daeser1
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 218
- Joined: 2008/08/18 01:58:22
- Status: offline
Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
I just finished a song, but for some reason it seems to have picked up my S's as very high pitch. I have a pop filter, but it still came out sounding like it has too much treble, but i don't think that's the case. Please check it out and let me know. The songs called "See Life For What It Is." 1st song on my page: myspace.com/dae1productionz thank you
post edited by daeser1 - 2010/02/05 04:11:20
|
Guitarhacker
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24398
- Joined: 2007/12/07 12:51:18
- Location: NC
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/05 07:41:27
(permalink)
Well...this is not a genre I listen to... but from a technical aspect....(my daughter just asked me...WHAT are you listening to?) OK from the technical side of things.... on my system the s's didn't sound all that overly loud. There was ...to my ears... a very high and clear upper end presence. Listening on cheap computer speakers.... not ref mons. When I record, I try to shoot for a sweet high end.... I like to be able to understand the words and the upper freqs assist in that aspect. Too much and you get sibilance..... so I will play around with the EQ. I use a multiband parametric EQ. I will roll the top end off (at times...because each song is different) generally in the 7khz range and higher. That removes or lowers the sibilant freqs and still lets the sparkle shine through in the 3k to 6k range. It also tends to "calm " the sizzle on the cymbals as well.
My website & music: www.herbhartley.com MC4/5/6/X1e.c, on a Custom DAW Focusrite Firewire Saffire Interface BMI/NSAI "Just as the blade chooses the warrior, so too, the song chooses the writer "
|
skullsession
Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1765
- Joined: 2006/12/05 10:32:06
- Location: Houston, TX, USA
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/05 10:46:14
(permalink)
Vocals sound pretty heavily compressed. This can tend to accentuate sibilance. So can the doubling you've got going through the whole thing. It doesn't sound OUT OF CONTROL really...not so bad. But I can see how it would get annoying after a while..so.... You may need to slow down the attack on your compressor to let the S's through without compression. Or, you may want to try a de-esser or EQ after the compresion to tame it back down.
HOOK: Skullsessions.com / Darwins God Album "Without a doubt I would have far greater listening and aural skills than most of the forum members here. Not all but many I am sure....I have done more listening than most people." - Jeff Evans on how awesome Jeff Evans is.
|
feedback50
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 564
- Joined: 2004/05/31 12:08:15
- Location: Oregon, USA
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/06 14:48:57
(permalink)
If you don't have a de-esser plug-in you can try the sonitus multiband compressor on the vocal tracks and only tweek one of the higher bands to compress only the SSSS sounds.
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/06 15:55:36
(permalink)
feedback50 If you don't have a de-esser plug-in you can try the sonitus multiband compressor on the vocal tracks and only tweek one of the higher bands to compress only the SSSS sounds. If you don't have a de-esser or it's giving you a lisp on other parts of the song try the clip gain envelope, zoom in on each one and reduce it. It's a lot of work but the only way to get them all perfect.
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/06 16:02:45
(permalink)
Hi Ari, I have listened to it and personally I dont mind the top end on the vocals as they are. At least your 'esses' sound smooth and are not harsh like some sybilance can be. I would not worry too much about it. There are different types of harshness and yours is not nasty or anything like that. I tend to make sure that vocals are reasonably crisp anyway as it really helps with diction etc. But if you are really concerned then maybe do some surgical editing like Frank has suggested etc. I tend to do that in other programs like Adobe Audition etc..
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
daeser1
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 218
- Joined: 2008/08/18 01:58:22
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/06 16:09:15
(permalink)
on my system the s's didn't sound all that overly loud. There was ...to my ears... a very high and clear upper end presence. Listening on cheap computer speakers.... not ref mons. Thank you for taking the time to help. I know it is a pretty rough song (content-wize), and I "thank you" for not judging me on the content. Ok, Well I have often had trouble with monitoring the output. I have some pretty expensive Bose headphones i use when mixing and mastering, but it always sounds different when i play it in my car system (which is also Bose). In your opinion what is the best way to estimate how the general listener is going to hear your work? In other words, what speakers or headphones do you use when you are mixing and mastering?
|
daeser1
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 218
- Joined: 2008/08/18 01:58:22
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/06 16:13:54
(permalink)
If you don't have a de-esser plug-in you can try the sonitus multiband compressor on the vocal tracks and only tweek one of the higher bands to compress only the SSSS sounds. Thanx. I wasn't really sure what a de-esser is, but i know exactly what the multiband compressor is. This is exactly what i was thinking of doing except i was afraid I'd lose the crispness of the vocals.
|
daeser1
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 218
- Joined: 2008/08/18 01:58:22
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/06 16:16:40
(permalink)
try the clip gain envelope Believe it or not i have never used a "clip gain envelope" I'm not sure what it is, but i will definitely look it up.. Thank you..
|
ohhey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11676
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
- Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/06 23:49:24
(permalink)
daeser1 try the clip gain envelope Believe it or not i have never used a "clip gain envelope" I'm not sure what it is, but i will definitely look it up.. Thank you.. Envelopes are the key to all automation of a mix. They are a line that you can put over the waveform in track view and adjust by making nodes (elbows) and then draging the line up or down. They can control gain (pre effects bin), volume (post effects bin), pan, all kinds of things. The list is dynamic so if you add an effects to the track that can be automated you will see new envelopes to choose from. In track view you can right click on a clip and select the envelope you want. There are many to choose from. The clip gain controls the output of the clip before it even goes to the effects. This is the one you want to use for fixing recordings that have little spots that are too loud. Keep in mind this envelope is per clip, not per track like the track volume so if you have split the recording into clips you have to add one for each clip. Track envelopes cover the entire track. If you zoom in far enough where the ssss sound is you can see it. The wav will be really close together and appear darker then the rest of it. Make two nodes in the clip gain envelope on each side of that ssss part and then pull down on the line between the two sets of nodes. You will see a notch created in the line. This causes that little section of audio to play back at a lower level. So this for a few of the ssss sections and keep adjusting it till you get it just right on each one. If you like the results do all of them. You can also do things like making one node on each side and one in the center and pull down on the center one to make a V in the envelope line. This is like a quick fade out and back in. In some cases this works better and is less noticeable. On a vocal track you can adjust each word till it's the perfect volume, reduce breath noise to almost zero to get it out of the forground but not make the track sound "fake", all kinds of stuff. Once you get good at envelopes your mind will go wild with all the things you can do with them.
|
NW Smith
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 565
- Joined: 2006/05/08 16:01:48
- Location: Seattle, USA
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/07 11:19:07
(permalink)
Do a search on "Spitfish" It's a free de-esser part of the "fish fillets" collection of plug ins. It's simple to use and it does a good job taming those types of sounds.
|
No How
Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5180
- Joined: 2006/05/02 11:56:01
- Location: the boogie-woogie Isles
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/12 09:31:12
(permalink)
A couple ideas: 1) if you change the song to "FLEE life for what it DID" you'll get rid of a lot of sibs. 2) a painstakingly effective method is to envelope each 'esssss' out to where you can still hear the 's' but it's not distorting. De-essers (even the better ones like spitfish) can be frustrating IMO but if you can get it to do what you need more power to you.
post edited by No How - 2010/02/12 09:56:10
s o n g s – Beauty lodged in a bad hotel has no value. Raymond Lull
|
savageopera
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 625
- Joined: 2008/04/01 23:26:15
- Status: offline
Re:Sizzeling S's.. ouch!
2010/02/14 01:43:18
(permalink)
I use to have big meter pegs on my S's and hard consonant sounds. Sometimes careful mic technique is the answer. Turning your face away from the mic on problem high sibilant words can prevent the "ssss" from becoming dominant. If you concentrate on being aware of the upcoming "trouble" words or passages and shoot the "sss" to the side, and watch your enunciation carefully, your can print a smoother vocal track so less processing is required. "Careful and smooth"="no ouch".
post edited by savageopera - 2010/02/14 19:37:44
Sonar Artist, HP Laptop, AMD A8700 , 1T+250g, M-Audio Fast Track Ultra ,Roland 88 Hammer action, Roland AX-1, M-audio 88es, Arturia minilabII......When I was young I wanted to become a mad scientist. I achieved everything except the "scientist" part.... http://www.soundclick.com/savageopera
|