DarrenH
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 64
- Joined: 2008/04/09 07:14:25
- Status: offline
Recommendations for USB Mixer?
Hi all I'm going to be using Sonar 7 and/or cubase for recording mostly keyboards, but occasionally vocals. I'm totally blind so won't be able to make use of the virtual mixer, so I need a hardware version, preferably one that'll sit on the desktop. Price really isn't an issue as I can claim it back through a governemtn scheme for blindpeople. So, something reasonably sized, USB connected with an onboard dedicated sound card would be great. Over to you guys. Cheers Darren
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
RE: Recommendations for USB Mixer?
2008/04/18 10:22:15
(permalink)
|
HumbleNoise
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2004/01/04 12:53:50
- Status: offline
RE: Recommendations for USB Mixer?
2008/04/18 11:13:47
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: ohhey There are lots of new ones out.. if it were me I would go with the Allen & Heath ZED-14. However, if you need to record a lot of channels at once like for a full band the Mackie Onyx series are worth a look. However, they are firewire, not USB. http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Allen-Heath-ZED14-USB-Mixing-Console?sku=630271&src=3WFRWXX&ZYXSEM=0&CAWELAID=81282141 Wow that's pretty impressive for the price. Frank, I had a question about that mixer. I currently have a Yamaha MG12/4 and it has an alt bus called group 1-2 in Yamaha speak that I use to route signal to the MAudio 2496 sound card inputs. I don't see the physical alt bus on the Allen and Heath but does their USB function serve the same purpose? "USB audio flexibility Getting audio to and from a computer easily is now a common requirement for live sound and music production. The way we have implemented this on ZED is super-flexible and super-easy! No longer do you need to fiddle around the back of your PC to get to the soundcard inputs, only to find that the levels are all wrong and noisy. Just plug in a USB lead to your ZED, select the USB routing on the mixer and the device on your computer and that's it! Quality audio to and from your PC or Mac. Three switches provide different send/return configurations for recording, playback and utilizing external FX." So are they using USB to get to the sound card inputs? I thought USB wasn't the greatest way to do this. I see it has inserts which was a great feature of the MG12/4. One final question. Would the ZED-14 be an appreciable upgrade from the Yam MG 12/4? Thanks for your help. PS I will only record 2 live mikes at once into my 2496 panned hard right and left in mono.
Humbly Yours Larry Sonar X2 x64 MAudio 2496 Yamaha MG 12/4 Roland XV-88 Intel MB with Q6600 and 4 GB Ram NVidia 9800 GTX Windows 7 x64 Home Premium
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
RE: Recommendations for USB Mixer?
2008/04/18 11:28:42
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: HumbleNoise ORIGINAL: ohhey There are lots of new ones out.. if it were me I would go with the Allen & Heath ZED-14. However, if you need to record a lot of channels at once like for a full band the Mackie Onyx series are worth a look. However, they are firewire, not USB. http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Allen-Heath-ZED14-USB-Mixing-Console?sku=630271&src=3WFRWXX&ZYXSEM=0&CAWELAID=81282141 Wow that's pretty impressive for the price. Frank, I had a question about that mixer. I currently have a Yamaha MG12/4 and it has an alt bus called group 1-2 in Yamaha speak that I use to route signal to the MAudio 2496 sound card inputs. I don't see the physical alt bus on the Allen and Heath but does their USB function serve the same purpose? "USB audio flexibility Getting audio to and from a computer easily is now a common requirement for live sound and music production. The way we have implemented this on ZED is super-flexible and super-easy! No longer do you need to fiddle around the back of your PC to get to the soundcard inputs, only to find that the levels are all wrong and noisy. Just plug in a USB lead to your ZED, select the USB routing on the mixer and the device on your computer and that's it! Quality audio to and from your PC or Mac. Three switches provide different send/return configurations for recording, playback and utilizing external FX." So are they using USB to get to the sound card inputs? I thought USB wasn't the greatest way to do this. I see it has inserts which was a great feature of the MG12/4. One final question. Would the ZED-14 be an appreciable upgrade from the Yam MG 12/4? Thanks for your help. PS I will only record 2 live mikes at once into my 2496 panned hard right and left in mono. Yes, the ZED has a built in sound card so you don't have to use the 2496 inputs. You would select the ZED as your sound card in Sonar. The problem with USB in the past has been that it does use more CPU power then Firewire or PCI. However, computers are a lot faster now so for many folks it's no longer an issue. The ZED is new and I have no reports of how well it works... I think you would be the first. So if you get one please post back and let everyone know how it goes. I know A&H is a very high quality brand and I would say it will be as good or better then the Yamaha. In fact I would be shocked if the preamps are not better then the ones in the Yamaha, they should be. One nice advantage over your Yamaha/M-Audio setup is that you don't need the unbalanced audio connections so you should get a LOT less noise in your recorded signal. I used to have a 2496 and I could never get rid of all the low level noise. Using cables with extra shielding like the ones they sell for high end car stereo setups helps but it was never all quiet. I think with having the sound card built inside the mixer and only having a digital connection to the computer will get rid of any noise.
post edited by ohhey - 2008/04/18 11:33:08
|
HumbleNoise
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2004/01/04 12:53:50
- Status: offline
RE: Recommendations for USB Mixer?
2008/04/18 11:38:35
(permalink)
Built in sound card? That's a first for me. I wonder if their AD/DA would be a noticeable upgrade from the 2496? Would I remove the 2496? Or use it for other basic audio needs? There's always a question of drivers. Hate to be the first to try it but it looks so new it's unlikely there's any reviews out. I'll check when I get time. Thanks for the information.
Humbly Yours Larry Sonar X2 x64 MAudio 2496 Yamaha MG 12/4 Roland XV-88 Intel MB with Q6600 and 4 GB Ram NVidia 9800 GTX Windows 7 x64 Home Premium
|
mgh
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 8594
- Joined: 2007/05/10 05:15:56
- Location: betwixt and between
- Status: offline
RE: Recommendations for USB Mixer?
2008/04/18 11:43:05
(permalink)
hey darren it might be a bit overkill for what you need, but the edirol m 16dx looks like a very good product, and being by Roland, you know it should work well with sonar - in fact i think it comes with sonar LE which means a cheaper upgrade to Sonar 7! here's the soundonsound review of it - http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jul07/articles/edirolm16dx.htm
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
RE: Recommendations for USB Mixer?
2008/04/18 11:57:29
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: HumbleNoise Built in sound card? That's a first for me. I wonder if their AD/DA would be a noticeable upgrade from the 2496? Would I remove the 2496? Or use it for other basic audio needs? There's always a question of drivers. Hate to be the first to try it but it looks so new it's unlikely there's any reviews out. I'll check when I get time. Thanks for the information. Yes ! that's exactly what all the computer connected mixers are. They just have a sound card built in, that's all it is. Or you can think of them as a USB audio interface with a LOT of extra featues on the box LOL !  . Most of them just have a stereo sound card in there and you pick what signals you want to show up at the inputs, and then select that input in your software. It a neat idea because you get rid of all the extra cables and stuff. Mackie took this a step further and put a slot in the mixer so the sound card is an add-on option. They also made it a 16in / 2 out interface so you can record a bunch of channels at once. However, it's only available in firewire right now. So you would need a firewire card for your computer also. As for the AD/DA quality that is to be seen. You would have to run a test and see what you think. However, I think all the major brands are using good converters now, they are not going to do "soundblaster" quality inside a pro mixer. You do need to check the specs so make sure it will do the sample rate you use. Some of the built in cards inside the mixers might be limited to 44.1 and 48k. If you like using 96k or have projects already recorded at that rate then those won't work. It might be a trade off where you get a little less quality on the AD but lower noise. As long as it sounded OK I'd take lower noise. I don't think you would hear a huge difference between the 2496 and the ZED. Now, if you were going from a Lynx Two card to the ZED you might but lose some quality but the 2496 is not exactly a high end card. If converter quality is a big deal to you then a USB or Firewire mixer is not for you. Get a Lynx card and a analog mixer (or preamps). What I did was spend all the money on the Lynx Two and then got a cheap SoundCraft Compact 4 to go with it. The Lynx has balanced I/O as does the SoundCraft so I got rid of all the noise, got a decent (quiet) mixer for cheap, and if I want to upgrade the mixer later or use external preamps I don't have to replace my sound card. However, I do have at least 4 wires to deal with between the Lynx and the mixer. There are no mixers that have a $1000 sound card inside so it is a bit of a trade off.
|
HumbleNoise
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2004/01/04 12:53:50
- Status: offline
RE: Recommendations for USB Mixer?
2008/04/18 12:07:12
(permalink)
That's great food for thought Frank. I'm thinking that my recording needs are very small at this point and I don't see that need expanding so perhaps saving for a better sound card may be a better long term investment.
Humbly Yours Larry Sonar X2 x64 MAudio 2496 Yamaha MG 12/4 Roland XV-88 Intel MB with Q6600 and 4 GB Ram NVidia 9800 GTX Windows 7 x64 Home Premium
|
terrylittledad
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 194
- Joined: 2004/02/19 09:46:47
- Location: Glendale, Arizona
- Status: offline
RE: Recommendations for USB Mixer?
2010/03/24 16:43:18
(permalink)
I just bought a ZED-14. I'll use it for live sound at our church and it is great; nice and quiet. At home is a different thing. I tried connecting the usb to my pc (2.8 ghz 4 gig of ram running Sonar 6 with a Delta 1010 LT card) and it did not recognize it. So I downloaded some drivers and finally got Sonar to set it as its soundcard. I could not get anything to record. It would start recording and then drop out. And the ZED did not out any sound from Sonar either. So I tried using the 'inserts' on channels 1-6 as direct outputs. I can get th 6 channels into Sonar simultaneously but there is a high whine as tho I need a ground lift switch (ZED does not have one). I had wanted to send Aux 1 & 2 from Zed to pc using the USB and then the main xlr from Zed to channels 1 & 2 on the Delta 1010 (also xlr). Sonar wouldn't let me use both. I love the mixer by itself but I'm pretty disappointed with the pc set up. Looks like I'm not going to be able to record until I get rid of that whine. peace, Terry
Sonar 6.0 Studio; 2.66 P4;1024 DDRAM; Delta 1010LT, and a mouse to click in the notes. TnT for Christ
|
NoKey
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 974
- Joined: 2008/10/28 15:30:19
- Status: offline
RE: Recommendations for USB Mixer?
2010/03/24 22:30:46
(permalink)
On USB mixers, don't expect that each physical thing plugged into its sockets ends up as a separate audio channel in Sonar. Some only put into the pc the same two L and R channels via the USB. No different than if they were analog mixers. Audio interfaces, can be that way too, but most are not. Audio interfaces are way up for those purposes. And, also, their latency would be another thing to check, so for use in live play with softsynths needs to be prudentially considered and verified. I believe they are basically like a USB microphone, except they are stereo, and if they have a soundcard, that's for playing back whats's already recorded. In other words, true DUPLEX capability needs to be checked to see if it's there, and functional as expected. If they come with proprietary ASIO-2 drivers, thtat'd be a good sign.
|
Tap
Max Output Level: -30 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4536
- Joined: 2008/10/09 11:55:30
- Location: Newburyport, MA
- Status: offline
RE: Recommendations for USB Mixer?
2010/03/25 12:31:03
(permalink)
ZED-14 Review Interesting .... According to the Review at MF, As an extra bonus for PC users, Allen & Heath has bundled Cakewalks SONAR LE audio and MIDI application, so you can turn the ZED-14 into a PC-based digital audio workstation. Given the amazing variety of audio processing features found in most of the popular music applications on the market, the ZED-14’s USB audio effects connection is like buying a new car, and finding it comes with a free yacht. Terry, It sounds like your Free Yacht sank ????
MC4 - M-Audio FW410 / Behringer UCA202 - Fender Strat / Jazzmaster / DuoSonic / Washburn / Peavy Foundation M-Audio Radium 49 Roland Juno 106 / JazzChorus / Seymore Duncan Convertible - HP A1230N ( AMD Athalon 3800+ 2G Ram + 200G HD ) http://soundclick.com/cut2thechaise
|
terrylittledad
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 194
- Joined: 2004/02/19 09:46:47
- Location: Glendale, Arizona
- Status: offline
RE: Recommendations for USB Mixer?
2010/03/25 15:10:04
(permalink)
Sonar 6.0 Studio; 2.66 P4;1024 DDRAM; Delta 1010LT, and a mouse to click in the notes. TnT for Christ
|