Helpful ReplyReverse engineering pop productions

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
caminitic
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 151
  • Joined: 2012/05/28 16:46:22
  • Status: offline
2016/03/06 14:15:17 (permalink)

Reverse engineering pop productions

So I've been going to school on the newest Justin Bieber record...say what you may...but you can't deny its pop perfection. It got me thinkin about listening and stealing ideas from pro mixes and integrating them into your own productions.

Right off the top, I can't believe

1) the amount of air they get on his voice with ZERO sibilance

2) how his vocal seems to be protected by a forcefield from the rest of the (very dense) arrangements, though not feeling like it's way out in front

3) how huge the low end is without feeling lumpy and muddy...even sounding huge on my iPhone mono speaker

Anyway...I'd love to hear anyone's thoughts on the Bieber record or just any other techniques or ideas you stole from analyzing commercial mixes. It's amazing what A/Bing your mixes with references reveals...

Who's got somethin?
#1
jpetersen
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1499
  • Joined: 2015/07/11 20:22:53
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/06 17:12:11 (permalink)
It's like another world, the professional productions out there.
There are any number of youtubes by renowned producers and mixdown pros,
yet none reveal anything where one can say - Ah. That's where I am going wrong.
 
My hero is Max Martin.
#2
jshep0102
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 984
  • Joined: 2006/02/21 22:44:35
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/06 17:34:51 (permalink)
I am in your exact frame of mind, caminitic. I have the Chris Lord-Alge Audio Legends sessions and video. You can see (and hear) everything he does, as you load it in Sonar. BUT - the difference for me is in the tracks. Not only how they are recorded, but what the instrument/voice sounded like in the 1st place. There is no denying large format and pro ears to 'get it right going in'.

SHEP-ASRock Z97 Pro4 - i7 4790K 4.0ghz - 16 GB DDR3 - Windows 10 Home - Apollo Twin USB Duo - UAD2 Duo - Digimax FS - Focal CMS50 - Raven MTi2 - Slate VMS 1 - Bluebird - Yamaha MOXF8 - Axe Fx Ultra - SPLAT 2017.2
#3
caminitic
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 151
  • Joined: 2012/05/28 16:46:22
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/06 17:59:40 (permalink)
Yeah I was wondering how that CLA video series was...and I totally know what you mean about the quality of the raw tracks to start with.  Yet...I constantly hear about ITB mixes...watch similar YouTube videos and (like you) go...those don't sound at all like mine....
#4
jshep0102
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 984
  • Joined: 2006/02/21 22:44:35
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/06 18:03:33 (permalink)
I am getting better at this point, but I sure as hell wouldn't say that I'm gonna have a late career change because of it!

SHEP-ASRock Z97 Pro4 - i7 4790K 4.0ghz - 16 GB DDR3 - Windows 10 Home - Apollo Twin USB Duo - UAD2 Duo - Digimax FS - Focal CMS50 - Raven MTi2 - Slate VMS 1 - Bluebird - Yamaha MOXF8 - Axe Fx Ultra - SPLAT 2017.2
#5
Cactus Music
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8424
  • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/06 18:14:49 (permalink)
We all need goals and there is nothing wrong with working towards something as lofty as a million dollar pop record. That's what's always been the way I work. 
Bottom line is it's not so much how you do something, it's all about the talent of the performer and everyone involved.  
 
I can have 2 people come into my studio and say sing and play guitar to the same song. 
Performer # 1 is an old pro with talent up the wazoo. 
Performer #2 is an amateur with lets just say blossoming talent. 
I will say, use the exact same set up and technique. 
There will always be a world of difference between the 2 performances.
Performer # 1 will pull off a perfect song in 1 or 2 takes.
Performer #2 will take multiple takes, copy/ paste, melodyn etc and it will still not compare to performer #1's song.  
 
Mr Bieber would probably sound good if recorded to a Casstte four track with a SM 58. 
But ya, they are very good people working with him, top grade everything, they have the budget and a highly marketable act. 
But what you are trying to do is a very good way to get better at your craft... Please don't think it's a pre set on pro channel,,, that's all hogwash. Good sound starts at the source. 

Johnny V  
Cakelab  
Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
 http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
 
 
#6
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/06 20:15:49 (permalink)
I'm not sure which song you're talking about, but I was recently helping a singer I know with a cover of the JB song 'Company'. And to me, one of the immediately striking things is the clarity of the arrangement. It's not just that, of course. But it's also not just mixing skill. It's not like there was a mess for the mix engineer to fix.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#7
caminitic
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 151
  • Joined: 2012/05/28 16:46:22
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/06 20:19:43 (permalink)
John TI'm not sure which song you're talking about, but I was recently helping a singer I know with a cover of the JB song 'Company'. And to me, one of the immediately striking things is the clarity of the arrangement. It's not just that, of course. But it's also not just mixing skill. It's not like there was a mess for the mix engineer to fix.


Yes yes YES...I have been listening to that song a ton, and in fact, that was the one that prompted me to post in the first place.  But...do you hear how crystal clean, airy, bright, present and non-harsh that vocal is?  It's ridiculous
#8
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/06 20:25:41 (permalink)
Yes. There is indeed a lot of very skilled engineering going on.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#9
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/06 20:29:04 (permalink)
Also, I'm no particular fan of the Beibs himself, but he has always been a very good singer, and I'm sure he's had the very best tuition in mic technique since his career got off the ground.
 
I suppose what I'm batting it is that it's the entire chain that makes it sound like that. Song, singer, players, arrangement, gear, mix, master, etc, etc. There's no magic trick that makes a thing sound that way. It's more that every link in the chain is of a very high standard.
 

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#10
Larry Jones
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 834
  • Joined: 2007/10/11 02:45:33
  • Location: Southern California
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 01:29:09 (permalink)
I, too, listen to modern "hit radio" or whatever it's called, and am amazed by the quality, even if the songs are juvenile and repetitive. As a writer I am not interested in the kinds of songs I'm hearing, but I am fascinated by the sheer brilliance of the production.
 
Lately, my thoughts on this go back 40 years to when I had a 16-track commercial studio. I was mixing -- obviously -- with an all-hardware setup: 2-inch tape machine into an ATR-100 at 30 ips, forty or so 100mm real faders... But the biggest difference between then and now (for me) is that in the old days I had time-aligned UREI 813 monitors and Crown amplifiers playing in a professionally treated room.
 
Long story short, I was much less experienced than I am now, and my mixes were better, because, I think, I was hearing everything accurately. I don't have the money or the space to recreate that setup today, so I am constantly trying to "adjust" to the inadequacies of my mixing environment. Not to take anything away from the terrific pros who are making these amazing modern recordings, but I wonder if the big edge the majors have is near-perfect monitoring.

SONAR Platinum 2017.10 • CbB  Win10 • i7/2600 • 16GB RAM • Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 • NVIDIA GeForce 8400GS
#11
mmarton
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 666
  • Joined: 2006/01/26 13:23:30
  • Location: White Rock, B.C. Canada
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 02:40:56 (permalink)
Room treatment, good monitoring and good hardware.  Sorry, JB isn't good no matter what anyone may say to me about it but that's jmho.  And I'm Canadian.  He doesn't sing particularly well (he's autotuned almost 100%), his guitar playing and key playing are "ok" at best.  He's certainly not the "prodigy" his manager would have you believe he is.  Sorry.  OP picked a bad example of perfection for me.  BUT, the example is perfect as to what Larry just alluded to and previous posts also.  Max Martin has "the formula" and resources to make anyone sound like that.  Modern production is crafted down to the cadence of the syllables with the beat.  There's no longer just one hook.  The intro has to have a hook, then one for the verse, then chorus, then outro.  Every section changes just a little bit to keep you interested.  There's a LOT of stuff going on to get that audio crack to addict you.  For me it makes it that much better when I actually hear a great singer and just a guitar that grabs me. But then that performer has probably also had the pro mixers/engineers and mastering guys with all the tricks to make it sound awesome too. :)  In any case I do agree, I've also watched the CLA vids.  Pensado's place on YouTube is actually pretty good.  He'll actually dive in and show the effects he's using and settings but as said, the tracks are already recorded so you don't get the recording magic...

Happy Sonar Platinum 64 bit Registered Owner
Epi Casino, Les Paul, Strat, Martin GPCPA3, Cort C4Z bass, Roland D20 Synth, TC Konnekt48, Sansamp BDDI, Roland JDXI, APS Klasiks, Windows 10 64bit
#12
Sanderxpander
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3873
  • Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 03:47:32 (permalink)
There's more to great singing than perfect pitch. Alicia Keys is off a lot of the time but I still love her voice and delivery. Even if she kinda "broke" her voice over the last ten years. I always feel a bit Twilight-Zoned when musically knowledgeable people go off on people like Bieber or Katy Perry. Sure, there are BETTER singers in the world. But to pretend they're talentless hacks shows a gross misunderstanding of what an engineer can actually do. I'm no Max Martin but I'm also not unskilled. I record lots of vocals, many of them "medium" quality, and often you really can't polish what's not there.
#13
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 05:33:31 (permalink)
Interesting discussion.
 
A friend of mine is really into girl bands & solo girl vocalists - stuff like All Saints, Sugababes, Kylie, Girls Aloud etc.
 
Not only are the songs arrangements nigh on perfect but the space, clarity & production is a REAL ear opener.

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#14
Wood67
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1348
  • Joined: 2008/10/27 08:57:36
  • Location: Brighton, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 07:27:14 (permalink)
I had exactly the same experience with Scream and Shout (Will.I.Am/Britney).  Fantastic production and clarity - and yet sparse.
 
I'm currently working my way through David Gibson's 'Art of Mixing'.  A interesting compliment to the far more technical Roey Izahki's standard tome, particularly if the visual approach aligns with your way of thinking.  Both of these are excellent and give plenty of scope for experimentation.

Wood

Studio One 3 Pro, (Sonar Platinum), Intel i7, Win10 Pro, 32Gb ram, RME Babyface Pro, Behringer X-Touch, Presonus Faderport, Akai MPK49, Arturia KeyLab25, KRK Rokit 5 monitors, and other sonic surprises.
#15
bitman
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4105
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:11:54
  • Location: Keystone Colorado
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 09:27:10 (permalink)
As for air, try either the Maag EQ (vst or hardware) and boost the 40khz.
If on a serious budget like me, you can use the Maag wannabe, Luftikus at http://www.vst4free.com/free_vst.php?plugin=Luftikus&id=1500.
 
As for protecting the vox, The old tried and true says carve out the vocal frequencies from the back track. This is better served today with a multiband compressor or dynamic eq on the back track ducking the backtrack where the offending frequencies are.
 
May I suggest the MixbusTV series of videos, in particular, this one which addresses your vocal query.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ey2v8ZEjjcY
 
#16
codamedia
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1185
  • Joined: 2005/01/24 09:58:10
  • Location: Winnipeg Canada
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 09:29:28 (permalink)
My attention to great POP production started in the 80's. When I first heard INXS I had the exact same experience as the OP. How did they get that thumping/clear bottom end.... how did they get Michael Hutchence voice to sit where it did.... always on top, never too loud.
 
Performance, production, engineering and gear... it's all relevant.
IMO... I know its been said already but one of the most overlooked ingredients is the arrangement... and how sparse a lot of great recordings really are.

Don't fix it in the mix ... Fix it in the take! 
 

Desktop: Win 7 Pro 64 Bit , ASUS MB w/Intel Chipset, INTEL Q9300 Quad Core, 2.5 GHz, 8 GB RAM, ATI 5450 Video
Laptop: Windows 7 Pro, i5, 8 Gig Ram
Hardware: Presonus FP10 (Firepod), FaderPort, M-Audio Axiom 49, Mackie 1202 VLZ, POD X3 Live, Variax 600, etc... etc...
#17
dwardzala
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1470
  • Joined: 2008/05/26 19:18:33
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 09:57:53 (permalink)
bitman
As for air, try either the Maag EQ (vst or hardware) and boost the 40khz.
If on a serious budget like me, you can use the Maag wannabe, Luftikus at http://www.vst4free.com/free_vst.php?plugin=Luftikus&id=1500.
 


Boost 40kHz? - I assume this is a typo and you meant either 4kHz or 10kHz?

Dave
Main Studio- Core i5 @2.67GHz, 16Gb Ram, (2) 500Gb HDs, (1) 360 Gb HD
MotU Ultralite AVB, Axiom 49 Midi Controller, Akai MPD18 Midi Controller
Win10 x64 Home
Sonar 2017.06 Platinum (and X3e, X2c, X1d)
 
Mobile Studio - Sager NP8677 (i7-6700HQ @2.67MHz, 16G Ram, 250G SSD, 1T HD)
M-Box Mini v. 2
Win 10 x64 Home
Sonar 2016.10 Platinum
 
Check out my original music:
https://soundcloud.com/d-wardzala/sets/d-wardzala-original-music
 
 
#18
Kamikaze
Max Output Level: -45 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3013
  • Joined: 2015/01/15 21:38:59
  • Location: Da Nang, Vietnam
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 10:25:37 (permalink)
dwardzala
bitman
As for air, try either the Maag EQ (vst or hardware) and boost the 40khz.
If on a serious budget like me, you can use the Maag wannabe, Luftikus at http://www.vst4free.com/free_vst.php?plugin=Luftikus&id=1500.
 


Boost 40kHz? - I assume this is a typo and you meant either 4kHz or 10kHz?





Bottom right hand corner.

 
#19
Karyn
Ma-Ma
  • Total Posts : 9200
  • Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
  • Location: Lincoln, England.
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 10:51:27 (permalink)
I don't have any ultrasonic transducers in my gig bag...  Will an SM58 do?

Mekashi Futo
Get 10% off all Waves plugins.
Current DAW.  i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum

#20
jpetersen
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1499
  • Joined: 2015/07/11 20:22:53
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 11:06:39 (permalink)
For a sparse JB production, try "Love Yourself".
It starts with one Vox and one e-guitar, played clean with no top boost and no harmonics from distortion.
 
That's it. The barest touch of reverb. Later some harmony vox comes in.
 
And yet it is right there in front of your nose.
#21
dwardzala
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1470
  • Joined: 2008/05/26 19:18:33
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 11:13:27 (permalink)
Kamikaze
dwardzala
bitman
As for air, try either the Maag EQ (vst or hardware) and boost the 40khz.
If on a serious budget like me, you can use the Maag wannabe, Luftikus at http://www.vst4free.com/free_vst.php?plugin=Luftikus&id=1500.
 


Boost 40kHz? - I assume this is a typo and you meant either 4kHz or 10kHz?





Bottom right hand corner.


Is that a joke?
 
Seriously, what exactly is that high boost doing, because if its altering the sound, its not just boosting 40kHz frequencies?

Dave
Main Studio- Core i5 @2.67GHz, 16Gb Ram, (2) 500Gb HDs, (1) 360 Gb HD
MotU Ultralite AVB, Axiom 49 Midi Controller, Akai MPD18 Midi Controller
Win10 x64 Home
Sonar 2017.06 Platinum (and X3e, X2c, X1d)
 
Mobile Studio - Sager NP8677 (i7-6700HQ @2.67MHz, 16G Ram, 250G SSD, 1T HD)
M-Box Mini v. 2
Win 10 x64 Home
Sonar 2016.10 Platinum
 
Check out my original music:
https://soundcloud.com/d-wardzala/sets/d-wardzala-original-music
 
 
#22
jamesg1213
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 21760
  • Joined: 2006/04/18 14:42:48
  • Location: SW Scotland
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 11:36:32 (permalink)
jpetersen
For a sparse JB production, try "Love Yourself".
It starts with one Vox and one e-guitar, played clean with no top boost and no harmonics from distortion.
 
That's it. The barest touch of reverb. Later some harmony vox comes in.
 
And yet it is right there in front of your nose.




I heard that on the radio recently, didn't know who it was, or who wrote it (Ed Sheeran) until the DJ back-announced it. I was really impressed at how it leapt out of the radio.

 
Jyemz
 
 
 



Thrombold's Patented Brisk Weather Pantaloonettes with Inclementometer
#23
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 12:17:14 (permalink)
This will make you appreciate the hard work of Mr. Bieber's engineering team...
 



All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#24
caminitic
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 151
  • Joined: 2012/05/28 16:46:22
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 14:14:07 (permalink)
bitflipperThis will make you appreciate the hard work of Mr. Bieber's engineering team...
 

Still...you must admit what a nice sheen there is to his vocal....lol
 
#25
bitman
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4105
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:11:54
  • Location: Keystone Colorado
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 14:38:17 (permalink)
Charlie Sheen could likely sing better.
#26
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10037
  • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
  • Location: SL,UT
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 16:42:43 (permalink)
caminitic
bitflipperThis will make you appreciate the hard work of Mr. Bieber's engineering team...
 

Still...you must admit what a nice sheen there is to his vocal....lol
 


DOES NOT MAKE ME WANT TO HEAR IT.
UGH.
 

Bats Brew music Streaming
Bats Brew albums:
"Trouble"
"Stay"
"The Time is Magic"
--
Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
 
#27
caminitic
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 151
  • Joined: 2012/05/28 16:46:22
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 17:03:52 (permalink)
I hope the humor of his post and my reply didn't escape you...
#28
samson7842
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 287
  • Joined: 2005/05/07 14:32:31
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 17:54:20 (permalink)
I'm glad I'm not the only one here who thinks the work on these Pop records is incredible. I'm a huge fan of Max Martin and Dr. Luke. I've studied what they do and so much of it comes from the sounds they use and the arrangements. Focus on those and it will get you a lot of the way there.

Lateef Murdock
 
Gear:
Dell XPS 8700
i7-4770 3.9 GHz
24 GB Dual Channel DDR3 160MHZ 4DIMMs
Windows 10 64bit
Cakewalk (CxB)
Sonar Platinum
Studio One 4
Komplete 9 Ultimate
Maschine 2.7 MK3
Edirol PCR 500
Roland A-300 Pro 
Steinberg Virtual Guitarist 2
Virtual Guitarist Silk
Virtual Guitarist Amber
Virtual Guitarist Iron
Steinberg UR22
Waves Gold
Melodyne 4 Studio
Various other fiddly bits
#29
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2685
  • Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
  • Location: Montreal
  • Status: offline
Re: Reverse engineering pop productions 2016/03/07 22:04:31 (permalink)
samson7842
I'm a huge fan of Max Martin...



What I don't like is that all top pop songs sound pretty much the same, because they're all done by the same guy.  To my ears Taylor Swift stands above the rest, probably because she has a fair amount of input into the process.  It's just as artificial as the rest, and similar, but it's better.  I wonder where things can go from here.  Will it be possible to produce to a degree even more extreme than is now achieved ?

Sonar Platinum [2017.10], Win7U x64 sp1, Xeon E5-1620 3.6 GHz, Asus P9X79WS, 16 GB ECC, 128gb SSD, HD7950, Mackie Blackjack
#30
Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1