So I came home with this guitar last night..........

Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
Author
Starise
Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7563
  • Joined: 2007/04/07 17:23:02
  • Status: offline
2013/02/04 14:18:42 (permalink)

So I came home with this guitar last night..........

 
 I seen this guitar in the GC website and ended up buying it for a good price thinking that the EMG 81 and 85 pickups would be slammin' on anything heavy rock. The guitar itself is beautiful, neck through,abalone inlays. mahogany wood, jumbo frets,locking tuners and a graphtech nut. The only thing I might would have missed is a Floyd Rose. This guitar really does have some serious tone.
 
 Now for the bad news......I made a side by side comparison with my other guitars and  I can't really tell much of a difference in the sound,even the sustain seems the same for my bolt on necks with an FR.  My HSS Fender type axe sounds about the same on the bridge pickup which is non active alinco 4s. There may be a slight difference in tone but that could be worked out in the mix. My variax is so close that I might be wasting my money here. I had thought that I would get superior sustain with the neck through and active EMGs, I can't seem to tell a difference.
 
 I played the guitars  through an amp and through my HD500. Am I missing something...maybe I'm deaf?  I might have to take this guitar back even though it is lighter than the others and much nicer to look at.
 


Intel 5820K O.C. 4.4ghz, ASRock Extreme 4 LGA 2011-v3, 16 gig DDR4, ,
3 x Samsung SATA III 500gb SSD, 2X 1 Samsung 1tb 7200rpm outboard, Win 10 64bit, 
Laptop HP Omen i7 16gb 2/sdd with Focusrite interface.
 CbB, Studio One 4 Pro, Mixcraft 8, Ableton Live 10 
 
 www.soundcloud.com/starise
 
 
 
Twitter @Rodein
 
#1

73 Replies Related Threads

    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 14:49:12 (permalink)


    Are you playing a Fender Champ while comparing the tone?

    Or is it a Focusrite and Guitar Rig making it all sound the same?



    Stuff like that?





    It looks purty.


    #2
    spacey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8769
    • Joined: 2004/05/03 18:53:44
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 14:52:26 (permalink)
    Sounds like you have some deciding to do. Sure is pretty though.

    #3
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 15:53:45 (permalink)
    mike_mccue


    Are you playing a Fender Champ while comparing the tone?

    Or is it a Focusrite and Guitar Rig making it all sound the same?



    Stuff like that?





    It looks purty.

    Suggestion: turn off guitar-a-gog
    #4
    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 16:09:02 (permalink)
    Tim - the most important question is:

    did you get permission to bring her home in the first place????

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #5
    craigb
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41704
    • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
    • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 16:41:08 (permalink)
    Beagle


    Tim - the most important question is:

    did you get permission to bring her home in the first place????

    ('Tis better to get forgiveness than permission Reece.)
     
    All I can say is that my neck-through would sustain for well over a minute - much longer than my bolt-on neck guitars.

     
    Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
    #6
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 16:45:15 (permalink)


    How about screwing 4 3/16" bolts in the back of the neck joint to see if that increases the sustain?


    #7
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 16:47:27 (permalink)
    mike_mccue


    How about screwing 4 3/16" bolts in the back of the neck joint to see if that increases the sustain?

    Would those be standard bicycle bolts? If not, why waste the effort?
    #8
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 17:03:03 (permalink)


    Sometimes it's worth going custom if you want a special color.


    #9
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 17:05:15 (permalink)
    mike_mccue


    Sometimes it's worth going custom Earl Scheib if you want a special color.

    Old fashioned.
    #10
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 17:06:38 (permalink)


    I may have to wiki that?


    #11
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 17:07:46 (permalink)
    mike_mccue


    I may have to wiki that?

    Use .zipx
    #12
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 17:08:47 (permalink)
    The x is .zipx means x-tra fast.
    #13
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 17:21:11 (permalink)


    Like jalapenos and fiber?

    Or like a Prius back from the SpeedShop?




    #14
    digi2ns
    Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2694
    • Joined: 2010/11/24 14:27:12
    • Location: MICHIGAN
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 17:42:02 (permalink)
    Nice looking guit-fiddle Tim!

    What is it-I have an idea but not sure

    If the body is Mahogany, I would think it would do good

    The only thing I could think of to maybe improve sustain would be a brass nut and maybe a good heavy set of strings.

    It is pretty



    MIKE

    --Dell Studio XPS I7/870 2.93 Ghz, 8GB Mem, 2-2TB Barracuda HDs, 500 GB Ext.HDD, Win7/64
    --X1 64 Pro Expanded, Dual 21" Monitors 
    --PCR500  
    --MAUDIO FastTrack Ultra
    --Mackie 1604 VLZ PRO
    --Line6 X3 Live
    --Gibson, Fender, Takamine, Schecter, Washburn
    http://pogopoppa.wix.com/5thgear#
     http://soundcloud.com/digi2ns  
     
     
     
     

    #15
    digi2ns
    Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2694
    • Joined: 2010/11/24 14:27:12
    • Location: MICHIGAN
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/04 17:48:53 (permalink)
    This place has a bunch of goodies,

    Havent checked the quality of their suppliers yet though

    http://www.allparts.com/B...t-Brass-Nut_p_786.html




    MIKE

    --Dell Studio XPS I7/870 2.93 Ghz, 8GB Mem, 2-2TB Barracuda HDs, 500 GB Ext.HDD, Win7/64
    --X1 64 Pro Expanded, Dual 21" Monitors 
    --PCR500  
    --MAUDIO FastTrack Ultra
    --Mackie 1604 VLZ PRO
    --Line6 X3 Live
    --Gibson, Fender, Takamine, Schecter, Washburn
    http://pogopoppa.wix.com/5thgear#
     http://soundcloud.com/digi2ns  
     
     
     
     

    #16
    Starise
    Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7563
    • Joined: 2007/04/07 17:23:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/05 12:29:09 (permalink)
     LOL! Yeah I did get permission but I told my wife that the last guitar was the only one I would ever need, now I'm back pedaling to get around that statement. I would still like to get some more guitars one day ;)

     The guitar is a Schecter Hellraiser C-1. I'm not really sure if I can play this in church;).... it is a mahogany body. The thing is I am kind of new to the whole heavy sounding guitar thing and I didn't really know what I wanted.I'm probably not doing the right things.

      I was playing her last night and I am having some serious second thoughts about getting rid of her now. I think maybe it is my technique that isn't getting the results and not the fault of the guitar. I do find myself reaching for a whammy bar with this, however I'm bending more to compensate for the lack of a whammy. I think there is more sustain potential without a whammy bar.

      Mike(digi2ins), Thanks for the heads up on those parts.I'll check it out.  I  noticed some subtle things with the 81/85s. Maybe you can tell the differences. I recorded some tracks last night( I didn't rehearse so  the playing isn't all there or even close lol) anyways I am keeping the guitars a secret . I'll let the word out but wanted to see which sounds you thought were the best. This is purely subjective if you decide to participate.

     If you care to try and see which one is the real Schecter C-1 using EMG 81/85 be my guest. I recorded all of them through an HD500 using the " Singing Lead" sound coming out of the HD into a Mackie with no EQ. sent to Sonar in 24/48 bit via line level at around -3db and exported to Mp3 128.

     There are three guitars involved using both neck and bridge settings.One guitar is a Laguna HSS which is similar to a Fender strat HSS. A JTV69 Variax using a 1958 Les Paul standard setting on both neck and bridge and the Schecter C-1 Hellraiser.

    Here are some tracks I played using the different guitars on a rather clean song. 

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk1.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk2.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk3.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk4.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk5.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk6.mp3

     Some tracks of power chords with the guitars set on the bridge positions.

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk7.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk8.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk9.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk10.mp3



    Intel 5820K O.C. 4.4ghz, ASRock Extreme 4 LGA 2011-v3, 16 gig DDR4, ,
    3 x Samsung SATA III 500gb SSD, 2X 1 Samsung 1tb 7200rpm outboard, Win 10 64bit, 
    Laptop HP Omen i7 16gb 2/sdd with Focusrite interface.
     CbB, Studio One 4 Pro, Mixcraft 8, Ableton Live 10 
     
     www.soundcloud.com/starise
     
     
     
    Twitter @Rodein
     
    #17
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/05 13:33:33 (permalink)
    Starise

    The guitar is a Schecter Hellraiser C-1. I'm not really sure if I can play this in church;).... 
    Why? Does it say "Hellraiser" on it? Maybe some tape over the name?


    Now, I can see why you would not want to play my son's Jonez Custom guitar in church:


    #18
    digi2ns
    Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2694
    • Joined: 2010/11/24 14:27:12
    • Location: MICHIGAN
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/05 14:01:22 (permalink)
    Starise


    The guitar is a Schecter Hellraiser C-1.

    Mike(digi2ins), Thanks for the heads up on those parts.I'll check it out.  I  noticed some subtle things with the 81/85s. Maybe you can tell the differences. I recorded some tracks last night( I didn't rehearse so  the playing isn't all there or even close lol) anyways I am keeping the guitars a secret . I'll let the word out but wanted to see which sounds you thought were the best. This is purely subjective if you decide to participate.

    If you care to try and see which one is the real Schecter C-1 using EMG 81/85 be my guest. I recorded all of them through an HD500 using the " Singing Lead" sound coming out of the HD into a Mackie with no EQ. sent to Sonar in 24/48 bit via line level at around -3db and exported to Mp3 128.

    There are three guitars involved using both neck and bridge settings.One guitar is a Laguna HSS which is similar to a Fender strat HSS. A JTV69 Variax using a 1958 Les Paul standard setting on both neck and bridge and the Schecter C-1 Hellraiser.

    Here are some tracks I played using the different guitars on a rather clean song. 

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk1.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk2.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk3.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk4.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk5.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk6.mp3

    Some tracks of power chords with the guitars set on the bridge positions.

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk7.mp3 Laguna Neck

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk8.mp3    Schecter Bridge 

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk9.mp3  Variax Neck 

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk10.mp3  Laguna Bridge

    Well I was right on my thoughts of what is was.

    Havent actually listened much to Lagunas
    So heres my guess on the Power Chords
    Like to try later on the others LOL







    MIKE

    --Dell Studio XPS I7/870 2.93 Ghz, 8GB Mem, 2-2TB Barracuda HDs, 500 GB Ext.HDD, Win7/64
    --X1 64 Pro Expanded, Dual 21" Monitors 
    --PCR500  
    --MAUDIO FastTrack Ultra
    --Mackie 1604 VLZ PRO
    --Line6 X3 Live
    --Gibson, Fender, Takamine, Schecter, Washburn
    http://pogopoppa.wix.com/5thgear#
     http://soundcloud.com/digi2ns  
     
     
     
     

    #19
    zungle
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2745
    • Joined: 2006/02/15 13:00:33
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/05 19:27:17 (permalink)
    That actually looks to be an 89 in the neck.(copper logo)

    Your probably not gonna get full performance out of that set up. Active EMG's are gonna perform best on a tube amp and hitting the the input hard.

    EMG's and modelers or any solid state amp aren't always a great combo. 
    IMO ....Sansamp PSA,Axe Fx and V-Amp Pro, work better with active EMG's than others.........throwing a Palmer on a real amp is a good direct choice as well.
    Passive pickups will be warmer and fuller with most digital modelers.

    The 81's are particularly harsh with digital amp modeling......the have ceramic magnets with cutting highs and upper mids.

    That being said, the 85's have an alnico magnet and are a bit warmer,fuller and spongier than the 81.
     
    85's aren't bad for digital, in the bridge of a set neck guitar.

    The 85 and 85X are very nice in the bridge of an alder guitar,bolt neck,vintage trem.

    They are used frequently in the neck and a lot of folk don't know why?
    They were originally designed as a warmer active bridge pickup.
    I don't like 85's in the neck.....
    Used in the neck they are  dark and get muddy,they are also hard to balance with an 81.
    The 60,60X and H are much better suited in the neck especially on a Mahogany or set neck guitar.
    In an Alder vintage trem guitar the 60's and "H" have great cleans.

    The 81's are going to shine doing Metal with a tube amp, 12ax7 pre, using drop tunings on a guitar with a scale of 25.5 or more. They are very focused and will stay tight with good definition on the low end.
    The thing most folks are missing with the EMG's that, they aren't gonna instantly turn each guitar into a "Metal" machine, its the focus,balance and clarity they have that allows a better platform to sculpt the overall tone while using massive gain.
    It also helps that they are high output and dead quiet.


    Sorry for rambling


    And being overly...........serious.........


    Of course all of this rambling is only my non professional possibly messed up opinion......



    PS.....I have 4 axes loaded with various EMG's and 1 w/Dragon Fires



    post edited by zungle - 2013/02/05 22:33:37
    #20
    zungle
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2745
    • Joined: 2006/02/15 13:00:33
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/05 20:12:54 (permalink)
    I almost forgot......

    Cool guitar.......
    #21
    craigb
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41704
    • Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
    • Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/05 20:45:02 (permalink)
    I've only had one guitar with EMG's (a Steinberger) and it DID sound great through a Sansamp PSA, but better through my '79 Mike Soldano-modded Marshall JMP!

     
    Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
    #22
    zungle
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2745
    • Joined: 2006/02/15 13:00:33
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/05 22:29:59 (permalink)
    I've only had one guitar with EMG's (a Steinberger) and it DID sound great through a Sansamp PSA, but better through my '79 Mike Soldano-modded Marshall JMP!
     
     
     
    Sweet................!!!!!
    post edited by zungle - 2013/02/05 22:35:46
    #23
    Starise
    Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7563
    • Joined: 2007/04/07 17:23:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/08 10:12:00 (permalink)
    digi2ns


    Starise


    The guitar is a Schecter Hellraiser C-1.

    Mike(digi2ins), Thanks for the heads up on those parts.I'll check it out.  I  noticed some subtle things with the 81/85s. Maybe you can tell the differences. I recorded some tracks last night( I didn't rehearse so  the playing isn't all there or even close lol) anyways I am keeping the guitars a secret . I'll let the word out but wanted to see which sounds you thought were the best. This is purely subjective if you decide to participate.

    If you care to try and see which one is the real Schecter C-1 using EMG 81/85 be my guest. I recorded all of them through an HD500 using the " Singing Lead" sound coming out of the HD into a Mackie with no EQ. sent to Sonar in 24/48 bit via line level at around -3db and exported to Mp3 128.

    There are three guitars involved using both neck and bridge settings.One guitar is a Laguna HSS which is similar to a Fender strat HSS. A JTV69 Variax using a 1958 Les Paul standard setting on both neck and bridge and the Schecter C-1 Hellraiser.

    Here are some tracks I played using the different guitars on a rather clean song. 

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk1.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk2.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk3.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk4.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk5.mp3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk6.mp3

    Some tracks of power chords with the guitars set on the bridge positions.

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk7.mp3 Laguna Neck

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk8.mp3    Schecter Bridge 

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk9.mp3  Variax Neck 

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30861263/trk10.mp3  Laguna Bridge

    Well I was right on my thoughts of what is was.

    Havent actually listened much to Lagunas
    So heres my guess on the Power Chords
    Like to try later on the others LOL



     Hey Mike, Thanks for listening to some of the takes here and for your guesses. 

     The Laguna isn't really much different than a fender type HSS setup. They use a heavy body,swamp ash I think. For the money it is a nice guitar. I can get the strat quack on the neck and mid pick up exactly like a strat or rock on the bucker in the bridge.. The nice thing about both the Laguna and the Schecter is that they both have coil taps so you can make them sound so clean you would never know they have some kahunas know what I mean? FWIW I did not use coil taps in these examples.

     I would be interested in which sounds people prefer over others too. I will post which is what here soon. I am thinking that some might prefer a sound that they would never have guessed that it came from what it did. 


     The blind test is where it's at because all you can go on is how it sounds.


     Hey Zungle, thanks man! I'll double check those pickups and look more into that other gear. To me the neck pickup is the most clear compared to the bridge pickup which  comes across as more muddy and less defined. Maybe playing it through a tube amp would make a difference.  I probably should have tried drop D because I think this is maybe where this guitar would shine. I would be interested in a comparison between drop D on the Schecter and the drop D setting on the Variax. One big difference being that on the variax you still have the string tension. I appreciate your thoughts. I was hoping someone would talk me out of this but I'm not sure its possible lol.


     Bapu- Yeah it says " Hellraiser" on it..that's ok though I might raise hell in church with it. Why should the devil have all the good crap?


     Het Craig, I love those steinbergers too kind of a novelty like the Parker but in a different way. The one thing I don't like about those is that you need special strings.
     




    Intel 5820K O.C. 4.4ghz, ASRock Extreme 4 LGA 2011-v3, 16 gig DDR4, ,
    3 x Samsung SATA III 500gb SSD, 2X 1 Samsung 1tb 7200rpm outboard, Win 10 64bit, 
    Laptop HP Omen i7 16gb 2/sdd with Focusrite interface.
     CbB, Studio One 4 Pro, Mixcraft 8, Ableton Live 10 
     
     www.soundcloud.com/starise
     
     
     
    Twitter @Rodein
     
    #24
    zungle
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2745
    • Joined: 2006/02/15 13:00:33
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/08 10:45:34 (permalink)
    Starise,

    Which pickups are tapped?

    The neck is a copper logo so that should be the 89 .....split coil.

    The bridge should be an 81, but those are impossible to get muddy. 

    Looking at your pic it almost looks like the bridge is a Gold logo 85

    And that could get a soft on the bottom , depending on the scenario.


    Unlike passives EMG's work best raised up as high as possible.
    Literally as close the string as you can get.

    Also if you device or amp allows increase the input gain to borderline clipping.


    Also change your battery .


    See if any of that helps.





    #25
    Starise
    Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7563
    • Joined: 2007/04/07 17:23:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/08 11:11:21 (permalink)
    Hmmmm...I'm gonna need to check that out. I thought I had the typical 81/85 layout. I am practicing on  pick hammer on techniques(and I need a LOT of practice) and so I had the guy at GC lower my strings as close as possible. I guess you mean raising the pickup toward the strings.

     I would describe the bridge pickup as more mushy not as defined. Depending on how you hit the strings I think it is still very usable on some material. Unfortunately I sold my tube amp and so I have been using a small Behringer amp which actually isn't bad, has a bugera speaker in it and isn't too loud. I can get some harmonics/feedback going off of it but I'm sure tubes would be better.The Behringer has amp emulation built into it so I can get close.

    Intel 5820K O.C. 4.4ghz, ASRock Extreme 4 LGA 2011-v3, 16 gig DDR4, ,
    3 x Samsung SATA III 500gb SSD, 2X 1 Samsung 1tb 7200rpm outboard, Win 10 64bit, 
    Laptop HP Omen i7 16gb 2/sdd with Focusrite interface.
     CbB, Studio One 4 Pro, Mixcraft 8, Ableton Live 10 
     
     www.soundcloud.com/starise
     
     
     
    Twitter @Rodein
     
    #26
    Danny Danzi
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 5810
    • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
    • Location: DanziLand, NJ
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/08 11:15:42 (permalink)
    Hi Starise,

    I'll give you my opinion for what it's worth. With higher gain in your sound, you're not going to notice much difference in guitars, pick-ups or the tone. Gain has a way of hiding those elements.

    For example, I can play 5 different guitars in my rig right now and post the results....a few *may* hear a slight difference, the majority will hear no difference unless I use a strat or a tele. Anything with humbucks is going to be close unless you use something with a super distortion or Fernandes sustainer or something.

    The same with changing pups....you'll notice differences in presence, maybe some will have more mids...less mids, 4k boost...but there will be nothing mind blowing.

    Now, if you go to a clean sound or a very light gain, this is where you start to hear the true tonality within the guitar. Active pups are going to really shine here and stick out more in a good way. Passive pups will have less presence and be less expressive to touch/execution.

    I remember during my "pup trial" days where I went to a music store and bought every pup they had to try out. It was amazing how close they all sounded when higher gain was used. But back that gain down, or use a clean sound and then you could hear the differences. You WILL hear differences in the higher gain, but it won't be night and day unless you are comparing say Gibson Dirty Fingers to a Seymour Duncan Custom. No comparisson....the Duncan Custom will obliterate the Gibson in the tone area whether you're using high gain, light gain or a clean sound.

    Your best bet when buying guitars where you will be using them for higher gain, is to buy them for feel and playability over looking for a mind-blowing tone difference. The gain will always mask a majority of the tone. You'll hear subtle things, you'll get a little more sustain at times or hear certain frequencies accentuated, but it's never going to be a "wow" factor in my opinion and experience. Most humbuckers that come stock with any kind of rock guitar are going to have a similar output and tone with the differences being so subtle, they may not be worth talking about.

    Be careful if you decide to raise the pups up super high like Zungle mentioned. Sometimes if you raise them too high, you can literally get dual tones when trying to tune as the string does something funny when too close to the pup. You can really hear the effects of this as strings get old and tuning can become a nightmare.

    My rule of thumb is to chug some chords with higher gain. I raise the bass part of the pup until the notes I chug start to sound like a run on sentence without any percussive attack. When I hear that, I back the pup down until that goes away. For the high end of the pup, I fret the highest note on the neck and adjust the higher end of the pup until it gives me a nice sustain/hold without any weird artifacts. You can get away with raising this side a bit higher. By the time I get done, sometimes my high side is a little higher than my bass side. It depends on the guitar as well as how much output the pups give me in a particular area. Hope some of this helps....good luck and I love the look of that guitar! :)

    -Danny
    post edited by Danny Danzi - 2013/02/08 11:17:13

    My Site
    Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
    #27
    Starise
    Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7563
    • Joined: 2007/04/07 17:23:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/08 11:37:59 (permalink)
     Thanks Danny,

      Thanks for chimeing in here.So I'm not deaf or going bonkers...or if I am this doesn't figure into it. I am hearing exactly what you describe. Subtle differences but nothing to really make me step back and say  wow! This is radical! 

      The only other option I can get close with is the Variax but having said that I like the way this guitar feels in my hands. You can tell it is better made. The way it looks now if my electronic stuff takes a dump I can always lean on the real deal here. The vari has a standard HSS setup in it in addition to the electronics but It doesn't really do what this does....I guess this is why we need more than one guitar.

     The neck pickup in the Schecter has a nice creamy thing going on that is just different and nice on cleaner material. When I go to distorted material though it really doesn't stick out above anything else to any extreme. I am glad you confirmed that for me here.

     When I play with my pups I'll keep your advice in mind. Thanks again for giving some much needed input here. At least I know that what I'm hearing is pretty common.

    Intel 5820K O.C. 4.4ghz, ASRock Extreme 4 LGA 2011-v3, 16 gig DDR4, ,
    3 x Samsung SATA III 500gb SSD, 2X 1 Samsung 1tb 7200rpm outboard, Win 10 64bit, 
    Laptop HP Omen i7 16gb 2/sdd with Focusrite interface.
     CbB, Studio One 4 Pro, Mixcraft 8, Ableton Live 10 
     
     www.soundcloud.com/starise
     
     
     
    Twitter @Rodein
     
    #28
    zungle
    Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2745
    • Joined: 2006/02/15 13:00:33
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/08 11:41:54 (permalink)
    Be careful if you decide to raise the pups up super high like Zungle mentioned. Sometimes if you raise them too high, you can literally get dual tones when trying to tune as the string does something funny when too close to the pup. You can really hear the effects of this as strings get old and tuning can become a nightmare.

     
    Yes, been there..............
     
    But EMG's are designed to be as close to the string as possible...............with touching it of course............
    #29
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:So I came home with this guitar last night.......... 2013/02/08 11:54:25 (permalink)


    Gain is an actual description of change in voltage: Voltage out - Voltage in = gain.

    I think sometimes, heck often times, guitarists use the words "high gain" when they mean "square wave".

    A square wave has 3dB more RMS voltage than a sine wave with the same peak... and that's all it's ever gonna have.

    Most preamps have 50dB to 80dB gain.

    You can squash a sinusoidal signal into a square wave with very little gain... and indeed that is what all modern distortion circuits are doing. That's how you get the controlled mayhem sound... by tone shaping with minimum gain.

    Square waves are square waves... they don't have a lot of potential for character... but a circuit can have some sort of personality with regard to how quickly it alters a sinusoidal wave and turns it into a square wave. You can appreciate all sorts of cool sounds on the front end of a signal being squashed into a square wave.  In so called "high gain" guitar amp designs that is all going on in the circuit and not in between the guitar and the input so the pickup's contribution to tonality is marginalized.

    In older amp designs the squaring happens right at the first stage with the tube... it's exciting to hear a PAF make a Fender Champ scream. It never get's totally squared... there's always some rounding at the corners... and that gives it character as you push the corners flat with your pick attack.




    You'll know when you are really in the presence of actual high gain... it will cause the trans-conductance happening in the power amp to drive the speaker cones straight out of the front of the cabinet.

    Don't ask me how I know. :-)



    With cleaner signals that aren't forced into well formed squares you can easily hear how pickups react to the impedance and reactance of a good guitar amp. You can hear how the frequency response alters with amplitude.

    All those details get masked when the signal is squared up by a gain circuit optimized to sculpt square waves with as little gain as possible.





     Tube amps remain popular because players can sense a dynamic relationship between the reactance at the  first  preamp stage with the pickups. There's quite literally a spring of "tension" that speaks back to the pickup and the whole becomes a system from string vibration through to the speaker cone... it's a great big spring.

    It's a lot of fun.

    If you plug your passive pickup into something solid state instead of a tube the spring analogy breaks down and it's like you put a big resistive dampener on the spring. It's still fun... but you aren't going to sense the dynamic springiness with the same drama. Most folks using active pickups and other solid state tone shapers are actually looking for a square wave they like the sound of so they don't miss the reduced reactance very much.





    I love guitars and amps... they let you make temporary sculpture with air molecules. :-)


    best regards,
    mike
    post edited by mike_mccue - 2013/02/08 12:19:49


    #30
    Page: 123 > Showing page 1 of 3
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1