use it or don't" it probably will never matter anyway. It comes down to "if you like it".


I sort of did both sides of what Karyn is saying. I did a mix of a song using Slate's VCC on every channel and bus. I liked it. Then I went to an existing mix and added VCC to every channel and bus. It did not really change the "shound" of that other song. I believe it was because I did not EQ or FX to the VCC.

I wasn't talk to you. I was talking to Karyn. Pfffft 




Your ignored 

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#32
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 14:10:30 (permalink)
Mooch4056

Your ignored 

Is that all it took? I shudda done this years ago.
#33
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 14:12:37 (permalink)
bapu


Mooch4056

Your ignored 

Is that all it took? I shudda done this years ago.

No .... I should have done this yesterday 

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#34
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 14:13:50 (permalink)
Mooch4056


bapu


Mooch4056

Your ignored 

Is that all it took? I shudda done this years ago.

No .... I should have done this yesterday 

Hmmmmmm. I thought I was ignored.
#35
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 41704
  • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
  • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 15:10:13 (permalink)
Karyn



In the digital world 1 + 1 always equals exactly 2 
Unless you have X1 before the patches, ya?


 
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
#36
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 15:51:34 (permalink)
bapu


Mooch4056


bapu


Mooch4056

Your ignored 

Is that all it took? I shudda done this years ago.

No .... I should have done this yesterday 

Hmmmmmm. I thought I was ignored.

I am ignore you 

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#37
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 15:52:35 (permalink)
Bub

This was very interesting to me (from Craig's video) ... 

"It's important to start your mix while the Console Emulators are already in place and do your mix with all of them enabled, adding them after the fact to an existing mix is rarely as effective."


I don't understand why? If you mix your project so it sounds good, and then you add the CE, it should add 'something' to the mix, good or bad. Even if it emphasizes the high end, and creates distortion, you should still hear something. Another thing bad about this is, it's kind of odd to have it work this way, especially if you want to go back and add it to an existing project. You'd have to reset the desk and start from scratch. That just doesn't make sense to me.

Bub, the reason why is obvious - because the documentation says that's the way you should use it.

http://www.cakewalk.com/Documentation/default.aspx?Doc=SONAR%20X2&Lang=EN&Req=ProChannel.8.html

Don't confuse yourself by trying to use logic and reasoning when it comes to audio. Or get bogged down in technical details about what's actually going on or do blind testing or anything like that.

Instead, just blindly accept what the marketing folks tell you and your entire world will be beautiful and happy and wonderful and joyous and you can post upstairs about how wonderful everything is!

You will automatically hear the stuff they tell you about:

A wider sound stage.
Increased sense of sense [sic] of spatial cohesion.*
More depth and definition.
A bit more warmth and aggression.
Easier to balance levels across tracks.

*This is my favorite, because, before X2, my spatials just weren't cohesed (even when they were warmly and aggressively deep and defined). 

I'm not sure about the wider sound stage though, because I don't have a ruler handy in my studio.

 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
#38
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 16:00:23 (permalink)
So you really like the sound of it?  :-) 


#39
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 16:04:26 (permalink)
bapu


Mooch4056


bapu


Mooch4056

Your ignored 

Is that all it took? I shudda done this years ago.

No .... I should have done this yesterday 

Hmmmmmm. I thought I was ignored.

Btw .... I am still ignoring you 




It's a trick I learned from the United States government.  Say that your doing one thing but then do the opposite. Works for them ....and so far....been working for me 

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#40
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 16:07:27 (permalink)
drewfx1



Don't confuse yourself by trying to use logic and reasoning when it comes to audio. Or get bogged down in technical details about what's actually going on or do blind testing or anything like that.

Instead, just blindly accept what the marketing folks tell you and your entire world will be beautiful and happy and wonderful and joyous and you can post upstairs about how wonderful everything is!

You will automatically hear the stuff they tell you about:


Golly .... Sounds like they do the same thing our Government does. 
post edited by Mooch4056 - 2013/01/16 16:08:47

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#41
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 16:53:19 (permalink)
Mooch what's this grubyoumeant ewe tawkin' about?
#42
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 19:32:26 (permalink)
mike_mccue


So you really like the sound of it?  :-) 
Actually, I've been so put off by the incredible amount of ridiculous BS surrounding it that I haven't really put it through it's paces to try and figure out what it's actually doing.


post edited by drewfx1 - 2013/01/16 19:35:29

 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
#43
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 19:40:15 (permalink)


I reckon it's the horse meat of the DAW world.





#44
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 19:44:45 (permalink)
mike_mccue


I reckon it's the horse meat of the DAW world.

I prefer to think of it as the cream in your* coffee










*since I don't drink coffee




#45
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 20:21:49 (permalink)


I like the non wary creamer.


#46
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 20:24:09 (permalink)
The powdery stuff?
#47
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 20:42:59 (permalink)
I repeat. The console emulations doesn't do anything just like Bapu doesn't do anything. They are twins. Same DNA. 

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#48
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 20:45:36 (permalink)
Mooch4056


I repeat. The console emulations doesn't do anything just like Bapu doesn't do anything. They are twins. Same DNA. 

I love you too Mooch.
#49
Mooch4056
Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7494
  • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
  • Location: Chicago
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 20:49:13 (permalink)
Bapu

I love you too Mooch.

I don't know why ....have you read my above post?
post edited by Mooch4056 - 2013/01/16 20:50:24

From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
 
Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




#50
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Question about Pro Channel Consolue Emulation 2013/01/16 20:50:48 (permalink)
Mooch4056


bapu


Mooch4056


I repeat. The console emulations doesn't do anything just like Bapu doesn't do anything. They are twins. Same DNA. 

I love you too Mooch.

I don't know why ....have you read my above post?

Y U Hatin'? U no I cannae red.
#51
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1