Helpful ReplyRME vs competitive alternatives

Author
Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2819
  • Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
  • Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
  • Status: offline
2016/06/27 13:11:04 (permalink)

RME vs competitive alternatives

Hi!
 
I apologize if this been discussed a lot before, but I'd still be happy to get some feedback with respect to my personal requirements ...
  • I currently run Roland interfaces (VS-700 + OctaCapture + Presonus OctoPre MkII via ADAT), which gives me 20 pic pre inputs, ability to run 4 different headphone mixes (using zero latency via OctaCapture DSP) and roundtrip latency of 8.1 ms @ 96 kHz - which is good
  • But Roland drivers are NOT the most stable (no longer supported, either) and some Sonar builds work better, some crash more often, Kontakt 5 is often painful when pushed - so that's not so good
Hence, I'm considering making the move to RME, but since it's not going to be cheap I'd appreciate your feedback ...
  • Can I really expect that rock solid stability that others claim to have or is that wishful thinking?
  • Will there be a noticeable difference between RME and Roland converters?
  • How do I get 20-22 input channels @ 96kHz? I assume I can continue using 4 ADAT channels from the OctoPre MkII @96kHz, but the UFX offers only 12 i.e. I would need another device (recommendations?) to get 4 - 8 inputs with at least some of them being mic pre-amps
  • I need at least 4 separate DSP monitor mixes (including some reverb) with ability to save monitor mix settings
  • What about using something like an RME OctaMix XT plus something other than a UFX?
  • What other interfaces are worth considering (Apollo, MOTU, Lynx, etc.)?
 
Thanks

GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER
  +++   Visit the Rehab   +++
 
DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600
Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture)   Control-Surface: VS-700C 
VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really) 
#1
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9871
  • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
  • Location: Ohio
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/06/27 14:02:49 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby Rob[at]Sound-Rehab 2016/06/28 10:44:36
RME drivers are rock-solid.
It's not "made up" or exaggerated.
They've earned that reputation over many years.
The only "down" side to RME is the cost.
If your machine can keep up with the load, the UFX will playback glitch-free at a 48-sample ASIO buffer size.
One nice thing about the RME drivers; they report dropped samples.  If the machine is struggling, and you think you heard a glitch, you can open the driver settings panel to see if there were any dropped samples.
 
The latest AVB series from MOTU is extremely good.
The larger units actually have slightly lower noise-floor than the Fireface UFX.
 
If you settle on the Fireface UFX:
If your external 8-channel preamp supports SMUX (and it's A/D supports 96k sample-rate), you can use the pair of ADAT inputs on the UFX to provide 8 additional channels of inputs (at 96k).
 
You can't make a bad decision RME or the latest generation MOTU.
Lynx PCIe units are also excellent (digital I/O to external converters - albeit more costly).
 
There are other good options... but these are the best if you're wanting to work with substantial loads at the smallest ASIO buffer sizes.
 

Best Regards,

Jim Roseberry
jim@studiocat.com
www.studiocat.com
#2
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/06/27 14:08:29 (permalink)
I'd long planned to go RME if my old MOTU ever died, but when that finally did happen I had no money. Should have been saving up, I guess. So I had to shop around for something I could afford. I ended up with a Focusrite, because it was cheap and there were many satisfied users here.
 
It turned out to be a lucky move, as it sounds great, has been 100% reliable, and the one time I needed advice from the company they were responsive and helpful. The Saffire Pro40 has nearly all the features of its closest RME counterpart but costs 1/3 as much. I would therefore consider Focusrite to be a viable alternative, especially if you have other things on your wishlist you'd like to spend the money on. 


All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#3
filtersweep
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 194
  • Joined: 2009/03/10 21:11:27
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/06/27 15:59:35 (permalink)
As far as I know, and according to RolandUS web site,  OCTA  Capture is still supported. Win 10 driver downloads automatically.
Obviously not in same class as RME, but it isn`t orphaned.
Brian
#4
rumleymusic
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1533
  • Joined: 2006/08/23 18:03:05
  • Location: California
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/06/27 21:22:45 (permalink)
There is nothing exaggerated about RME's stability and performance, and actually I find the sound quality of the newest generation interfaces to be underrated.  I pretty much abandoned any other recording gear and trust RME with most everything (with a few exceptions of a couple analog preamps and Mytek converters for expansion when needed).  I am using an XTC + UFX for recordings and a Babyface Pro in my edit studio.  The XTC sounds fantastic and is perfectly quiet up to 80+dB of gain!! 
 
Sure they are more expensive than the Chinese built brands (not that most of them are not well made and reliable), but the German build quality and sound of RME rival much more expensive options.  

Daniel Rumley
Rumley Music and Audio Production
www.rumleymusic.com
#5
Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2819
  • Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
  • Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/06/28 14:36:29 (permalink)
Thanks for the feedback so far :-)
 
Need to do some more research but it looks like the UFX should work with the Presonus to give me 8 inputs via ADAT @96kHz, which means I would not need something like XTC right away to get the full 22 inputs @96 kHz.
 
I assume Direct USB Recording and TotalMix have full access and control also over ADAT in/out for the monitor mix?

GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER
  +++   Visit the Rehab   +++
 
DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600
Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture)   Control-Surface: VS-700C 
VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really) 
#6
Amicus717
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 555
  • Joined: 2014/12/30 08:48:49
  • Location: Canada
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/06/28 17:15:50 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby Rob[at]Sound-Rehab 2016/06/29 01:37:01
I can comment from a driver stability and audio quality perspective: I went from a Roland VS-700 to an RME Babyface, and I'm thrilled.
 
Like you, I experienced driver instability with the Roland stuff, but that has gone away completely now that I'm using RME. Their driver performance has been flawless for me.
 
The sound quality is great. I didn't directly A/B them (I sold my V-studio rig before buying the RME), but the Babyface sounds just great - clean, clear and open. And this is an older, 1st gen unit that I bought used. I'm very happy I made the switch. 
 
I don't use many ins and outs, or mic pres -- I'm an ITB guy -- so I can't comment on that stuff. But FWIW, I'm 100% satisfied with the performance and sound quality from my RME, and I have no regrets at all about ditching my Roland hardware.
 
Rob

Sonar Platinum, Windows 10 Pro 64, Core i7-5820K Haswell-E CPU, 32GB DDR4 RAM, RME Babyface, Adam F7 monitors, Mackie MCU
#7
rumleymusic
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1533
  • Joined: 2006/08/23 18:03:05
  • Location: California
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/06/29 00:10:26 (permalink)
I assume Direct USB Recording and TotalMix have full access and control also over ADAT in/out for the monitor mix?

 
Absolutely, all channels are freely rout-able in Total Mix and record-able using DUREC .  I record all jobs using both the laptop and Direct USB recording as a backup.  Saved me a couple of times with hard drive glitches.  

Daniel Rumley
Rumley Music and Audio Production
www.rumleymusic.com
#8
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2567
  • Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
  • Location: West Midlands, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/06/29 00:27:40 (permalink)
Just to add a 'me too' really.

I've found RME drivers to be absolutely rock solid at sub 5ms round trip times and the sound quality is very, very good. It's not so much that they use "special" convertor chips (the UFX DA chip is also used in a Presonus interface for example), it's the quality of the electronics on the analogue side of things. The noise floor is remarkably low and the mic pres are pretty neutral.

As for controlling it, Totalmix is an absolute beast of an application, with the ability to set up multiple mixes at the same time, control over ADAT connected inputs, eq, basic fx and ckmpression you can print or send only to outputs you're usimg for foldback/monitoring. A fully functional digital mixer in itself. So if you ever need a high quality small stage or portable mixer in a single rack unit, a UFX plus the iOs version of Totalmix is very usable.

Complaints? Only two. The mic pres double up as instrument inputs, and the unbalanced jack instrument level input impedence is 470Ohms, which is maybe bit low for a guitar really, especially using a long lead. Though tube screamers are the same impedence and no-one complains they suck out treble.

My second complaint is the price, but it has to be said the engineering, design, build quality and components are excellent.

Oh, and RME stuff does have look a very German industrial design look to it. Functional rather than stylish.

Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board,
ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre.
Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
#9
Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2819
  • Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
  • Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/06/29 11:09:48 (permalink)
OK. Research progressing - looks like this I going to get expensive ;-)
 
RME UFX would be perfect match for simply exchanging the VS-700 / OctaCapture while holding on to the ADAT interface.
 
Yet, I have started to read up on what MOTU offers on the new AVB series and their scalability via CAT5 cables appears really impressive, but so far I have only found roundtrip latency via Thunderbolt and via USB2. I'd appreciate if anyone could post figures (ideally from use with Sonar) ... and I wonder whether this new series is currently more optimized for OS than win10 (i.e. can the stability compare to RME)?

GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER
  +++   Visit the Rehab   +++
 
DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600
Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture)   Control-Surface: VS-700C 
VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really) 
#10
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5694
  • Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
  • Location: Richmond Virginia USA
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/06/29 12:25:06 (permalink)
Rob[atSound-Rehab]
I assume Direct USB Recording and TotalMix have full access and control also over ADAT in/out for the monitor mix?


Yes, you can apply effects to and record with DigiCheck or to USB everything that comes in the SPIDF or ADAT inputs. SPIDF is on the UCX. You can mix it all together and use parallel compression if you use the loopback feature creatively.

Using the ADAT and syncing to my Tascam 2488, I get up to 24 concurrent tracks.

I still wish I had purchased the UFX though.
post edited by gswitz - 2016/06/29 12:47:47

StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen.
I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
#11
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5694
  • Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
  • Location: Richmond Virginia USA
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/07/05 11:18:37 (permalink)
It is true that in 1u I can record eight channels with the UCX and the quad Mic pre. With the UFX alone you can only record 4 channels with only 1u. Of course the UFX scales up fast.

StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen.
I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
#12
fireberd
Max Output Level: -38 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3704
  • Joined: 2008/02/25 14:14:28
  • Location: Inverness, FL
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/07/05 13:32:40 (permalink)
I went from an Octa-Capture to a MOTU 896mk3 Hybrid (as much as my wallet could stand).
 
Better all around after I had tutoring on their Que Mix.
I always used a mic preamp with the Octa-Capture but find for most vocal the mic preamp is not needed.

"GCSG Productions"
Franklin D-10 Pedal Steel Guitar (primary instrument). Nashville Telecaster, Bass, etc. 
ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero M/B, i7 6700K CPU, 16GB Ram, SSD and conventional hard drives, Win 10 Pro and Win 10 Pro Insider Pre-Release
Sonar Platinum/CbB. MOTU 896MK3 Hybrid, Tranzport, X-Touch, JBL LSR308 Monitors,  
Ozone 5,  Studio One 4.1
ISRC Registered
Member of Nashville based R.O.P.E. Assn.
#13
fret_man
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 312
  • Joined: 2009/05/14 23:57:37
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/07/05 13:37:49 (permalink)
From the RME forum: the USB interface of the UFX is limited to about 10 MByte/s throughput. Therefore recording in Double Speed is limited to 34 channels, in Quad Speed to 16 channels.
 
I assume this means you can record all 60 channels in Single Speed.
 
And this is with a single 1u unit.
#14
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5694
  • Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
  • Location: Richmond Virginia USA
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/07/05 14:02:25 (permalink)
Yeah, but you need converters for all but twelve and preamps for all but four.

You get sixteen in on ADAT fiber.

Four analog in on the front with pres.

Eight analog in for quarter inch inputs on the back... no pres.

The last two are aes digital input.

So practically, to record 28 inputs, you probably will need 2u for preamps and converters to the ADAT inputs. 1u for another 8 preamps to the eight UFX analog inputs. So, you are at 4u counting the UFX.

When mixing live, I would probably copy the live mix to the AES channels and set them to loopback so I could record the live mix for reference later.
post edited by gswitz - 2016/07/05 14:25:20

StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen.
I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
#15
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5694
  • Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
  • Location: Richmond Virginia USA
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/07/05 14:11:32 (permalink)
Using my RME UCX, quad Mic pre and Audient ASP 880, I get to sixteen channels in 2u. I get to 24 channels by bringing my Tascam which is big and cumbersome. I sync using the SPIDF.

This leaves me no ability to scale up without buying another RME interface. The interfaces can be used together to scale. I believe the limit of interfaces is three on one computer, but this would push the IO capacity of most computers. I believe it may be possible to write the data from each interface to a different drive using RME DigiCheck, but I haven't done it.
post edited by gswitz - 2016/07/05 14:32:35

StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen.
I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
#16
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5694
  • Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
  • Location: Richmond Virginia USA
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/07/05 14:18:52 (permalink)
Also, at double speed, the ADAT work together so you get half the channels... sixteen becomes eight. At quad, sixteen becomes four. So at quad speed the UFX only handles eighteen channels.

The analog channels are not reduced by going to double or quad speeds.
post edited by gswitz - 2016/07/05 15:21:53

StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen.
I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
#17
rumleymusic
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1533
  • Joined: 2006/08/23 18:03:05
  • Location: California
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/07/05 22:34:32 (permalink)
Also, at double speed, the ADAT work together so you get half the channels... sixteen becomes eight. At quad, sixteen becomes four.

 
That's just the way ADAT works whether you buy a $90 interface or a $9000 one, you loose digital channels with ADAT and MADI at higher sample rates.  The new UFX+ does have MADI capability which should allow for quite a bit of expansion later on, for a steep price of course.  
 
With two ADAT inputs, you can use all the channels of an 8 Channel digital preamp at 96kHz. I rarely record more than 10-12 channels at once even with a full orchestral recording.  
 
And personally, I never record at 4x speeds, waste of space with no sonic benefit IMHO.  

Daniel Rumley
Rumley Music and Audio Production
www.rumleymusic.com
#18
musicroom
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2421
  • Joined: 2004/04/26 22:31:02
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2016/07/07 21:43:49 (permalink)
The positive gushing we read about around RME interfaces turned out to be true for me. Low latency, dependable and the surprising thing to me - the sound was much better than any other interface I used to own. Absolutely no buyers remorse, just satisfaction.

 
Dave
Songs
___________________________________
Desktop: Platinum / RME Multiface II / Purrfect Audio DAW  I7-3770 / 16 GB RAM / Win 10 Pro / Remote Laptop i7 6500U / 12GB RAM /  RME Babyface



 
 
#19
stephenri
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6
  • Joined: 2015/06/28 12:14:43
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2017/12/06 16:00:21 (permalink)
Rme
#20
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10037
  • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
  • Location: SL,UT
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2017/12/06 16:53:57 (permalink)
the focusrite preamps definitely do not match the pristine quality of the preamps in the babyface pro i have....
 
i've ab'd them live, and in mixdown..
 
that said, the focusrite sounds good enough as to not matter.
 
but there isn't much of an equivalent to the RME stuff,
and i cannot attest to the focusrite AD/DA conversion, but the RME is perfect.
also, cannot attest to the  focusrite drivers, but the RME has been extremely reliable.
 
have not worked with any of the MOTU stuff,
but that had been second choice to me when i was shopping.
 
 

Bats Brew music Streaming
Bats Brew albums:
"Trouble"
"Stay"
"The Time is Magic"
--
Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
 
#21
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5694
  • Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
  • Location: Richmond Virginia USA
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2017/12/06 18:22:02 (permalink)
FocusRite liquid pres are awesome.

StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen.
I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
#22
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8424
  • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2017/12/06 19:46:59 (permalink)
Old thread alert Observe low post count of #20. 

Johnny V  
Cakelab  
Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
 http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
 
 
#23
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10037
  • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
  • Location: SL,UT
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2017/12/06 22:50:07 (permalink)
guess it's more relevant now, than it was then.

Bats Brew music Streaming
Bats Brew albums:
"Trouble"
"Stay"
"The Time is Magic"
--
Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
 
#24
Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2819
  • Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
  • Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
  • Status: offline
Re: RME vs competitive alternatives 2017/12/07 19:12:34 (permalink)
Yes old threat alert. I asked the original question long time ago.
Meanwhile using several MOTU AVB devices networked over LAN. Something I could not do with RME ... had some hickups initially. But meanwhile really happy with setup

GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER
  +++   Visit the Rehab   +++
 
DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600
Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture)   Control-Surface: VS-700C 
VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really) 
#25
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1