southpaw3473
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 782
- Joined: 2008/04/22 16:50:41
- Location: Western MA
- Status: offline
Sonarworks Reference or ARC?
Hi all, I have been using ARC in my studio for a number of years and it's helped dramatically with mixing in my less than perfect control room. I have been wondering if the Sonarworks Reference 4 is better for the job. Just wondering if anyone has used both and if there is a difference. I have Sonarworks headphone calibration which is also pretty helpful. Thanks for the replies!
We'll not risk another frontal assault-that rabbit's dynamite!!! Tommy Byrnes Sonar Platinum Win 10 Pro x64 AMD FX 8350 Eight-Core 4.00GHz/ ASRock 970 Extreme4/ 16 gigs RAMUA Apollo Firewire/UA 2 Quad Satellite/ Focusrite OctoPre/Makie Onyx1220i Mixer THANK YOU!!!
|
FJ Lamela
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11
- Joined: 2015/10/21 05:56:15
- Location: Spain
- Status: offline
Re: Sonarworks Reference or ARC?
2017/11/18 15:24:10
(permalink)
As user of both products,I Say SonarWoks Reference 4 beats IK all the time. Easy setup,easy,more precise calibration,better sound because you can switch between minimun phase to linear phase eq. Filters are better implemented and.... A lot of improvements in the next comming soon free updates. That's all :)
|
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10037
- Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
- Location: SL,UT
- Status: offline
Re: Sonarworks Reference or ARC?
2017/11/18 15:44:52
(permalink)
i use arc2... sounds good... easy to edit curves to suit your needs. it's not hard to setup, it uses the Audyssey MultEQ® XT32 technology---audyssey uses time domain measurement and correction and the resulting filters are not based on bands. Instead they operate on the amplitude and phase of the signal simultaneously to avoid any such anomalies. haven't used sonarworks.
|
Lynn
Max Output Level: -14 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6117
- Joined: 2003/11/12 18:36:16
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re: Sonarworks Reference or ARC?
2017/11/18 16:08:27
(permalink)
I don't have Sonarworks, but ARC 2 has a lot going for it. My favorite thing about ARC 2 are the speaker emulations which I use all the time.
|
southpaw3473
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 782
- Joined: 2008/04/22 16:50:41
- Location: Western MA
- Status: offline
Re: Sonarworks Reference or ARC?
2017/11/18 16:09:05
(permalink)
I've been happy for the most part with ARC II but I have a major project that is about to enter post production and I was wondering if Sonarworks was better in terms of accuracy. I have ARC profiles for all the monitors and although precision is very much recommended, it was fairly easy to set up and implement.
We'll not risk another frontal assault-that rabbit's dynamite!!! Tommy Byrnes Sonar Platinum Win 10 Pro x64 AMD FX 8350 Eight-Core 4.00GHz/ ASRock 970 Extreme4/ 16 gigs RAMUA Apollo Firewire/UA 2 Quad Satellite/ Focusrite OctoPre/Makie Onyx1220i Mixer THANK YOU!!!
|
fret_man
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 312
- Joined: 2009/05/14 23:57:37
- Status: offline
Re: Sonarworks Reference or ARC?
2017/11/18 16:25:31
(permalink)
Sonarworks compensates for magnitude changes, although there seems to be some evidence that phase compensation is coming. The various filters are nice. Arc2 compensates for both magnitude and phase and has various speaker playback emulations that are handy.
|
exrove
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16
- Joined: 2015/01/16 23:07:56
- Status: offline
Re: Sonarworks Reference or ARC?
2017/11/18 20:20:44
(permalink)
I believe sonarworks sounds better than arc. I have both. Sonarworks makes it easier to mix bass frequency. Arc is a way too unfocused in the low end. At least this is my experience. Plus sonarworks headphone mixing is superb.
|
garyhb
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 73
- Joined: 2009/09/15 07:53:40
- Location: Northern Ireland
- Status: offline
Re: Sonarworks Reference or ARC?
2017/11/18 22:11:20
(permalink)
Hi Southpaw I started with ARC and had good results in an untreated room. After designing and building a small studio, tested and treated it, I switched to SW3. I have Adam A77X monitors. Both programs are easy to set up and don't add any appreciable latency but I found SW to be more accurate in the low end. In a small studio (< 1500 ft^3) you need to be able to trust the correction software to compensate for room issues. Last week I mixed and mastered an EP (Black Keys/Artic Monkeys style) and I was very unsure about it but the client loved it so much he gave me 5k to produce the next album. This week I mastered an EDM track and the client said the bass was was "absolutely fantastic". In other words, without SW3 I don't believe I would be having these results. I hope this helps. However.... I'm assuming your room is treated adequately?? If not, analyse your room and update the treatment first - grab a free copy of Room EQ Wizard here and a flat omni mic. Monitor correction software only really works with an already treated room... Hope this helps! Gary
Gear: Sonar Platinum 64bit, Win 10 Pro 64bit. Soundcraft Signature MTR 22. Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz, 16GB ECC RAM, Dell MB 0PM2CW, NVIDIA GeForce 210, 5TB WD Black storage, HannsG HT231 23" multi-touch monitor (1920x1080), LG 22" W2242S (1680x1050), Soundcraft Signature MTR 22, Adam A77X, Sonarworks Reference 3, Studiologic VMK188+ and the usual other stuff there's no space for...
|
southpaw3473
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 782
- Joined: 2008/04/22 16:50:41
- Location: Western MA
- Status: offline
Re: Sonarworks Reference or ARC?
2017/11/19 00:41:12
(permalink)
Thanks Gary! My control room is treated but it's small and nearly square. If I run into problems it always seems to be in the lows, say from 80 or so down. I just might try the Sonarworks and see if there is a significant difference.
We'll not risk another frontal assault-that rabbit's dynamite!!! Tommy Byrnes Sonar Platinum Win 10 Pro x64 AMD FX 8350 Eight-Core 4.00GHz/ ASRock 970 Extreme4/ 16 gigs RAMUA Apollo Firewire/UA 2 Quad Satellite/ Focusrite OctoPre/Makie Onyx1220i Mixer THANK YOU!!!
|
mikedocy
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1157
- Joined: 2007/05/09 23:00:37
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
- Status: offline
Re: Sonarworks Reference or ARC?
2017/11/19 01:26:20
(permalink)
I agree that the bass is more controlled with Sonarworks. The bass is a little flabby (woolly?) with Arc. The Sonarworks setup is easier than Arc. An on-screen graphic shows you where to move the mic, then it starts the measurement automatically when it has sensed that the mic is in the requested position. Sonarworks: Having one plugin in your master with the ability to switch between headphone curve or speaker curve is great. Arc: A little more flexible with setting up a user-defined EQ. I like to boost the highs a little for my aged ears. Sonarworks needs a little improvement in the user-defined EQ options. Sonarworks: The new zero-latency mode is an excellent feature. Sonarworks says that it may use more cpu in that mode but I have not noticed this (yet).
post edited by mikedocy - 2017/11/19 04:03:32
|
Unknowen
Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1276
- Joined: 2014/11/07 11:27:09
- Status: offline
Re: Sonarworks Reference or ARC?
2017/11/21 01:58:40
(permalink)
I use ARK 2 and REF3, well until a few days ago. I upgraded to REF4 with System Wide... Not just in the DAW anymore. Its cool to not have to bring my reference songs into the DAW now... peace!
Hay look, Somethings are not locked in stone... lol 3/18/2019
|