Should there be an X1c Beta Release first?

Author
kday
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 206
  • Joined: 2011/01/02 04:06:50
  • Status: offline
2011/07/20 16:15:48 (permalink)

Should there be an X1c Beta Release first?

If Cakewalk plan on releasing an X1c - They should release a beta version to the public FIRST for additional and a more thorough bug testing and report b4 releasing the official version. The public will always discover things that the limited beta tester team will not.

This way cakewalk can discover more bugs that previous fixes and new feature additions could possibly have created.

Microsoft and many other companies do it this way as a standard. There is a consensus of what works best, I used to be a beta tester.



#1

22 Replies Related Threads

    Stone House Studios
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3550
    • Joined: 2004/05/07 15:07:32
    • Location: Natural Bridge, VA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/20 16:53:40 (permalink)
    kday


    If Cakewalk plan on releasing an X1c - They should release a beta version to the public FIRST for additional and a more thorough bug testing and report b4 releasing the official version. The public will always discover things that the limited beta tester team will not.

    This way cakewalk can discover more bugs that previous fixes and new feature additions could possibly have created.

    Microsoft and many other companies do it this way as a standard. There is a consensus of what works best, I used to be a beta tester.
    They did.  Its called X1 a and b!
    Just kidding bakers!
     
    Brian

     Core i7-6700@3.40Ghz  Windows 10x64 16 GB RAM
    Sonar Platinum/Studio One     PreSonus Studio 192
    #2
    Grumbleweed_
    Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 915
    • Joined: 2007/11/01 09:13:58
    • Location: Southampton, England
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/20 16:55:54 (permalink)
    Stone House Studios


    kday


    If Cakewalk plan on releasing an X1c - They should release a beta version to the public FIRST for additional and a more thorough bug testing and report b4 releasing the official version. The public will always discover things that the limited beta tester team will not.

    This way cakewalk can discover more bugs that previous fixes and new feature additions could possibly have created.

    Microsoft and many other companies do it this way as a standard. There is a consensus of what works best, I used to be a beta tester.
    They did.  Its called X1 a and b!
    Just kidding bakers!
     
    Brian

    You beat me to it!
     
    Grum.

    Grumbleweed on Soundcloud
    Grumbleweed on Bandcamp
    Grumbleweed on Soundclick

    Windows 10 Pro (64 bit), 3770K i7, 8 GB ram, Focusrite Saffire Pro 14, Cubase 9.5, Reason 10, CbB.
    #3
    Bub
    Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7196
    • Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
    • Location: Sneaking up behind you!
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/20 17:09:16 (permalink)
    grumbleweed4162
    They did.  Its called X1 a and b!
    Just kidding bakers!
     
    Brian
    You beat me to it!
     
    Grum.
    Me too.

    Bub.


    "I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
    #4
    gcurrie
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 84
    • Joined: 2004/05/29 12:40:35
    • Location: Kirkland, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/20 17:47:01 (permalink)
    I'm sure it is being beta tested right now - just not publically.

    Microsoft only releases certain programs for public beta (e.g OS and browser) - most of their software is NOT tested publically. Part of that has to do with a customer base of 100 million.

    -Gordon
    Win 10 Pro x64, i5, 16 GB, RME FireFace UFX, Sonar Platinum 

    'Where the spirit does not work with the hand, there is no art.' - Leonardo da Vinci
    #5
    Bub
    Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7196
    • Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
    • Location: Sneaking up behind you!
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/20 18:05:23 (permalink)
    There's a lot riding on X1C.

    You know the rule ... 3 strikes and your out.

    "I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
    #6
    Gregmang
    Max Output Level: -59.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1592
    • Joined: 2003/12/31 07:21:57
    • Location: Maryland USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/20 18:12:43 (permalink)
    Gotta be completely honest here. This update will be make/break for me.

    I fired up 8.5.3 today for the first time in ages and it felt like visiting an old friend that I knew extraordinarily well.

    Maybe I'm old and stuck in my wys but I am sick of the constant "little" problems with X1 and also fairly certain that the GUI is completely unintuitive whereas 8.5.3 pretty much had everything I needed RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME.

    Wishing I hadn't bought it as there really is nothing compelling for me in it.....
    #7
    jbow
    Max Output Level: -0.2 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7601
    • Joined: 2003/11/26 19:14:18
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/20 20:09:49 (permalink)
    In a word NO. IT will be what it will be. Cakewalk will be doing their best to give us all a premium DAW. I don't expect it to be perfect but I expect CW to keep working in it until it is smooth as a baby's butt. We now have really good processors, we have 64bit windows, we have drivers that are better and better. Everything iscoming together to create the environment for them to produce a DAW that will run like it should if... you have a new computer and interface. Any chain is only as strong as its weakest link. There are two laws at work here. There is Murphy's law: if anything will go wrong it will and there is Moore's law: that the number of transistors on a chip double every year (that may have slowed a bit but it stil holds). Moores law is going to overcome Murphy's law very soon.
    Listen to people like Jim at Studiocat and if he is able to run X1 without problems then so should you. I truly think that since the price of an awesome computer has become affordable, if you get one and an interface that is new and jam up, you have your DAW setup by a pro like Jim... you are going to be happy. That is my opinion.
    They will get it right. If it still needs tweaking, they will be on it... but now is the time to make sure all your hardware is up to the task of making good use of the new software, OS, and drivers.

    Have faith. Look for the good. If it just does not suit you, move on to something else.

    Julien

    Sonar Platinum
    Studiocat Pro 16G RAM (some bells and whistles)
    HP Pavilion dm4 1165-dx (i5)-8G RAM
    Octa-Capture
    KRK Rokit-8s
    MIDI keyboards...
    Control Pad
    mics. 
    I HATE THIS CMPUTER KEYBARD!
    #8
    jbow
    Max Output Level: -0.2 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7601
    • Joined: 2003/11/26 19:14:18
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/20 20:12:45 (permalink)
    You know the rule ... 3 strikes and your out.

     
    Bub, you ain't going nowhere...
     
    Julien
     
     

    Sonar Platinum
    Studiocat Pro 16G RAM (some bells and whistles)
    HP Pavilion dm4 1165-dx (i5)-8G RAM
    Octa-Capture
    KRK Rokit-8s
    MIDI keyboards...
    Control Pad
    mics. 
    I HATE THIS CMPUTER KEYBARD!
    #9
    bitman
    Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4105
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:11:54
    • Location: Keystone Colorado
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/20 21:18:55 (permalink)
    @OP

    Oh You.




    Like that's gonna happen or even help for that matter.
    We're the beta testers.

    Bring it on btw Cakewalk.

    I'm hoping for a scrollable ProChannel
    Oh and a Pony too.

    A nice one.
    post edited by bitman - 2011/07/20 21:25:57
    #10
    Grumbleweed_
    Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 915
    • Joined: 2007/11/01 09:13:58
    • Location: Southampton, England
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 11:46:45 (permalink)
    I don't suppose anyone is interested but I got into a "conversation" on another forum with a guy who bought X1 (as he hadn't tried Sonar) and now he doesn't have X1 as it just didn't work as advertised.
    I hope "c" makes Sonar closer to what the users want rather than what Cakewalk thought would be a good idea. 
     
    Grum.

    Grumbleweed on Soundcloud
    Grumbleweed on Bandcamp
    Grumbleweed on Soundclick

    Windows 10 Pro (64 bit), 3770K i7, 8 GB ram, Focusrite Saffire Pro 14, Cubase 9.5, Reason 10, CbB.
    #11
    John T
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6783
    • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 12:27:04 (permalink)
    Given that it's going to be a free update, I'm not sure how putting it out and calling it a beta would be significantly different from just putting it out.

    http://johntatlockaudio.com/
    Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
    #12
    pwal
    Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2909
    • Joined: 2004/08/24 07:15:57
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 12:35:05 (permalink)
    more people could test & possibly find bugs, same as any other beta...

    list of stuff
    #13
    John T
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6783
    • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 12:40:58 (permalink)
    Well... yes. But that's true whatever they choose to call it. As always with a software update, you can choose to apply it right away, or you can wait and see if other users say it's okay. All that would be different would be the nomenclature.

    http://johntatlockaudio.com/
    Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
    #14
    pwal
    Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2909
    • Joined: 2004/08/24 07:15:57
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 12:50:38 (permalink)
    "beta" implies "pre-release" as in, anything left to fix/change before we release it

    list of stuff
    #15
    John T
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6783
    • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 12:55:16 (permalink)
    Well, yes, that's my point, in the case of free updates, it kind of makes no odds. It's merely an "implication"; there are no practical differences.

    http://johntatlockaudio.com/
    Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
    #16
    pwal
    Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2909
    • Joined: 2004/08/24 07:15:57
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 13:16:53 (permalink)
    ideally, an update, free or otherwise, shouldn't break things; a beta test period gives an opportunity to identify the more obscure stuff; a public beta is good because the range of system combinations is far wider than a private test

    list of stuff
    #17
    John T
    Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6783
    • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 13:29:26 (permalink)
    Yes, I get the idea.

    How about this. Everyone who wants a public beta, but wouldn't want to risk being a tester in one can just not download it until enough other people say it's working okay.

    http://johntatlockaudio.com/
    Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
    #18
    pwal
    Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2909
    • Joined: 2004/08/24 07:15:57
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 13:46:33 (permalink)
    they do something similar @ ableton, though the beta releases are clearly separated from the "stable" builds (own forum, etc) - but it would be up to cake to say what was stable and what was beta, rather than the users; then as the last bugs etc are removed from the beta, it eventually becomes the stable/release version; expectations are managed

    list of stuff
    #19
    BEATZM1D10T
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 285
    • Joined: 2009/05/22 12:43:50
    • Location: Mid-West
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 13:53:58 (permalink)
    "If Cakewalk plan on releasing an X1c - They should release a beta version to the public FIRST" - - - Ask and you shall receive: http://www.cakewalk.com/S...reader.aspx/2007013244
    #20
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 14:05:17 (permalink)
    Bub


    There's a lot riding on X1C.

    Only time will tell.
    #21
    mrberrie
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 42
    • Joined: 2006/07/05 22:16:32
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 14:07:05 (permalink)
    You can always choose to NOT load and wait to see how others are doing with it.  Me, I'll load it on my test box first then after running it in my test environment and checking out this forum to get other Users feedback, I will eventually load X1c on the "real" Music Box.

    SONG WRITER
    Dell I7 Laptop 6GB Ram 
    Sonar X1b Producer
    Windows 7 64bit
    Cakewalk VSTi
    http://www.myspace.com/uome2/music/songs
    #22
    LJB
    Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1502
    • Joined: 2009/07/29 10:31:31
    • Location: South Africa
    • Status: offline
    Re:Should there be an X1c Beta Release first? 2011/07/21 15:39:45 (permalink)
    I still love X1b, (maybe just because I can fly it closed eyes?), but having recently invested in another set of Professional audio Tools, (the one where the multi-track beat quantization actually WORKS on audio), "C will have to be a real sweety to keep me from crossing to the other side on a more permanent basis.

    Ludwig Bouwer, One Big Room Studios.
    --------------------
    Cakewalk
    with all the trimmings / Win 10Pro 64 / Intel i7-7700 / Asus Prime Z270k / 16GB DDR4 / RME HDSP9652 / RME UFX / Black Lion Audio ADA8000 / ART MPA & ART Pro Channel / Focusrite Voicemaster Pro / Aphex 107

    Check out my work at www.onebigroom.co.za

    #23
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1