Signal Routing Question

Author
LpMike75
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1621
  • Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
  • Location: CT
  • Status: offline
2013/06/12 01:35:42 (permalink)

Signal Routing Question

Hey guys - Please excuse my ignorance as I have never worked on a real console and only record in a home studio.  Here is the scenario:
 
I have a friend who runs a local studio which is 100% analog (He actually has a REAL plate reverb!).  I am trying to introduce him to Sonar and bring him up to speed on DAW's, with todays ease of use, editing and recording techniques.  I need help in figuring out how to connect him to a computer.  Here is the rough set up:
 
A self made 24 track mixing console, routed through an Alesis Adat tape machine (3 of them daisy chained, for a total of 24 possible tracks).  The Adat machines have optical connectors.  I am thinking, he needs to come out of the Adat machine via the optical connectors, into some kind of AD convertor/interface, which will connect to his computer.
 
I believe the optical connectors can send out up to 8 individual tracks (or so I read somewhere).  Would he really have to daisy chain 3 different 8 channel audio interfaces to get his 24 tracks from the Adat machines?  How to the 48 channel SSL consoles send to their computers?   
 
Any suggestions are appreciated.


- Mike
Sonar Platinum - M-Audio Profire 2626 , Pro Tools 11 HD Omni - PC I7 6850K - 64 G RAM - GeForce GTX 970
http://www.soundcloud.com/michael-lizotte 
Http://WWW.HomeRecordingWizard.Com
HTTP://WWW.Facebook.com/HomeRecordingWizard
Http://www.mjlmusic.com 
#1

22 Replies Related Threads

    spacealf
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2133
    • Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 03:15:16 (permalink)
    From what I read, if I understand it, ya the ADAT tape machines record actually 16 -bit but with 20 bits, so going to something with 20 bits is I think not possible anymore if it ever was.
     
    Might be possible to just go from the mixing console into an interface but then I am not sure about that either. I think the ADAT machines from what I have seen had phono inputs and other type inputs but I do not think that anything nowadays is the same.
    http://www.alesis.com/first25
    Yep, looking at pictures phono plugs but an digital in and out connector (??).
    Don't know what his mixer has for output connectors.
     
    Analog to Digital Convertor.
    http://www.rme-audio.de/en_products_m32ad.php
    and the RME unit goes into another unit to get into the computer whatever it all is about.
    ????????????????
     In other words, I just do not know.
     
    post edited by spacealf - 2013/06/12 04:18:52

     
     
    #2
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 06:49:38 (permalink)
    The easiest thing to do is to think of the DAW as a tape deck and just use the number of outs that your I/O hardware has. Not only is it the easiest way but you are, in fact, more or less limited to the number of I/Os your DAW has.
     
    So it's easy, buy a MOTU 24i/o. It was built expressly to integrate a DAW into a 24 track analog environment.
     
    If you don't get a 24i/o box then you have all those other options, where you daisy kludge a bunch of smaller format boxes into a system.
     
    Remember you don't have to have the whole 24i/o but it seems like the console was built to work that way so that will be an obvious goal.
     
    What you will learn is that Pro Tools makes a better "DAW as a tape deck metaphor" and most of the things we SONAR fans don't get about ProTools were made to suit the a work flow that supports the "DAW as a tape deck metaphor".
     
    SONAR can work great in this scenario. You are just gonna need some fresh cables.
     
    Speak to your friend about this and you will see that he already knows how his studio is wired and you just need to insert the DAW where the ADATs are now. Of course he'll want to dream up some way of switching out quickly, or even transferring from one to the other.
     
    A couple bays with db25 connectors may be the way to go... it just depends on what he has set up already.
     
     
    all the best,
    mike
     
     


    #3
    LpMike75
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1621
    • Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 09:46:46 (permalink)
    Thank you Mike and Spacealf. I didn't even think about what bit's the Adat machine was outputting.
     
    Mike - Thanks for the Motu suggestion.  It sounds like you are proposing simply replacing the Adat machines with the Motu (or similar).  That sounds easy enough, just not sure how he will like parting the with Adat machines :)
     
    Thanks for suggestions, I will mention this to him.


    - Mike
    Sonar Platinum - M-Audio Profire 2626 , Pro Tools 11 HD Omni - PC I7 6850K - 64 G RAM - GeForce GTX 970
    http://www.soundcloud.com/michael-lizotte 
    Http://WWW.HomeRecordingWizard.Com
    HTTP://WWW.Facebook.com/HomeRecordingWizard
    Http://www.mjlmusic.com 
    #4
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 09:56:10 (permalink)
     
    Ideally, you would have the Adats and all that old work stored on tapes available while making the studio DAW capable.
     
    Imagine that in the "beginning" people would track on the ADATS because they were reliable and then transfer to Pro Tools for edits, automation, etc.
     
    You can figure out a way to use both... some form of patchbay can provide that functionality.
     
    Have fun!
     
    best regards,
    mike


    #5
    LpMike75
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1621
    • Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 10:48:36 (permalink)
    Currently he tracks to the Adat's.  He then sends a stereo out to his computer to master it.  If he wants to mix individual tracks after the fact, he can only output 2 tracks at a time (in real time) from the Adat's to his computer, because of he has no audio interface and must use the inputs on the back of his PC.  He then plugs all those tracks into Sony Vegas for editing and mixing.  He has been in business a long time and has his own workflow. 
     
    I know he will want to incorporate the Adat's.  Just not sure how.  I have never worked with patchbays and don't know the first thing.  I will show him the Motu suggestion and see what he thinks. 


    - Mike
    Sonar Platinum - M-Audio Profire 2626 , Pro Tools 11 HD Omni - PC I7 6850K - 64 G RAM - GeForce GTX 970
    http://www.soundcloud.com/michael-lizotte 
    Http://WWW.HomeRecordingWizard.Com
    HTTP://WWW.Facebook.com/HomeRecordingWizard
    Http://www.mjlmusic.com 
    #6
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 10:54:02 (permalink)
    I assumed that you were saying he had a 24 track recording console that he used with the ADATs.
     
    So I assumed there was already a bundle of 24 wires that you can patch into some where.
     
    It may be that easy.
     
    best regards,
    mike
     
     
     
     


    #7
    batsbrew
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10037
    • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
    • Location: SL,UT
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 11:12:07 (permalink)
    spend some time studying the quality of the audio capture and playback of the adats, and see if it's really worth the investment.
     
     
    back in the day, the adat's were the sh!t
     
     
    but no more

    Bats Brew music Streaming
    Bats Brew albums:
    "Trouble"
    "Stay"
    "The Time is Magic"
    --
    Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
     
    #8
    LpMike75
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1621
    • Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 11:50:57 (permalink)
    Yes Mike, that is the case with the console.  I just wasn't sure how they are typically connected to the computer - Console > Interface (with equal number of inputs) > computer? 
     
    Bats - Yes, I don't know how the Adat's stack up soundwise in todays audio world.   I will also ask him to consider that.  I know he isn't interested in spending a lot of money (if any) so he will look to use what he already owns


    - Mike
    Sonar Platinum - M-Audio Profire 2626 , Pro Tools 11 HD Omni - PC I7 6850K - 64 G RAM - GeForce GTX 970
    http://www.soundcloud.com/michael-lizotte 
    Http://WWW.HomeRecordingWizard.Com
    HTTP://WWW.Facebook.com/HomeRecordingWizard
    Http://www.mjlmusic.com 
    #9
    spacealf
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2133
    • Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 17:22:33 (permalink)
    The MOTO 24 i/o has TRS outputs so you still need something to get into the computer.
     
    RME has these (there is a lesser one usually have to search for it on RME:
     
    http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/HDSPeRayDAT/?utm_source=Google&utm_medium=PPC&utm_campaign=audio&utm_term=rme_hdspe_raydat&adpos=1t1&creative=14165894161&device=c&network=s&matchtype=b&gclid=CN3IsKW337cCFfBaMgod5hQAlw
     
    This one is a 72 channel PCI-e card in the computer (they have a 36 channel one but I don't think it is as flexible as this one for connections).
     
    The MOTU won't work without another unit to go into and it has TRS 1/4" outputs looking at it so it a computer card would have to have those 24 kinds of connections to connect to.
    To me I doubt it if can be done. Not citing RME to buy at all, just showing what equipment where I can find it you would have to use. RME has mic XLR 8 channels units also like Misestacy however it is spelled or the OctaMic II whatever unit that is, but the
    HDSPeRayDAT PCI-e card that allows the connection to whatever AD convertor or such you would get would be where it goes. You can find it over at the RME website, I did last night but have to search again to find the page at RME. They don't list it along with all the other stuff on that page I linked to in previous post.
     
    That was to go out of his mixer into the AD convertor which goes by connection into the HDSPeRayDAT card inside of the computer to run the DAW. Actually you could do without his mixer also and just buy mic inputs and outputs and other equipment there also. ?????
     
    http://www.rme-audio.de/en_products_hdspe_raydat.php
     
    found it.
    The interfaces depend on which kind of equipment cables you want to connect with, while this one I think has all 3 type of connections AEU/ADAT/whatever it connects with as a path into the computer.
     Oh, the RayDAT has 36 inputs and 36 outputs (I guess for monitors connections or that stuff).
    So it is 72 total channels.
     
    Well, if he is only two tracks at a time, he should record through a better audio/interface into the computer than a sound card and record all the tracks first into the DAW (24 channels or tracks) then mix down and whatever, because Sonar will Export all the tracks into an outputted 2 track WAVE or possibly *.MP3 file getting the code for that to run it in the DAW or perhaps even burn a CD with the song (songs) afterwards by a Microsoft program or NERO program to make a CD-R CD playable on a CD player or DVD player or such device. After that if you want a regular CD you would have to send the files somewhere where they make a regular CD for sale then.
     
     If he wants to use the ADAT tape machines I would talk to the manufacturer first like RME to make sure that the output of the ADAT tape machine could go into another unit. Oh, ya, it was a digital connector I don't know what kind so I imagine there may not be cable for it anymore so that would be out also. Only a 1/4" cord-based system into the AD convertor could be used then or from the phono outputs of the ADAT tape machine into a 1/4" TRS input of the AD convertor. Cords would have to be made (probably not found without adaptors being used and stuff like that so the connection would be not good as it should be for a studio). (consumer-grade -10dBu stuff instead of studio +4dBu standard whatever it is.
    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
     
    I have to eat my food getting cold.
    I know I babbled on here but the connections have to be there on whatever unit to go into a unit that gets to the DAW (audio/interface) on the MOTU or any equipment used.
     
    post edited by spacealf - 2013/06/12 17:42:16

     
     
    #10
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 17:44:59 (permalink)
    The audio quality of the ADAT's is definitley fine in today's world. I produced a whole series of albums on them at one time and they still sound great. But the reason not to use them is not so much about sound quality but instead it is about the whole mechanical nature of them. They are a bit of a pain that way. They do require regular mechanical maintenance etc and also they are slow in terms of locating at least compared to a DAW.
     
    Now the ADAT's can remain in the system because they are always active as A to D converters and back. The optical IN/OUT is always actively patched through to their Analog IN/OUT. ie if you send an ADAT the optical signal the audio will appear on the analog outs at all times. And the other way around too any signal coming into an ADAT wil be sent via its optical OUT.
     
    But if the ADAT's are being used as A to D and D to A then you need some sort of PCI card that has at least three ADAT optical connectors on it. RME Make such devices.
     
    http://www.rme-audio.de/en_products_hdsp_9652.php
     
    or this:
     
    http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/HDSPeRayDAT/
     
    Then the three ADAT's are connected that way to the computer. The analog inputs are getting all the direct outs from the mixer and the Analog OUTS are feeding into the tape returns of the mixer for mixdown etc.. The Sweetwater option has room for four ADAT's actually.
     
    The A to D and D to A quality is now purely based on the ADAT's themselves. But they are fine. If they are the 20 bit models then they do operate at 20 bit which is a bit better. The black face ADAT is 16 bit only. Something worth considering. The good thing about the ADAT machines is that he can go back to tracking with them at anytime and not use the computer.
     
    The most elegant solution though is this from Motu:
     
    http://www.motu.com/products/pciaudio/24IO
     
    It is about $1400 from Sweetwater while the ADAT option is around $1000. Personally I would eliminate the ADAT's from the system and go the MOTU route. Or any nice audio interface solution that has all 24 IN and 24 OUT available. Some of them may use db25 connectors as Mike has also suggested but that is still suitable.
     
    Once he starts using a decent DAW and multichannel interface then he will never look back. Also he does not need a 24 analog OUT system either if he goes all digital and ITB either.
     
    The number of inputs required obviously depends on the total number of input sources that needs to be recorded at once. I think today too that 24 bit recording is a minimum requirement. Not sure of the ADAT situation but they may have only reached 20 bit depth which is better than 16 bit but not quite as good as 24 bit either. I think that depends on the specific ADAT model.
     
     
    post edited by Jeff Evans - 2013/06/12 19:01:33

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #11
    spacealf
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2133
    • Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 20:21:55 (permalink)
    Okay, here is some more MOTU pictures, and the MOTU does have 20-bit recording also I see.
    http://www.motu.com/products/pciaudio/24IO/specs.html

    http://www.motu.com/techs...24-system-requirements

    http://www.motu.com/techs.../pci-424-compatibility


    the MOTU 24 i/o goes into the pcie-424 or the pci-424 in the computer.
    or if the ADAT tape machines have an ADAT connector out into just the PCIe card in the computer and one of those units like the PCIe-424 or RME unit.
    Of course I read also that the ADAT tape machines only have a 92dB noise floor level because it is still tape (if you like I guess S-VHS tape sound in which with VCR tape machines or even Beta it also had what was called - FM modulation noise (actually called FM Modulation Distortion) but still close to CD quality which is 96dB floor noise depth.) Hi-fi movies sounded great but not as good as digital nowadays with the 24-bit recording, and I guess FM Modulation Distortion to me did not seem like anything, but that is what they stated in those type of VCR or probably even the ADAT tape machines.
     
    The new digital units are probably way better than that and if doing too many dubs on a tape machine that would also raise up the noise floor level and noise would eventually creep into the recording before it got to the DAW inside of the computer. ???????
     
    Again the connections in the back of the ADAT tape machines (I did see a picture somewhere searching along reading about those ADAT tape machines which show exactly the back connections on those machines in a bigger picture by searching it up and looking at Images on the search.
     
    Whatever and how it can be done will be depend on the back connections - digital if possible out of the ADAT tape machines directly into the PCIe or PCI card in the computer or -- analog along the way until the analog unit changes it to digital and into the card inside of the computer which then is found by the DAW being used.
     
    Here's an image almost clear. Are the digital input and output - ADAT???? I do not know. Then you have it looks like 9 pin connectors for sync like an old mouse unit on a computer - serial 9600baud type connector before the PS2 connectors for the mouse were used. (actually called the DB-9 connection after looking at the sweetwater HDSP 9652. So that seems to fit also with that card.
     
    http://www.d8apro.com/ebay/ADAT_XTa.jpg
     
    that is a picture of an Alesis ADAT XT tape machine being sold on e-bay for $1000 I guess I did not look that long at it.
     
    http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/HDSP9652
     
    Don't know if the MOTU analog unit is the one that allows 20-bit recording if he has newer ADAT tape machines, or the old ones that only were 16-bit. I don't know about any RME card then or even the MOTU card in the computer, but if 20 bit I suppose the MOTU would fit better for the ADAT tape machines digital out (if it is an ADAT type output and input).
     
    Only a card into the computer is needed then.
    pcie-424 MOTU
    RayDAT
    or old one HDSP 9652 RME card.
     
    After looking again I don't see where the MOTU- pcie -424 (or pci - 424) card comes separate from the other MOTU unit. It looks as if you have to buy the other analog unit (whatever output) and then the card for the computer comes with that.
     
    RME card would be separate (but then 20 bit recording if needed ???)
     
    Then the final volume out in probably volts of the ADAT tape machines vs. the input level accepted by the ADAT computer card. (I know some outputs of even consumer stuff long ago may put out a level of up to 2 volts instead of the usual 1 volts depending perhaps, and if that effects the ADAT input and output and all of that - probably in the manual of the ADAT tape machine and Specs of the computer card used. (all that stuff).
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    post edited by spacealf - 2013/06/12 21:38:39

     
     
    #12
    The Band19
    Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2795
    • Joined: 2012/05/29 19:21:32
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 22:18:39 (permalink)
    Couldn't he just take it out a track at a time? And in to a sound card and in to SONAR/X2? Then once it's in the box, you don't need the console/ADAT setup? Not elegant I know, but it seems like it would work.

    Sittin downtown in a railway station one toke over the line.
    #13
    The Band19
    Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2795
    • Joined: 2012/05/29 19:21:32
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/12 22:20:16 (permalink)
    my fireface has an optical ADAT connector?
     
    • Input Digital: 1 x ADAT optical or SPDIF optical, SPDIF coaxial (AES/EBU compatible)
     

    Sittin downtown in a railway station one toke over the line.
    #14
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/13 01:15:32 (permalink)
    The Ray DAT or the Presonus version would work.  I haven't used them but have heard of success w/ the RME thing.
     
    Moto.
     
    But I don't know if how good the sync would be between 3 adat units and the computer interface.
     
    The TC Konnekt 48 has 2 sets of ADAT, but only for 8 channels (it does smux, which is 4 channels of ADAT at 96 or less).  Which might not be a bad way to go - a double or single adat equiped interface and transfer 8-16 channels at a time.  The guy likes ADAT because that is what he knows.  When he gets the digital audio in a DAW and starts editing, he might decide just to skip the middle man ADAT.
     
    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #15
    LpMike75
    Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1621
    • Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/13 01:32:28 (permalink)
    Spacealf - Jeff - Robby - AT
     
    Thank you for the in depth posts, ideas and information.  I will look this over and offer these ideas to him.  He knows his routing much better than I..so I will have to look at that in more depth.
     
    He has, and continues to turn out professional audio recordings, from music to VO to book readings, and Mastering.  But he is really limited with automation, effects etc..all the cool stuff of a modern DAW.  I agree, once he starts learning Sonar, he will say "What the heck have I been doing all this time?!?!" ...atleast that's what I hope he says! 
     
    Thank you again for all of your expertise, I will have to pour over these posts a couple times


    - Mike
    Sonar Platinum - M-Audio Profire 2626 , Pro Tools 11 HD Omni - PC I7 6850K - 64 G RAM - GeForce GTX 970
    http://www.soundcloud.com/michael-lizotte 
    Http://WWW.HomeRecordingWizard.Com
    HTTP://WWW.Facebook.com/HomeRecordingWizard
    Http://www.mjlmusic.com 
    #16
    spacealf
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2133
    • Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/13 02:21:07 (permalink)
    The RME 9652 is only 16 channels in and out on ADAT. You can see the arrows on the Sweetwater image. There is some typing errors on RME pages.
     
    The RayDAT would be the way to go for all 24 channels of all the ADAT tape machines then, as it is more like a total of at least 32 channels in and out  probably 36 in and out with all the total connections and a bit newer card that has some other things that may help also.
     
    Well, that is about it. I read something where the RME Adat connections are Alesis ADAT type connections for sure for another unit RME makes.
     
    Well, however, all channels at once into the computer or 8 channels or whatever can be assumed to be handled by the ADAT tape machine digital connector (if ADAT and it looks like it) straight into a computer card (and sync lock if that works and looks like it would) into the DAW of the computer.
     
    I would check first and make sure by some sound salesperson, or whomever than me on this forum.

     
    whooping 24 channels all at once then recorded in Sonar.
     
    and then somehow it has to come out or go to something to listen to it all being played back in Sonar.
    Soundcard? Audio/Interface?  ???????
     
     Edited again, because I am not thinking here on this I guess. If ADAT out is digital then there probably is no voltage on anything, that would be analog outs and like that connection. Duh!
     
    Well, off to find a brain somewhere, that is all.
    Digital out of the ADAT tape machines to digital in ADAT of the computer card (RayDAT) used, I guess would work then, but check with other sound people perhaps if you buy a computer card like the RayDAT and check with them.
     
    Okay I am out of here.
     
     
    post edited by spacealf - 2013/06/13 04:19:01

     
     
    #17
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/13 09:03:41 (permalink)
    The wise thing to do is remove the ADAT's all together from the system. The machines themselves are not getting any younger. As they get older they also require a bit more regular maintenance. A head replacement would not be worth doing. They are a bit of a mechanical nightmare. The three of them take up 9 rack units for a 24 IN/OUT device. The MOTU interface is only a single rack unit of space for the same IN/OUT. Think of the other things you can put in there! And quieter (motor noise) too. (from memory they draw around 115 watts I think so three would be using 345  watts of power compared to about 20 watts for the audio interface, stop using so much energy!)
     
    There is the issue of having ADAT masters in storage from previous projects. I have quite a few still. You only to keep one machine to be able to transfer anything even if you have sessions that span three tapes.  You can use the ADAT optical connector of course to take 8 channels of audio at once digitally but you could also transfer using the analog IN/OUT of the audio interface if you had to. It would still sound pretty good. (There is an old JLCooper sync box that converts ADAT sync to midi timecode which is very cool. You could find one on ebay. Your DAW will chase lock the ADAT then. It locks up instantly and is super stable.)
     
    Playing with ADAT sessions inside a DAW once transferred is fun and there is a lot one can do with those tracks further. Just set the session to 48K sampling rate and away you go. The ultimate device for transferring ADAT's over to a DAW is a system Alesis made called Connect. I have it still. It has a PCI card with ADAT optical IN/OUT and also the sync IN and OUT. The computer takes control of your ADAT. It transfers digitally into folders. If a session is over three tapes it punches the transfer points in and out for all of them so you transfer 8 tracks at a time for each tape in turn but end up with all 24 tracks in a folder in sync ready to import. 
    post edited by Jeff Evans - 2013/06/13 09:13:29

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #18
    spacealf
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2133
    • Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/13 14:29:57 (permalink)
    That will do it (what Jeff said). There is all kinds of ways to do it. RME drivers on the computer probably will not support 20-bit so only 16-bit will work out of the ADAT tape machines. The RCA phono plugs can work out (as analog does) to 1/4" guitar cord type plugs to input into a recording unit but the cord length usually will be only 3 or 6 feet long unless making special cords.
     
    It's the same ol' consumer type connections to pro-audio type newer connections that warrant usually in the end - just change to something new and forget the Past.
     
    Tape Machines only last so-long and then they are usually dead and gone. Bury them if having to and either start anew or fiddle around with it if a person must.
     

     
     
    #19
    The Band19
    Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2795
    • Joined: 2012/05/29 19:21:32
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/17 20:49:06 (permalink)
    The only challenge is, RME stands for R*** My Exit... They're not cheap. 

    Sittin downtown in a railway station one toke over the line.
    #20
    spacealf
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2133
    • Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/18 01:35:09 (permalink)

    The db9 serial cable sync between the master deck and slave decks synchronizes playback and provides wordclock to the slave decks. So set your USB or firewire computer interface to sync to incoming optical and voila! 24 tracks via Alesis ADAT Optical. 16bit/44.1 or 48k


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqSom7--tl0



     
     
    #21
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/18 04:13:52 (permalink)
    Each ADAT optical connector on the rear of each ADAT will only send 8 channels of digital audio. If you wanted to capture or run all three ADAT's at the same time you will need some sort of PCI card (RME ) that accepts at least three ADAT optical connectors. Each ADAT needs to connect to the PCI card for a total of 3 optical connectors or 24 tracks in total. This card is around $1000 though whereas the MOTU option at 24 IN/OUT is only around $1400 which seems a better option to me.
     
    I still think it is time to put ADAT's to bed now. There are much more elegant solutions.
     

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #22
    spacealf
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2133
    • Joined: 2010/11/18 17:44:34
    • Status: offline
    Re: Signal Routing Question 2013/06/23 13:58:48 (permalink)
    Well, if this guy is real then MOTU has a problem with drivers.
    http://www.rme-audio.de/forum/viewtopic.php?id=17778
     
    Basically saying the units don't work because of it.
     If getting an internal error on that link, just try again. May be busy? I really do not know why it does not work as good as it did before.
     

     
     
    #23
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1