Roland: I'd pay you for this enhancement

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
Dave Modisette
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11050
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 22:12:55
  • Location: Brandon, Florida
  • Status: offline
2011/09/16 09:30:51 (permalink)

Roland: I'd pay you for this enhancement

How about enhanced I/O?
 
Features would includle
 
Stereo and MONO friendly naming of both Inputs and Outputs.
User I/O saveable presets for I/O friendly names
Stronger more bullet proof Hardware I/O for out and back usage of hardware effects.
Choice of Mono and Stereo drop down menus for Track inputs.
More (in number) visible sends on the Console view so that individual headphone mixes can be tweaked in the Mixer channels.
 
Console View enhancement
 
Choices between knobs or sliders
More streamlined sends - fewer knobs - just levels showing - click the widget to expand and change pan and I/O
User Mixer Builder - you have a toolbox that allows custom interfaces to be built.  (not that I want to do this, but I sure will take advantage of work done by those who do have a gift for this sort of thing.

Dave Modisette ... rocks a Purrrfect Audio Studio Pro rig.
http://www.gatortraks.com 
My music.
... And of course, the Facebook page. 
#1

3 Replies Related Threads
    DeeringAmps
    Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2614
    • Joined: 2005/10/03 10:29:25
    • Location: Seattle area
    • Status: offline
    Re:Roland: I'd pay you for this enhancement 2011/09/16 09:53:03 (permalink)
    Seems reasonable (and doable).
    especially
    "More streamlined sends - fewer knobs - just levels showing - click the widget to expand and change pan and I/O"

    Tom Deering
    Tascam FW-1884 User Resources Page
    Firewire "Legacy" Tutorial, Service Manual, Schematic, and Service Bulletins

    Win10x64
    StudioCat Pro Studio Coffee Lake 8086k 32gb RAM

    RME UFX (Audio)
    Tascam FW-1884 (Control) in Win 10x64 Pro
    #2
    adrian4u
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 568
    • Joined: 2010/12/07 19:07:11
    • Location: Poland
    • Status: offline
    Re:Roland: I'd pay you for this enhancement 2011/09/16 11:12:56 (permalink)
    GAIN for incoming audio WAVEDRAWING for incoming audio fixing problem with acces to track in AV when you hided this track in CV better cooperation with hardware synthesizers making "instrument" in instrument rack to assing controls to controll external synths in realtime (just as VST) BUILDING NEW CONTROL SURFACE system - NOT ACT ANYMORE!

    Phenom II x6 1100T (OC to 6x 4,1gHz), 8gB DDR3/1600gHz RAM, Win7/64; SONAR Producer X1c; Korgs: Z1, M50, Triton Rack, TRinity Rack; NI Maschine; Behringer BCF-R2000; MOTU 828mk3 FW; Edirol Edirol UA-1000; guitars: Cort Z-Custom, LAG JET100 totally customed, Cort SFX-DAO; some other music toys, one very musical cat 
    ***************************************
    Be patient for newbie ;)
    #3
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:Roland: I'd pay you for this enhancement 2011/09/16 20:35:17 (permalink)

    Aw heck,

    I'd be awfully happy to pay for any of that stuff.

    Those are great ideas and all speak directly to functionality and work flow rather than how much *stuff* do I get for money.


    Earlier this year I pointed out the irony of "friendly name" inputs and outputs and someone official said... "oh yeah... well we've already have friendly names for years now" and I said something like "you have got to be kidding me".

    And I realized the names might be as friendly as they are gonna get.

    Yeah, I'd pay for friendly names!

    Sign me up!!!!


    #4
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1