. . . . The age old problem . . . .

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
jerjabs
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 427
  • Joined: 2008/06/08 13:54:51
  • Location: http://www.myspace.com/d20music
  • Status: offline
2009/07/02 21:42:53 (permalink)

. . . . The age old problem . . . .

I recently added auralex to the space I record and mix in with bass traps in all four corners along with wall treatments. I use Event TR 8's as my main monitors with a KRK 10" sub for the low end. I played many many "pro" commercial songs thru the system and adjusted the sub output to a level that sounds balanced and on point. Yet, again every time I mix one of my songs thru the system the bass ends up too much or too little. As usual, the mix sounds great when I'm mixing but in my truck I can hear issues.

To say that making a mix . . . going down four floors in my complex . . . getting into my truck only to have the mix more than just a tad off . . . having to rinse and repeat over and over is becoming a MAJOR ****ING DRAG! It's like chasing a ghost.

I'm using Superior drummer for drums. In my truck, the kick is LOW. In my mix room it is Pumping. I don't get it. All my iPod tunes sound awesome thru my trucks system....I truck's system is not cheap and sounds balanced when I play itunes songs.

I have read tons about this common problem but I'm stumped again. I want to try the IK ARC system...but I just cant fork over the $$$ for it right now.

I'm sure many of you guys have had similar issues, what tricks did you do to help out your low end mix issues?
post edited by jerjabs - 2009/07/02 21:58:30

i7-920, 8 GIGS DDR5, SONAR Pro 8.5.2, Motu Ultralite, UA Twin-Finity 710 pre, RNC 1773, M-Audio Axium 49, Event TR 8 and SP-5B Monitors, KRK Sub, Jolymod Oktava 219 mic, MXL V69m, SM7B, Studio Projects C1, POD 2.0 and APHEX 661 & the Variax 700 acoustic.
#1

35 Replies Related Threads

    mmarton
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 666
    • Joined: 2006/01/26 13:23:30
    • Location: White Rock, B.C. Canada
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/02 22:13:06 (permalink)
    Try mixing without the sub

    Happy Sonar Platinum 64 bit Registered Owner
    Epi Casino, Les Paul, Strat, Martin GPCPA3, Cort C4Z bass, Roland D20 Synth, TC Konnekt48, Sansamp BDDI, Roland JDXI, APS Klasiks, Windows 10 64bit
    #2
    keith
    Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3882
    • Joined: 2003/12/10 09:49:35
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/02 22:13:33 (permalink)
    A couple of suggestions...

    1.) Park the truck in your living room.

    2.) Move your studio to your truck.

    Seriously, I actually use a pair of Sony cans (MDR 7506 and/or 7502) to zone in on bass balance and muddiness issues. I don't have a pro live monitoring situation in terms of room treatment and whatnot, so it's much easier for me to fine tune in extreme isolation and cross-check the result after the fact.
    #3
    yorolpal
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13829
    • Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/02 22:17:46 (permalink)
    jerjabs ol pal, I feel yor pain. I used to have problems like you're talking about until I got a new set of monitors (Event 6.5s) and, most important, a subwoofer (again, an Event). Now my mixes translate across most all speakers and environments. In fact, I recently mixed a friends new country album and then took it out to listen to it in my car. The bass and the kick were over-hyped. I went back to the project studio and discovered that in a recent rewiring I'd accidentally turned off the subwoofer footswitch(yea, I know, you'd think I would've heard it ). Turned it back on, remixed and everything sounded totally pro in the car....and everywhere else. YMMV. So it may or may not be your sub. In my case it solved the problem. In your case it might be causing it.
    post edited by yorolpal - 2009/07/02 22:30:07

    https://soundcloud.com/doghouse-riley/tracks 
    https://doghouseriley1.bandcamp.com 
    Where you come from is gone...where you thought you were goin to weren't never there...and where you are ain't no good unless you can get away from it.
     
    SPLAT 64 bit running on a Studio Cat Pro System Win 10 64bit 2.8ghz Core i7 with 24 gigs ram. MOTU Audio Express.
    #4
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/02 22:38:48 (permalink)
    Getting a mix that sounds good in my car has been my personal holy grail for years and years. I've pretty much given up on it ever happening.

    When I first started seriously recording at home, I really only had my car stereo as the sole alternate reference. First attempts were shockingly bad.

    After about the 100th attempt I upgraded my monitors.

    After about the 200th attempt I spent a year seriously studying acoustics and acoustic treatments, bought several cases of 703, drilled a lot of holes in the ceiling, entombed myself in the stuff.

    After about the 300th attempt I upgraded my monitors again. Sometime after that I bought a subwoofer.

    And after all that money and effort, the CDs still sounded like crap in the car.

    Then I took my CD to a professional studio where a friend was recording. The engineer was kind enough to let me play the CD through his expensive speakers in a room treated with multiple floor-to-ceiling Helmholtz resonators. I first listened to some exceptional jazz fusion stuff he'd recorded there, and it sounded mahvelous. Then I loaded my 24-bit waves into Pro Tools, sat in the mix chair, and to my amazement it sounded good. Really good. Bass was right where it should be.

    At that moment, I had an epiphany: it was the stereo in my car that sounded like crap.

    So I next went through my CD collection, pulling out albums that I knew well and that I'd always admired for their sound quality. Guess what? They all sounded like crap in the car!

    At this point I was beginning to doubt everything I thought I knew about audio. I could not find one record that sounded good in my car. What had happened?

    Here's what had happened. The car stereo was always substandard, I just didn't know it. But over a 3-year period of intense listening my ears had become more and more observant, more picky, better trained, better at critical listening. The better my mixes became, the more I expected from them. And all along, the car stereo was crap.

    So I made some measurements in the car. Jeez, I had no idea how bad it was. An ear-piercing bump a 4KHz, a woofy peak at 80-100Hz, nothing below 60Hz. Resonances all over the spectrum. The only way a mix was ever going to sound good in there was if I EQ'd it specifically for that space.

    The moral of this story: beware of using your car stereo as a reference. For starters, the car's interior is a small space, which is an acoustically bad thing all by itself. There are large reflective surfaces (glass) on all sides, pretty much assuring rampant comb filtering galore. In my Yukon, the tweeters are actually aimed at the windshield! The woofers are mounted in the doors. Doors that are intentionally resonant so that they make a satisfying whump when you close the door, giving the illusion of vault-like isolation. Everywhere are plastic things that rattle and buzz. Add to that the asymmetry of sitting to one side - there is no "sweet spot". Acoustically, the car is a mess, and if you're sitting in a pickup truck it's going to be even worse.

    On top of that, the stereo is by Bose, that once-proud manufacturer that went to the dark side in the 80's. That big 100Hz bass boost gives the illusion of having lots of bass response to the casual listener. But in reality, the bass is very uneven and sorely lacking in the very low end.

    So what to do? First, use a spectral display as a sanity check to make sure you're not doing anything too evil yourself. Load up some commercial CDs that are similar to your own style and study their spectra. Of course, you can't just get away with copying somebody else's curve, but you can tell if you're in the ballpark.

    Next, take some measurements of your room. You can use Ethan Winer's stepped sine SONAR project and your own microphone, so it won't cost a dime. Simply knowing where the room is weak will help you make informed decisions, even if you do nothing else to mitigate the problems.

    Your subwoofer may be working against you. I love having one, especially for playing music for enjoyment, impressing visitors, and video games. But the truth is you're probably better off not using one at all. But if you're already too attached to it, try moving it around to different locations in the room, re-measuring the bass response of the room with each move. One method, which I've used myself, is to set the sub on your chair and crawl around until you find a spot that sounds just right. That's where you want to put the sub.



    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #5
    Middleman
    Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4397
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
    • Location: Orange County, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/02 22:45:53 (permalink)
    Ditch the sub unless you are doing music for dance clubs. Upgrade the Events. Find the sweet spot in your room.

    Gear: A bunch of stuff.
    #6
    PaPi
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1032
    • Joined: 2008/12/27 18:02:03
    • Location: SoCal
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/02 23:17:29 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: jerjabs

    I recently added auralex to the space I record and mix in with bass traps in all four corners along with wall treatments. I use Event TR 8's as my main monitors with a KRK 10" sub for the low end. I played many many "pro" commercial songs thru the system and adjusted the sub output to a level that sounds balanced and on point. Yet, again every time I mix one of my songs thru the system the bass ends up too much or too little. As usual, the mix sounds great when I'm mixing but in my truck I can hear issues.

    To say that making a mix . . . going down four floors in my complex . . . getting into my truck only to have the mix more than just a tad off . . . having to rinse and repeat over and over is becoming a MAJOR ****ING DRAG! It's like chasing a ghost.

    I'm using Superior drummer for drums. In my truck, the kick is LOW. In my mix room it is Pumping. I don't get it. All my iPod tunes sound awesome thru my trucks system....I truck's system is not cheap and sounds balanced when I play itunes songs.

    I have read tons about this common problem but I'm stumped again. I want to try the IK ARC system...but I just cant fork over the $$$ for it right now.

    I'm sure many of you guys have had similar issues, what tricks did you do to help out your low end mix issues?


    How small is your studio? That might be the real problem. Some people record in rooms so small, no amount of acoustic treatment can ever solve the low-frequency issue. Anyhow, try adding a "cloud" over your head (that would be a bass trap hanging from the ceiling, made with two sheets of dow-corning 705 with 1.5" of air space between them. You can make it yourself and it's not going to be expensive, around $60-70. Plenty of places on the net to copy ideas and projects, like gearslutz.com or similar forums.)
    #7
    jerjabs
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 427
    • Joined: 2008/06/08 13:54:51
    • Location: http://www.myspace.com/d20music
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 00:50:49 (permalink)
    Thanks for all the input but there is one constant...All the pro music I play in my truck sounds epic. My only real issue is that I must have the volume in my truck at a fairly decent level for music to sound locked in.

    I have known people that mixed amazing stuff with their Event TR8's.
    post edited by jerjabs - 2009/07/03 01:02:27

    i7-920, 8 GIGS DDR5, SONAR Pro 8.5.2, Motu Ultralite, UA Twin-Finity 710 pre, RNC 1773, M-Audio Axium 49, Event TR 8 and SP-5B Monitors, KRK Sub, Jolymod Oktava 219 mic, MXL V69m, SM7B, Studio Projects C1, POD 2.0 and APHEX 661 & the Variax 700 acoustic.
    #8
    jerjabs
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 427
    • Joined: 2008/06/08 13:54:51
    • Location: http://www.myspace.com/d20music
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 01:05:25 (permalink)
    I guess I don't understand how if I go onto iTunes and download a song from Sting, Metallica, Boston, Yanni and play it thru my mixing system they all sound great and balanced. I take them to my car...they sound great and balanced....

    In my studio my mixes sound great and balanced...I go to my car...they don't. If my studio and truck are on point with store bought music why isnt mine the same situation?

    i7-920, 8 GIGS DDR5, SONAR Pro 8.5.2, Motu Ultralite, UA Twin-Finity 710 pre, RNC 1773, M-Audio Axium 49, Event TR 8 and SP-5B Monitors, KRK Sub, Jolymod Oktava 219 mic, MXL V69m, SM7B, Studio Projects C1, POD 2.0 and APHEX 661 & the Variax 700 acoustic.
    #9
    soundtweaker
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1036
    • Joined: 2003/11/12 12:25:59
    • Location: San Francisco
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 02:01:11 (permalink)
    You just have to find those low frequencies that are too boomy for your car stereo.
    I had the same setup and it got to be such a pain to keep going out to my truck and finding out this or that was off.
    After I bought an xbox and could stream my mixes right to my home stereo it became a huge time saver for me to instantly check my mixes.
    #10
    jcatena
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 404
    • Joined: 2009/06/09 09:34:04
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 02:30:46 (permalink)
    There are a variety of factors that may explain that, some have been explained.
    A very important one is that commercial records were mixed and mastered in very well conditioned spaces, with balanced reverberation along the spectrum, few reflections, and balanced frequency response. By trained ears, that checked agains less linear speakers too.
    In your mixing room, there are most probably many dips in the frequency response caused by reflection combing, reverberations, etc. This means that even if you can hear professional recondings well, there are some frequencies that you don't hear, there are transients that you don't hear well enough. When you do your mixes, you don't notice flaws that you can not hear. You may have in your mixes large peaks at some frequencies that you can't hear.
    When you hear commercial recording in your home studio or in car, you don't actually hear everything in either, but roughly you hear it as balanced as the listening environment is, because the source can be considered "neutral".
    But when you hear your mixes in your car, you hear things that you couldn't in your home studio, so it may sound much more different than commercial recordings.
    It is much easier to do mixes that translate well in a very neutral listening environment, but even so, it takes some training. You can detect flaws in your mixings hearing them at different locations (that's what are you actually doing when hearing in your car), and you need to do it much more if you don't mix in a good environment. At the end you may obtain good results, but after many time consuming atempts.
    While you can improve a home studio a lot using absorbers and bass traps, don't think you are close to a good professional studio. In the studio I have been working, the first thing I did was to measure its characteristics, and what I found is impossible to obtain if everything, starting with the room shape and dimenstions, was not designed for outstanding sound quality. A flat RT-60 below 100ms, with only two small peaks of 150 ms at 100 and 150 Hz, ruler flat frequency response... No matter what I coud do at home will get me remotely close to that.
    But don't be too pesimist. Even if a home studio is far from perfect, you can get pretty close unless yours have too serious problems. You can walk probably 95% or more of the way. The remaining bits could then be very quickly fixed in a professional studio, or to some degree with a lot of patience in yours.

    Jose Catena
    DIGIWAVES, S.L.
    #11
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 02:34:26 (permalink)
    I would find another system other than your main and truck. Computer speakers are revealing - both the good and the bad. I have one song that sounds great on the monitors, great in the car and the home system, but has a bass that blooms on a note on my computer speakers.

    It is really just a matter of trying a couple of systems and then working out a mean. Get it to sound good on the mains then find out what you have to do to balance out on other systems. It is art more than science. Obviously there is a problem is commercial releases sound good the truck. I would think there is too much bass - but maybe not in the kick and bass. Try cutting the lows on everything but those two with a sharp filter - cut the other tracks until you hear the difference and then back off to let a little bass back in. Sometimes you can have subsonics and trash that doesn't make a sound but has a lot of energy anyway. Cut it out and it frees the bass to do it job.

    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #12
    Dizzi45Z
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1040
    • Joined: 2005/10/26 17:00:20
    • Location: Orem, Utah
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 02:41:37 (permalink)
    Put your speakers on stands.

    I was having many of these same problems with my ASP8's. When I finally made the purchase to put them on $100 speaker stands, I was blown away with how different it sounded. I could then also position my speakers exactly where they needed to be. My monitoring environment is extremely good right now. My mixes translate very well now.

    Don't ignore this step. Speakers on the desk add muddiness to your mixes around 200-240 hertz and you lose a lot of bottom frequencies.

    I own ARC and my mixing only improved about 5% through using it. When I put my speakers on stands, I measured it in ARC and realized that I had really, really good response in my treated room. So I stopped using ARC and my mixing has improved at least 30% because of the speaker stands. Definitely worth the shot. You can get speaker stands much cheaper than 100 bucks nowadays.

    -Dave
    Noisebox Studios -Utah Recording Studio
    Sonar 8.5 , Melodyne Plug-in, Pro Tools 8 HD2,  Waves Platinum Bundle
    Tascam DM-3200 with IF-FW/DM mkII
    AMD 64 X2 4400
    Mac Pro Quad Xeon 2.6 11GB Ram


    #13
    jerjabs
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 427
    • Joined: 2008/06/08 13:54:51
    • Location: http://www.myspace.com/d20music
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 04:03:56 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Dizzi45Z

    Put your speakers on stands.

    I was having many of these same problems with my ASP8's. When I finally made the purchase to put them on $100 speaker stands, I was blown away with how different it sounded. I could then also position my speakers exactly where they needed to be. My monitoring environment is extremely good right now. My mixes translate very well now.

    Don't ignore this step. Speakers on the desk add muddiness to your mixes around 200-240 hertz and you lose a lot of bottom frequencies.

    I own ARC and my mixing only improved about 5% through using it. When I put my speakers on stands, I measured it in ARC and realized that I had really, really good response in my treated room. So I stopped using ARC and my mixing has improved at least 30% because of the speaker stands. Definitely worth the shot. You can get speaker stands much cheaper than 100 bucks nowadays.



    I actually have my Events on stands.

    i7-920, 8 GIGS DDR5, SONAR Pro 8.5.2, Motu Ultralite, UA Twin-Finity 710 pre, RNC 1773, M-Audio Axium 49, Event TR 8 and SP-5B Monitors, KRK Sub, Jolymod Oktava 219 mic, MXL V69m, SM7B, Studio Projects C1, POD 2.0 and APHEX 661 & the Variax 700 acoustic.
    #14
    alexoosthoek
    Max Output Level: -23 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5238
    • Joined: 2008/11/12 11:20:51
    • Location: A'gus
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 04:19:47 (permalink)
    Why don't you take one of this good sounding commercial songs, load it into Har-Bal or something like that, load your own and see what happens.
    Don't use Har-Bal to change your song but change your mix.

    The CHB
    Some Live Demo's


    Various ADK computers   and some thingy's
    Have fun!
    #15
    Mooch4056
    Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7494
    • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
    • Location: Chicago
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 05:33:39 (permalink)
    Your subwoofer may be working against you. I love having one, especially for playing music for enjoyment, impressing visitors, and video games. But the truth is you're probably better off not using one at all.



    yup yup

    I have one -- I very rarely turn it on - I have a foot switch under my desk that turns it on -- I MIGHT click it once in a while towards the end of my mixing just to do a quick check -- but most of the time I dont even do that

    I like listening to everyone else's CD's or music for entertainment -- but when I mix with it -- your right -- it gets in the way... i dont know another way to say it other then -- hearing the lower frequencies so dominatly just get in the way when I am trying to focus on something else -- usually if it souds glued together and even through the mains -- then it will transfer elsewhere --

    when the sub is on its almost a distratction

    ehhh -- to each his own -- i know people get good n great mixes using one -- but i find it gets in the way

    I seem to always agree with everything bitflipper says -- I kinda wanna hang out with u and learn some more ....when you gunna move to chicago ?


    From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
     
    Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
    Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




    #16
    CJaysMusic
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 30423
    • Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
    • Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 07:37:58 (permalink)
    Jerjabs, It takes a great ear to make your mixes translate (sound good) on different stereo systems. The problem your having is that your not hearing everytihng in the low end of the spectrum and this is why. It doesnt matter if your mix and pro mixes sounds great in your room (studio). Even though you said your mixes sound like the pro mixes, your not really hearing the lows and the refections that come from your room and therefore it sounds different in other systems.

    JCatena said it best in his post
    Cj

    www.audio-mastering-mixing.com - A Professional Worldwide Audio Mixing & Mastering Studio, Providing Online And Attended Sessions. We also do TV commercials, Radio spots & spoken word books
    Audio Blog
    #17
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 10:59:07 (permalink)
    I seem to always agree with everything bitflipper says


    Mooch, you are obviously a highly intelligent individual.


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #18
    yorolpal
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13829
    • Joined: 2003/11/20 11:50:37
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 11:05:40 (permalink)
    I guess it's a matter of room and personal ears. I wouldn't mix without my sub. Since I installed it every single mix is way better. I used to over-hype my low end on almost everything. No more. I own a commercial broadcast studio but my music project studio is at my home. I very often do mix checks in my car, on my home stereo/theatre rig and in both edit suites at work. Before I got the sub my mixes sounded different in each of those environments. Now they are very consistent everywhere. I've also been thinking of getting some Avantones for further checking. Keep at it JerJabs. And good luck.

    https://soundcloud.com/doghouse-riley/tracks 
    https://doghouseriley1.bandcamp.com 
    Where you come from is gone...where you thought you were goin to weren't never there...and where you are ain't no good unless you can get away from it.
     
    SPLAT 64 bit running on a Studio Cat Pro System Win 10 64bit 2.8ghz Core i7 with 24 gigs ram. MOTU Audio Express.
    #19
    jcatena
    Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 404
    • Joined: 2009/06/09 09:34:04
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 12:06:33 (permalink)
    Another thing that helps is good knowledge of your mixing location characteristics. Once you have the frequency response and reverberation charts, you know what aspects are more problematic, and you know at what you must pay more attention when mixing. It also allows you to select the kind of alternate listening checks you need in order to identify possible flaws in your mixes, I mean you can select for example 3 different checks that are complementary, instead of a lot of random ones. That will ease the process a lot, save time, and will help you to improve your judgement because you understand what's going on, what's meaningful in each alternate check.
    There are some other issues to take into account:
    Consistent and adequate monitoring levels are important. Too low or too high may fool your perception. Knowing how the level affects perception, a check at lower or higher level can help identify issues, in comparison with the average correct level.
    There is a check that I always want to have handy: a pair of small speakers. I use 4" computer speakers that are easily saturated by too much bass, while if there is too litle it is pretty evident. As you acquire experience, this is less necessary (you almost always find it's ok when checking), but it helps a lot while learning.
    post edited by jcatena - 2009/07/03 12:08:50

    Jose Catena
    DIGIWAVES, S.L.
    #20
    Chuck_P
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 100
    • Joined: 2006/03/15 07:57:13
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 12:07:56 (permalink)
    Thank you for this extremely insightful post bitflipper. I have certainly over-relied on my car stereos for various projects over the years, only to come to similar conclusions. A car is a lousy place to make important decisions about high-quality stereo audio - just think about it for a second. A whole bunch of small speakers wedged into strange places in all directions, sheets of glass inches from your ears, your head nearly bumping the ceiling - not many pro mixing/mastering rooms look much like that! Really, it's amazing that top-end car stereos sound as good as they do. My new car came with a 230-watt Blaupunkt stereo with 11 speakers and 2 subs, for some reason. My observations:

    - When cranked, pop music tracks - Katy Perry, Rihanna, whatever - sizzle like bacon frying and punch like "Sugar" Shane Moseley. Completely awesome.

    - When I switch to my Diana Krall / Bela Fleck / Gillian Welch / Alison Krauss discs they sound quiet, flat, and dull, especially at first.

    If my solution to this was to take a mix that sounded like "Revelator" and brickwall-limit everything below 300Hz and layer brighteners on, I would hope T-Bone Burnett would magically appear and beat me into submission with my PodXT. I recommend using the following algorithm.

    1) Are you Lady Ga-Ga?
    2) If NO, then don't get too worked up if your mixes don't light up car stereos
    3) If YES, I don't know what to tell you. You certainly have your own thing going. Good luck with that.

    cp

    Chuck
    Core i7 2600K, ASUS P8Z68 mobo, 16GB PC1600 RAM, XFX NVIDIA 8500GT (x2)
    Mackie Onyx 1640 Firewire
    SONAR X1c Producer, Windows 7 Home Premium 64
    #21
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 12:32:48 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: bitflipper

    Getting a mix that sounds good in my car has been my personal holy grail for years and years. I've pretty much given up on it ever happening.

    When I first started seriously recording at home, I really only had my car stereo as the sole alternate reference. First attempts were shockingly bad.

    After about the 100th attempt I upgraded my monitors.

    After about the 200th attempt I spent a year seriously studying acoustics and acoustic treatments, bought several cases of 703, drilled a lot of holes in the ceiling, entombed myself in the stuff.

    After about the 300th attempt I upgraded my monitors again. Sometime after that I bought a subwoofer.

    And after all that money and effort, the CDs still sounded like crap in the car.

    Then I took my CD to a professional studio where a friend was recording. The engineer was kind enough to let me play the CD through his expensive speakers in a room treated with multiple floor-to-ceiling Helmholtz resonators. I first listened to some exceptional jazz fusion stuff he'd recorded there, and it sounded mahvelous. Then I loaded my 24-bit waves into Pro Tools, sat in the mix chair, and to my amazement it sounded good. Really good. Bass was right where it should be.

    At that moment, I had an epiphany: it was the stereo in my car that sounded like crap.

    So I next went through my CD collection, pulling out albums that I knew well and that I'd always admired for their sound quality. Guess what? They all sounded like crap in the car!

    At this point I was beginning to doubt everything I thought I knew about audio. I could not find one record that sounded good in my car. What had happened?

    Here's what had happened. The car stereo was always substandard, I just didn't know it. But over a 3-year period of intense listening my ears had become more and more observant, more picky, better trained, better at critical listening. The better my mixes became, the more I expected from them. And all along, the car stereo was crap.

    So I made some measurements in the car. Jeez, I had no idea how bad it was. An ear-piercing bump a 4KHz, a woofy peak at 80-100Hz, nothing below 60Hz. Resonances all over the spectrum. The only way a mix was ever going to sound good in there was if I EQ'd it specifically for that space.

    The moral of this story: beware of using your car stereo as a reference. For starters, the car's interior is a small space, which is an acoustically bad thing all by itself. There are large reflective surfaces (glass) on all sides, pretty much assuring rampant comb filtering galore. In my Yukon, the tweeters are actually aimed at the windshield! The woofers are mounted in the doors. Doors that are intentionally resonant so that they make a satisfying whump when you close the door, giving the illusion of vault-like isolation. Everywhere are plastic things that rattle and buzz. Add to that the asymmetry of sitting to one side - there is no "sweet spot". Acoustically, the car is a mess, and if you're sitting in a pickup truck it's going to be even worse.

    On top of that, the stereo is by Bose, that once-proud manufacturer that went to the dark side in the 80's. That big 100Hz bass boost gives the illusion of having lots of bass response to the casual listener. But in reality, the bass is very uneven and sorely lacking in the very low end.

    So what to do? First, use a spectral display as a sanity check to make sure you're not doing anything too evil yourself. Load up some commercial CDs that are similar to your own style and study their spectra. Of course, you can't just get away with copying somebody else's curve, but you can tell if you're in the ballpark.

    Next, take some measurements of your room. You can use Ethan Winer's stepped sine SONAR project and your own microphone, so it won't cost a dime. Simply knowing where the room is weak will help you make informed decisions, even if you do nothing else to mitigate the problems.

    Your subwoofer may be working against you. I love having one, especially for playing music for enjoyment, impressing visitors, and video games. But the truth is you're probably better off not using one at all. But if you're already too attached to it, try moving it around to different locations in the room, re-measuring the bass response of the room with each move. One method, which I've used myself, is to set the sub on your chair and crawl around until you find a spot that sounds just right. That's where you want to put the sub.



    Outstanding post and long overdue. I have had similar things go on with me. Not with my mixes because I knew from many years ago that a car's stereo is not the best place to listen to music. They are OK for very casual listening but there is so much distortion and its not limited to harmonic and intermodulation but awful phase distortion too. Not to mention stereo image distortion. One thing we have to consider in a car stereo environment is noise intrinsic to the car itself. Wind noise is going to impact the quality of highs that can be heard well. The tiny size of the cars interior can't allow for the proper propagation of bass. There are so many problems inherent with a car's stereo that I for a long time refused to listen to them. This has not been solved by high end car stereos either.

    I am not so picky now but I never take them as being the last word on quality sound.

    Great post Bit.


    Best
    John
    #22
    KeithLuedke
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 133
    • Joined: 2004/10/27 19:14:42
    • Location: AUSTIN, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 13:13:14 (permalink)
    dude...Hiiii--larious. 100% accurate.


    ____________________________
    Keith Luedke
    #23
    Razorwit
    Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1235
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 18:39:32
    • Location: SLC, UT
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 13:16:49 (permalink)
    One more bit of advice: Get a second set of regular commercial stereo speakers and put them in your studio to A/B with. Put them in a different position than your near-fields so they don't interact with your room/listening position in the same way. You'll see this at lots and lots of big commercial studios as well...it's not a panacea but it's another tool in the box.

    Dean
    #24
    Dizzi45Z
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1040
    • Joined: 2005/10/26 17:00:20
    • Location: Orem, Utah
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/03 16:40:00 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: bitflipper

    Getting a mix that sounds good in my car has been my personal holy grail for years and years. I've pretty much given up on it ever happening.

    When I first started seriously recording at home, I really only had my car stereo as the sole alternate reference. First attempts were shockingly bad.

    After about the 100th attempt I upgraded my monitors.

    After about the 200th attempt I spent a year seriously studying acoustics and acoustic treatments, bought several cases of 703, drilled a lot of holes in the ceiling, entombed myself in the stuff.

    After about the 300th attempt I upgraded my monitors again. Sometime after that I bought a subwoofer.

    And after all that money and effort, the CDs still sounded like crap in the car.

    Then I took my CD to a professional studio where a friend was recording. The engineer was kind enough to let me play the CD through his expensive speakers in a room treated with multiple floor-to-ceiling Helmholtz resonators. I first listened to some exceptional jazz fusion stuff he'd recorded there, and it sounded mahvelous. Then I loaded my 24-bit waves into Pro Tools, sat in the mix chair, and to my amazement it sounded good. Really good. Bass was right where it should be.

    At that moment, I had an epiphany: it was the stereo in my car that sounded like crap.

    So I next went through my CD collection, pulling out albums that I knew well and that I'd always admired for their sound quality. Guess what? They all sounded like crap in the car!

    At this point I was beginning to doubt everything I thought I knew about audio. I could not find one record that sounded good in my car. What had happened?

    Here's what had happened. The car stereo was always substandard, I just didn't know it. But over a 3-year period of intense listening my ears had become more and more observant, more picky, better trained, better at critical listening. The better my mixes became, the more I expected from them. And all along, the car stereo was crap.

    So I made some measurements in the car. Jeez, I had no idea how bad it was. An ear-piercing bump a 4KHz, a woofy peak at 80-100Hz, nothing below 60Hz. Resonances all over the spectrum. The only way a mix was ever going to sound good in there was if I EQ'd it specifically for that space.

    The moral of this story: beware of using your car stereo as a reference.



    Bitflipper,

    This story is classic. It should become a sticky.

    -Dave
    Noisebox Studios -Utah Recording Studio
    Sonar 8.5 , Melodyne Plug-in, Pro Tools 8 HD2,  Waves Platinum Bundle
    Tascam DM-3200 with IF-FW/DM mkII
    AMD 64 X2 4400
    Mac Pro Quad Xeon 2.6 11GB Ram


    #25
    Chris S
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 396
    • Joined: 2007/06/13 21:40:13
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/05 17:01:58 (permalink)
    Here is what I've found out about:
    If you overlayer any one frequency it will create problems on lower-end speakers.
    It is not just a problem with bass, but that is the range most people experience it first.
    When mixing, pick one track to be the low end and hi cut all of the others or any overs that directly compete with it.
    Always cut frequencies below 20Hz and most importantly use multiple sets of completely different monitors to do your final mixing on.

    I've gone back and forth from the studio to the car countless times........and I'm finally at a point where I can make a mix that sounds good on both.
    #26
    LixiSoft
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1017
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 03:06:33
    • Location: Sunny TuneTown, USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/05 21:07:46 (permalink)
    I've also been thinking of getting some Avantones for further checking.


    DO IT !! The Avantones are great, (they sound like crap), which is a good thing I spend more than half of my mix time on them. Nothing is better for setting volume relationships, kick and bass tones, reverb tails, delay times and vocal and guitar eq's. I dial in a rough mix on my Adams, then switch to the Avantones to fine tune the mix, when the mix works on the Avantones I switch back to the Adams and a set of high end headphones to double check the low end volumes. Then print the mix, it translates everytime.

    Just get a pair, they suck real good

    LixiSoft
    #27
    AJ_0000
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 738
    • Joined: 2007/05/05 01:32:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/06 02:33:31 (permalink)
    Hmm. The car stereo, even if it's sub-standard, can be a good reference because you're usually extremely familiar with it. You know what commercial releases sound like on it, so you can use it to compare yours. It's not good for the ONLY reference, but it can be useful. If you have a good, higher-end aftermarket system that's been set up properly, it can be better.

    I wonder if your problem is really monitoring and "room tuning", or if it's technique. Maybe your understanding of EQ and compression is lacking.

    Or maybe...you've treated your room to the point where you've wiped out too much of the bass...
    #28
    Lanceindastudio
    Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4604
    • Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/06 06:13:56 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: bitflipper

    Getting a mix that sounds good in my car has been my personal holy grail for years and years. I've pretty much given up on it ever happening.

    When I first started seriously recording at home, I really only had my car stereo as the sole alternate reference. First attempts were shockingly bad.

    After about the 100th attempt I upgraded my monitors.

    After about the 200th attempt I spent a year seriously studying acoustics and acoustic treatments, bought several cases of 703, drilled a lot of holes in the ceiling, entombed myself in the stuff.

    After about the 300th attempt I upgraded my monitors again. Sometime after that I bought a subwoofer.

    And after all that money and effort, the CDs still sounded like crap in the car.

    Then I took my CD to a professional studio where a friend was recording. The engineer was kind enough to let me play the CD through his expensive speakers in a room treated with multiple floor-to-ceiling Helmholtz resonators. I first listened to some exceptional jazz fusion stuff he'd recorded there, and it sounded mahvelous. Then I loaded my 24-bit waves into Pro Tools, sat in the mix chair, and to my amazement it sounded good. Really good. Bass was right where it should be.

    At that moment, I had an epiphany: it was the stereo in my car that sounded like crap.

    So I next went through my CD collection, pulling out albums that I knew well and that I'd always admired for their sound quality. Guess what? They all sounded like crap in the car!

    At this point I was beginning to doubt everything I thought I knew about audio. I could not find one record that sounded good in my car. What had happened?

    Here's what had happened. The car stereo was always substandard, I just didn't know it. But over a 3-year period of intense listening my ears had become more and more observant, more picky, better trained, better at critical listening. The better my mixes became, the more I expected from them. And all along, the car stereo was crap.

    So I made some measurements in the car. Jeez, I had no idea how bad it was. An ear-piercing bump a 4KHz, a woofy peak at 80-100Hz, nothing below 60Hz. Resonances all over the spectrum. The only way a mix was ever going to sound good in there was if I EQ'd it specifically for that space.

    The moral of this story: beware of using your car stereo as a reference. For starters, the car's interior is a small space, which is an acoustically bad thing all by itself. There are large reflective surfaces (glass) on all sides, pretty much assuring rampant comb filtering galore. In my Yukon, the tweeters are actually aimed at the windshield! The woofers are mounted in the doors. Doors that are intentionally resonant so that they make a satisfying whump when you close the door, giving the illusion of vault-like isolation. Everywhere are plastic things that rattle and buzz. Add to that the asymmetry of sitting to one side - there is no "sweet spot". Acoustically, the car is a mess, and if you're sitting in a pickup truck it's going to be even worse.

    On top of that, the stereo is by Bose, that once-proud manufacturer that went to the dark side in the 80's. That big 100Hz bass boost gives the illusion of having lots of bass response to the casual listener. But in reality, the bass is very uneven and sorely lacking in the very low end.

    So what to do? First, use a spectral display as a sanity check to make sure you're not doing anything too evil yourself. Load up some commercial CDs that are similar to your own style and study their spectra. Of course, you can't just get away with copying somebody else's curve, but you can tell if you're in the ballpark.

    Next, take some measurements of your room. You can use Ethan Winer's stepped sine SONAR project and your own microphone, so it won't cost a dime. Simply knowing where the room is weak will help you make informed decisions, even if you do nothing else to mitigate the problems.

    Your subwoofer may be working against you. I love having one, especially for playing music for enjoyment, impressing visitors, and video games. But the truth is you're probably better off not using one at all. But if you're already too attached to it, try moving it around to different locations in the room, re-measuring the bass response of the room with each move. One method, which I've used myself, is to set the sub on your chair and crawl around until you find a spot that sounds just right. That's where you want to put the sub.




    Well said Bit!

    I must say though, that I have always been aware that a car system is a very awkward listening place, and to me, it simply lets me know if anything is substantially wrong.

    My car checks are not for intricate adjustments, but for checking if anything is fairly out of wack.

    I have found that my system, which is a pretty nice system that I installed myself, is a good place to check the mix compared to other songs I already appreciate the mix for.

    I compare my mix to stuff I respect while mixing/mastering is sonar, and then use the same songs to compare with in my car.

    The thing is, even with sub standard listening environments, if you can use some decent monitors, a boom box( I have a little JVC tube boom box that is great for comparison checks!), and a decent car system as a 3 point check while comparing to stuff you know sounds nice, and also use a spectrum analyzer as a major reference point when in sonar od course, you can get some damn good mixes.

    Comparison is very very useful!!! For me, it is vital in checking the reality of my mix/master to see if it is actually in the ballpark of what Im going for!

    When I get ready to mixdown and master a track, I always use refernce tracks of stuff I like and use my ears, and secondly, the spectrum analyzer to zero in on something acceptable.

    Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard   
    i7 3770k CPU
    32 gigs RAM
    Presonus AudioBox iTwo
    Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit
    Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops
    Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51
    Presonus Eureka
    Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
    #29
    ShumMakom
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7
    • Joined: 2009/06/09 18:34:43
    • Status: offline
    RE: . . . . The age old problem . . . . 2009/07/06 08:38:21 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: bitflipper

    Getting a mix that sounds good in my car has been my personal holy grail for years and years. I've pretty much given up on it ever happening.

    When I first started seriously recording at home, I really only had my car stereo as the sole alternate reference. First attempts were shockingly bad.

    After about the 100th attempt I upgraded my monitors.

    After about the 200th attempt I spent a year seriously studying acoustics and acoustic treatments, bought several cases of 703, drilled a lot of holes in the ceiling, entombed myself in the stuff.

    After about the 300th attempt I upgraded my monitors again. Sometime after that I bought a subwoofer.

    And after all that money and effort, the CDs still sounded like crap in the car.

    Then I took my CD to a professional studio where a friend was recording. The engineer was kind enough to let me play the CD through his expensive speakers in a room treated with multiple floor-to-ceiling Helmholtz resonators. I first listened to some exceptional jazz fusion stuff he'd recorded there, and it sounded mahvelous. Then I loaded my 24-bit waves into Pro Tools, sat in the mix chair, and to my amazement it sounded good. Really good. Bass was right where it should be.

    At that moment, I had an epiphany: it was the stereo in my car that sounded like crap.

    So I next went through my CD collection, pulling out albums that I knew well and that I'd always admired for their sound quality. Guess what? They all sounded like crap in the car!

    At this point I was beginning to doubt everything I thought I knew about audio. I could not find one record that sounded good in my car. What had happened?

    Here's what had happened. The car stereo was always substandard, I just didn't know it. But over a 3-year period of intense listening my ears had become more and more observant, more picky, better trained, better at critical listening. The better my mixes became, the more I expected from them. And all along, the car stereo was crap.

    So I made some measurements in the car. Jeez, I had no idea how bad it was. An ear-piercing bump a 4KHz, a woofy peak at 80-100Hz, nothing below 60Hz. Resonances all over the spectrum. The only way a mix was ever going to sound good in there was if I EQ'd it specifically for that space.

    The moral of this story: beware of using your car stereo as a reference. For starters, the car's interior is a small space, which is an acoustically bad thing all by itself. There are large reflective surfaces (glass) on all sides, pretty much assuring rampant comb filtering galore. In my Yukon, the tweeters are actually aimed at the windshield! The woofers are mounted in the doors. Doors that are intentionally resonant so that they make a satisfying whump when you close the door, giving the illusion of vault-like isolation. Everywhere are plastic things that rattle and buzz. Add to that the asymmetry of sitting to one side - there is no "sweet spot". Acoustically, the car is a mess, and if you're sitting in a pickup truck it's going to be even worse.

    On top of that, the stereo is by Bose, that once-proud manufacturer that went to the dark side in the 80's. That big 100Hz bass boost gives the illusion of having lots of bass response to the casual listener. But in reality, the bass is very uneven and sorely lacking in the very low end.

    So what to do? First, use a spectral display as a sanity check to make sure you're not doing anything too evil yourself. Load up some commercial CDs that are similar to your own style and study their spectra. Of course, you can't just get away with copying somebody else's curve, but you can tell if you're in the ballpark.

    Next, take some measurements of your room. You can use Ethan Winer's stepped sine SONAR project and your own microphone, so it won't cost a dime. Simply knowing where the room is weak will help you make informed decisions, even if you do nothing else to mitigate the problems.

    Your subwoofer may be working against you. I love having one, especially for playing music for enjoyment, impressing visitors, and video games. But the truth is you're probably better off not using one at all. But if you're already too attached to it, try moving it around to different locations in the room, re-measuring the bass response of the room with each move. One method, which I've used myself, is to set the sub on your chair and crawl around until you find a spot that sounds just right. That's where you want to put the sub.




    Wow!

    that reminds me the problem I had, this was such a depressing experience for about 5 years already..., and I still suffer from it day by day because it almost killed my self confidence! I became a real paranoid and wasted tons of time and just got more confused....

    bad sound systems at parties is even worse experience.

    man...I almost killed myself because of it.

    but eventually I have learnt a lot from this.
    it probably was for a good reason after all, I feel that I grew up (as an artist and as a human being as well) through this awful experience. (at least I want to believe in that)
    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1