ORIGINAL: yep

slightly OT:
Does anyone know offhand what is the maximum theoretical number of posts a thread on the internet can contain before questions of character are introduced?
Cheers.

i defer to the TootsieRoll Owl: 3. .. particularly when other tools are discussed.

jeff

heh.

reaper reaper reaper reaaaaper!!!!

heh

Personally I'm looking forward to seeing how much like sonar cubase 4 is ;)

Kind regards

Dave Rich

ORIGINAL: Jason Brian Merrill

ORIGINAL: Jason Brian Merrill

hehe.

very interesting the thoughts presented here.

I signed up just to respond.

Yes. It is a threat to a certain demographic of Sonar, those who wish to do audio quickly and efficiently. having used Sonar, I say this isnt the case with it. (just my opinion, no need to flame)

Yes, it has several updates. 35 in the past month or so.

why?

because the dev listens to the users. most of those updates contain feature requests. not just bug fixes.

The midi features are ever-expanding, and post 1.0 expect to see alot of improvement. I think many here are likely ignorant of the full feature set this program provides. Perhaps you would like to stay this way, lest destroy your happy little worlds ;)

i suggest if you want more information,

visit this thread

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=138133&highlight=

or visit the REAPER forum

http://www.cockos.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=19

seee ^^^^^^^^^^^^^6

immediately i suggested moving to the reaper forum, or a thread in kvr regarding it.

seee ^^^^^^^^^^^^^6

immediately i suggested moving to the reaper forum, or a thread in kvr regarding it.

Sounds like a good plan.

ORIGINAL: kstevege

Mod Bod

Whats with the cheesy Hard Rock Cafe T-Shirt?

Yeah, I'm a bit upset with this too. He use to have a picture of himself wearing a Sonar T-shirt for his avatar, which was a lot more appropriate for posts in this forum. Now with the hard rock cafe shirt, I find this offensive since it is off topic and not appropriate and shows a total disrespect/disregard for his loyalty to Cakewalk who host this forum. I therefore have the opinion that ALL of Mod Bod's posts need to be moved to the off topic forum, since they are no longer appropriate for this forum. I'm going to click on the report abuse button and bring this matter to Cakewalks attention and let them deal with him.

ORIGINAL: kylen

I say keep the thread open, besides it ain't Cakes' style to be too heavy handed in matters like these.

If you want some distraction from this (and you just can't keep from peeking in here) then somebody open a "can I sell Sonar" thread and we can all scamper over there and play air guitar for a while...or mix some music whichever comes first!

A Sonar vs. Protools thread always seems to bring the crowd running too.

ORIGINAL: ...wicked

No, I'm standing my ground here. Sorry Red, I think you're wrong. Specifically because what's the issue here is not my "self righteousness" at asking this thread be killed. After all, I did ASK.

I think history will show that it was a REAPER user who first asked this thread be locked

Sorry, yes: I asked that the thread be locked

Then some winkie heads kept yakking nonsense so I had to respond. I dont see a problem with that

ORIGINAL: Soundweaver

I'm with ModBod on this one as well. This is tacky at best. If you want to inform about a new product with good intentions at heart, you'll move on w/out problem. True intentions come to light when things get a bit heated and people don't do what they say they are going to do like:
(to mr. moon's suggestion you all take it somewhere else)

pipelineaudio: yes, more than fair

in fact if he deleted the thread, I dont think anyone would cry foul

Then, next page you're still commenting and replying! (IMHO showing your true intentions):

How many more years till sonar gets mousewheel zoom?

Then maybe it can play in the same leagues as reaper

If we want to talk like silly nilly's anyhow

So what's it going to be?...are you going to do the right thing and do what you thought was good idea and let Reaper pay for the Reaper forum for feature request lists? Sounds like a good idea to me. You are tarnishing what could have been a good, open software discussion and ultimately a good taste in other people's mouths. Letting people in on a new product is not a crime. We do that all the time here. But, agreeing that it's a good idea to take it back to the product's native forum and then making an inflamatory statement screams that you have a different agenda.

Please do the right thing...
Eric

ORIGINAL: kb420

ORIGINAL: Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk]

ORIGINAL: kb420

I find it very interesting which threads Cakewalk staff choose to comment on.


Very interesting indeed!!!!

I'm not sure what the implication here is...

Let me clarify.

There have been innumerable threads on this forum and the P5 forum about Sonar and P5's quantization issues. A quick search of the word "quantize" will yield plenty of results. I believe that the frequency of the topic over numerous threads should have warrented a response from Cakewalk. This thread is the FIRST one that I have seen discussing Reaper, but there have been RESPONSES FROM TWO CAKEWALK PERSONNEL!

Let's take a deeper look at this. Reaper isn't a Cakewalk product at all. Some here feel that it shows promise, others don't. It's a reletively new product. Why would that gain the attention of Cakewalk personnel, but a function request that has resurfaced time and time again not?

Certainly the topic has been discussed enough to warrant some type of response. I can't see why or how Reaper caught your eye, but recording quantization didn't!?!?!?!?

Even a negative response would denote that our concerns had been acknowledged!!!!!!

Interesting!

Very interesting indeed!!!!!!

You are assuming quantization request threads, etc never get anyone's attention and that assumption would just be plain wrong. Personally I only catch up with the forum from time to time and I post on pretty random threads, depending on what kind of time I have to dedicate to the forum. Often it is to help out or correct and/or clarify (mis)information. What you see as "very interesting" I see as merely coincidence, or perhaps circumstance. I guess it would be better if I never posted at all?