State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!!

Author
mark4man
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 700
  • Joined: 2003/11/09 13:20:22
  • Status: offline
2011/08/09 23:06:26 (permalink)

State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!!

hello...
 
my old set of Roland TD-6's had a horrifically low audio output.   I tried everything...step-up xformers, preamps...but it was always weak.  yeah, I got it up to an acceptable input level w/ preamplification...but of course ALL pre's alter the sound somewhat.
 
last week...I shipped them off to my guitarist's studio & went out & purchased a new set of TD-9's.
 
SAME F_IN' DEAL...!!!
 
anyone have any ideas as to how & boost digital drum output transparently...???
 
thanx,
 
 
mark4man

ADK Pro Audio Quad Pro, w/ Intel Core i7 2600 CPU | 8 GB DDR3-1600 RAM | Seagate 500 GB SATA II (Primary) HD | Seagate 1 TB SATA II (Audio Data) HD | Win 7 Pro 64-Bit | Lynx Aurora8 ~ AES16 | Universal Audio UAD-1 | Cakewalk SONAR PE XI | Steinberg WaveLab 7 | NI Komplete 5 | Band-In-A-Box 2012 
#1

20 Replies Related Threads

    Beagle
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 50621
    • Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
    • Location: Fort Worth, TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/08/10 09:27:10 (permalink)
    what are you plugging them into?  soundboard?  soundcard?  is it the same on both?

    which preamps have you tried and not liked?  if you have to have a preamp for it, try something like the grace m101 (or 2 channel unit m201) or true systems.  they're pretty transparent gain.

    http://soundcloud.com/beaglesound/sets/featured-songs-1
    i7, 16G DDR3, Win10x64, MOTU Ultralite Hybrid MK3
    Yamaha MOXF6, Hammond XK3c, other stuff.
    #2
    Jim Roseberry
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 9871
    • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
    • Location: Ohio
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/08/10 09:58:02 (permalink)
    Mark,
     
    It sounds like you're pluggin the drum module (-10dB or 0dB line output) into a +4 line input.
    That would account for the "weak" signal.
    Some audio interfaces allow you to switch between -10dB  and +4dB.
    If the audio interface doesn't provide switching, you could run the drum outputs to a DI box (which would output +4 balanced on XLR).

    Best Regards,

    Jim Roseberry
    jim@studiocat.com
    www.studiocat.com
    #3
    IK Obi
    Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1549
    • Joined: 2011/02/22 20:25:48
    • Location: Salt Lake City, UT
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/08/10 15:33:12 (permalink)
    Yup something like this should set you straight.
    #4
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/08/10 15:53:13 (permalink)
    IK Obi


    Yup something like this should set you straight.


    That is for preparing a low level line signal to microphone level... it is a step DOWN system.





    If Mark has been using step up transformers and or preamps to drive a +4dBu... well, those are both good choices.

    If you step down to mic level with a step down direct system... what's next? A microphone preamp? Square one.


    The ideal choice would be to have a matched analog input that goes direct to digital... as has been suggested.

     e.g. if the signal is -10dBv use a input with a -10dBv selector.




    best regards,
    mike





    #5
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/08/10 16:08:14 (permalink)

    Upon reflection it occurs to me to add...

    One reason the idea of direct box may seem good is that the mic input of the next device in line will typically have a lot more gain than the line input on the same device. So by stepping down to a mic output... you can then use the whole preamp.


    One reason the idea of a direct box may seem bad is that the step down will increase the noise to signal and so the signal to noise ratio will suffer... especially when you turn it all back up in the next preamp.



    But, I think in balance of considerations, the extra gain may seem more useful in practical use... and so the direct box will work ok.


    I would still prefer to find the ideal interconnection where the SNR stay as good as what comes out of the drum module.



    all the best,
    mike

    post edited by mike_mccue - 2011/08/10 16:09:31


    #6
    mark4man
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 700
    • Joined: 2003/11/09 13:20:22
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/08/10 23:22:28 (permalink)
    1) i'm gettin' sick of providing an image verification to log the f on.  what difference does it make if there are al queda members posting in a f_in' forum...it's a f_in' forum, for god's sake.  completely ridiculous.
     
    [feel much better, now]
     
    2) thanx for all input (pardon the pun).
     
    mike...i'm not sure there is a difference between the switchable input on a good AI & a step-up transformer...that's more-than-likely all it is in the AI.  btw-I have one (a switchable input...-10 dBv / +4 dBu) on my lynx aurora8.  & like an idiot...I can't remember what happened when I toggled that.
     
    I'll tell u what, tho...just knowing the Z & level on ANY output from the TD-9...(main outs, headphone) would make a determination much easier.  I recently got my hands on an old simpson VOM (the kind of meter we used in electronics school in the '70's)...& I'm gonna take some measurements & come back to report.
     
    thanks all,
     
     
    mark4man

    ADK Pro Audio Quad Pro, w/ Intel Core i7 2600 CPU | 8 GB DDR3-1600 RAM | Seagate 500 GB SATA II (Primary) HD | Seagate 1 TB SATA II (Audio Data) HD | Win 7 Pro 64-Bit | Lynx Aurora8 ~ AES16 | Universal Audio UAD-1 | Cakewalk SONAR PE XI | Steinberg WaveLab 7 | NI Komplete 5 | Band-In-A-Box 2012 
    #7
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/08/11 16:31:18 (permalink)
    Mark

    Ideally, if the input is switched to match a -10dBv signal then the ADA will see all the voltage it needs for you to record at suitable levels and it will translate the signal to digital without adding any extra noise in the signal to noise ratio.

    If you pump a -10dBv signal into a +4 dBu input by using gain at some interstage to get enough voltage at the ADA then you are also turning up the noise. But it should stay relatively even. That's what I figure you are doing by your OP description.

    If you turn down the signal with some sort of step down only to turn it up again in the next stage... not only will you turn up the sound and noise but the SNR will lower proportionally. You will add noise to the signal... so I'd avoid that scenario if possible.

    I suspect you already know this... I'm just throwing it out on the table for the discussion.


    best regards,
    mike



    #8
    mark4man
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 700
    • Joined: 2003/11/09 13:20:22
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/01 15:33:04 (permalink)
    mike_mccue sed:

    Ideally, if the input is switched to match a -10dBv signal then the ADA will see all the voltage it needs for you to record at suitable levels and it will translate the signal to digital without adding any extra noise in the signal to noise ratio
    mike...

    [sorry it took so long to get back...been thru surgery recently]...
     
    ...but how does that occur...???...(the ADA seeing the -10dBv signal)...wouldn't it just be a switchable step up xformer/line level shifter...???
     
     
    mf


    ADK Pro Audio Quad Pro, w/ Intel Core i7 2600 CPU | 8 GB DDR3-1600 RAM | Seagate 500 GB SATA II (Primary) HD | Seagate 1 TB SATA II (Audio Data) HD | Win 7 Pro 64-Bit | Lynx Aurora8 ~ AES16 | Universal Audio UAD-1 | Cakewalk SONAR PE XI | Steinberg WaveLab 7 | NI Komplete 5 | Band-In-A-Box 2012 
    #9
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/01 16:33:43 (permalink)
    It just depends how the circuit around the a to d is designed.

    If the the +4dBu input on the device is padded (rather than the -10dBV being stepped up) and -10dBV is straight through than it will be an ideal match for a device that puts out a nominal -10dBV signal.

    I'm not sure how to know how each different device is designed.

    best regards,
    mike
     


    #10
    mark4man
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 700
    • Joined: 2003/11/09 13:20:22
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/01 17:20:12 (permalink)
    have a call in to Lynx to see if it's padded or stepped.  if it's padded, i'll use the lynx...if it's stepped, i may as well use my ebtech -10dBv > +4 dBu (gotta be a better xformer, right?).
     
    [still haven't measured the output Z on the TD-9 yet, either...(been recuperating)]
     
    will get back

    ADK Pro Audio Quad Pro, w/ Intel Core i7 2600 CPU | 8 GB DDR3-1600 RAM | Seagate 500 GB SATA II (Primary) HD | Seagate 1 TB SATA II (Audio Data) HD | Win 7 Pro 64-Bit | Lynx Aurora8 ~ AES16 | Universal Audio UAD-1 | Cakewalk SONAR PE XI | Steinberg WaveLab 7 | NI Komplete 5 | Band-In-A-Box 2012 
    #11
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/03 18:06:31 (permalink)
    I hadn't considered the Lynx... I'd imagine that it's truly designed for a nominal +4dBu.

    I think you'd find that many of the cheaper 'sumer grade stuff, with the cost saving power supplies, run at lower levels and just pad the "pro" +4dBu input on the way in. They still sound clean... so I thought that might be worth a try.

    Honestly... if you really feel the drum brain lacks output I wouldn't hesitate to run it thru a preamp and boost it on the way in to your system. You may get a bit of noise after that but I think that would be something you can dial out with gain staging and some EQ.


    Good luck.

    best regards,
    mike







    #12
    Houndawg
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 759
    • Joined: 2006/10/26 18:08:33
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/03 20:51:28 (permalink)
    The Aurora’s analog I/O can be used with balanced or unbalanced line level devices operating at a nominal trim level of +4dBu or –10dBV (switchable in banks of four channels).
    #13
    mark4man
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 700
    • Joined: 2003/11/09 13:20:22
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/04 14:04:23 (permalink)
    yeah...
     
    called lynx...& they sed it was neither (padded or stepped)...that it was 'either potential made available to the A/D thru switching' (???).
     
    anyway...houndawg is correct, but I have to get their remote software to do so...otherwise...when the aurora 8's INPUT is switched to -10...the OUTPUT is also switched.
     
    this is exactly why I never heard a difference on the digital drums...makes perfect sense, now.
     
    with the remote software, the I/O switch link can be opened, with the OUTPUT allowed to remain at +4 while the INPUT is switched to -10...that will make my difference.
     
    (the higher gain was always there when I switched to -10...SONAR recorded at that higher level...I just couldn't hear it due to the OUTPUT also dropping.  now real time monitoring will reflect true state).
     
    have to determine my firmware build first, tho...to get the correct driver & remote updates...'bout to do that right now.
     
     
    Houndawg...

    will answer ur PM later...but I was going to follow directions in the manual to get my global output at max...(don't want to differ from the kit component level differences...just get the master out higher).  the mod is the TD-9.
     
    thanx to both of u...will get back w/ results
     
     
    mark forman 

    post edited by mark4man - 2011/11/04 14:06:37

    ADK Pro Audio Quad Pro, w/ Intel Core i7 2600 CPU | 8 GB DDR3-1600 RAM | Seagate 500 GB SATA II (Primary) HD | Seagate 1 TB SATA II (Audio Data) HD | Win 7 Pro 64-Bit | Lynx Aurora8 ~ AES16 | Universal Audio UAD-1 | Cakewalk SONAR PE XI | Steinberg WaveLab 7 | NI Komplete 5 | Band-In-A-Box 2012 
    #14
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/05 09:02:22 (permalink)
    'either potential made available to the A/D thru switching'

    So the "Potential" (what many people call voltage) is made available to the the A/D thru switching?

    Great... but that doesn't seem like an actual answer to the question.

    The A/D is calibrated to some voltage. Some particular voltage equates to 0dBFS.

    nominal  +4dBu = 1.23   vAC    and
    nominal -10dBV = 0.316 vAC

    I guess it's possible that a switch could recalibrate the A/D rather than a system that pads and/or boosts signals.

    At some point the incoming voltage has to be conformed to a range that the A/D works in?



    It seems like you have found a practical solution.

    best regards,
    mike



    #15
    ChuckC
    Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1488
    • Joined: 2010/02/13 01:22:55
    • Location: Port Charlotte, Fl
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/05 10:14:07 (permalink)
    Mark,
    I don't know the technical aspect of it all, but I am also using the TD-9 and haven't had any trouble at all.  My interface is a relatively inexpensive m-audio fast track pro. 

    ADK Built DAW, W7, Sonar Platinum, Studio One Pro,Yamaha HS8's & HS8S  Presonus Studio/Live 24.4.2, A few decent mic pre's,  lots of mics, 57's,58 betas, Sm7b, LD Condensors, Small condensors, Senn 421's,  DI's,  Sans Amp, A few guitar amps etc. Guitars : Gib. LP, Epi. Lp, Dillion Tele, Ibanez beater, Ibanez Ergodyne 4 String bass, Mapex Mars series 6 pc. studio kit, cymbals and other sh*t.
    http://www.everythingiam.net/
    http://www.stormroomstudios.com
    Some of my productions: http://soundcloud.com/stormroomstudios
    #16
    Cactus Music
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8424
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/07 11:38:30 (permalink)
    Reading this,,, what I don't get is what's always been a simple process of increasing the input "gain" until a proper signal strength is reached. Either using a meter or an idiot light.  
    Hot hi-z signals usually require the pad be engaged. Dynamic mics are always pad out and gain past 12 o'clock. Some syths and sound modules are somewhere in between which is what I read into your description. Sounds like a setting of pad out at 10 o clock to me. If your interface does not have an adjustable input gain stage ( pre amp) then either buy one that does, buy a mixer or a rack full of pre amps. 

    Johnny V  
    Cakelab  
    Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
    3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
     http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
     
     
    #17
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/08 08:34:28 (permalink)

    The Lynx is a deluxe unit that is intended to integrate with a studio full of +4dBu preamps and rack gear.

    Some of that gear can hit +26dBu before you hear anything you might not use.

    The lynx is designed to work gracefully while being attacked and ravaged by signals that are many times hotter than what's coming out of the TD-9. It isn't really designed to provide make up gain to a weaker signal.

    It doesn't have input gain knobs... The newer ones have trim pots in case you need to make some small long term compensation to suit a particular piece of gear.

    I'm still thinking a preamp with a line input is the way to go.

    best regards,
    mike


    #18
    mark4man
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 700
    • Joined: 2003/11/09 13:20:22
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/08 12:22:48 (permalink)
    no...no...
     
    not necessary.
     
    this is what I did...I installed the aurora's remote software.  like I sed before...it permits me to drop the input gain to -10 while leaving the output level at +4...works in banks of 4 I/O's...now I have a really strong gain coming into the aurora & SONAR:
     

    problem solved...I'm good...thanx to everyone here.
     
     
    mark forman
    post edited by mark4man - 2011/11/08 12:24:18

    ADK Pro Audio Quad Pro, w/ Intel Core i7 2600 CPU | 8 GB DDR3-1600 RAM | Seagate 500 GB SATA II (Primary) HD | Seagate 1 TB SATA II (Audio Data) HD | Win 7 Pro 64-Bit | Lynx Aurora8 ~ AES16 | Universal Audio UAD-1 | Cakewalk SONAR PE XI | Steinberg WaveLab 7 | NI Komplete 5 | Band-In-A-Box 2012 
    #19
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/08 12:45:15 (permalink)
    I'm glad you have it worked out.

    Did you had to switch a bank of 4 pairs of inputs to -10dBV? Or only 4 mono inputs?


    best,
    mike
    post edited by mike_mccue - 2011/11/08 12:47:13


    #20
    mark4man
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 700
    • Joined: 2003/11/09 13:20:22
    • Status: offline
    Re:State of the Art...Digital Drums / Output Levels...SUCKIE...!!! 2011/11/08 13:01:17 (permalink)
    4 physical  INs, period.  SONAR gives me the ability to select Left, Right or Stereo driver...& that all works, as well

    ADK Pro Audio Quad Pro, w/ Intel Core i7 2600 CPU | 8 GB DDR3-1600 RAM | Seagate 500 GB SATA II (Primary) HD | Seagate 1 TB SATA II (Audio Data) HD | Win 7 Pro 64-Bit | Lynx Aurora8 ~ AES16 | Universal Audio UAD-1 | Cakewalk SONAR PE XI | Steinberg WaveLab 7 | NI Komplete 5 | Band-In-A-Box 2012 
    #21
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1