Frank Haas
Max Output Level: -50.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2490
- Joined: 2005/01/14 06:32:54
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:05:44
(permalink)
feel free to post more.. 
|
Qwerty69
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1435
- Joined: 2004/02/19 17:44:10
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:06:54
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Twigman
ORIGINAL: Qwerty69
My wife and I are expecting child #2 in about two weeks and still haven't thought of a decent boys name. Apparently she maintains that "Theophrastus Bombastus" is inappropriate.
Any ideas?
We're expecting Dec10
Our 1st got called Freddie although I wanted to call him Stig
Our 2nd is likely to end up being called Charlie but I'd like to call him Stig too.
I am SO stealing that concept!! B.
|
Frank Haas
Max Output Level: -50.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2490
- Joined: 2005/01/14 06:32:54
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:07:13
(permalink)
what do you think..
will Sonar7 sound 10% better than S6, or more like 5% ?
|
adimatis
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 75
- Joined: 2007/03/23 05:18:11
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:08:00
(permalink)
undereason, you picked your time!
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:08:54
(permalink)
|
Qwerty69
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1435
- Joined: 2004/02/19 17:44:10
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:09:23
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Frank Haas
what do you think..
will Sonar7 sound 10% better than S6, or more like 5% ?
It'd have to be 20 - 40% better wouldn't it?
|
markheath
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 408
- Joined: 2003/12/30 05:28:55
- Location: Southampton, England
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:10:02
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Frank Haas
will Sonar7 sound 10% better than S6, or more like 5% ? I'm still on SONAR 5 so I'm hoping for more like 20-40% improvement
|
Twigman
Max Output Level: -38.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3667
- Joined: 2006/08/24 04:45:15
- Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:10:06
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Qwerty69
ORIGINAL: Frank Haas
what do you think..
will Sonar7 sound 10% better than S6, or more like 5% ?
It'd have to be 20 - 40% better wouldn't it?
surely no question about it
|
Qwerty69
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1435
- Joined: 2004/02/19 17:44:10
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:10:24
(permalink)
I am really just waiting for the nulled audio tests to demonstrate the differences between the audio engines...
|
Frank Haas
Max Output Level: -50.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2490
- Joined: 2005/01/14 06:32:54
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:10:36
(permalink)
well that depends.. are you talking about an AMD or Intel processor ?
|
daniel24672
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 450
- Joined: 2005/07/19 22:06:52
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:10:37
(permalink)
ok.... time to go.... keep posting people....remember.... is FREE!.
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:10:46
(permalink)
I predict we'll get there when we hit about 200 pages.
|
auricle
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 492
- Joined: 2007/02/25 09:36:32
- Location: English expat in Moscow/Russia
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:10:58
(permalink)
How we doing guys? Nearly 1500 posts - a quarter of the way there!
|
Qwerty69
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1435
- Joined: 2004/02/19 17:44:10
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:11:25
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: markheath
ORIGINAL: Frank Haas
will Sonar7 sound 10% better than S6, or more like 5% ?
I'm still on SONAR 5 so I'm hoping for more like 20-40% improvement
SNAP!
|
Twigman
Max Output Level: -38.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3667
- Joined: 2006/08/24 04:45:15
- Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:11:39
(permalink)
We'll be there in 12 hours once the merkins get in
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:11:51
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Qwerty69
ORIGINAL: Frank Haas
what do you think..
will Sonar7 sound 10% better than S6, or more like 5% ?
It'd have to be 20 - 40% better wouldn't it?
Same here.
|
ericzang
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 197
- Joined: 2003/11/12 02:05:41
- Location: Sedona, Arizona, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:12:10
(permalink)
|
Qwerty69
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1435
- Joined: 2004/02/19 17:44:10
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:12:45
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Frank Haas
well that depends.. are you talking about an AMD or Intel processor ?
Well...those results will have to be influenced on whether or not you've got the latest dual-core patch applied.
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:12:51
(permalink)
|
Maneswar
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 332
- Joined: 2006/01/11 11:16:06
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:13:26
(permalink)
Good morning from NYC, I see you gents have been busy... not bad, 1453 is what I see. 
|
Qwerty69
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1435
- Joined: 2004/02/19 17:44:10
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:13:45
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Twigman
We'll be there in 12 hours once the merkins get in
I thought a "merkin" was a wig for one's pubic hair...
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:13:54
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Twigman
We'll be there in 12 hours once the merkins get in
That's why we need CJ.............. CJ WHERE ARE YOUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Frank Haas
Max Output Level: -50.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2490
- Joined: 2005/01/14 06:32:54
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:14:44
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Qwerty69
ORIGINAL: Frank Haas
well that depends.. are you talking about an AMD or Intel processor ?
Well...those results will have to be influenced on whether or not you've got the latest dual-core patch applied.
yeah.. so you are saying that temperature is not a problem soundwise ?
|
Qwerty69
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1435
- Joined: 2004/02/19 17:44:10
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:14:50
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Maneswar
Good morning from NYC, I see you gents have been busy... not bad, 1453 is what I see.
Enough platitudes - more posts.  Q.
|
Maneswar
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 332
- Joined: 2006/01/11 11:16:06
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:14:51
(permalink)
Ah, coffee is ready.
|
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10031
- Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
- Location: United States
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:15:36
(permalink)
|
Qwerty69
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1435
- Joined: 2004/02/19 17:44:10
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:16:17
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Frank Haas
ORIGINAL: Qwerty69
ORIGINAL: Frank Haas
well that depends.. are you talking about an AMD or Intel processor ?
Well...those results will have to be influenced on whether or not you've got the latest dual-core patch applied.
yeah..
so you are saying that temperature is not a problem soundwise ?
Temperature has been a problem here ever since I decided to water cool my PC with hot coffee... I still maintain it was a sub-conscious desire to go quad-core, except the damn thing kept working.
|
Maneswar
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 332
- Joined: 2006/01/11 11:16:06
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:16:38
(permalink)
Good point.
|
Frank Haas
Max Output Level: -50.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2490
- Joined: 2005/01/14 06:32:54
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:17:10
(permalink)
good point.. I mean good boy
|
Mick
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1358
- Joined: 2004/03/03 11:39:30
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/18 07:17:16
(permalink)
This is a waste of time. 6000 posts is 200 pages of posts folks. By the time we reach it Sonar 8 will be out.
I have not changed my signature.
|