RESQ
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 21
- Joined: 2015/01/29 13:40:09
- Status: offline
SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
Hi all! First post for me on the forum! I´m using SONAR Platinum with a well spec´d PC (i7, 32 GB RAM) and a SONAR VS-100 soundcard. I´ve set the ASIO buffer size to 128 samples (2,9 msec) and this gives me a TRL of 18 ms. Seems very high to me! How high are your TRL? Same figures or lower? Any idea why this could be so high? (I must say that at the moment I´m working on a project with 15 tracks, 6 synths and a couple of FX and I don´t have any problems with latency, the synths playback just fine with no delay, it´s just the TRL figure that seems to be very high) Also, when I add an instance of Izotope Ozone to one of my tracks, suddenly the latency is very much noticeable. From that moment, there´s so much latency in the project that it becomes almost impossible to play a synth in real time. Any idea why that could be? Thanks for your help! Regards, Gis
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/10 14:44:23
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Zargg71 2015/10/10 16:14:51
What's your RTL with all effects removed from the project? Does it make any difference if you freeze the synths? The 2.9 ms theoretical latency based on buffer size alone does not take into account plugin latency nor added latency from additional buffering in your interface. With your buffer size, and an audio-only project, you should be getting around 4 or 5 milliseconds. So yes, your 18 ms is high. However, it's most likely explainable by plugin latencies.
 All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Adq
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 426
- Joined: 2015/01/21 20:05:25
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/10 15:09:11
(permalink)
18ms with 128 samples buffer is usual RTL with low quality USB interfaces (it is 17ms with 133 samples buffer on my Focusrite Scarlett 8i6). As I know some Roland cards have some setting for it (double buffer, CPU performance, or something like that). Good RME USB interfaces have 8-9ms as I know, and PCI/ PCI-E are the best. I have some troubles with that, because I use hardware synths, and I'm gonna upgrade to RME in the future. If you only use VSTis, it is less important.
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/10 16:04:08
(permalink)
Can you HEAR the latency? 18ms isn't particularly low but it's not "high". I'm guessing my RTL is higher than that when I set my interface to my lower buffer settings for tracking and there is no audible delay. ms = Milliseconds Milliseconds be short, yo.
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/10 16:06:36
(permalink)
Yup... just as I suspected. My RTL is 22.1 and I was recording solos all morning. I can get it down to 12ms RTL but why risk glitches? Edit: and welcome to the forum... sorry I thought you were someone else for a second. Cheers.
post edited by Beepster - 2015/10/10 16:17:56
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/10 19:39:06
(permalink)
18 ms of delay is the amount of delay between you and a loudspeaker that's 18 feet away. I suspect drummers tend to be most picky about latency not just because they keep time, but they're used to hearing that snare just a couple milliseconds away from their ears. When I'm on stage playing guitar my amp is at least 10 feet away so that's 10 ms right there. To minimize latency, wear headphones. If your near-field monitors are 4 from your ears, that's already 4 ms of latency. Also as bitflipper points out, plug-ins can add latency, sometimes enough to make real-time recording difficult if not impossible. As these are generally designed for mixing or mastering, you might not notice the latency when used in those applications.
|
RESQ
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 21
- Joined: 2015/01/29 13:40:09
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/12 13:01:56
(permalink)
Thanx for the replies!! I´ve taken away the FX and frozen the synths, but the RTL stays at 18 ms. Anyways, I have no problems recording, I was just wondering if that was a normal number, which it seems to be according to some of you. So, I´m happy with that. I also got around the problem with Izotope Ozone which DOES add noticeable latency to the signal. When I record, I just switch all FX off, record it and put all FX back on again. Now, just a final question. I´m using the VS-100 as my soundcard but I also have a Fractal AXE FX (guitar processor) hooked up to my PC via USB. I have DESELECTED the corresponding in- and outputs of this AXE FX in the DEVICES tab, so only my SONAR VS-100 in- and outputs are selected, but when I go to the SYNC AND CACHING tab, the record latency adjustment device is selected to the AXE FX. I can choose the VS-100, but then as soon as I select APPLY, the device jumps back to the AXE FX. This is weird (any maybe something to do with the RTL.....???) Is this normal behaviour or should my VS-100 figure here as the record latency adjustment device? Thanks ever so much!!!! Gis
|
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5321
- Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
- Location: Maryland, USA
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/12 13:42:45
(permalink)
Some ASIO drivers will conflict with others (at a Windows level), and USB drivers as mentioned above tend to have higher RTL. Do you have the Fractal AXE FX drivers handy for a re-install? If so, you may want to try uninstalling them to check the system. FWIW, I have an older Digitech GNX3000 whose drivers conflicted, and if I want to "bake FX" into a signal I just go with the direct audio out->Interface route since the latency is significantly lower that way.
ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
|
RESQ
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 21
- Joined: 2015/01/29 13:40:09
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/14 12:30:57
(permalink)
Tried that. Uninstalled the drivers. They didn´t show up in Sonar, only the VS-100, still the same RTL of 18,5 seconds. Anyway, it´s ok for me. I can work with it, if the latency get´s too much, I just temporarily switch off all FX to record something and that´s it! Thanks for all the replies Very much appreciated! Got me a better understanding of my system
|
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5321
- Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
- Location: Maryland, USA
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/14 13:07:09
(permalink)
You might want to try renaming the OP to include VS-100 and your Windows version. There are VS-100 users that would pick up on that more quickly and chime in (the subject line can be important).
ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
|
AlanSJackson
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 27
- Joined: 2015/01/11 15:13:47
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/14 16:03:35
(permalink)
I was forced into the Win10 thing which caused me endless problems with my Roland V-studio 20 (which I loved btw) to the point where I had to sell. I bought the Audient ID14 and upgraded to Sonar Platinum, but the reported ASIO latencies at all frequencies were initially so bad that a 29ms round trip was the best I could manage. I moved away from it all for fear of throwing something at the wall. However, I recently played around with the settings again after they announced the driver update and the lowest round trip is now less than 7ms. Massive improvement. Trouble is, now I don't know whether that's due to the new driver or changes to SONAR (Ipswich).
|
yevster
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 761
- Joined: 2007/09/19 02:07:47
- Location: Eastern Massachusetts
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/14 20:39:40
(permalink)
Ozone adds quite a bit of latency. It's designed for mastering, and thus happily trades off processing speed for DSP quality. Bypass it when tracking, and latency should improve.
|
Doktor Avalanche
Max Output Level: -32.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4294
- Joined: 2015/03/26 18:02:02
- Status: offline
yevster Duplicate post. Erase me from existence!
You might want to do that but I will at least need ONE MILLION DOLLARS (or a camel).
Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.6,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),2 x 1TB SSD (Samsung EVO 850),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5. Rap Pro,Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1,Addictive Keys,Waves Silver,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist,Acronis True Image 2015.
|
brconflict
Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1891
- Joined: 2012/10/05 21:28:30
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/15 14:13:23
(permalink)
One of the requests I and some others have made was a Global "freeze". If you could freeze the entire project to retain all effects, but leave armed tracks unfrozen you could essentially do what I understand PT does with their low-latency recording track (in the user's experience, anyway).
Being able to eliminate all plug-in latency on all tracks but the armed one by a Global freeze, would end most complaints about recording latency. And I'll be the first to admit, it's not been predictable in Sonar (for me). You can easily stop/start the Audio engine and latency will zero-out. It has been flaky in past Sonar versions, but I haven't "tracked" in Platinum yet. Only mixed.
Brian Sonar Platinum, Steinberg Wavelab Pro 9, MOTU 24CoreIO w/ low-slew OP-AMP mods and BLA external clock, True P8, Audient ASP008, API 512c, Chandler Germ500, Summit 2ba-221, GAP Pre-73, Peluso 22251, Peluso 2247LE, Mackie HR824, Polk Audio SRS-SDA 2.3tl w/upgraded Soniccraft crossovers and Goertz cables, powered by Pass-X350. All wiring Star-Quad XLR or Monster Cable. Power by Monster Power Signature AVS2000 voltage stabilizer and Signature Pro Power 5100 PowerCenter on a 20A isolation shielded circuit.
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/15 14:59:16
(permalink)
RESQ Tried that. Uninstalled the drivers. They didn´t show up in Sonar, only the VS-100, still the same RTL of 18,5 seconds. Anyway, it´s ok for me. I can work with it, if the latency get´s too much, I just temporarily switch off all FX to record something and that´s it! Thanks for all the replies Very much appreciated! Got me a better understanding of my system
Standard Operating Practice. Temporarily bypassing all your Fx (just hit 'e') reduces your latency to a minimum. Unless I'm recording someone who needs Fx whilst tracking, I do this all the time. If say, they really want reverb in their phones and you don't have access to an external solution, just uncheck "Bypass FX Rack" on your reverb bus (as an example)
post edited by Bristol_Jonesey - 2015/10/15 15:10:35
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Adq
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 426
- Joined: 2015/01/21 20:05:25
- Status: offline
Re: SONAR total roundtrip latency 18 ms
2015/10/15 16:41:18
(permalink)
There is also PDC override button, it can reduce latency on monitoring tracks, and you don't need to switch effects on other tracks off. You just don't put effects with latency on track you record, and on buses where it goes (including Master).
|