Sandyerickson
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 17
- Joined: 2009/07/12 22:46:56
- Location: Vancouver, Canada
- Status: offline
Stereo Images
I have three short questions about stereo imaging that needs clarifying. 1) When a CD has fantastic stereo imaging and you rip any of the songs into Sonar Prod (8.5) why do you end up with missing stereo information such as a much smaller width..? 2) I have tried to do some stereo panning in two recent CD project but found that when i used anything beyond about 20 % I started getting phase issues showing up on some of the monitoring plug-ins i use (Durrough meters.) I can't honestly say that i could actually 'hear' any phase issues however. I also notice that even some of the best CDs exhibit some phase unbalance on these meters. ( Eric Claptons new 2010 CD eg.) Is this something that should concern me or is it acceptable to have some phase shifting if it is below a certain value..?? 3) I recently tried the MS (Mid-side) mic technique on some acoustic guitar tracks i wanted to come out in stereo. I was able to duplicate the side mic track and then flip the polarity on the duplicated track. This did result in the side tracks (2 & 3) being silent (as required apperently) when the mid mike (tr 1) was muted. However it didn't seem to give me a wider stereo image when i turned the side mic tracks up..? Louder for sure but not really wider. I have rechecked my monitors with all the test CDs I have (chesky records Test CD for example) and they are working properly as far as i can tell. Any ideas for some of these issues above or even articles that could help me over the issues mentioned..? Thanks sandy
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Stereo Images
2012/01/22 07:24:21
(permalink)
M/S - you need to pan the original side recording to 100%L and duplicate to 100%R (or vice-versa). This gives you the stereo. It's when you sum the entire track to mono that the two sides will disappear and give no phase issues - one of the handy features of M/S.
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Stereo Images
2012/01/22 07:41:37
(permalink)
Not sure what Matt is saying above there but in order to decode an M/S recording you need three channels of a mixer. The M recording is panned to the centre. The Side recording is panned to the LEFT and a 180 degree phase inverted of the Side is panned to the RIGHT. This will result in the stereo being extracted from the M/S recording. When you sum to mono the Side will disappear because the Side will be cancelled out completely leaving only the Mid part. Check this link out here: http://www.paia.com/ProdArticles/msdecwork.htm Scroll down to the Alternatives section and you will see a diagram. But you don't need to do this either there are many plugins out there that will decode M/S recording directly back to stereo. To widen the stereo image you increase the Side component relative to the Mid component. To make the stereo image narrow you reduce the Side component.
post edited by Jeff Evans - 2012/01/22 15:57:55
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
mattplaysguitar
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1992
- Joined: 2006/01/02 00:27:42
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Stereo Images
2012/01/22 15:51:49
(permalink)
I said exactly that! I didn't mention the phase inversion part as Sandy had already mentioned doing that. And it's phase inverted, not a 180° phase shift, Jeff. I know you know better!!!!
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Stereo Images
2012/01/22 15:56:53
(permalink)
1) When a CD has fantastic stereo imaging and you rip any of the songs into Sonar Prod (8.5) why do you end up with missing stereo information such as a much smaller width..? Depends on how you're ripping them. If you're using Windows Media Player, for example, it creates WMA files. Other ripping utilities create MP3s. Both formats are prone to narrowing the stereo image, because a) "low" frequencies are combined into a single stream for compactness, and b) very high frequencies are attenuated and most of our stereo perception comes from high frequencies. Make sure you're ripping CDs to 44.1/16 PCM wave files, and there should be no degradation.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Stereo Images
2012/01/22 16:06:48
(permalink)
2) I have tried to do some stereo panning in two recent CD project but found that when i used anything beyond about 20 % I started getting phase issues showing up on some of the monitoring plug-ins i use (Durrough meters.) I can't honestly say that i could actually 'hear' any phase issues however. Are you panning stereo tracks or mono tracks? The latter should never cause phase shifts simply by panning, and even if they did you probably wouldn't hear it. Stereo tracks, OTOH, can have phase issues (synth patches can be especially bad). You might start with phase differences between the left and right sides that aren't apparent as long as they stay hard left and right, but can become audible when folded to mono. True stereo panning involves cross-bleeding the two sides, which is kind of like semi-mono-izing. If your meters are showing problems but you cannot hear them, click on the stereo/mono interleave button on your master bus and listen for thin-ness. If you still don't hear any problems, then you don't have any.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Stereo Images
2012/01/22 16:24:59
(permalink)
Mid/Side processing makes things wider only to the extent of the differences between what's in the mid versus side components. To use an extreme (not real-world) example, imagine that both mics were picking up exactly the same thing. With no differences between M and S, you've just got a mono recording. For M/S miking to work, you need differences between the two channels. Best place to start is recording in a nice-sounding reverberant room so that the figure-8 mic hears something very different from the straight-on mic. After tracking, you can help further bring out those differences with EQ and compression, assuming you have an equalizer and/or compressor that features internal mid-side processing.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
SCorey
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 538
- Joined: 2011/04/26 15:13:14
- Location: Salt Lake City, UT
- Status: offline
Re:Stereo Images
2012/01/23 10:30:44
(permalink)
bitflipper said: If your meters are showing problems but you cannot hear them, click on the stereo/mono interleave button on your master bus and listen for thin-ness. If you still don't hear any problems, then you don't have any.
I say: dang it! That's basically what I was going to say, but you beat me to it.
While I'm a big fan of all sorts of meters (they can be so pretty...), I think the phase meter is a particularly insidious one since it can show you huge phase differences between your L and R channels that can either be no problem at all, or can be a big problem when summing to mono. The phase meter can't tell you which it is, you have to actually sum to mono and listen. Or even listen to L and R separately. After years of doing this, I no longer use a phase meter to tell me anything about my sound. I just admire its squigglyness.
|
Sandyerickson
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 17
- Joined: 2009/07/12 22:46:56
- Location: Vancouver, Canada
- Status: offline
Re:Stereo Images
2012/01/26 02:54:39
(permalink)
bitflipper Mid/Side processing makes things wider only to the extent of the differences between what's in the mid versus side components. To use an extreme (not real-world) example, imagine that both mics were picking up exactly the same thing. With no differences between M and S, you've just got a mono recording. For M/S miking to work, you need differences between the two channels. Best place to start is recording in a nice-sounding reverberant room so that the figure-8 mic hears something very different from the straight-on mic. After tracking, you can help further bring out those differences with EQ and compression, assuming you have an equalizer and/or compressor that features internal mid-side processing. I will thank all of you for the great info. I have the MS down pat and the info Bit flipper says here about the "Difference" required for it to really show up as evident stereo is the Key to my problem. I set up the mics so close and directly in front of the amp in my 'dead' studio desk room. There are no diferences for the side mic to pick up so moving the side channels up only widens and crightens the signal perhpas 20-25%. Also the issues around reading the phase meters are probably not nearly as problematic as i thought at first. I will attempt some more mono track panning (Duplicate then pan original Left to ?% and the copy (or ghost) to Right ?%. I have seen other responses to stereo questions that have upwards of 20 or more tracks panned to multiple degrees left & right. So it has to be possible i just need to keep experimenting with methods and material till I get it i guess. thanks again guys, sandy
|