TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ?

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
petep
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5
  • Joined: 2006/04/05 14:12:32
  • Status: offline
2006/04/29 18:43:05 (permalink)

TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ?

I'm a longtime Samplitude user getting in to Sonar 5 Producer for some stuff.
Samp. is object-based so its easy to adjust clip (object) levels as you go along using handles.
New to Sonar and interested in mixing philosophies.
Anybody have reasons to use automation over track envelopes? Vise versa?
Just trying to get a good worklfow going.

Thanks for any thoughts.

#1

30 Replies Related Threads

    mmarton
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 666
    • Joined: 2006/01/26 13:23:30
    • Location: White Rock, B.C. Canada
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/29 20:12:23 (permalink)
    How about automating your envelopes? That's what I do.

    Happy Sonar Platinum 64 bit Registered Owner
    Epi Casino, Les Paul, Strat, Martin GPCPA3, Cort C4Z bass, Roland D20 Synth, TC Konnekt48, Sansamp BDDI, Roland JDXI, APS Klasiks, Windows 10 64bit
    #2
    glazfolk
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5253
    • Joined: 2004/05/12 01:19:07
    • Location: Tasmania
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 00:27:19 (permalink)
    Pete ...

    I have used Samplitude (though not as much as you have) and find that automation is one area where Sonar does excel.

    I'm guessing that you're asking about the relative advantages/disadvantages of these two methods of achieving much the same end:

    1. Arm a parameter (eg Volume for one track) for automation. Record the automation, fading the Volume fader up and down to suit, while the track plays. When you stop play, the envelope will be drawn for you, with plenty of nodes as the track fades up and down. OR

    2. Right click over an audio track, and from the menu add an Envelope, say, for Volume. You can then dbl-click on the envelope to add nodes, drag them up with the mouse, or use the envelope pencil tool to shape the envelope.

    Both these methods will give you automation.

    In my view, method 1 is better for novices, you can hear what you're doing as you go, but it takes ages and you never get it right first time anyway. You can keep going back over and over again to fix things up.

    I prefer method 2. Get the parameter level roughly right for the mix, then add the envelope, then use the pencil tool or nodes to tweak where it's required.

    Remember that you can do this with the parameters of all the plug-ins that come with Sonar, and with most others (except very old ones). So if you want to add some gain at around 120Hz to add more warmth to a particular vocal phrase, you can use an envelope to do that.

    Best,
    Geoff

    Geoff Francis - Huon Delta Studios

    AMD Opteron 246 2GHZ twin CPU
    Tyan S2875 AVRF Dual M'board
    2 Gig RAM, Three Monitors w NVIDIA GeForce FX5700
    Alesis iO26, 2 NTFS Seagate HD
    DigitalDesign Speakers
    #3
    AndyW
    Max Output Level: -45.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2956
    • Joined: 2005/10/06 17:13:00
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 01:16:32 (permalink)
    I vote method 2 as well...

    Best,

    AndyW

    OBJECTS IN MIRROR ARE CLOSER THAN THEY APPEAR

    www.soundclick.com/andyw
    #4
    glazfolk
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5253
    • Joined: 2004/05/12 01:19:07
    • Location: Tasmania
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 01:46:13 (permalink)
    Just a couple more comments in case what I said was a bit unclear -

    I've made the distinction between the two methods for convenience, but an envelope is an envelope is an envelope. So, for example, you can if you wish use Method 1 to record, Method 2 to edit.

    Also, the recording method begins to take on more appeal if you use a Control Surface ... you can record as many automation envelopes at once as you can twiddle knobs at the same time.

    Best,
    Geoff

    Geoff Francis - Huon Delta Studios

    AMD Opteron 246 2GHZ twin CPU
    Tyan S2875 AVRF Dual M'board
    2 Gig RAM, Three Monitors w NVIDIA GeForce FX5700
    Alesis iO26, 2 NTFS Seagate HD
    DigitalDesign Speakers
    #5
    ohhey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11676
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
    • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 01:50:29 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: petep

    I'm a longtime Samplitude user getting in to Sonar 5 Producer for some stuff.
    Samp. is object-based so its easy to adjust clip (object) levels as you go along using handles.
    New to Sonar and interested in mixing philosophies.
    Anybody have reasons to use automation over track envelopes? Vise versa?
    Just trying to get a good worklfow going.

    Thanks for any thoughts.



    I think it's the same thing, however, if you make all the nodes while looking at the waveform in track view you can be a lot more accurate and only have to do stuff once and not make a mess with a bunch of nodes. If you use a control surface or fader you are flying blind and will end up with tons of nodes that are impossible to thin out to make adjustments. Working directly on the envolope and making your own nodes (only as many as needed) is the easy and most accurate way to do things.

    Keep in mind you want to use the clip gain envelope to do all your dynamics adjustments and mutes because it's pre effects bin. Then use the Track Volume envelope to set the overall level and do fade in and fade out of each track. So on most tracks you will end up with a fairy busy clip gain envelope and a track volume envelope with only two nodes at each end. The clip gain envelope is the key to a perfect mix and unlike plugins like limiters, compressors, de-essers, etc, they take almost no CPU power and you can adjust each note or part of a note exactly as it should be. A dynamics plugin can only use one rule for the entire track. It's more work then poping a plugin into the effects bin but it's worth it in the long run if you want a perfect sounding track that fits in the mix.
    #6
    glazfolk
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5253
    • Joined: 2004/05/12 01:19:07
    • Location: Tasmania
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 02:33:11 (permalink)
    If you use a control surface or fader you are flying blind and will end up with tons of nodes that are impossible to thin out to make adjustments...


    Ah! But the envelope pencil tool is my friend. Well, sometimes it is.

    Best,
    Geoff

    Geoff Francis - Huon Delta Studios

    AMD Opteron 246 2GHZ twin CPU
    Tyan S2875 AVRF Dual M'board
    2 Gig RAM, Three Monitors w NVIDIA GeForce FX5700
    Alesis iO26, 2 NTFS Seagate HD
    DigitalDesign Speakers
    #7
    ohhey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11676
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
    • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 02:39:29 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: glazfolk

    If you use a control surface or fader you are flying blind and will end up with tons of nodes that are impossible to thin out to make adjustments...


    Ah! But the envelope pencil tool is my friend. Well, sometimes it is.

    Best,
    Geoff


    My question is why do it twice (record to get close and edit to fix your mess) when you could get it right once by adding your own nodes and moving the lines in track view ? Seems easier to me. You can use the console view to set a rough mix before you add the track volume envelopes and they will default to the value you have the fader set for. You don't want to use the track volume envelople to do your automation anyway because it's post effects bin so your reverb will dip or mute with your edits. Clip gain is where it's at.
    #8
    kstevege
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 490
    • Joined: 2003/12/06 20:57:59
    • Location: Patchogue, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 02:49:49 (permalink)
    Interesting. I learned something new tonight. I didn't realize the pre-effects clips versus post effects track stuff. Very deep stuff.

    Steve
    #9
    glazfolk
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5253
    • Joined: 2004/05/12 01:19:07
    • Location: Tasmania
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 03:10:42 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: kstevege
    Interesting. I learned something new tonight. I didn't realize the pre-effects clips versus post effects track stuff. Very deep stuff.


    Steve ...

    If you've got Sonar 5, take some time to study and take in the flow chart on page 373 of your manual. I'm not saying that it is the mother and father of all good mixing, but it sure is the mixer's indispensable littel helper. It'll also show you, for example, exactly what are the differences between Pre and Post settings for your Bus sends.

    Best,
    Geoff

    PS Frank ... I do agree with you for the most part that envelopes with manual adjustments are the way to go ... I even said so near the top of this page somewhere! It's just that there have been times when I really do find I need to experiment to hear how two or even more parameters on a plug in interact with each other, ie what they do to the overall sound. An example is for instrumenst with which I'm not too familiar, to see how subtle Compressor Threshold and Ratio changes intereact with each other. At times like those, recording automation with the aid of a control surface can be really helpful! When the experiment is over, it's often easiest to just ditch those envelopes and then create new ones manually.

    Horses for courses is what we say over here ...
    post edited by glazfolk - 2006/04/30 03:56:18

    Geoff Francis - Huon Delta Studios

    AMD Opteron 246 2GHZ twin CPU
    Tyan S2875 AVRF Dual M'board
    2 Gig RAM, Three Monitors w NVIDIA GeForce FX5700
    Alesis iO26, 2 NTFS Seagate HD
    DigitalDesign Speakers
    #10
    kstevege
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 490
    • Joined: 2003/12/06 20:57:59
    • Location: Patchogue, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 03:22:41 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: glazfolk

    ORIGINAL: kstevege
    Interesting. I learned something new tonight. I didn't realize the pre-effects clips versus post effects track stuff. Very deep stuff.


    Steve ...

    If you've got Sonar 5, take some time to study and take in the flow chart on page 373 of your manual. I'm not saying that it is the mother and father of all good mixing, but it sure is the mixer's indispensable littel helper. It'll also show you, for example, exactly what are the differences between Pre and Post settings for your Bus sends.

    Best,
    Geoff





    Thanks Geoff. I have the manual in front of me right now, in fact the page corner was folded over but I forgot all about that page. Awesome stuff. Thanks!!

    Steve
    #11
    glazfolk
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5253
    • Joined: 2004/05/12 01:19:07
    • Location: Tasmania
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 03:58:08 (permalink)
    Keep in mind you want to use the clip gain envelope to do all your dynamics adjustments and mutes because it's pre effects bin.


    Just to add to that, because I suspect a lot of folks don't realise this, like Frank says, Clip Envelopes come before both the Clip FX Bins and the Track FX Bin, but the Track Volume Trim comes after the Clip FX Bins. When Clip FX bins were introduced, I didn't realise this at first and did some strange things.
    post edited by glazfolk - 2006/04/30 04:07:57

    Geoff Francis - Huon Delta Studios

    AMD Opteron 246 2GHZ twin CPU
    Tyan S2875 AVRF Dual M'board
    2 Gig RAM, Three Monitors w NVIDIA GeForce FX5700
    Alesis iO26, 2 NTFS Seagate HD
    DigitalDesign Speakers
    #12
    Dave Horch
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 214
    • Joined: 2004/12/28 05:09:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 04:42:32 (permalink)
    If you use a control surface or fader you are flying blind and will end up with tons of nodes that are impossible to thin out to make adjustments.


    That's exactly why I never saw the value of using an external control surface - other than to have one around so clients can see some familiar looking "recording studio" hardware. To me, a control surface would only serve to slow my workflow down in a big way.

    For the client's eye candy - I take the dust cover off my Mackie 8*buss 24x8, power it up and send the DAW out over to it so it "lights up" a bit. Ooooo-aaaahhh!
    -DH
    #13
    petep
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5
    • Joined: 2006/04/05 14:12:32
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 17:39:59 (permalink)
    This is quite aforum you folks have going here. Thanks for the info.
    Is there a keystroke to add a gain envelope to a clip, or are you stuck with the damn pulldown menu. That alone is a dealbreaker for me. I tried finding it in the key bindings...hope I;m missing something.
    #14
    Honest_Al
    Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3642
    • Joined: 2005/12/09 00:07:27
    • Location: just below the cloud on the left
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 17:45:07 (permalink)
    Is there a keystroke to add a gain envelope to a clip, or are you stuck with the damn pulldown menu. That alone is a dealbreaker for me. I tried finding it in the key bindings...


    :( so true... it IS missing.

    wicked and me (if not some others) requested it too ..here - http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=702312

    amazing how you can see here similar posts again and again
    #15
    kstevege
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 490
    • Joined: 2003/12/06 20:57:59
    • Location: Patchogue, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 21:24:39 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: glazfolk

    ..., but the Track Volume Trim comes after the Clip FX Bins.


    So the track volume trim is pre-effects bin?

    Steve
    #16
    glazfolk
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5253
    • Joined: 2004/05/12 01:19:07
    • Location: Tasmania
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/04/30 21:39:00 (permalink)
    Steve - According to the flow chart on Page 373 the following order applies, top to bottom (see diagram for fuller info - I have missed some things out for simplicity):

    Audio Clip
    Clip Mute, then Clip Fades, then Clip Envelopes
    Clip FX Bin
    Track Volume Trim
    Pre Fader Sends
    Track FX Bin
    Track Volume Fader
    Post Fader Sends

    Best,
    Geoff

    Geoff Francis - Huon Delta Studios

    AMD Opteron 246 2GHZ twin CPU
    Tyan S2875 AVRF Dual M'board
    2 Gig RAM, Three Monitors w NVIDIA GeForce FX5700
    Alesis iO26, 2 NTFS Seagate HD
    DigitalDesign Speakers
    #17
    kstevege
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 490
    • Joined: 2003/12/06 20:57:59
    • Location: Patchogue, NY
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 00:04:51 (permalink)
    Yep I see it. Thanks!! Good to know this stuff!

    Steve
    #18
    DesertHermit
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 73
    • Joined: 2005/03/22 12:39:07
    • Location: Palm Springs, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 00:15:37 (permalink)
    The question has been answered very well, but I'd like to comment on the reason I use clip envelopes instead of track automation. Let's say I have a guitar track and it has a few dynamics that need to be tamed or enhanced. First I'll set an overall track volume with the fader, then apply clip envelopes where necessary.

    Later on I may decide I want to EQ that guitar a little differently. When I do it changes the overall volume of that track. All I have to do is adjust the track volume fader once and all my clips are changed at the same percentage. If I'd have done it as a track envelope, I'd have to go in and adjust each node. I learned this lesson the hard way

    (Yeah, I know ... I could probably set up a routine to increase/decrease all the track nodes at the same percent, but I'm a simple man )

    As for assigning a second track envelope in addition to the clip envelopes, I just create one track envelope on the master bus for my fade-in/fade-out and only add at the track level if the master fades don't work together well. That's assuming, of course, that you're routing all your channels to a master ... which is what I do because that's where I insert Ozone for the final gloss.

    I hope that helps someone.

    Sonar X3c
    Dell XPS 435T
    Intel Core i&7 3.20 GHz
    8 GB RAM
    64-bit Windows 7 Professional sp1
    M-Audio Profire 2626
    #19
    glazfolk
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5253
    • Joined: 2004/05/12 01:19:07
    • Location: Tasmania
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 00:39:16 (permalink)
    DesertHermit ...

    I'm not gonna argue with you over how you prefer to work, it always has to be for each of us whatever works best ... there's no one size fits all in my view. But I just noticed this comment that you made:

    All I have to do is adjust the track volume fader once and all my clips are changed at the same percentage. If I'd have done it as a track envelope, I'd have to go in and adjust each node. I learned this lesson the hard way


    If you're happy doing it the way you are, fine, but did you know that it's really quite easy to move a whole envelope up or down - not just Volume, any envelope.

    1. Make sure that "Select Envelopes with Clips" is ticked (it's the little drop down arrow right next to the Select Tool)
    2. Make sure the Select tool is selected
    3. Select the Track or Clips

    Notice that all Nodes on the envelope that are located on clips or tracks will be selected. You can then move the envelope up and down all together by clicking and holding on any part of the envelope and dragging.

    Best,
    Geoff

    Geoff Francis - Huon Delta Studios

    AMD Opteron 246 2GHZ twin CPU
    Tyan S2875 AVRF Dual M'board
    2 Gig RAM, Three Monitors w NVIDIA GeForce FX5700
    Alesis iO26, 2 NTFS Seagate HD
    DigitalDesign Speakers
    #20
    Honest_Al
    Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3642
    • Joined: 2005/12/09 00:07:27
    • Location: just below the cloud on the left
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 00:53:13 (permalink)
    If you use a control surface or fader you are flying blind and will end up with tons of nodes that are impossible to thin out to make adjustments. Working directly on the envolope and making your own nodes (only as many as needed) is the easy and most accurate way to do things.


    Cakewalk added a quick FREE HAND mode finally (many thanks to Ron and everyone that listened) so I disagree with "impossible to thin out to make adjustments"..it's very individual i see, it got easy now.
    "tons" of nodes can be easily get to much less nodes with some quick alt+dragging the mouse over..I prefer the less clicking around (creating nodes) in the first place, I find creating nodes more of a pain (and without a key binding we mentioned above) I don't care if later i have to quickly adjust some curves when it's a faster process now -
    I didn't see any serious CPU differences between "some" nodes and full touches of automation here and there.
    #21
    dreamkeeper
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2141
    • Joined: 2004/12/05 15:51:13
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 07:35:57 (permalink)
    but did you know that it's really quite easy to move a whole envelope up or down

    Careful with that! This would be the way to go IF envelopes were implemented well. BUT: moving the whole envelope won't preserve the relative levels. I.e. a difference between nodes of say 3dB will increase when you're moving the envelope down, try it. (Unless it has been fixed in 5.2)

    For overall adjustments I recommend using Offset mode instead.

    werner
    #22
    petep
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5
    • Joined: 2006/04/05 14:12:32
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 09:09:56 (permalink)
    So no keystroke.....you've got to be kidding me. One of the most used features is buried 3 menus deep? You folks actually mix like that? Sorry to be a downer, but that is complete crap.
    It looks like I'll be exporting any work I do in Sonar back to Sampitude. If you've never seen how beautifully designed that software is, you're really missing something. I bought Sonar for it's MIDI capabilities, but I'm getting pretty tired of it's clunky interface.

    I have to say though that this forum is the best I've seen, and it's nice to see folks helping each other out so much.
    #23
    Honest_Al
    Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3642
    • Joined: 2005/12/09 00:07:27
    • Location: just below the cloud on the left
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 09:35:39 (permalink)
    no keystroke for that..yes, some don't get how crucial it is.

    BUT SOME DO and request it often - this one is by wicked..good ideas here - http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=702312

    BTW - Sonar does get improvements all the time (I know you sometimes just can't wait...)
    Cakewalk are listening and monitoring these forums.

    we already had some posts here about clip's volumes..sorry for pasting the long quotes..
    Scott Lee wrote here 3 months ago:
    "Hi all,

    I am still a Sonar 4 user currently and have been debating the plunge into S5 (been waiting on completing a few commecial products to be finalized.)

    I've noticed some basic functions have changed that I have used over the years like the process audio / +3 db volume -3 db volume keys I use to hotkey. Im always adjusting the volume on audio clips up and down on the fly and that was a great feature, while the new gain setting now requires 2 steps to process audio clip volume (which would make realtime clip audio adjustments more tedious.) Anyone have a solution in Sonar 5 that would bring this function back possibly? (CAL or something I missed while playing with my friends Sonar 5) Would definely make the upgrade more confortable. thanks in advance. "

    Ron's answer:

    "Process | Audio Gain is a more general purpose version of the old very limited +/- 3dB commands. You can choose any gain stage, left/right mix and/or phase flip. That's for destructive gain adjustments.
    You can also create a clip envelope and nondestructively adjust the gain. There is little or no CPU load for doing that"

    and of course then came my usual thoughts -

    "You are right that it was limiting having the -3/+3dB but this is funny now -
    what Scott asks is a keyboard shortcut for doing that (or i'm sure he would be glad to have ANY level setting with a key binding..for a selected clip)

    now , it's funny because a few nights ago there was a thread where me and some other users wanted to have the ability to control basic volume changes of clips with something that Sonar doesn't have - either a Volume Line on each clip -like an envelope that is always there..main gain(and a way to use keybindings with it) or even to just being able to bind something close to that..maybe a quick "create CLIP envelope" PLUS two nodes on the edges to just drag the line between them with the mouse.. or have some options with key shortcuts for anything close to that.. like a -/+ dB scaling from the keyboard

    It would be sure good to have something like that"


    ..and of course there was another thread about the missing shortcut to create the nodes at the edges of a selection -

    Cakewalk users would benefit from all these ideas at some point... i hope.
    post edited by Honest_Al - 2006/05/01 09:49:32
    #24
    glazfolk
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5253
    • Joined: 2004/05/12 01:19:07
    • Location: Tasmania
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 09:44:04 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: petep
    So no keystroke.....you've got to be kidding me. One of the most used features is buried 3 menus deep? You folks actually mix like that? Sorry to be a downer, but that is complete crap.


    Of course you're free to rant and rage about it if that's your thing ... on the other hand, you could always take a more positive view and put in a Feature Request.

    Best,
    Geoff

    Geoff Francis - Huon Delta Studios

    AMD Opteron 246 2GHZ twin CPU
    Tyan S2875 AVRF Dual M'board
    2 Gig RAM, Three Monitors w NVIDIA GeForce FX5700
    Alesis iO26, 2 NTFS Seagate HD
    DigitalDesign Speakers
    #25
    Spinedoc
    Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 574
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 22:05:43
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 15:08:11 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: DesertHermit

    The question has been answered very well, but I'd like to comment on the reason I use clip envelopes instead of track automation. Let's say I have a guitar track and it has a few dynamics that need to be tamed or enhanced. First I'll set an overall track volume with the fader, then apply clip envelopes where necessary.

    Later on I may decide I want to EQ that guitar a little differently. When I do it changes the overall volume of that track. All I have to do is adjust the track volume fader once and all my clips are changed at the same percentage. If I'd have done it as a track envelope, I'd have to go in and adjust each node. I learned this lesson the hard way

    (Yeah, I know ... I could probably set up a routine to increase/decrease all the track nodes at the same percent, but I'm a simple man )

    As for assigning a second track envelope in addition to the clip envelopes, I just create one track envelope on the master bus for my fade-in/fade-out and only add at the track level if the master fades don't work together well. That's assuming, of course, that you're routing all your channels to a master ... which is what I do because that's where I insert Ozone for the final gloss.

    I hope that helps someone.

    Beware that if your using a compressor on the track, and you have your dynamics dialed in like you like it, that using the clip envelope to adjust volume causes more signal into the compressor (or any effect for that matter) and will change how the effect responds to the audio signal.
    #26
    Sonic
    Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1517
    • Joined: 2004/07/24 20:01:00
    • Location: Saint Petersburg, Florida
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 15:20:46 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: AndyW

    I vote method 2 as well...

    Ditto

    The best is always yet to come. Now...shut up and make some noise!
    A small sample of my music... http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/turtlebend2.htm
    #27
    glazfolk
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5253
    • Joined: 2004/05/12 01:19:07
    • Location: Tasmania
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 18:31:39 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: dreamkeeper

    but did you know that it's really quite easy to move a whole envelope up or down

    Careful with that! This would be the way to go IF envelopes were implemented well. BUT: moving the whole envelope won't preserve the relative levels. I.e. a difference between nodes of say 3dB will increase when you're moving the envelope down, try it. (Unless it has been fixed in 5.2)

    For overall adjustments I recommend using Offset mode instead.

    werner


    werner ...

    I take your (very valid) point here, but please understand I was making a statement about envelopes in general, definitely NOT specifically Volume - "not just Volume, any envelope". I got the impression from our friend's post that he was not aware that this was possible.

    There are times (eg with Pan envelopes and Bus Send Level envelopes) when it is very useful for me to move the whole envelope up or down somewhat, then maybe use the pencil tool to make little tweaks here and there afterwards if necessary.

    Much quicker and more effective than adkusting every node individually!

    Best,
    Geoff

    Geoff Francis - Huon Delta Studios

    AMD Opteron 246 2GHZ twin CPU
    Tyan S2875 AVRF Dual M'board
    2 Gig RAM, Three Monitors w NVIDIA GeForce FX5700
    Alesis iO26, 2 NTFS Seagate HD
    DigitalDesign Speakers
    #28
    dreamkeeper
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2141
    • Joined: 2004/12/05 15:51:13
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/01 19:15:27 (permalink)
    Hey Geoff,

    didn't mean to disagree with you. Just a heads-up for those who might not know that Sonar may screw the relative volume levels when moving multiple nodes. For envelopes with linear scale it works well, just not for volume and send levels which are logarithmic - I should have made that clearer I think.

    werner
    #29
    cyberzip
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 613
    • Joined: 2003/11/12 13:09:45
    • Location: Sweden
    • Status: offline
    RE: TO AUTOMATE OR ENVELOPE ? 2006/05/02 07:04:38 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: petep

    So no keystroke.....you've got to be kidding me. One of the most used features is buried 3 menus deep? You folks actually mix like that? Sorry to be a downer, but that is complete crap.


    Wow, I had never thought of a keyboard shortcut for adding clip volume envelopes. Now that I think about it, it could be very useful. (I'm thinking about how useful CTRL-L is for creating loop clips.) I think I'll fill out the feature request form.

    But you do realize that not everyone's needs are similar to yours?
    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1