Helpful Reply[Solved] Query re setting up reverb send

Author
ULTRABRA
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 484
  • Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
  • Location: Helsinki, Finland
  • Status: offline
2014/12/03 06:21:49 (permalink)

[Solved] Query re setting up reverb send

I have a new reverb and have been testing it under different circumstances.   I know how to set up a send with reverb on it, but I discovered some things that did not happen as I expected, if someone could explain/clarify :
 
I have a vocal on an audio track, and set a reverb as an insert on that track.  I got things sounding just right and the reverb had a mix of 41.5% dry/wet.
 
I wanted to get this exact same sound using the reverb as a send.    I insterted the reverb 100% wet on a bus.   On the vocal track (with its insert turned off) what send level should I need to set it to match the way it was on the insert?   At full level, 0db, it didn't sound right at all (too much).
 
I noticed also that if I routed a track via the reverb return with the reverb turn OFF (essentailly routing a track via a send with nothing on it) the tone still changed (even when there was no reverb there) - it just sounded a bit louder (although checking the master bus, there appeared to be no volume change).
 
Perhaps I just don't understand the basic way things happen when send are used ...... if there was nothing on the send, why would it sound different?
 
Probably did not explain this too well ... but appreciate any feedback.

HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM,  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3    
My Soundcloud
#1
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 07:19:03 (permalink)
I'll answer the second question first. The reason it sounded louder with the send on and going through an empty buss is that there is now two signals, albeit identical, hence it is louder.
 
Remember a send "sends" a copy of the original signal and then feeds that to the master buss or further down the signal chain. The original signal also exists unless the track fader is reduced. That's assuming the send is pre -fader of course. If the send is post-fader then the send level is affected by the track fader.
 
In answer to the first part, you should set the reverb on the buss to 100% wet and then adjust the effect level with the send level. In this instance the send should be "post-fader". That way you have the dry signal controlled by the track volume. The "wet" sound is controlled by the send level but once set at a level in relation to the dry track that you are happy with you don't have to keep changing it every time you adjust track (dry) level volume as the send is decreased or increased by the same relative amount.
 
In theory to achieve the same level as when the reverb is on the track you should set the track volume to 0dB, the send level to 41.5%, buss volume level to 0dB with reverb set to 100% wet. Once that is done make sure the send is "post fader" and the relative level is maintained as explained above.
 
HTH
 
 
#2
ULTRABRA
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 484
  • Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
  • Location: Helsinki, Finland
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 07:41:13 (permalink)
Thanks Karl.
 
That is pretty much how I imagined it .. though I was not sure if I needed to set the send level to anything other than 0db, but obviously I need that to be at 41.5% also, as you say.
 
But, this send level isn't in %, its in db, so seems to be from 0db to -76db .... so take a level that is 41.5% between?
 
ie,    100%-41.5%m= 58.5%    So I need 58.5% of 76 = 44.46    so I set the level to be -44.46db   (if that math is correct :-))

HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM,  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3    
My Soundcloud
#3
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 07:48:53 (permalink)
Er..... School was a long time ago for me but yeah roughly although I'm not sure it's quite an exact science hence the words "In theory" at the start of my answer. I'm sure someone who knows better than me will be along with a more scientific answer on that.
 
The send control effectively becomes the wet/dry control of the reverb because although it is sending a dry signal to the buss the reverb is set to 100% so there is no dry signal at all coming from the buss just wet signal.
 
I'd say the best way to get the sound you want is to use your ears, the golden rule is.......if it sounds right it is right. 
#4
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10654
  • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
  • Location: TeXaS
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 09:45:31 (permalink)
Math is hard, as Barbie says.  But for reference, 6 dB makes a sound twice as loud, not 100 dB.  -44 dB wouldn't be heard on the send.  Your 40% setting wet is less than 1/2 reverb, 60% dry.  Try -8 dB or so to start with, then adjust by ear. 
 
@

https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
 
there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
#5
ULTRABRA
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 484
  • Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
  • Location: Helsinki, Finland
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 11:12:41 (permalink)
Thanks AT, you are totally right of course --- that came from my maths whilst not being at my studio ;-)   So of course -44db isn't 41.5% at all ...
 
But, anyway, I tried around -8db as you suggested and various other levels ... but I just could NOT get it to sound the same as the insert.    The send version sounded BETTER, thicker/warmer, hard to describe, but the Insert version was certainly harsher.  I cannot think WHY that can be.   All reverb settings were identical (except the send version was 100% wet).    There are no other effects at all anywhere in Sonar.   
 
Logically the insert version and the send version should sound the same right (when the wet-dry balance is right)?   Any ideas why the send version in this case does not?
 
I'm using 2CAudio Aether, if that helps at all.

HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM,  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3    
My Soundcloud
#6
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 11:47:32 (permalink)
I use the graphic nature of the send volume to tel what is right. Where it is pointing to such as straight up means 50 %.  A quarter up means 25 % and so on. Its not exact but I use my ears mostly any way.  I also use the fader on the return, (aux) buss to help dial in just the right amount. 
 
Being too exact is a little unnecessary. Its OK to be exact but why? Its audio! Your ears are the best way to decide how it sounds.  

Best
John
#7
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 12:01:31 (permalink)
ULTRABRA
Thanks AT, you are totally right of course --- that came from my maths whilst not being at my studio ;-)   So of course -44db isn't 41.5% at all ...
 
But, anyway, I tried around -8db as you suggested and various other levels ... but I just could NOT get it to sound the same as the insert.    The send version sounded BETTER, thicker/warmer, hard to describe, but the Insert version was certainly harsher.  I cannot think WHY that can be.   All reverb settings were identical (except the send version was 100% wet).    There are no other effects at all anywhere in Sonar.   
 
Logically the insert version and the send version should sound the same right (when the wet-dry balance is right)?   Any ideas why the send version in this case does not?
 
I'm using 2CAudio Aether, if that helps at all.




Did you drag copy the reverb? Try this and report back:
 
1. Open the send reverb, and save its preset under a new name, like HarshnessTest.
2. Insert a fresh instance of the reverb into the track insert (e.g., drag from the browser or use the insert pop-up)
3. Load the HarshnessTest preset.
 
Is the sound still different? 

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#8
ULTRABRA
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 484
  • Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
  • Location: Helsinki, Finland
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 14:14:44 (permalink)
Thanks for the replies.
 
@John I hear you --- it was not the fact that I could not get it EXACTLY the same - the issue is that using reverb as an insert was resulting in a lower quality than same reverb via the send.    So, I could not get a result that was even close to being the same.
 
@Anderton :     I inserted a preset, that had a mix of 41.5%, and then on the send I put the same preset there (just that it was 100% wet).   I tried with Breverb and got exactly the same result:   the insert sounded kind of tinny, and the send version sounded much smoother and warmer.  So, I think I eliminated the reverb plugin itself as the cause, but why would I get this result comparing insert and send.   Could anyone else try?   I made a fresh song in Sonar, 2 audio tracks containing the same vocal sample.  On one track I added a reverb as an insert, and on the other I added reverb via a send which had the exact same reverb preset, just that it was 100% wet.   Is anyone else getting the same issue as I am?    Or is it something I'm doing wrong?
 
 

HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM,  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3    
My Soundcloud
#9
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 16775
  • Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
  • Location: Bristol, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 15:24:00 (permalink)
Can you describe your routing, distinguishing clearly between track output destinations and send destinations.
 
 

CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughout
Custom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
#10
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13933
  • Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
  • Location: NYC
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 15:29:52 (permalink)
So when you set a send level of 0dB to a 100% wet effect return, post fader, does that mean the effective dry/wet ratio is 50%?

James
Windows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
#11
ULTRABRA
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 484
  • Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
  • Location: Helsinki, Finland
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 15:38:37 (permalink)
@Bristol    
Track output goes to Master, which goes to Main Outs
Send output to Reverb Bus, whose output goes to Master ...
 
 

HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM,  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3    
My Soundcloud
#12
ULTRABRA
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 484
  • Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
  • Location: Helsinki, Finland
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 17:33:57 (permalink)
I looked more into this and it bothered me so much, that I downloaded a demo of ... Cubase  (Sorry!) ... just to check it out there.    
 
I quickly added an audio track there, and added the insert reverb and it sounded ......... PERFECT!
 
Back in Sonar, it was sounding not good at all on the insert.
 
If anyone is familiar with Aether, it displays input on a circular meter.  In Cubase my insert track showed input all round the circle, but in Sonar it showed input only on the LEFT hand side of the circle.    I still heard sound in both side of my headphones, but soething surely is wrong somewhere.   All other settings as far as I know are normal.   I do not know, but maybe its a mono/stereo issue somehwhere ........ how can I go about troubleshooting that?
 
Please don't make me buy Cubase ... ;-)
 
 
 
 

HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM,  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3    
My Soundcloud
#13
johnnyV
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2677
  • Joined: 2010/02/22 11:46:33
  • Location: Here, in my chair
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 18:34:26 (permalink)
When you insert an Effect in the tracks effect Bin, the signal will pass 100% through that effect. this is desirable for things like EQ and Compression. Normally we would not put things like reverb there. Reverb often needs to be shared by other tracks and it helps to keep your sound all in the same "room" by only using one instance.  
My guess is the difference you are hearing is the effect has some sort of EQ involved in the settings. Reverbs often do. This is for good reason when we don't want to process say, the lower frequencies. 

Sonar X3e Studio - Waiting for Professional
 Scarlett 6i6
Yamaha Gear= 01v - NSM 10 - DTX 400 - MG82cx
Roland Gear= A 49- GR 50 - TR 505 - Boss pedals
Tascam Gear=  DR 40 - US1641 -
Mackie Gear= Mix 8 - SRM 350's 
i5 Z97 3.2GHZ quad 16 Gig RAM W 8.1  home build
Taylor mini GS - G& L Tribute Tele - 72 Fender Princeton - TC BH 250 - Mooer and Outlaw Pedals  Korg 05/RW
 
#14
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 19:05:16 (permalink)
I can't say I've ever noticed any great difference between an effect on a send or on the track insert. Perhaps there's somethjing else going on with the track? Having said that I rarely, if ever, use reverb on a track. It's nearly always on a send for me for the reason JohnnyV mentions.
#15
...wicked
Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7360
  • Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
  • Location: Seattle
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 19:20:11 (permalink)
Dude, if you can't suss out how a send/return works, it doesn't matter what DAW you use. 
 
The obvious answer here is "use your ears". Keep dialing the send controls and the verb controls until you reach a sound you like. There's no perfect recipe for that stuff, it's totes subjective.
 

===========
The Fog People
===========

Intel i7-4790 
16GB RAM
ASUS Z97 
Roland OctaCapture
Win10/64   

SONAR Platinum 64-bit    
billions VSTs, some of which work    
#16
js516
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 347
  • Joined: 2006/05/17 15:14:53
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 19:38:57 (permalink)
ULTRABRA
If anyone is familiar with Aether, it displays input on a circular meter.  In Cubase my insert track showed input all round the circle, but in Sonar it showed input only on the LEFT hand side of the circle.    I still heard sound in both side of my headphones, but soething surely is wrong somewhere.   All other settings as far as I know are normal.   I do not know, but maybe its a mono/stereo issue somehwhere ........ how can I go about troubleshooting that?
 
Please don't make me buy Cubase ... ;-)


Check the send's pan setting and check the buss the reverb is on to make sure you added a stereo bus.

Joe Sera
 
Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3, AMD FX-8320, Corsair 32GB 1600 Ram, MOTU AVB on USB3, AMD Radeon R7-200
#17
Jean
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 61
  • Joined: 2004/10/05 07:49:08
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/03 19:59:44 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby ULTRABRA 2014/12/04 02:58:53
@ ULTRABRA
Have you tried the stereo interleave button on the mono vocal track?  If you turn on the stereo interleave, with the reverb as an insert, does the Aether 'circle' show on both sides?
#18
ULTRABRA
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 484
  • Joined: 2009/07/07 05:27:34
  • Location: Helsinki, Finland
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/04 02:44:27 (permalink)
Thanks for all the suggestions/ideas.
 
@Jean:    Yes, that was it!  On the mono vocal track the stereo interleave was on mono.   Changing it to stereo fixed the issue.  Thanks so much for that.
 
post edited by ULTRABRA - 2014/12/04 04:49:46

HP Z420, Intel Xeon E5-1620@ 3600MHz, 8GB RAM,  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Soundcard : Focusrite Saffire 24, & Sonar : Producer X3    
My Soundcloud
#19
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Query re setting up reverb send 2014/12/04 09:47:06 (permalink)
I always appreciate it when someone acknowledges pilot error instead of just disappearing from a thread they started. I think this kind of input is very helpful to those learning about computer-based recording.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#20
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1