He has no cause, only pathetic bitterness and an inability to grasp the large pool of talent in this forum from which were he to post actual issues he might get some assistance.

I think he thinks 47% of us would make fun of him no matter what, and feel we are entitled to support - taking maintenance from Cakewalk and taking assistance from this forum.

Hey, original poster - are you Mitt Romney?

Bob Bone

Marc, Marc, Marc... if I may call you Marc...

In a previous posting you said you had been a user since version 5. Now it's version 2! Mon Dieu but the numbers are slippery in anglais, No?

But since you are only 16 years old we should be gentle...

Au revoir

ggg

ggg


Marc, Marc, Marc... if I may call you Marc...

In a previous posting you said you had been a user since version 5. Now it's version 2! Mon Dieu but the numbers are slippery in anglais, No?

But since you are only 16 years old we should be gentle...

Au revoir

ggg

Well let me clarify and I hope to clear up any confusion on my part. I have been using Sonar since Pro Audio 9. Sonar became my main DAW in version 5. I started a thread that showed a video way back when I was using Sonar 5. I never said that I had been using since Sonar 5.


For clarification I used pro Audio 9 then went to Sonar 2 studio. Then Went to Sonar 3 studio. Then went to 3 producer version. Then went to Sonar 5 producer, Sonar 7 producer, Sonar 8 producer, 8.5 producer, X1 producer, Then X2. I also tried and used cubase, protools, and Reaper. I primarily used those in other studios. Not my studio. Hopefully that will clear up any confusion.


versions set aside. I don't see how this relates to someone coming into the forum trolling and making wild accusations all in the name of fun. You can continue to find fault with me if you must but that is what is happening here. The OP already had two threads closed and I think this one is a candidate to be closed as well. 

Venting frustrations is one thing and I totally understand that. Making wild accusations like cakewalk is hiring authors of magazine articles and then saying they are writing mixed reviews is really something else. It is obvious the OP is not concerned with resolving issues and only wants to start trouble. There is no place here for that and we have a rules of conduct here for a reason. I for one will not tolerate it.

Should the OP choose to vent frustrations then fine. Trolling for entertainment is another matter entirely. No one calls me Marc.....but I guess I have been called worse. You think I am 16.....too funny, my question is are you operating under another name. maybe say....axl59

Well let me clarify and I hope to clear up any confusion on my part. I have been using Sonar since Pro Audio 9. Sonar became my main DAW in version 5. I started a thread that showed a video way back when I was using Sonar 5. I never said that I had been using since Sonar 5.

Marcus - The OP's name is Marc. He made the claims I referred to. This was addressed to him. Sorry for any confusion. 


ggg

LOL... the funniest thing with this thread is where it started and where it went!

All I know is that I couldn't figure out what Marcus had done to prompt such a reply. Now it makes perfect sense.

Proving that Shakespeare was wrong. The right name applied to the wrong person can be very confounding. 

...to be honest...could´nt find an better comedy right now...

Soooooooooo, how many Marcus'es DOES is take to screw up a light bulb?

(I am kidding, innocent victim Marcus #2, that only applies to the first one OP)

But, how many??? :)

Bob Bone

Hey, original poster - are you Mitt Romney? 

Trying to remember.... still trying... Who?

BTW just a little reminder for everybody here that the Church Cult of Satan will be holding the usual blessings next week (Wed).
Please bring your usual copy of Sonar X2 for sacrifice.
We are sorry Satan is a very busy person right now so personal meeting time will be severely restricted. Journalists will be allocated double time

Church welcomes all, just don't expect to leave.... ever..

#"Welcome to the forum cakewalk sonar
Such a lovely place (Such a lovely place)
Slag off Sonar X
Plenty of room at the forum cakewalk sonar
Any time of year (any time of year)
You can find Bulls**t here"#

John T


Hmm. As I said earlier in the thread, I do various bits of writing and reviewing (and I'm not the only member of this forum who does so), and I have never been told what to write, much less been bribed, and no other writer I know has either. It's a really extremely rude claim to bandy about, especially when you clearly have no evidence of it happening. Even if you did have an instance of it, all you'd have is one instance. The claim "most reviews are paid for" is extremely insulting, as is the suggestion that journalists deserve a special place in hell. Maybe think before you spout off about things you know nothing about in future, eh?

John I agree 100 percent.


The accusation is not only did these magazine writers except the bribe, but they accepted the bribe and still wrote a really bad review. Just how idiotic does one need to be to make such a statement to begin with? They got paid to say it's pretty but it sucks? That to me marks the most ignorant thing I have ever read on this forum.

John


All I know is that I couldn't figure out what Marcus had done to prompt such a reply. Now it makes perfect sense.

Proving that Shakespeare was wrong. The right name applied to the wrong person can be very confounding. 

 
 
Shakespeare missed the Marc?

thearclight


EVERYthing what i have to say...STOP.
Nobody knows where the discussion really started...I´m sick of it...how old are we ???

I´m 42 and far far away to point my decision to spend up to 800€ for "my" new DAW called XXX, ´cause it´s the new "hell of a machine" in magazine XXX...(not X-rated to be part of this thread...;)
My first so called DAW was runing on my C64 and it was Steinbergs first product...
Later I was traveling from Logic (Emagics stuff) to Cubase over trying Samplitude for a while...´til I found for myself Sonar 8, which fitted all what I want in good package for working at home on my MUSIC...
In our studio I´m working on Cubase and also ProTools...at home on Sonar X2...
...and it´s running like a charm, no crackles, not a single point of "ommph!!!" during it´s release...a few bugs...yes but nothing very special.

AND I DON´T GIVE A **** ON MAGAZINE REVIEWS, FORUMS AND WEBSITES !!! (these are just Picturebooks with a few usable Tipps inside, more entertainment than "you have to...")

Wait a second here..   You are using four different daws?   You have not said goodbye to any of them?  OMG, that is plain weird.

All this time I am thinking, "i am the only person using several daws, at the same time, without saying goodbye to any of them."

With the exception of Ableton Live..   I sold my license a while back, "woo hoo."  But in my defense, "i did not say goodbye to it."