S3 Files in S4 - A bad idea?

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
mgreene
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 148
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 09:54:39
  • Status: offline
2004/12/14 14:40:33 (permalink)

S3 Files in S4 - A bad idea?

IN one thread today, someone mentioned that they kept Sonar 3 loaded to work on legacy files that were made in S3 - instead of loading them into S4 due to instability problems with the S3 files. No one dissented to this opinion.

Is there a consensus?

Mike
#1

2 Replies Related Threads
    Guest
    Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4951
    • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
    • Status: online
    RE: S3 Files in S4 - A bad idea? 2004/12/14 14:43:34 (permalink)
    based on my experience .. S4 with the patch is as stable as
    S3 ... haven't had any problems w/ it .. in fact, i've had
    considerably fewer drop out problems with S4.

    i haven't had to go back to S3 for anything so far...

    jeff
    #2
    chaz
    Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2775
    • Joined: 2004/02/03 12:08:00
    • Location: Tampa, FL
    • Status: offline
    RE: S3 Files in S4 - A bad idea? 2004/12/14 14:46:09 (permalink)
    I am finding that all of the S3 files that I have mixed in S4 are quite stable and have had no apparent problems thus far.
    #3
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1