Second attempt with GTP3

Well, I think I'm begining to catch on to how GTP3 works. The more I use it, the better I like it for guitar stuff. Its alot easier to deal with than Sonar 4 if you only want audio. Anyway, here is a rough mix of my second attempt. The end of the tune is missing, but for now I just used the beginniing. Any comments/suggestions would be appreciated.

http://www.glorfeld.com/audio/DogDays.mp3

Hi montezuma:

The drums are loops. I am really bad at drums, so my drums are boring as usual. I recorded the rythm track with an Ibanez Jem through a V-Amp 2 clean and the heavier parts through a V-Amp 2 modern high gain with a Wolf Deluxe LP copy (I never play my 79 LP custom anymore). I can and do sometimes mike up my amps, but I have not tried this with GTP3 yet. This machine is running an M-Audio Delta 410. I have two other machines for music production. One runs an Emu 0404 with Protius X and Sonar 4 studio and the second runs an SW1000XG with XGWorks 3.0. These are great machines and software when I want to use MIDI, but for pure audio with guitars, GTP3 is my choice.

Sorry you didn't likr the middle. Thats the way I play, so like it or not, thats what you'll get. The beginning is actually two separate guitar parts, recorded separately No tricks!.

I do use Amplitube. The chunky rythm licks after the dual guitar intro are processed through Amplitube. However, I do not use Amplitube by itself without first going through some other processer. Sonar 4 studio came with a full version of Amplitube (a supposed $130 freebee) instead of the Amplitube LE that came with GTP3. IMHO you arent missing much. Revalver is not bad either.

not saying the middle is not good, just in my opinion, continuing on or expanding to some degree the "mood" you had at the beginning would be better.. anyway.. song sounds good.. keep it up