Helpful ReplyRecording Levels....

Author
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
2013/08/17 18:34:58 (permalink)

Recording Levels....

Thought this guy did a nice job of explaining this so thought I would repost it here..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bC3tvdoVZb8

You can get the Dynamic Range Meter he uses in the video here for free..

http://www.pleasurizemusic.com/es/es/download#menu

for the novice (and seasoned Pro alike) this is good information so thought I would share...


#1
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/17 18:43:27 (permalink)
Sonar can show peak and RMS at the same time. 

Best
John
#2
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/18 17:20:08 (permalink)
And it has mixing and mastering tools too
(so my little pea brain has been told)
 
Why is it not the industry standard?
 
#3
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/18 18:42:16 (permalink)
I
bapu
 
Why is it not the industry standard?
 




 


#4
ltb
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2707
  • Joined: 2005/06/19 13:34:08
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/18 19:10:48 (permalink)
I still use the Offline to check files & folders. IIRC developed by Brainworx.
#5
ohgrant
Max Output Level: -35.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3966
  • Joined: 2007/03/27 22:53:01
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/18 19:12:30 (permalink)
Is that a beaver pelt on his head? Good info though....

Me
 
#6
drewfx1
Max Output Level: -9.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6585
  • Joined: 2008/08/04 16:19:11
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/18 20:06:16 (permalink)
cclarry
Thought this guy did a nice job of explaining this so thought I would repost it here..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bC3tvdoVZb8

You can get the Dynamic Range Meter he uses in the video here for free..

http://www.pleasurizemusic.com/es/es/download#menu

for the novice (and seasoned Pro alike) this is good information so thought I would share...


 
Some of it is a little bit dubious - for instance I would argue that the supposed "sweet spot" for 24bit converters is realistically "anywhere you aren't clipping", but he seems to be implying that a simple calibration level is somehow sonically significant for some unknown reason (or does ProTools not have any trim controls?). And the zero spot on a fader doesn't necessarily indicate the dbFS value for a very good reason - because it indicates the amount of gain change you are applying (because that's what a fader does).


It sounds to me like a case where someone is trying to imply that there are technical advantages for doing something in a consistent and predictable way when there really aren't any. This only muddies the water and invites unnecessary criticism and technical debate - unnecessary because doing something in a consistent and predictable way is reason enough and doesn't need the dubious technical arguments. IOW, it's sometimes useful to do things in a particular way for practical workflow advantages not technical ones.

 In order, then, to discover the limit of deepest tones, it is necessary not only to produce very violent agitations in the air but to give these the form of simple pendular vibrations. - Hermann von Helmholtz, predicting the role of the electric bassist in 1877.
#7
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5139
  • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
  • Location: Ballarat, Australia
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/18 20:54:39 (permalink)
I have explained all this many times and well before this guy with the K System posts I have done. -18 is a good ref for sure but I can see why -20 is actually better. It is aligned to the film score reference of -20 and also you get 20 db of peak headroom which is 2 db better then -18 dB. And if you are making -20 dB equal to 85 dB SPL in the room then the music can get as loud as 105dB. Fun.
 
Also I like the K system approach of 3 ref levels. And -14 is great too. Because you can recalibrate your system and just be creating a louder rms wave the whole time from the start tracking right through to final mix. 3 Ref levels are better than one. When you work at -14 you are already pretty loud rms wise and you have less to add in mastering to achieve a very loud master later. -12 is also an interesting level to work at too.
 
RMS meters in standard DAW's are not so good because they are indicating something low on a scale.  A dB or two variation is not easily seen. On a VU at the 0 dB mark such a small deviation is clearly visible. You need a VU meter that is hitting 0dB Vu when the ref level is being played back. And better still a VU that matches the ballistics of a real one. There is so much information contained in how the VU moves around.
 
I have got my computer monitor sitting directly on top of my hardware VU meter display. I can put the VST's at the bottom of the screen and see all of them at once.
 
The Klanghelm meters are still a winner for me. The Klanghelm meters rise and fall the same way the real ones do.
http://www.klanghelm.com/VUMT.html
 
PSP has released a nice looking VU meter VST.
http://www.pspaudioware.com/plugins/tools_and_meters/psp_2meters/
 
The PSP rises the same but does not fall quite the same as the real meter. I have spent some time trying to get them to match. I may need to spend some more time to fine tune.
 
They can all be calibrated for any ref level and there are many parameters you can tweak which effect how they behave and move.
post edited by Jeff Evans - 2013/08/19 05:17:10

Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
 
Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
#8
The Band19
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2795
  • Joined: 2012/05/29 19:21:32
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/18 23:32:56 (permalink)
Probably best in the techniques forum? It's best to pick a song that you like (the mix and the dynamics) and then try to emulate it.

Sittin downtown in a railway station one toke over the line.
#9
Guitarpima
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4125
  • Joined: 2005/11/19 23:53:59
  • Location: Terra 3
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/19 12:28:26 (permalink)
That guy comes off as an arrogant prick. He knows what he's talking about but even so, he needs to get over himself.

Notation, the original DAW. Everything else is just rote. We are who we are and no more than another. Humans, you people are crazy.
 
 Win 7 x64  X2  Intel DX58SO, Intel i7 920 2.66ghz 12gb DDR3  ASUS ATI EAH5750  650w PSU 4x WD HDs 320gb  DVD, DVD RW Eleven Rack, KRK Rokit 8s and 10s sub
#10
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/19 13:45:39 (permalink)
I enjoy his videos and his efforts to keep stuff light and fun. Plus, the grammy for the Toots and the Maytals record seems impressive.
 



#11
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/19 13:59:35 (permalink)
Heh Heh.
 
McQ said toots.
 
I'm sure he thought of Mooch when he said it.
#12
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 86000
  • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
  • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/19 14:01:45 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby cclarry 2013/08/19 14:12:48
Guitarpima
That guy comes off as an arrogant prick. 

Who among us hasn't?
#13
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/19 14:12:42 (permalink)
bapu
Guitarpima
That guy comes off as an arrogant prick. 

Who among us hasn't?



+1


#14
Guitarpima
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4125
  • Joined: 2005/11/19 23:53:59
  • Location: Terra 3
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/19 17:35:52 (permalink)
I'll +2 that Bapu.

Notation, the original DAW. Everything else is just rote. We are who we are and no more than another. Humans, you people are crazy.
 
 Win 7 x64  X2  Intel DX58SO, Intel i7 920 2.66ghz 12gb DDR3  ASUS ATI EAH5750  650w PSU 4x WD HDs 320gb  DVD, DVD RW Eleven Rack, KRK Rokit 8s and 10s sub
#15
jimusic
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1325
  • Joined: 2008/05/21 18:59:52
  • Location: Near Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/25 14:37:16 (permalink)
cclarry
...
You can get the Dynamic Range Meter he uses in the video here for free..

http://www.pleasurizemusic.com/es/es/download#menu
...

Thanks Larry.
 
Curious - would this meter be any better or any different than what's included in Ozone 5?



 
 
#16
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/25 15:14:58 (permalink)
Jr,
 
I like the size of this meter...and the features...especially for free...
the Dynamic Range in the center is useful also...hence the name..

I have T-Racks metering also...but this one is just more "there" for me...

To me, that is one of the great shortfalls of X2, the metering isn't great...
(ducks and covers for flying fanboi debris....)

I don't know about the metering in Ozone 5...I did the demo
awhile ago and don't remember the metering that well...

This one seems fairly accurate...and for FREE...it's GREAT!!!

Cubase finally incorporated a nice Metering system in V7
I don't know why these DAW's are so slow in implementing
NEEDED things like this, and FAST at getting "fluff" out...I guess
because "fluff" sells product...

I have several others...but have started using this one...
I'm old and this one I can see really well...

I just wish it were 64 bit...


#17
ltb
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2707
  • Joined: 2005/06/19 13:34:08
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/25 15:29:59 (permalink)
There this one too, haven't used it a while but I see there's now a x64 'experimental' version.
http://code.mzuther.de/kmeter/
#18
jimusic
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1325
  • Joined: 2008/05/21 18:59:52
  • Location: Near Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/25 16:08:38 (permalink)
Thanks Larry



 
 
#19
cclarry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 20964
  • Joined: 2012/02/07 09:42:07
  • Status: offline
Re: Recording Levels.... 2013/08/25 16:48:35 (permalink)
carl
There this one too, haven't used it a while but I see there's now a x64 'experimental' version.
http://code.mzuther.de/kmeter/



Yep..I have that one too...If it goes 64 bit and they
update the interface I might switch back...

Still a good meter...especially for free...

These guys do a SUCH A TREMENDOUS favor to US with the "freebies"

It's smart on their part, because, if it's good, you should be willing
to help them out, or upgrade to a paid version, if one exists...

Many of them just do it for the love the art...and that says a lot 
to me...about them...

All in all..you can do just about anything you want decently just with 
the available "freebies"....not as well as with the big boys per se...
but just about as well, if you've got the ear for it....I've heard some
pretty amazing mixes with just "FREE" plugins...IJS...so you don't 
REALLY have to spend an arm and a leg to get into this....


#20
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1