Re: System Benchmark Oddities
2014/01/08 08:29:43
(permalink)
I've been benchmarking computers for 30 years - performance profiles used to be part of my job - and I've never given much weight to absolute numbers. There are so many variables, and small variances don't tell you much about what you can practically do to improve things. Mainly I'm looking to identify the weakest component (singular), the biggest single bang for the buck upgrade, the most significant bottleneck. And, of course, identify things that are plain broken.
A disk drive that returns unexpectedly low numbers can be addressed a number of ways, from load balancing to replacement. But if it's 4% slower than the manufacturer says it should be I wouldn't even consider that statistically significant as long as it's not taking excessive errors that might suggest a future failure. The important thing is whether replacing it would improve overall system performance more than any other action.
At the end of the day, the system can either do the required job or it can't. If you can record and play back what you want, having a faster video card or disk drive won't change your experience.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to.
My Stuff