Saving resources: Track, Mono or Stereo

Author
Unknowen
Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1276
  • Joined: 2014/11/07 11:27:09
  • Status: offline
2016/12/10 12:49:54 (permalink)

Saving resources: Track, Mono or Stereo

I have a few mono tracks that need stereo imaging.
 
Would it be more efficient make a copy of the track and use two tracks for Stereo (two buss)?
Or
Create a Aux track for say left or right track, then to two buss?
Or
Bounce mono to stereo and  split at the Aux or buss stage?
 
From a  resource point of view?
 
Other ideas?
 
Thanks!
post edited by 11Dreams - 2016/12/12 08:16:35

Hay look,
Somethings are not locked in stone... lol 3/18/2019
#1

7 Replies Related Threads

    Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
    Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2819
    • Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
    • Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
    • Status: offline
    Re: Saving resources: Track, Mono or Stereo 2016/12/11 02:41:14 (permalink)
    11Dreams
    I have a few mono tracks that need stereo imaging.
     



    what kind of imaging that the pan knob could not do?

    GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER
      +++   Visit the Rehab   +++
     
    DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600
    Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture)   Control-Surface: VS-700C 
    VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really) 
    #2
    Dave76
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 171
    • Joined: 2015/01/21 20:08:30
    • Status: offline
    Re: Saving resources: Track, Mono or Stereo 2016/12/11 11:47:10 (permalink)
    You can use the Freeze Track feature and get the best of both worlds.  Take a mono track w/ Stereo Interleave enabled and then add your stereo imager plug-in.  When you have it sounding how you want it, hit Freeze and SONAR renders it down to the stereo waveform and writes this out to disk just as if you had down all that manually.  This will save plug-in resources with any plug-in -- not just the stereo imaging example.  You will find with some plug-ins that they are very resource intensive and so Freeze makes sense and you might find with others that they are pretty light weight and not worth the hassle of freezing/unfreezing.  
     
    #3
    Love
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2
    • Joined: 2014/12/20 11:41:13
    • Status: offline
    Re: Saving resources: Track, Mono or Stereo 2016/12/11 13:46:43 (permalink)
    I like what Dave76 said; however, you also have the option to bounce instead of freeze.  I find myself bouncing to a new track after I have my plugins adjusted as I want them instead of freezing, because I have experience with freezing is not consistent; in other words, after a couple of days or weeks of recording, the sound change from how I first set everything when freezing.  Freezing does not always preserve the original way to how you freeze it, but bouncing works more consistent than freezing.
    #4
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: Saving resources: Track, Mono or Stereo 2016/12/11 19:10:19 (permalink)
    Any advice would be irrelevant without knowing what kind of stereo processing you intend to do. Do you have a plugin that doesn't work properly with a mono input? Do you need to process left and right channels independently? Or do you just want to add a basic stereo effect such as chorus or ping-pong delay to your mono track?


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #5
    Unknowen
    Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1276
    • Joined: 2014/11/07 11:27:09
    • Status: offline
    Re: Saving resources: Track, Mono or Stereo 2016/12/12 08:28:59 (permalink)
    bitflipper
    Any advice would be irrelevant without knowing what kind of stereo processing you intend to do. Do you have a plugin that doesn't work properly with a mono input? Do you need to process left and right channels independently? Or do you just want to add a basic stereo effect such as chorus or ping-pong delay to your mono track?


    I'm not asking if I need to split the track. I'm asking which way would save the most resources.
    I guess I was not clear on that. sorry... I need two tracks to buss. oh, yea! I could just use two sends/pre... maybe that will work the best way to save resources? :) I don't know... lol

    Hay look,
    Somethings are not locked in stone... lol 3/18/2019
    #6
    batsbrew
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10037
    • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
    • Location: SL,UT
    • Status: offline
    Re: Saving resources: Track, Mono or Stereo 2016/12/12 16:00:17 (permalink)
    a mono track, duplicated and panned left, right.....
    nope.
     
    to stereo image mono tracks,
    you'll have to use a send from each mono track and send it to a stereo effect,
    that takes each mono tracks and does something to it that creates a stereo effect (say, a doubler, or stereo delay)
     
    be careful of phase issues.
     
     

    Bats Brew music Streaming
    Bats Brew albums:
    "Trouble"
    "Stay"
    "The Time is Magic"
    --
    Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
     
    #7
    Unknowen
    Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1276
    • Joined: 2014/11/07 11:27:09
    • Status: offline
    Re: Saving resources: Track, Mono or Stereo 2016/12/12 18:35:02 (permalink)
    batsbrew
    a mono track, duplicated and panned left, right.....
    nope.
     
    to stereo image mono tracks,
    you'll have to use a send from each mono track and send it to a stereo effect,
    that takes each mono tracks and does something to it that creates a stereo effect (say, a doubler, or stereo delay)
     
    be careful of phase issues.
     
     


    Sounds like the plan for tomorrow... thank you!

    Hay look,
    Somethings are not locked in stone... lol 3/18/2019
    #8
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1