Helpful ReplyRecord compression on a track?

Author
grizwalter
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 102
  • Joined: 2013/11/21 13:41:09
  • Location: Golden, Colorado
  • Status: offline
2013/12/11 13:13:22 (permalink)

Record compression on a track?

I understand the signal flow for SONAR X3 fine, but it strikes me that the fader, gain control and effects bin are not in the line to the actual recorded track. How would one record with compression? I know it is a dumb, and probably easily answered question, but I am from the old skool (read: 20 years ago) world of recording, and things were a little different then, beginning with the fact that generally we'd bring mics into many channels to go to other tracks sometimes, using effects, faders and all on the initial channel to affect the input. I'm assuming there is a way to do that in a DAW that is basically the same, but figured rather than search the world and web for a day, I'd ask those in the know here.
 
#1
brundlefly
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14250
  • Joined: 2007/09/14 14:57:59
  • Location: Manitou Spgs, Colorado
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 13:28:01 (permalink)
In DAWland, FX can only be applied after A/D conversion. Theoretically, you could apply FX to the digital audio stream before writing it to file (and I gather some DAWs do allow "printing" FX like this, but since the great advantage of working in digital is non-destructive processing/editing, there's little value in that. Input Gain is a little oddball in that it is only applied to previously recorded clips, and not live input whereas FX are applied to both. I'm not sure why that is.

SONAR Platinum x64, 2x MOTU 2408/PCIe-424  (24-bit, 48kHz)
Win10, I7-6700K @ 4.0GHz, 24GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 32GB SSD Cache, GeForce GTX 750Ti, 2x 24" 16:10 IPS Monitors
#2
grizwalter
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 102
  • Joined: 2013/11/21 13:41:09
  • Location: Golden, Colorado
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 14:13:10 (permalink)
Thanks for the response brundlefly (great name, btw!).
 
I realize, and as you note, that enough editing/comping is possible so that effects and such are not necessary as often, especially with unlimited tracks, melodyne, take lanes, etc. However, one thing I can't get past wanting to use is light compression on vocals and acoustic guitars going into the channel. I realize I can just keep the level down to give myself a safety net, but, at least in the old days when I used 32 tracks of digital audio tape in my studio, there was still a relevance to "tape saturation," as it were. Is that no longer the case? Seems my mind can't quite get past the idea that I still want a strong signal level for recording so there is more information accurately captured. Might just be that old guy cap thinking though.
 
Also, I wondered, is there no way to send something through a plug-in compressor on another channel and then back for recording on the input track? If possible, that would certainly be a work-around if I insisted on keeping old habits! lol
#3
Jay Tee 4303
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 246
  • Joined: 2013/01/08 08:42:11
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 14:30:42 (permalink)
Coming in, you couldraise a standalone instance of a plug such as T-Racks, Ozone,or, I believe Amplitube, and set the DAW to record the output of the plug as opposed to the instrument input.

Depending on you specs, you may notice latency/timing issues you'll need to correct.

Given unlimited tracks, I like to record both processed andun, but you're almost certainly going to see phase and comb filtering issues mixing processed and unprocessed tracks.

IBM PC/XT
1 MB RAM
8087 Math Co-Processor
5 Megabyte Seagate Hard Drive
Twelvetone Cakewalk Version 2.0
#4
dubdisciple
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5849
  • Joined: 2008/01/29 00:31:46
  • Location: Seattle, Wa
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 14:36:32 (permalink)
I'm not sure if what you ask is impossible because it never occurred to me to try it. I can't think of an advantage these days in recording any process live.  As brundlefly pointed out,  seems like it would tax your CPU and defeat the advantages of working in digital. In the analog days it was important to record a very hot signal to maximize signal to noise ratio.  In the digital world, as long as you have a decent level, clean signal, it is best to avoid pushing the levels too hot. Of course now that you have mentioned it, i have to try. :)
#5
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 14:44:07 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby dubdisciple 2013/12/11 14:45:45
Digital tape can't have tape saturation unless the recorder is badly broken. Keep in mind that anything over 0 dB will clip, meaning it will go no higher. For your needs I would recommend a hardware compressor that is placed before the A to D conversion. 
 
 

Best
John
#6
dubdisciple
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5849
  • Joined: 2008/01/29 00:31:46
  • Location: Seattle, Wa
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 14:47:15 (permalink)
John
Digital tape can't have tape saturation unless the recorder is badly broken. Keep in mind that anything over 0 dB will clip, meaning it will go no higher. For your needs I would recommend a hardware compressor that is placed before the A to D conversion. 
 
 




 
I do have occasions when  i need to use a compressor when recording like live event video where I have people of varying, unpredictable sound levels.  For that i use hardware.
#7
grizwalter
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 102
  • Joined: 2013/11/21 13:41:09
  • Location: Golden, Colorado
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 15:05:04 (permalink)
John
Digital tape can't have tape saturation unless the recorder is badly broken. Keep in mind that anything over 0 dB will clip, meaning it will go no higher. For your needs I would recommend a hardware compressor that is placed before the A to D conversion. 



 
I used the term "Tape Saturation" only as a description. More accurately, in the days of digital tape, a hotter signal meant a more accurate "read" of the data. So you would still want to aim above a certain level threshold going onto tape. And obviously, in a situation with a difficult noise floor situation it could also be important, depending, obviously, on what one was recording.
 
Jay Tee 4303
Coming in, you couldraise a standalone instance of a plug such as T-Racks, Ozone,or, I believe Amplitube, and set the DAW to record the output of the plug as opposed to the instrument input.

Depending on you specs, you may notice latency/timing issues you'll need to correct.

Given unlimited tracks, I like to record both processed andun, but you're almost certainly going to see phase and comb filtering issues mixing processed and unprocessed tracks.


By Joe I think he's on to something here! That might be worth a try, if for no other reason than to know I could do it if I had to!
 
Oh, and btw, one of the major reasons I would like to be able to do this is that I am working on voice over stuff myself, and when I'm recording I don't want to worry about levels at all once I've set them. Currently I have to record with plenty and plenty of extra room on top, so a compressor, or even a soft limiter, would help nicely.
 
#8
Lynn
Max Output Level: -14 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6117
  • Joined: 2003/11/12 18:36:16
  • Location: Kansas City, MO
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 15:59:16 (permalink)
John
Digital tape can't have tape saturation unless the recorder is badly broken. Keep in mind that anything over 0 dB will clip, meaning it will go no higher. For your needs I would recommend a hardware compressor that is placed before the A to D conversion. 
 
 


  I agree with John on this.  Even now, in the digital age, there are plenty of engineers that put a hardware compressor in front of their converter.  Not only for safety reasons, but because a good pre-amp or compressor can thicken a sound and make it sound better going into the computer.  It's perfectly valid as long as one doesn't overdo it.  If you have the hardware, I would recommend experimenting until you're satisfied with the results.  Many of the classic recordings of the past sound so good today because engineers sometimes had to make hard DECISIONS, whereas today, so many want to play it safe and fix it in the mix.  The end result of this being homogeneous recordings that have a certain sameness to them.  There are exceptions, of course.

All the best,
Lynn

my songs
www.soundclick.com/lynnwilson

www.youtube.com/lywilson
my videos

Cakewalk by Bandlab| Sonar Platinum @ 64bits| i7 860 | 8 gigs ram | W10 @ 64 bits | RME FF 400
#9
Sanderxpander
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3873
  • Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 16:13:25 (permalink)
As was already stated, there is really no point to applying a software compressor to an audio stream before writing it to disk. The only thing you could possibly achieve is degrading the audio signal permanently. The point of doing compression before recording in the old days was indeed to keep the
level higher without clipping the tape. Not only do today's 24 bit converters generally have plenty of headroom and a super low noise floor so that you can record at almost any level, but applying a software compressor to the signal will always, by definition, happen AFTER A/D conversion (when the only place where it MIGHT have made sense is BEFORE). You will literally achieve the exact same effect/sound by applying the compression after recording/file writing, with the exception that you'll be able to change your mind later and switch it off, or alter parameters.

In other words, if you really need to compress before recording because your signal is super unstable (and you're afraid your A/D converters don't have enough dynamic range, which would be relatively rare) the only way is still to use an analog (hardware) compressor.
#10
grizwalter
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 102
  • Joined: 2013/11/21 13:41:09
  • Location: Golden, Colorado
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 16:25:07 (permalink)
Thanks for all the input folks. It definitely isn't a need, since apparently Digital Audio is good enough now that keeping the recording level lower no longer has a negative impact.
 
I agree, based on that, when compression is necessary (just by virtue of time constraints and wanting to keep it moving forward without doing retakes due to clipping) I'll go the external compressor route.
 
Thanks again all!
#11
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 16:49:14 (permalink)
When you're recording, assuming you're working with 24 bit  just make sure your meters stay around -9dB to -12dB and you'll be golden come mixdown.

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#12
Sidroe
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1954
  • Joined: 2010/11/10 18:59:43
  • Location: Macon,Georgia
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 17:12:09 (permalink)
Before I started using the Roland Studio Captures, I always had a dbx compressor inserted into the channel on my mixer to catch those peaks before they even went in to Sonar. With the Studio Captures, 12 of the channels have compressors built in the interface. I no longer even use the mixer! This sounds like a commercial for Roland! YIKES!

Sonar Platinum, Sonar X3e, Sonar X2a , Sonar X1 Expanded and 8.5.3 (32 and 64 bit), Windows 10 on a Toshiba P75-A7200 Laptop with i7 @ 2.4 quad and 8 gigs of RAM and secondary WD 1 Tb drive, Windows 10 desktop, Asus i5 @ 3.2 quad, 12 gigs RAM, 1 Tb drive, 1 500 gig drive, MOTU 24io, 2 Roland Studio Captures, Saffire 6 USB for laptop, Soundtracs Topaz Project 8 mixer, Alesis Monitor 2s, Event BAS 20/20s, Roland Micro-Monitor BA-8s, and 45 years worth of collecting FX, Mics, Amps, Guitars, and Keyboards!
#13
Sanderxpander
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3873
  • Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 17:21:04 (permalink)
I would still suggest, if you're frequently noticing the compressors kicking in, to turn down the input gain.
#14
Garry Stubbs
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2619
  • Joined: 2008/02/18 17:34:48
  • Location: Castlethorpe, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 18:12:17 (permalink)
As someone said in the thread above, you can go through a preamp, connected to an external compressor (I use an ART PRO MPA II Reference series 2 channel preamp and an ART PRO VLA II 2-channel compressor) before going D/A via line level into your audio interface to the DAW.
 
Certainly some very mild compression, on some lead vocal, backing vocals, guitar and bass guitar can produce a great digital track to still be able to do a lot of things with if needs be for engineering or artistic reasons ITB (in the box) You also get a predictable character and tone which can differentiate your studio sound too if you are prepared to tweak and listen enough. A little is a good thing, and if you overdo it, you are stuck with what you have got unless you retrack. YMMV
 
Garry Kiosk


https://soundcloud.com/garry-kiosk
Sonar Platinum 64-bit: Q6600 8Gb Win7 64-bit: KRK Monitors: ART MPA PRO VLA ii preamp: 3 x 500Gb internal SATA disks: Superior Drummer2: GPO4: Realstrat: Saxlab: Rapture: Dimension Pro: Ozone 4: Edirol SPS-660: PCR-500 MIDI controller: Korg PadKontrol: Fender / Gibson / Yamaha / Ibanez guitars:Guitar Rig 5: Dual 22" Monitors: Mapex Drums, Sabian AAX cymbals: Alesis DM5 Pro Kit: SE Electronics and Shure Mics: Mathmos Lava Lamp (40W)
#15
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 18:28:31 (permalink)
If 20+ years makes you "old skool", then what does that make me? Prehistoric School? Yikes.
 
So speaking as someone who's also from an old school, I gotta say that the ability to NOT commit effects when recording is the greatest advancement in recording since, well, digital recording itself. Once upon a time we printed effects out of necessity, but now have no reason to do so because we've got unlimited devices and oodles of headroom.
 
If you're worried about clipping while recording, that's going to happen in your audio interface and must be dealt with on the analog side of things. A compressor/limiter plugin won't see the signal until it's too late to mitigate problems. What you need is an outboard hardware compressor in front of the interface. Many interfaces have them built-in, but if yours doesn't there are plenty of inexpensive compressors or mic pres with compression.
 
If you can't afford an outboard compressor, or want to keep your setup simple and compact, you can always use the really-old-school method of closely watching recording levels. In the digital world, we've got so much headroom to play with it's no longer necessary to record as hot as possible. Set your analog levels low enough that there's no danger of clipping and do a test recording. If your peaks are between -30dB and -12dB, you're good to go.


All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#16
Sidroe
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1954
  • Joined: 2010/11/10 18:59:43
  • Location: Macon,Georgia
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/11 19:18:20 (permalink)
I agree with bit to a certain extent. You will probably find that a hardware compressor or one built into the interface makes your job a lot easier. Even if you make sure your level is low enough not to clip without a compressor, an inexperienced singer who shoves the mic down his throat one minute and stands 3 feet away from the mic the next is enough to put you over the edge sometimes. A more experienced singer will be less the problem. 
And as he mentioned, always remember that -12 to -15 is really the equivalent of hitting zero on an analog desk.

Sonar Platinum, Sonar X3e, Sonar X2a , Sonar X1 Expanded and 8.5.3 (32 and 64 bit), Windows 10 on a Toshiba P75-A7200 Laptop with i7 @ 2.4 quad and 8 gigs of RAM and secondary WD 1 Tb drive, Windows 10 desktop, Asus i5 @ 3.2 quad, 12 gigs RAM, 1 Tb drive, 1 500 gig drive, MOTU 24io, 2 Roland Studio Captures, Saffire 6 USB for laptop, Soundtracs Topaz Project 8 mixer, Alesis Monitor 2s, Event BAS 20/20s, Roland Micro-Monitor BA-8s, and 45 years worth of collecting FX, Mics, Amps, Guitars, and Keyboards!
#17
Splat
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8672
  • Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
  • Location: Mars.
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/12 02:18:42 (permalink)
This is top on my list to hook into my saffire pro for this very reason, nice discussion:
http://uk.focusrite.com/m...s/octopre-mkii-dynamic

Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed.
@48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38.

Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
#18
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10654
  • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
  • Location: TeXaS
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/12 10:00:05 (permalink)
I go through a RND Portico channel strip when overdubbing or recording a single channel.  It has parellel compression built in, which is usually what I use.  I'm not worried about overs - just keep the levels sane (as per above) - but I like how the compression firms up a sound before hitting conversion and how it evens out the sound a bit.  It doesn't do much for a screamer as described above, who swollows the mike at full volume but backs off for the softer parts.  On regular dynamic tracks it does shave the amplitude a bit and the noisefloor is not a problem w/in my system.  It makes it much easier to mix later and I don't have to digitally squish the sound so much.
 
For stereo, I use comps too, usually.  Same result, even tho they don't do internal parellel compression.  Just judicious use again to preshape the dynamics a little and run the audio through some nice electronic components before digitalization (I don't use a mixer here at home).
 
@

https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
 
there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
#19
Mystic38
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1622
  • Joined: 2010/08/30 17:40:34
  • Location: Mystic, CT
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/12 10:35:13 (permalink)
The reason for recording post compression in times past was to keep the levels up.. away from the noise floor. Now however, given that the noise floor is significantly lower than in days past, that rationale is defunct so unless you have outstanding hardware gear that you want to use in your signal chain i don't see any reason to add a destructive element to the source material

HPE-580T with i7-950, 8G, 1.5T, ATI6850, Win7/64, Motu 828 III Hybrid, Motu Midi Express, Sonar Platinum, Komplete 9, Ableton Live 9 & Push 2, Melodyne Editor and other stuff, KRK VXT8 Monitors
Virus Ti2 Polar, Fantom G6, Yamaha S70XS, Novation Nova, Novation Nova II, Korg MS2000, Waldorf Micro Q, NI Maschine Studio, TC-VoiceLive Rack, 2012 Gibson Les Paul Standard, 2001 Gibson Les Paul DC, 1999 Fender Am Hardtail Strat, Fender Blues Jr, Orange TH30/PPC212, Tak EF360GF, one mic, no talent.
#20
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/12 11:21:46 (permalink)
I've always said there is ZERO benefit in applying any sort of post recording processing if the analog gear you're using isn't absolutely top notch.
 
If I had a rack of 1173's, Pultecs, LA2A's etc then sure, go for it.
 
But I don't, and the little hardware I do own will be smoked by many/most of the bundled plugs that come with Sonar, so why compromise your recording?

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#21
soundtweaker
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1036
  • Joined: 2003/11/12 12:25:59
  • Location: San Francisco
  • Status: offline
Re: Record compression on a track? 2013/12/12 12:42:49 (permalink)
Sidroe
Before I started using the Roland Studio Captures, I always had a dbx compressor inserted into the channel on my mixer to catch those peaks before they even went in to Sonar. With the Studio Captures, 12 of the channels have compressors built in the interface. I no longer even use the mixer! This sounds like a commercial for Roland! YIKES!


I have the Studio Capture also. I was under the impression the built-in channel compressors are after the preamps in the signal chain.
So couldn't peaks still clip on the inputs?
#22
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1