Soundcards question.

Author
DreamzCatcher
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 123
  • Joined: 2007/03/19 07:13:08
  • Status: offline
2008/09/24 16:28:04 (permalink)

Soundcards question.

Ok it goes like this.

if I plug in HD synth (virus..) directly through two soundcards (one by one) lets say, Soundcard 1 = Pulsar, Soundcard 2 = Audigy...

I record the same riff exactly, at 44.1, 24bit on both soundcards.

will there be any difference in the sound quality ?
to be more precise, if I will turn the phase of one of them vs the other, will there be a total silence? (phase cancellation)

post edited by DreamzCatcher - 2008/09/24 16:30:24

"Don't forget to imagine."
Intel 965P-DS4 F5, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300@1.86GHz (x2), 2,096,620 KB RAM. Cubase SX 4, SoundForge 9.. Dynaudio Acoustics & Adam A7..
#1

8 Replies Related Threads

    ohhey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11676
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
    • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Soundcards question. 2008/09/24 17:02:17 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: DreamzCatcher

    Ok it goes like this.

    if I plug in HD synth (virus..) directly through two soundcards (one by one) lets say, Soundcard 1 = Pulsar, Soundcard 2 = Audigy...

    I record the same riff exactly, at 44.1, 24bit on both soundcards.

    will there be any difference in the sound quality ?
    to be more precise, if I will turn the phase of one of them vs the other, will there be a total silence? (phase cancellation)



    If you are talking about recording something from the inputs of the sound card then no, they will never be exactly the same. Each sound card will differ in sone way. Even if the chips are the same the analog input stage may be different on one then the other, even the driver could make a difference. There are all kinds of other elements of design of a sound card that can change it's sound. That's why you can find a $100 and a $1000 sound card that use the same chips but sound different.

    If you are talking about a softsyth those don't go through the sound card.. only out. So any sound difference would just be monitoring not the actual recording (if it's recorded at all).
    post edited by ohhey - 2008/09/24 17:06:24
    #2
    DreamzCatcher
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 123
    • Joined: 2007/03/19 07:13:08
    • Status: offline
    RE: Soundcards question. 2008/09/24 17:06:25 (permalink)
    thanks haha, I kinda knew the answer already, different convertors... but I'm in a bet and lots of money involved lol, so even tho I know the answer, I need some reliable answer to increase my confidence.

    any more info about how do they actually change the sound practically?

    "Don't forget to imagine."
    Intel 965P-DS4 F5, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300@1.86GHz (x2), 2,096,620 KB RAM. Cubase SX 4, SoundForge 9.. Dynaudio Acoustics & Adam A7..
    #3
    ohhey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11676
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
    • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Soundcards question. 2008/09/24 17:24:03 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: DreamzCatcher

    thanks haha, I kinda knew the answer already, different convertors... but I'm in a bet and lots of money involved lol, so even tho I know the answer, I need some reliable answer to increase my confidence.

    any more info about how do they actually change the sound practically?


    I'm not an expert but I'm sure there is lots of information on the web. I know the sample rate clock is a key element and good ones are expensive so those don't get used in cheap cards. Analog components in the input stage have to be high quality and the input stage has to be a clever design to keep noise out and alter the input signal as little as possible. There is a filter in the A/D stage that has to be well designed, Apogee got their start in the business selling just this part as an upgrade to high end (at the time) digital recorders. They later made the entire converter and sold that as an external unit... the rest is history. Even the way the board of the sound card is layed out and how all the chips connect is a fine art and does affect things like keeping noise out, keeping the clock stable, etc. Digital audio gear design is not easy.. it takes skill, good components, and some real talent to get it right. There is a big gap in quality between making it "work" and getting it really good, even when using the same chip.

    When you get a consumer grade card all those things are designed to just "function" and be cheap to make. When you get a high end card they put a lot of development into each part and tested it under real world conditions to make sure the sound is as good as it can be all the way from end to end.
    #4
    DreamzCatcher
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 123
    • Joined: 2007/03/19 07:13:08
    • Status: offline
    RE: Soundcards question. 2008/09/24 17:33:31 (permalink)
    Thanks m8!

    Apogee vs SoundBlaster test
    http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=12836

    "Don't forget to imagine."
    Intel 965P-DS4 F5, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300@1.86GHz (x2), 2,096,620 KB RAM. Cubase SX 4, SoundForge 9.. Dynaudio Acoustics & Adam A7..
    #5
    foxwolfen
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8256
    • Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
    • Status: offline
    RE: Soundcards question. 2008/09/24 17:44:39 (permalink)
    Depending on the Audegy... if its Gen 1, then you will definitely hear a difference on the output due to the fact that the first gen Audegy's had a known problem with playback of 44.2khz (it gets resampled to 48 and poorly at that).

    An Audegy 2 and better will give you very good results and you might be hard pressed to find a more pleasing sound for the money (they average about 100 bucks).

    I know nothing about the other card you mentioned so have no basis for a quality comparison.

    As for a VST working in Sonar for instance, this is all done via the CPU so if its in the same computer, it will sound identical regardless of what card you use for mixing (setting aside the monitoring output difference).

    However if you use any DSP effects you will notice a marked improvement in performance with the Audegy over many cards that cost 3 or 4 times as much due to the hardware acceleration of DSP.

    Cheers
    Shad

    A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything.

    Composers Forum
    #6
    DreamzCatcher
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 123
    • Joined: 2007/03/19 07:13:08
    • Status: offline
    RE: Soundcards question. 2008/09/24 17:57:11 (permalink)
    It leads me to another question,

    since A/D always leaves some sort of noise...than hardware synth can't compete the quality of a Vsti, right? or wrong?(explain?)

    "Don't forget to imagine."
    Intel 965P-DS4 F5, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300@1.86GHz (x2), 2,096,620 KB RAM. Cubase SX 4, SoundForge 9.. Dynaudio Acoustics & Adam A7..
    #7
    ohhey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11676
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
    • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Soundcards question. 2008/09/24 21:11:24 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: DreamzCatcher

    It leads me to another question,

    since A/D always leaves some sort of noise...than hardware synth can't compete the quality of a Vsti, right? or wrong?(explain?)


    Technically the software version would produce the more pure output and if noise is a problem recording with your sound cards input then yes the software version would not have that noise in the final product.

    However, that's only a fair test if both the hardware synth and software synth produced the same sound. It's rare that would be the case and it's much better to have the perfect synth sound with some noise and damage then one that doesn't work with the song. Recording the analog output of a synth can also render some unexpected happy side effects. For example some of them have a output stage that is not very flat and may in fact fatten up the sound. Some folks have noticed this when they compare the SPDIF and analog outs of their synth, on some patches the analog outs sound better.

    So the technically correct method is not always the most musical. Guitar players learned this right away when guitar amps were invented and they found out that by setting the gain stages "wrong" the thing sounded fantastic.
    #8
    foxwolfen
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8256
    • Joined: 2008/03/29 23:41:47
    • Status: offline
    RE: Soundcards question. 2008/09/24 21:44:05 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: DreamzCatcher

    It leads me to another question,

    since A/D always leaves some sort of noise...than hardware synth can't compete the quality of a Vsti, right? or wrong?(explain?)

    Yes and no... a "Hardware synth can be analog or digital. The analog will always sound better (IMO) than digital, be it VST or a chip (code is code irrespective of how its executed). However, everything will always come down to the quality of the conversion and output stages. A hardware synth might have extremely high quality output for studio quality sound. Far better than those found on all but the best cards/interfaces (which can cost as much as the HW synth).

    I would have to say that, in my somewhat limited experience, the sound quality of HW synths/DAWs far exceeds the VSTs/soft DAWs I own (though some of the VSTs have their own unique character, and I do not have high end audio components on my computer).

    Just to be clear, the noise you speak of is not actually noise but sampling or conversion error. HQ ADACS will have almost no noise that is detectable by you and I with out sophisticated and sensitive measurement gear. A digital source will be noise free until it reaches the analog stage.

    Cheers
    Shad



    A scientist knows more & more about less & less till he knows everything about nothing, while a philosopher knows less & less about more & more till he knows nothing about everything.

    Composers Forum
    #9
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1