So, why is MONO important? NOT!
So, why is MONO important? NOT! I often drive through east lansing, and the MSU campus. I have been way happy to see dozens of kids wearing headphones. Staples is selling such headphones for more than $300. So, of course mixing with/for headphones is a requirement. But why worry about MONO. Nina Hagan used way-happy polarity adjustments to broaden the sound stage, in the '70's. Sure these tracks in MONO would be not the same. But why should I care now?
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/08 01:25:34
(permalink)
You don't need to, but mono compatibility is still preferred for any AV work esp., since you never know what format the audio will be tortured into. Some web stuff is still gets mono music, although TV is mostly broadcast in stereo these days. It used to be much more important - not for home recordists but commercially. It is also an excellent method of checking mixes. If you can hear the separation in mono, you know it will sound good in stereo.
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/08 06:55:53
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby bluzdog 2015/05/08 08:22:19
Mono is a great tool to have under control. Your music ends up in stereo for sure but mono work earlier leads to better final stereo images. I prefer the mono speaker to be a single speaker in this case and separate to the main speakers. Mono sounds better to me being heard from one speaker alone. It can be used in a technical way to check mono compatibility with say a hardware synth sound that has used excessive phase devices in its final effects processing. I once had a hardware synth patch that sounded amazing in stereo and collapsed to a heap in mono. Loss of level and terrible tone change. In the end I shifted the phase of one channel by 90 degrees I think and narrowed down the image. It still sounded stellar wide in stereo but collapsed very nicely in mono not loosing level now and sounding robust. It means it will always sound wide but if for any reason the stereo image is collapsed to mono the synth part will stay behind and remain. Good for checking drum buses too for solid mono sound but just nice wide stereo sound. One artistic creative device might be jumping from a full wide stereo image to a total mono image. For a short time. eg 4 bars. Getting the mix to sound good in mono takes some practice too. It forces you to make more changes to similar sounding parts to separate themselves. Back in stereo once panned etc they sound clearer then. Turn them down now a little and they are still heard. Maximum illusion minimum voltage. Another creative effect might be jumping from the normal stereo mix to a mono mix again but panned to one side with the out of phase copy on the right side. ie in phase L and out of phase R. When you use this effect you might want to temporarily edit the EQ of both sides to make it sound better for the duration. Listening to your mix summed in mono on a small speaker at low volume tells you a lot too. If there are too many things going on it will be revealed in this check. All the parts are lined up with each other in the same spot. It clutters everything. After pealing back some parts and simplifying tracks everything will sound clearer in mono. Just the right amount of things going on. Back in stereo and panned it will sound twice as good. It is also good to listen to just the left channel only to make sure the vocals (or lead instruments) and important stuff is still present in the mix. And same for right channel. Listen to what is just there. Many times I have been in cafes or restaurants and there are two speakers set up but only one is working. I have composed music for AM radio and in many TV soundtrack situations where my music ended up being summed L+R for whatever reason. I got caught out badly once in that situation. (A very important part nearly disappeared because I was being smart!) It is good to know how that is going to sound by doing a mono sum check.
post edited by Jeff Evans - 2015/05/08 07:08:46
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/08 10:27:07
(permalink)
Just name your album "For Headphones Only" and you'll be OK. The process would be so easy if we could be assured that everybody'd be hearing our stuff only through quality headphones. (Unfortunately, those cans you see the kids walking around with are not high-quality, just overpriced.) But the reality is that if the music is successful, it'll end up being played over a nightclub's (mono) sound system, or used in a TV soundtrack (might as well be mono), or played on radio (ditto).
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
rumleymusic
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1533
- Joined: 2006/08/23 18:03:05
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/08 12:00:59
(permalink)
Yeah, it is a good way to make sure your music is mixed properly. There are only two tracks in stereo, and there is a lot of information shared between them most of the time. Summing to mono is still the best way to expose and amplify problems not only in phase, but also in balance. As an end medium for serious listening, there is no mono anymore, not even in cell phones (okay maybe cheap ones). Live PA and strip malls still play music in mono, but with audio quality that bad, mono compatibility problems are the least of your worries.
|
davdud101
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1058
- Joined: 2010/07/15 13:30:44
- Location: Detroit, MI
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/08 13:04:15
(permalink)
Michigander I am! You're far out there though. Mono is pretty important for me... I've noticed that when things are in mono you may get disgusting frequency buildups, masking and overlapping. Someone may be listening on a phone or a single speaker. I'd like to mix to account for every possibility. what bitflipper said also is true (i just didn't wanna repeat info:D). ^^
Mics: MXL 990, MXL R80, 2 x MXL Tempo XLRs, Cobalt Co9, SM48, iSK Starlight Cans: Hifiman HE4XX, AKG M220 Gear: Cakewalk BBL - PreSonus Firepod - Alesis Elevate 3 - Axiom 49 DAW: Win10, AMD FX-8300, 16GB DDR3
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/08 13:58:32
(permalink)
A few more reasons why mono matters.
iPads and other tablets may claim their built-in speakers are stereo but in practice they're often on the same side of the device so are effectively mono in that any phase cancellation effect between left and right will be massive. Laptop speakers, even if a few inches apart,have the same problem.
You have no control over the listening environment. Rather than follow best practice, people often put hifi and surround speakers in all kinds of strange places. As in putting the left speaker under the sofa and the right speaker across the room facing it up near the ceiling on a wall bracket so they're less visually obtrusive. Or side by side with one angled left and the other right and the listener in the dead zone between them.
You have no control over how end users or intermediate stages between you and them might lower your stereo track's resolution. Or how someone might start with downloading high resolution mp3 then compress that into a much smaller mp3. When converted to low bitrate mp3 stereo phasing issues can reveal themselves through headphones as the entire track switching from side to side like a drunk staggering down the road.
Finally, mix the low end with stereo separation and it can sound really weird through headphones as all the weight of the track switches sides or sticks on one side. Again, not pleasant to listen to.
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/08 16:15:35
(permalink)
OK I have used panipulator for years to check stuff in MONO and channel flip. I sorta thought the headphones seem to be an improvement over ear buds. And in the past year I have noticed more wearing the phones. But I defer to the BIT man about quality. So: what is the point of stereo? Only for our temporary fun cuz our happiest fun may reduce usefulness? Fun listening to that old Nina stuff.
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/08 21:38:45
(permalink)
YouDontHasToCallMeJohnson So: what is the point of stereo?
Stereo means the hi-fi shop gets to sell everyone two speakers instead of one? More seriously, you've made a very valid point there. Most live and club PA systems are mono and lots of great music has been recorded in mono and sometimes still is. For a bass/drums/one guitar band the best mix can easily be just to send everything straight down the middle like they did in the 1950s and early 60s.
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
olemon
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 768
- Joined: 2011/10/27 05:35:19
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/08 22:24:45
(permalink)
I'm starting to toggle the mix bus to/from mono from time to time, just to listen to the mix. From what I gather, if I can hear each track in mono and still have a decent balance in the mix, I'm doing something right:)
https://www.reverbnation.com/scottholson Platinum, Studio One 3 Pro, Win 10 (x64), AMD FX-8350, ASUS M5A97 R2.0, 16GB, RME UCX, Digimax DP88, Faderport 8, Revive Audio Mod Studio Channel, Vintage Audio M72, Summit Audio TLA-50, KRK Rokit 5 G2 Monitors, Guitars "If you wait till the last minute, it only takes a minute."
|
codamedia
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1185
- Joined: 2005/01/24 09:58:10
- Location: Winnipeg Canada
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/09 20:36:11
(permalink)
YouDontHasToCallMeJohnson So, why is MONO important? NOT!
- There are many iPod docks sold that are MONO only (1 speaker)... and these sell regularly at costco, walmart, and many other locations. I will lump in the "iPod Dock Alarm Clock" with this as well.
- FM Radio collapses to MONO when the signal weakens. Some people live in this "collapse" area...
- You will be amazed at how many people listen to music through the internal speaker on an iPhone or equivalent.
- Many (if not most) 70 volt systems are setup in mono. These are the systems in department stores, elevators, commercial buildings, etc... etc...
- The majority of PA systems are still setup in MONO. This is done to assure that the people on the right side of the stage hear the same thing as the people in the left, or middle.
- Many TV's are still MONO, and AM Radio is MONO.
- If your competitor prepared for MONO and you didn't... your music will sound terrible compared to theirs when heard in that environment.
If you are 100% certain your music will never be played in the above environments, then go ahead - ignore mono. My rule of thumb is this... - Never assume your music is being listened to in stereo.
- Mix it in Stereo, FIX it in Mono! The stereo mix WILL sound better when you fix any problems that get revealed in mono.
- If you care about your music, you will make it so it will still sound the best it can in the worst possible situation.
IMO - the only reason not to make your mix work in MONO is laziness!
post edited by codamedia - 2015/05/09 20:44:56
Don't fix it in the mix ... Fix it in the take! Desktop: Win 7 Pro 64 Bit , ASUS MB w/Intel Chipset, INTEL Q9300 Quad Core, 2.5 GHz, 8 GB RAM, ATI 5450 Video Laptop: Windows 7 Pro, i5, 8 Gig Ram Hardware: Presonus FP10 (Firepod), FaderPort, M-Audio Axiom 49, Mackie 1202 VLZ, POD X3 Live, Variax 600, etc... etc...
|
Kamikaze
Max Output Level: -45 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3013
- Joined: 2015/01/15 21:38:59
- Location: Da Nang, Vietnam
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/10 08:05:40
(permalink)
I love my mono little friend, one day I may by it a brother, when I chain it, it will still be mono, if I by a splitter it will be stereo.
|
ston
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 965
- Joined: 2008/03/04 12:28:40
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/12 04:01:33
(permalink)
All natural sounds are mono (apart from that produced by the Stereo Feedback Echoless Duck).
Stereo is just an artificial virtualisation of the 3D space containing mono soundsources.
So both are important and related I reckon.
Did I forgot my meds again..?
|
SvenArne
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2719
- Joined: 2007/01/31 12:51:29
- Location: Trondheim, Norway
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/12 05:01:00
(permalink)
I feel that mono is bigger now than any time in history since the 70s. Phones, docking stations, portable Bluetooth speakers, Tivoli-type desktop radios etc etc...
|
bluzdog
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1928
- Joined: 2007/10/06 17:15:14
- Location: Lakewood, Colorado
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/12 08:52:31
(permalink)
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/12 11:07:30
(permalink)
|
Kamikaze
Max Output Level: -45 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3013
- Joined: 2015/01/15 21:38:59
- Location: Da Nang, Vietnam
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/12 12:05:23
(permalink)
ston All natural sounds are mono (apart from that produced by the Stereo Feedback Echoless Duck).
Stereo is just an artificial virtualisation of the 3D space containing mono soundsources.
So both are important and related I reckon.
Did I forgot my meds again..?
How do you mean 'all natural sounds', I guess you don't mean instruments? For instance an acoustic guitar is resonating and giving off different frequencies from teh stings and the body. so has a stereo width. Same to a flute, the head is producing the sound, but the sound is escaping from holes along it's body and the body is also resonating differently along its length. A piano too has strings spread throughout it's body and even when playing one string sympathetic resonance occur throughout the whole instrument.
|
rumleymusic
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1533
- Joined: 2006/08/23 18:03:05
- Location: California
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/12 12:33:15
(permalink)
Ronan gives a convincing argument for mono compatibility here:http://recordingbootcamp.com/2015/05/the-best-stereo-technique-for-recording-strings-on-pop-rock-productions/ That is some good advice. Especially in the context of a pop record. If you need to mess with the stereo field, recording with a coincident pair is a good idea. One of the reasons we do opt for spaced pairs in orchestral recordings is the stereo separation based on phase is much more natural sounding and open, and less exaggerated than a separation based on level differences, but we do have to sacrifice good mono compatibility in AB or Decca arrangements. One of the reasons US engineers in the mid 20th century adopted the Blumlein pattern for ensemble recording over Decca and AB which was popular in Britain and Europe, was because of Mono compatibility. The US and US consumers have always been a little behind the times when it came to audio technology, and we still are to a certain degree.
|
ston
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 965
- Joined: 2008/03/04 12:28:40
- Status: offline
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/14 10:30:52
(permalink)
Kamikaze How do you mean 'all natural sounds', I guess you don't mean instruments? For instance an acoustic guitar is resonating and giving off different frequencies from teh stings and the body. so has a stereo width. Same to a flute, the head is producing the sound, but the sound is escaping from holes along it's body and the body is also resonating differently along its length. A piano too has strings spread throughout it's body and even when playing one string sympathetic resonance occur throughout the whole instrument.
Stereo reproduction is a means to emulate the effect of hearing sound sources in 3D space (nominally 2D, but with some additional processing trickery 3D emulation is possible). All mono sound sources produce a stereo effect, or have stereo width, due to the fact that we have two ears. Stereo reproduction systems emulate this. As to whether a guitar, flute, piano or 'produce sounds in stereo' as you state is a debatable point. In this case, it's our ears which produce the stereo effect based on the transmission of sound waves from, effectively, an infinite number of individual (mono) sound sources. In this case, by infinite I mean continuous, or as near continuous as you can get given the limitations of certainty in measurement. The sum of those individual sound sources do not have stereo width, they have 4-dimensional width. That we have two ears provides the means to identify the location in 3D space, a simplified version of which is location in 2D (stereo) space. To put that another way, a guitar|piano|flute doesn't produce a stereo image, it produces an incredibly complex set of information allowing, given sufficiently accurate measurement and calculation, depiction of the entire 4D environment. For example, you could build an image of the room the instrument was in, the materials the room was constructed of, the location of the instrument in the room, a depiction of how each element of the instrument was moving in space etc. Lord knows how much processing that would take, or the accuracy of the information gathering that was required. You'd need something like...a human brain (or a Culture Mind) ;-) So I'll correct my original statement from 'all natural sound sources are mono' to 'all natural sound sources are 4-dimensional'. Stereo they are not.
|
Re: So, why is MONO important? NOT!
2015/05/16 08:34:51
(permalink)
OK. So MONO and Stereo are here to stay for a while. Mixing for either should lend and ear to the other. And depending upon the particular project, 5.1, 7.1 and 10.2, should be "collapsible" to all the lessers What prompted my post was the often asked question about using headphones for mixing. It seems to be a requirement now. Recently I was listening to TV with headphones and was very happy to hear how guitar sound was ping-ponging from left to right, quickly, in time. And: I learned a lot listening to the Beatles White album, especially Dear Prudence, with headphones. --------------- Definitions are fun. If a tree falls in the woods and no one (human) is within ear shot, does it make a sound? Yes. Does it make a noise? No.
|