Reflection Filters.

Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
Author
DW_Mike
Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6907
  • Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
  • Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
  • Status: offline
2013/03/08 11:30:39 (permalink)

Reflection Filters.

Not sure which forum category this falls into so why not post it in the busiest one?

Are any of you using a reflection filter for your vocal recording?
If so do they actually work?

I have an untreated space and was looking at a few and noticed that they range from $100-$400.

I've read some nice reviews on THIS ONE and was wondering if there really is that much of a difference to warrant spending the extra money.


Thanks.


Mike 

Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW  
GA-Z77X-UD5H
Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz
32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8) 
2x Samsung 250GB SSD 
1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB 
Corsair H80i Liquid cooler 
Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm 
Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU 
Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
#1

65 Replies Related Threads

    pagec
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 79
    • Joined: 2009/09/02 11:22:50
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 11:38:45 (permalink)
    Yes, Been using an SE for 2 years now. I never do a vox without it. Its best combined with something behind the vocalist also, old duvet hung up on wall or over a extended Mic stand does fine.. Don't push mic to far back inside the filter to avoid colouration. You won't regret paying out as it becomes a piece of essential kit.
     
    Hope helps
    #2
    stickman393
    Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1528
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 18:35:26
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 12:08:23 (permalink)
    Absolutely. In an untreated room or recording space, it's essential for clean vocals. 
    What PageC said.
    #3
    STinGA
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 552
    • Joined: 2005/11/06 14:51:38
    • Location: Andover, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 12:33:28 (permalink)
    I use one. I have an untreated room also.  My vocal recordings are night and day with and without. 

    Win 8 x64
    Sonar X3b Producer X64
    Edirol UA-101
    BCF2000 
    A-Pro 500
    Roland TD-6KV
    #4
    garrigus
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8599
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 17:23:21
    • Location: www.garrigus.com
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 12:41:22 (permalink)
    There's also the Portable Vocal Booth from RealTraps...
    http://www.digifreq.com/d..req/deals.asp#RealTraps

    Scott

    --
    Scott R. Garrigus - http://garrigus.com - SONAR X2 Power! - http://garrigus.com/?SonarX2Power
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar and Sony Sound Forge Power book series: http://garrigus.com/?PowerBooks
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar ProAudioTutor video tutorial series: http://garrigus.com/?ProAudioTutor
    * Publisher of the DigiFreq free music technology newsletter: http://digifreq.com/?DigiFreq
    * Publisher of the NewTechReview free consumer technology newsletter: http://newtechreview.com/?NewTechReview

    #5
    joeb1cannoli
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 199
    • Joined: 2012/09/22 20:07:26
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 13:43:26 (permalink)
      Make sure that you have a strong mic stand. The SE is heavy. There is tip from Sound on Sound on setting it up differently from SE's instructions. This method helps it to balance on the stand better.

    http://soundcloud.com/joe-b-10
    Windows 10 Pro x64, 6 core, Core i7 , 16GB ram
    Sonar Platinum , Komplete 8, Ozone 8  
    Presonus Studio 192 and DP88 ,uad-2 solo
    #6
    DW_Mike
    Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6907
    • Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
    • Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 14:26:23 (permalink)
    Excellent.
    My Sweetwater rep said that sE rep was in last week and did a demo using all the 'Reflection Filters' that they (Sweetwater) offer.

    Hands down he said the sE was by far the best sounding.

    Joe - Thanks for the heads up.

    Scott - I checked out RealTraps. I like the size and options for multiple uses. 
                I only found one problem.
    I was looking at the mic set up and below the specs it said this " Neumann microphone not included" 

    WTH Scott, $300 and no free Neumann? Sheesh!  


    Thanks all for your replies.


    Mike

    Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW  
    GA-Z77X-UD5H
    Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz
    32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8) 
    2x Samsung 250GB SSD 
    1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB 
    Corsair H80i Liquid cooler 
    Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm 
    Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU 
    Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
    #7
    garrigus
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8599
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 17:23:21
    • Location: www.garrigus.com
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 14:45:58 (permalink)
    chefmike8888

    Scott - I checked out RealTraps. I like the size and options for multiple uses. 
              I only found one problem.
    I was looking at the mic set up and below the specs it said this " Neumann microphone not included" 

    WTH Scott, $300 and no free Neumann? Sheesh!   
    LOL! Sorry, Mike. You'll have to take that up with RealTraps.


    Scott

    --
    Scott R. Garrigus - http://garrigus.com - SONAR X2 Power! - http://garrigus.com/?SonarX2Power
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar and Sony Sound Forge Power book series: http://garrigus.com/?PowerBooks
    * Author of the Cakewalk Sonar ProAudioTutor video tutorial series: http://garrigus.com/?ProAudioTutor
    * Publisher of the DigiFreq free music technology newsletter: http://digifreq.com/?DigiFreq
    * Publisher of the NewTechReview free consumer technology newsletter: http://newtechreview.com/?NewTechReview

    #8
    emwhy
    Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1402
    • Joined: 2006/01/03 15:09:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 14:52:00 (permalink)
    Just my 2 cents, I have the SE reflection filter as well and it works great. As mentioned up-thread it is quite heavy. I have a 25 lb barbell at the base of my boom stand to keep it from tipping.
    #9
    DW_Mike
    Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6907
    • Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
    • Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 15:15:35 (permalink)
    I have a 25 lb barbell at the base of my boom stand to keep it from tipping.



    Excellent idea.


    Mike

    Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW  
    GA-Z77X-UD5H
    Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz
    32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8) 
    2x Samsung 250GB SSD 
    1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB 
    Corsair H80i Liquid cooler 
    Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm 
    Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU 
    Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
    #10
    Brando
    Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2776
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:47:20
    • Location: Canada
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 15:30:40 (permalink)
    chefmike8888



    I have a 25 lb barbell at the base of my boom stand to keep it from tipping.



    Excellent idea.


    Mike
    Until you stub your toe on it. Good way to perfect a Black Metal Death Growl.


    Brando
    Cakewalk, Studio One Pro, Reaper
    Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL
    ASUS Prime Z370-A LGA1151, 32GB DDR4, Intel 8700K i7, 500 GB SSD, 3 x 1TB HDD, Windows 10 Pro 64
    #11
    emwhy
    Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1402
    • Joined: 2006/01/03 15:09:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 15:47:31 (permalink)
    Ha! Notice I said barbell, not dumb bell! If you move the mic stand around my studio 10 times per arm you don't have to do any arm curls a the gym.
    #12
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 16:36:39 (permalink)
    chefmike8888


    Not sure which forum category this falls into so why not post it in the busiest one?

    Are any of you using a reflection filter for your vocal recording?
    If so do they actually work?

    I have an untreated space and was looking at a few and noticed that they range from $100-$400.

    I've read some nice reviews on THIS ONE and was wondering if there really is that much of a difference to warrant spending the extra money.


    Thanks.


    Mike 

    Hi Mike,
     
    I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say things that will probably make everyone in this thread hate me. But I just have to share the experience.
     
    First off, before you buy anything else, you seriously need to come hang out with me. I think we can put a lot of these myths to bed once and for all.
     
    Secondly, I've never noticed a major difference in these reflection things when you have a good enough mic to capture "the core" of your vocal tone. I mean seriously....when we are doing close mic'ing, how much room are you really getting in the mic? You've seen some of my videos and heard my voice. That mic prints exactly what you hear and there are no room issues to worry about.
     
    We can do so many cool tricks with impules if you need a "reflective" sound or an ambience. I mean seriously bro, how screwed up could your room be to where you would need something like this? I could see if it sounded like a bathroom or something...or the little room or office had some reflective tones. But even there, at a close mic position, you are not going to hear that stuff unless you solo up the track....and even there, I sincerely do NOT believe it will be anything that will ruin a track or be heard with the rest of the music. Sure, it may be a little more direct sounding....but don't we WANT a little breathing on our vocals anyway so they don't sound like a dude with a voice like God doing radio ads?
     
    I've recorded in so many different rooms using so many different mic's....no room I have ever used caused a problem for vocals to where the track was un-useable due to room reflections. I just personally think this is another one of those hype situations for the most part, but could really be useful in a situation where a room MAY have an impact. But still...think about what sort of room would have to be involved to do that. Mark my words...you buy this thing and the improvement will NOT be worth $300.
     
    Use that $300 to drive up and come see me and hang for a weekend. I promise you'll get more out of it than the admission price. :) Don't get me wrong, it's awesome for up close and intimate vocals and you will hear a difference. Just not a $300 difference in my humble opinion. I like the natural sound of a room while choosing the right mic for the vocalist and allowing things to materialize as they will. But do what you think is best and try it brother. A helpful tool in certain situations, but definitely not a necessity for me. I have two of them at my studio....we rarely use them these days because we like the sound of our vocal room in all its glory better. Sometimes we even track people in the control room which gives them a different sound of course...but that's the beauty of it...the room itself....flaws and all. :)
     
    -Danny

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #13
    cryophonik
    Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4724
    • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
    • Location: Elk Grove, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 16:42:57 (permalink)
    joeb1cannoli


      Make sure that you have a strong mic stand. The SE is heavy. There is tip from Sound on Sound on setting it up differently from SE's instructions. This method helps it to balance on the stand better.

    I posted my solution for the SE years ago at the following thread and I still use it:


    http://forum.cakewalk.com...39&mpage=1#1059939


    Unfortunately, the images are gone, but you'll get the point.  Also has a link to the SOS page.

    cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

    Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
    Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

    #14
    cryophonik
    Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4724
    • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
    • Location: Elk Grove, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 16:47:53 (permalink)
    Danny Danzi

    Hi Mike,
     
    I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say things that will probably make everyone in this thread hate me. 


    I hate you Danny! 

    cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

    Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
    Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

    #15
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 18:38:21 (permalink)
    This is one thing Danny and I agree on completely. There are better things to spend 300 bucks on. A heavy winter overcoat slung over a boom stand will do as much, and is multi-purpose to boot.


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #16
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 18:52:43 (permalink)
    cryophonik


    Danny Danzi

    Hi Mike,

    I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say things that will probably make everyone in this thread hate me. 


    I hate you Danny! 

    You so do not! Even if that smile wasn't there, I'd not buy into it cryo! LOL! :) You lub me...even when you may not agree with me. Hahahaha!
     
    -Danny

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #17
    Paul P
    Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2685
    • Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 21:50:01 (permalink)
    bitflipper : "This is one thing Danny and I agree on completely. There are better things to spend 300 bucks on. A heavy winter overcoat slung over a boom stand will do as much, and is multi-purpose to boot."

    Either of these might be ok if you wispering into a mic close up, but if you signing with any kind of involvement you're going to activate your lousy room and it won't be nice.

    My daughter gave me some track she'd done in her room and after I'd notched out all the garbage there wasn't anything left :-)
    #18
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 22:18:31 (permalink)
    If you sing with any kind of involvement you will be turning the mic pre gain way down too so then although you may be activating the room you still won't hear it either because of the fact your mic gain has just been dropped considerably. The louder the singer the better it could also be argued.

    Your daughter did not make a good recording in her room obviously Paul P. She was standing way too far back and had the gain cranked up and that is why it was what it was in the end. If it was a 58 she should have been touching the mic with her lips. If it was a decent condenser than she should have had a pop filter set up an inch from the mic and she should have been an inch from the pop filter. No room then left.

    I recently recorded a pop band completely live and the vocalist did the tracks live. I had a PA blasting in the room as well! She was up very close to a 58 ie touching it. Got a fab vocal track with virtually zero spill on it. 



    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #19
    Paul P
    Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2685
    • Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 22:34:01 (permalink)
    Jeff, you (and Danny) obviously know what you're talking about so I'll take you on your word even though it doesn't seem intuitively obvious to me. I can most definitely hear the room in my daughter's recordings but I'll see what kind of difference I can get if I tell her to eat her SM58.

    I don't see how you can prevent modes affecting the pressure right at the microphone when they're affecting the air everywhere else.
    #20
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 22:52:20 (permalink)
    I gather Paul P that she was using a 58. The thing about 58's are they are live PA vocal mics first and foremost. They work really well when you are literally on top of them ie touching them. They have lousy sensitivity so as soon as you start to back off ie like she may have done eg even a foot or so you get virtually no signal out of them so then you have to crank the gain to get the record level back up to a decent level. Problem then is that you are picking up lots of room at the same time. 

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #21
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 23:24:33 (permalink)
    Paul P


    Jeff, you (and Danny) obviously know what you're talking about so I'll take you on your word even though it doesn't seem intuitively obvious to me. I can most definitely hear the room in my daughter's recordings but I'll see what kind of difference I can get if I tell her to eat her SM58.

    I don't see how you can prevent modes affecting the pressure right at the microphone when they're affecting the air everywhere else.

    Honest Paul, with the right mic on the right voice at close range, you seriously have to have a problem in that room to literally hear it messing up a voice on a recording. You have to be 4 ft or more away from that mic to hear room reflections that would literally mess up a vocal in my opinion. As a matter of fact, that's how I do my back-up vocal tracks...4-6 feet away...sometimes further. The room actually does a great job with them...even if it's bad. Back-up vocals sound their best when they are flawed. Seriously...I know that sounds like the wrong thing to say in a recording situation, but it's true.
     
    When you listen to a gospel group....a large one...they usually sound 15 ms off from the music at all times. This is a flaw, but a good one. How much reflection can we really get out of a carpeted bedroom? How much gain was used on the pre-amp your daughter used...and was it cheap? Did she use a real pre-amp at all? 
     
    These are the things that can make a difference. Ever try to crank a mic through a stock soundcard? You gotta jack the gain so much, you pick up noise and the room because it's literally driving the signal. You will not get that when using a good mic as well as a good front end to push it. See, I don't have to eat the mics I use here. I can sing into them lightly and achieve -6 dB without breaking a sweat. The less signal I need, the more "voice" I get. If you have to push a signal, it can wreak havoc in a bad way. 
     
    Again, you've heard my video stuff right? I'm 4 inches away from an Equitek CAD E-200 with a pop filter in a regular room with no bells, whistles or acoustic treatment. You don't hear any room in that sound. If I were to sing, that is the exact mic I use in the exact position in which I sing. A CAD is way more sensitive than a 58...so if my room were coming into play (and I'm certainly not whispering on that video...at times I get excited and talk loud) you'd hear it. The videos were recorded at 16/44 then bounced to 320 mp3 within the video software editing.
     
    Trust me, I'm not disagreeing with that you are saying, I just don't find that to be the case in all my experiences with room reflections. In a warehouse, up close with a good mic and the right stuff, you're STILL not going to hear much room come into play unless you solo the track. And even there...the amount of room you will hear will not be enough to ruin it to where you're making cuts and notching stuff out. Honest. You'd have to be in a gymnasium or bathroom to hear anything remotely close that would possibly affect the recording in a bad way and you'd need to be a few feet away from the mic in order for that to even come into the mix.
     
    -Danny

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #22
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/08 23:42:14 (permalink)
    I have that filter and it's not that effective by itself because you still have to deal with ceiling and floor bounce in a small space. In conjunction with some other treatment it can be useful but it is no replacement for a vocal booth. If you need to reject reflections from one direction only, then it does its job. Money spent on this can get you:

    A DBX 160x
    A Voiceworks Plus unit
    A used TC electronics verb/delay
    Dinner for 9 at the Cheesecake factory.

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #23
    frankjcc
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 383
    • Joined: 2004/08/29 08:13:06
    • Location: Chicago, IL
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/09 00:22:44 (permalink)
    I going to chime in on this one and say, When I bought an SE filter and thoroughly checked it out for 15min, I couldn't get back to the guitar center fast enough to get my $300 back. I was hoping to get some super dry vocals, I tested with short loud phrases to see the difference in the room and it wasn't much difference at all on how much room I could still hear on certain words. I have a decently treated room, but I was going for a very dry sound, something like voice over work. Now I just find the driest spot in the room and record fairly close to the mic as mentioned earlier.

    Sonar platinum (life)
    Scarlett 18i20  2nd gen
    Intel i7 7700k 4.2ghz  16gig ram
    Geforce GTX 550 ti
    Win 10 Pro 64
    #24
    LpMike75
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1621
    • Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/09 00:39:48 (permalink)
    joeb1cannoli


      Make sure that you have a strong mic stand. The SE is heavy. There is tip from Sound on Sound on setting it up differently from SE's instructions. This method helps it to balance on the stand better.

    +1
     
    My room sound sucks, I would have a hard time doing any vocals without my reflection filter.  Not to mention VO work


    - Mike
    Sonar Platinum - M-Audio Profire 2626 , Pro Tools 11 HD Omni - PC I7 6850K - 64 G RAM - GeForce GTX 970
    http://www.soundcloud.com/michael-lizotte 
    Http://WWW.HomeRecordingWizard.Com
    HTTP://WWW.Facebook.com/HomeRecordingWizard
    Http://www.mjlmusic.com 
    #25
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/09 03:15:13 (permalink)
    The weird thing is that for $300 you could buy quite a lot of absorbing panels and maybe a bass trap. Place the panels carefully and you could change the whole sound of your space for the better if it is not so good. That seems like a better alternative to me than having a poorer sounding room with a reflection filter over in the corner.

    Something that has worked for me for years is having two baffles reasonably high for moving around doing various things. They are nice and absorbent on the sides. The obvious thing of course is to use them to separate musicians for better spill during tracking and they work great. They are just below head height so musicians have still got eye contact.

    I also use them to make a vocal booth. I put them on little stands to raise them up above head height. I bring them close together to form the two sides of a vocal booth. I set them up against a large bookcase full of books. (Fantastic for breaking up and dispersing sound very well.) Then complete the set-up with a nice absorbent panel on the top as the roof. So it is like a temporary vocal booth with one side open. I put a music stand and a light in there. Sounds very nice in there. Dead as and very little interference from the outside world. Can't even hear my computer or anything in there. This is way better than the reflection filter concept.

    To cap this off I record the mic through my Yamaha digital mixer which has a nice Mic Pre in it but I can insert a dynamic effect over the input signal. I choose a downward expander which drops the gain down a further 15 db or so in between any spoken or sung words. It is totally transparent and you cannot hear it working if you set it up correctly. End result is a perfect vocal sound that is totally silent in between every word. (no editing required later to remove unwanted sounds because they are just not there!) Sounds like you are now inside the ultimate vocal booth. Expander opens even on the slightest sound so everything is still captured. You don't hear any room tone behind when the signal is present because it is masked seriously by a very loud signal.

    The panels can be taken apart of course and used for their more normal lowering spill tasks and you no longer have a vocal booth taking up valuable space. The panels can be stored against the wall so they too disappear and you get all your room space again for other situations when that is needed.




    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #26
    SvenArne
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2719
    • Joined: 2007/01/31 12:51:29
    • Location: Trondheim, Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/09 04:28:54 (permalink)
    I've had the original Reflexion Filter for years and years, and to me it totally does what it says on the tin. But it is very expensive considering that with a little effort, you can get the same result using heavy blankets or similar. However, it's looks cool and is quick to set up. It's also very convenient for bringing with you to location recordings. 

    My room is well damped in the mid/highs, but the filter does tighten up the sound considerably without causing an overdamped, voice-in-the-head, type of sound. So in my room, I don't use any extra blankets/duvets when recording vocals. 

    If I was starting over, I would probably get one of the cheaper, lighter products though. 


    Sven





    #27
    SvenArne
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2719
    • Joined: 2007/01/31 12:51:29
    • Location: Trondheim, Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/09 04:41:16 (permalink)
    Jeff Evans


    The weird thing is that for $300 you could buy quite a lot of absorbing panels and maybe a bass trap. Place the panels carefully and you could change the whole sound of your space for the better if it is not so good. That seems like a better alternative to me than having a poorer sounding room with a reflection filter over in the corner. 

    To me, room treatment does not really compete with these products. Reflection filters do nothing in the low-mids/lows, so a bass trap achives a wholly different goal. Also, to treat a room with auralex foam to the point where the damping would be comparable to close-in damping like the filters do, your room would end up being totally overdamped for other purposes. 





    #28
    STinGA
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 552
    • Joined: 2005/11/06 14:51:38
    • Location: Andover, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/09 04:51:44 (permalink)
    Here's the version I bought bundled with the SE X1 mic and the SoS review.

    For my needs it's a perfect and tidy solution.  It doesnt have the weight issues of the other one.  It still cost me about £150 but for me it was worth it. 

    Of course there are other free alternatives blankets etc, but for those that don't have the luxury of being able to spend a lot of money on hi end preamps and Mics, it's a great alternative.

    http://www.soundonsound.c.../articles/x1bundle.htm



    Win 8 x64
    Sonar X3b Producer X64
    Edirol UA-101
    BCF2000 
    A-Pro 500
    Roland TD-6KV
    #29
    wst3
    Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1979
    • Joined: 2003/11/04 10:28:11
    • Location: Pottstown, PA 19464
    • Status: offline
    Re:Reflection Filters. 2013/03/09 12:36:26 (permalink)
    Danny Danzi
    Honest Paul, with the right mic on the right voice at close range, you seriously have to have a problem in that room to literally hear it messing up a voice on a recording.
    I may be coming at this from a different direction, but I have to respectfully disagree.


    First, you'd be surprised at how bad some rooms are. People record in really bad spaces. As someone that grew up working in purpose built studios I find it disturbing, but that's a different topic. As someone that has designed a few studios (some of which even worked), and been asked to help correct quite a few studios (both critical listening and recording spaces), I can tell you there are some really bad rooms out there, and $300 is not a lot to spend to fix them!


    The problems can be mitigated for less, but some folks do not wish to spend the time building gobos, or even draping moving blankets on mic stands. To each their own.


    For the record, but not directly OT, I don't really like the sound of most of the reflection filter type designs. You have to know quite a bit about selection and placement to get them to sound good - and if you know all that stuff you may not need one<G>!


    I have a space right now that is pretty bad - not awful, but bad enough that I do have to think about it. I use a music stand covered with old Sonex panels to provide some noise reduction and isolation. It's a real poor man's gobo<G>!


    Second - you might be surprised at how many folks do not have the microphone they need to record their voices. Microphones, good microphones anyway, are still not cheap. And that makes it a bit tricky! My microphone locker is modest, but I can usually find something that can works. When I can't then I rent what I really want<G>!


    All this to say that you aren't wrong - the key to recording is the proper microphone in the proper spot. With these two dragons bested you minimize the need for compression or filters. (All this assumes that you have a good performance to record<G>!)


    But, by the same token I'm not sure I think it is good advice to dismiss, out of hand, something like the SE Reflexion Filter. It is a tool, and in the proper hands, used properly, it can be a really good tool.


    That's all...




    -- Bill
    Audio Enterprise
    KB3KJF
    #30
    Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1