Helpful Reply[Solved] Confusion with Concrete Limiter

Author
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1153
  • Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
  • Status: offline
2014/01/20 11:13:40 (permalink)

[Solved] Confusion with Concrete Limiter

I have recently begun using the Concrete Limiter.  Previously I used Boost and that behaved as I expected.  That is, when I set an absolute limit to -1dB, I didn't get any "red LEDs" on the meter for the main bus.
 
With the Concrete limiter, I keep getting the overdrive LEDs lighting up on my main bud, even when I have the limiter ceiling set to -4dB.  I am thinking I must be misunderstanding the sequence the effects are applied.  I have the Concrete limiter in the bottom slot on my main bus ProChannel.  I thought that was the last thing the out the door. 
 
I must be missing something basic.  I understand that because of sampling error, the output might be slightly higher than the ceiling, but not 4 dB.  Any idea what I might be doing wrong?
post edited by Anderton - 2014/01/20 14:35:43

DAW: SONAR Platinum Audio I/F: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 gen2
OS: Windows 10 64-bit CPU: Haswell 4790 4.0 GHz, 4 core, 8 thread  Memory: 16 GB      Video: GTX-760Ti
Storage: Sandisk SSD 500GB for active projects. ReadyNAS 20 TB for long-term storage

sonocrafters.com
#1
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 11:27:04 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby dubdisciple 2014/01/20 11:46:34
The right fader is the one you set for output. The left fader is the one you set for increasing the loudness. 
 
Leave the right fader at the top and you get no limiting. Move it down to the point you want your output not to exceed and it wont go over that point. 

Best
John
#2
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 11:46:54 (permalink)
Regarding the sequence of signal flow, the ProChannel is pre-FX bin by default. If you click POST on the channel strip, it moves to post FX bin. Have you got anything in there?

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#3
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 12:05:43 (permalink)
Excellent point John. That got me when X1 E came out.  

Best
John
#4
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1153
  • Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 13:49:58 (permalink)
John T
Regarding the sequence of signal flow, the ProChannel is pre-FX bin by default. If you click POST on the channel strip, it moves to post FX bin. Have you got anything in there?


Ahhhh.  I think that's what is wrong.  I didn't know about that Post FX Bin setting.  Yes, I had a stereo widener in the FX bin.  Can you confirm that the processing in both the FX bin and in the ProChannel is top-to-bottom (in at the top, out at the bottom)?  It seems to work that way.
 
After making that change, I have the Concrete Limiter ceiling set at -2dB.  The limiter reads a peak of -2dB and my bus meter reads a peak of -1dB which I think can be accounted for because I am allowing the limiter to automatically set its attack time.  Some transients are probably getting through the limiter, but that's OK.  This setting seems to work as I expected.
 
Thanks.

DAW: SONAR Platinum Audio I/F: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 gen2
OS: Windows 10 64-bit CPU: Haswell 4790 4.0 GHz, 4 core, 8 thread  Memory: 16 GB      Video: GTX-760Ti
Storage: Sandisk SSD 500GB for active projects. ReadyNAS 20 TB for long-term storage

sonocrafters.com
#5
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 13:51:15 (permalink)
Yes, it's top to bottom.

There's a signal flow diagram in the help file if you go having a look for it.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#6
scook
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 24146
  • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
  • Location: TX
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 13:51:56 (permalink)
Yes, signal flow come in the top out through bottom in both FX bin and Pro Channel
http://www.cakewalk.com/D...amp;Req=Mixing.07.html
#7
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1153
  • Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 14:14:11 (permalink)
scook
Yes, signal flow come in the top out through bottom in both FX bin and Pro Channel
http://www.cakewalk.com/D...amp;Req=Mixing.07.html


That's very interesting and helpful, but unless I missed it, it doesn't really address the relationship of the prochannel and effects bis on the master bus.  But I think I understand how that is working now.

DAW: SONAR Platinum Audio I/F: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 gen2
OS: Windows 10 64-bit CPU: Haswell 4790 4.0 GHz, 4 core, 8 thread  Memory: 16 GB      Video: GTX-760Ti
Storage: Sandisk SSD 500GB for active projects. ReadyNAS 20 TB for long-term storage

sonocrafters.com
#8
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 14:19:53 (permalink)
It does; look at the PC next to the effects bin, with the little switch symbols. That's showing you the two places in the overall flow it can go.
 
In terms of signal flow, there's no difference between tracks and buses, other than buses omit the clip section at the top.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#9
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 14:21:47 (permalink)
I see your point; it gives a simplified version of the bus at the bottom, which is a bit confusing, IMO.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#10
Sanderxpander
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3873
  • Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 14:29:32 (permalink)
If you would like to have just the Concrete Limiter at the end of your signal chain, you can add an "fx chain" to your Pro Channel and put the stereo widener in there.
#11
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1153
  • Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 14:41:53 (permalink)
John T
I see your point; it gives a simplified version of the bus at the bottom, which is a bit confusing, IMO.


If the flow is the same on the main output bus as on each channel, this indicates that all the effects (FX bin and ProChannel are pre-fader.  If that is the case, how could you ever have a real limiter?  A limiter needs to be post-fader -- the very last thing out.

DAW: SONAR Platinum Audio I/F: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 gen2
OS: Windows 10 64-bit CPU: Haswell 4790 4.0 GHz, 4 core, 8 thread  Memory: 16 GB      Video: GTX-760Ti
Storage: Sandisk SSD 500GB for active projects. ReadyNAS 20 TB for long-term storage

sonocrafters.com
#12
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 14:53:50 (permalink)
I see what you're saying, but we don't have the same problems in a DAW as we would in a setup made out of physical boxes. In the case of Sonar, you can trust that the buses operate at completely reliable unity gain, and if the master bus fader is at 0db, then it won't do anything to change the level being put out by the last item before it.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#13
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1153
  • Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 15:04:35 (permalink)
John T
I see what you're saying, but we don't have the same problems in a DAW as we would in a setup made out of physical boxes. In the case of Sonar, you can trust that the buses operate at completely reliable unity gain, and if the master bus fader is at 0db, then it won't do anything to change the level being put out by the last item before it.


It looks like I had my main bus fader a little above 0dB.  It looked like it was at unity, but the flyover said 0.9dB, which explains the difference between the limiter and fader readings.  They are now reporting almost identical peaks.  So it seems like if using a limiter on the master bus (or any bus,) the best practice is to leave the fader at unity gain.


post edited by cparmerlee - 2014/01/20 15:29:34

DAW: SONAR Platinum Audio I/F: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 gen2
OS: Windows 10 64-bit CPU: Haswell 4790 4.0 GHz, 4 core, 8 thread  Memory: 16 GB      Video: GTX-760Ti
Storage: Sandisk SSD 500GB for active projects. ReadyNAS 20 TB for long-term storage

sonocrafters.com
#14
cparmerlee
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1153
  • Joined: 2013/06/25 22:14:42
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 15:08:09 (permalink)
Sanderxpander
If you would like to have just the Concrete Limiter at the end of your signal chain, you can add an "fx chain" to your Pro Channel and put the stereo widener in there.

Thanks for the tip.  I had looked at the FX chains in ProChannel before, but I guess I thought they were all pre-packaged chains.  I didn't think of adding my own.  So if I am already using the ProChannel, it seems like the best practice would be to never use an FX bin at all, and simply insert the FX stack into the ProChannel exactly where you want it to go.  I can't think of any good reason to use Both ProChannel strips and the FX bin on the same channel or bus.  It seems much more straightforward to have all the effects in the same stack so that there is absolutely no doubt about what is going on.

DAW: SONAR Platinum Audio I/F: Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 gen2
OS: Windows 10 64-bit CPU: Haswell 4790 4.0 GHz, 4 core, 8 thread  Memory: 16 GB      Video: GTX-760Ti
Storage: Sandisk SSD 500GB for active projects. ReadyNAS 20 TB for long-term storage

sonocrafters.com
#15
scook
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 24146
  • Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
  • Location: TX
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 15:14:35 (permalink)
Drop effects into the ProChannel will load the plug-ins in an FX chain automatically.
#16
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 15:26:49 (permalink)
cparmerlee
So if I am already using the ProChannel, it seems like the best practice would be to never use an FX bin at all, and simply insert the FX stack into the ProChannel exactly where you want it to go.  I can't think of any good reason to use Both ProChannel strips and the FX bin on the same channel or bus.  It seems much more straightforward to have all the effects in the same stack so that there is absolutely no doubt about what is going on.

Increasingly, I find myself doing exactly that. On the mix I'm working on right now, I have about 30 tracks, and only five of the regular effects bins have anything in them.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#17
Sanderxpander
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3873
  • Joined: 2013/09/30 10:08:24
  • Status: offline
Re: Confusion with Concrete Limiter 2014/01/20 16:40:12 (permalink)
Which is one of the reasons I personally avoid the ProChannel, haha. To each his own. I agree it makes sense to make an fx chain in one logical place rather than keep two separate ones.
#18
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1