Ace.trouble
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 57
- Joined: 2010/08/16 10:44:43
- Status: offline
The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
Hi! I'm using the "L2 Ultramaximizer" Peak Limiter Plugin by WAVES. I insert it on every bus to make sure I don't get clipping (using output ceiling values ranging from -0.2 to -0.7 dB). I also use its threshold fader when I want to get a louder signal.
Now, I also have the "L2 Ultramaximizer" on the master channel. I'm wondering whether that's a good idea, having the plugin on the individual busses AND on the master channel?
I don't know if this approach could cause something funny...
|
Guitarman1
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 380
- Joined: 2006/04/16 22:59:49
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/14 20:38:09
(permalink)
I don't think it is a good idea to have it on every single channel. Only need it on your master buss... that is what it is for.. if you are looking for clipping, your track vu meter will tell you, or you can insert an analyzer.. but to have the l2 on every channel.. you are really squishing the sound.
Pentium 4, Vista Premium 64 bit Dual Quad 8 gigs of ram Delta 44 Sonar Producer 8.5.3 If only the good die young, then I should make it thru this economic crisis
|
Norrie
Max Output Level: -58.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1665
- Joined: 2010/04/20 15:48:15
- Location: Scotland
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/14 21:27:13
(permalink)
Personally but everyone else might be different.... I would be using it on a master bus or perhaps a drum bus too catch rouge peaks not on every channel
SONAR X3c Producer Pro Tools 11 Allen & Heath GS-R24 M Adam A77x i7 4930K @ 4.4Ghz
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/14 23:19:56
(permalink)
You'd normally not need it on sub-busses except as an effect, as is common with drum busses. Other than that, you do not need it on anything other than the master bus. If you find that levels are going over zero coming in to the master, just turn down the master bus trim control until they don't. (Or - the proper way - lower your track levels across the board because you're letting them get too hot. But that's a lot of work. Just trim the master.)
 All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
Ace.trouble
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 57
- Joined: 2010/08/16 10:44:43
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/14 23:42:33
(permalink)
Thanks for the input, all of you!
The reason why I started using the "L2 Ultramaximizer" on multiple busses was that in the past I always thought that my recordings weren't loud enough on certain parts (at least compared to all the high budget productions I listen to). And yes, I know that many of those high budget albums are ridiculously compressed (but that could make for a separate thread altogether...).
So, generally you're recommending not to use it on that many busses, because - apart from making the signal louder via compression - it shapes the sound, not in a good way I assume?
Regards
|
Iron Keys
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 87
- Joined: 2012/03/21 14:47:28
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/15 08:26:40
(permalink)
Mixing tip; Don't have any of your channels peaking more than halfway up the meter. Just make sure your monitors are up loud enough. If everything is routed to your master bus, you only need the L2 on the master bus (without any gain boost), this is what I do anyway. Your busses/channels shouldn't be hammering away at high levels anyway, I doubt you'd end up with a good mix that way. The only buses/channels that seem to really benefit from creative limiting is drum channels and busses.
Iron Keys ~ Franky Charm Producer / Songwriter http://soundcloud.com/ironkeys Windows Vista Premium SP2 32-Bit, Intel Core 2 duo 2.3/2.4, 4GB Ram, Sonar Producer 8 (8.3), M-Audio Audiophile 2496, Alesis M1 MkII, Carillon Control 49.
|
Ace.trouble
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 57
- Joined: 2010/08/16 10:44:43
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/15 09:58:25
(permalink)
@ Iron Keys: Thanks! So if I understand this correctly, you leave every track below 0dB output, except for the master bus and only insert a limiter on that master bus? And on the master bus you're also not making use of the limiter's threshold function? So I assume you achieve an increase in perceived loudness only via clever EQing? Sorry, so many questions...
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/15 10:48:42
(permalink)
|
Ace.trouble
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 57
- Joined: 2010/08/16 10:44:43
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/15 11:14:05
(permalink)
@ mike_mccue:
Okay, I have no idea what that's supposed to mean...
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/15 11:29:46
(permalink)
 Mike's cleverly alluding to the importance of calibrating your playback levels, preferably using Bob Katz's k-system, which involves using a Sound Pressure Level (SPL) meter as shown in his attached picture.
 All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/15 11:36:36
(permalink)
It's a way of suggesting that you read about SPL meters and calibrating your play back system so that you know what just-less-than 0dBFS on your DAW should sound like. When you get used to listening at a consistent sound level... you can mix to that level in the DAW and your results will become more consistent. As that happens you will probably find less need for limiters on each track or bus or what have you. Also, if you have a moment... read up about look ahead limiters and how a DAW works with them. You may, or may not, form an opinion that it's less than best practice to stack multiple instances of look ahead effects in series. I do it a lot, I stack a convolution reverb and a look ahead limiter and a phase liner EQ in series, but when I do I regard the patch as ambitious and fragile and I treat the DAW carefully once I get to that final mixing phase of a project. all the best, mike
|
Kalle Rantaaho
Max Output Level: -5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7005
- Joined: 2006/01/09 13:07:59
- Location: Finland
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/15 13:04:20
(permalink)
You can use subtle compressing on many tracks in order to make the results of the final level boosting more natural yet still effective. EQing alone is seldom the way to prepare the mix to be "loud-able". The first step, however, is usually careful volume automation.
SONAR PE 8.5.3, Asus P5B, 2,4 Ghz Dual Core, 4 Gb RAM, GF 7300, EMU 1820, Bluetube Pre - Kontakt4, Ozone, Addictive Drums, PSP Mixpack2, Melda Creative Pack, Melodyne Plugin etc. The benefit of being a middle aged amateur is the low number of years of frustration ahead of you.
|
Iron Keys
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 87
- Joined: 2012/03/21 14:47:28
- Status: offline
Re:The "right" use of Peak Limiter Plugins (busses and master channel)
2012/05/15 15:54:49
(permalink)
Ace.trouble @ Iron Keys: Thanks! So if I understand this correctly, you leave every track below 0dB output, except for the master bus and only insert a limiter on that master bus? And on the master bus you're also not making use of the limiter's threshold function? So I assume you achieve an increase in perceived loudness only via clever EQing? Sorry, so many questions... Don't worry, my brother, it's all good - I have been racking my brain and questioning the hell out of everything for ages. Still many questions I have, but still a far way I have came! What I'm saying is, say your meter goes from 0db all the way to -60 db, don't let anything peak more than halfway between the two. Bus things to relevant buses, so perhaps Drums, Bass, Backing, Lead, Vocals. Keep these peaking halfway-ish. On your buses, use compression to 'gel' things together, and perhaps subtle eq. Compression on your busses, as well as 'gelling' things together, it also gives the track more 'power', but compress correctly, so that you're helping the dynamics of the track. On my master bus I have a L2 (Actually changed to an L3 recently, but usually an L2) and I have the ceiling at -0.2db, threshold stays at 0. Sometimes when I'm producing I'll pull the threshold down, not to induce any gain reduction, but just because I can't be bothered to turn my monitors up. But when it comes time for mixing, I don't do a thing to my master bus. The only things I limit are drums. If the signals you're having aren't registering high, just increase the gain(or trim) on the top of each channel, or turn up the master output of your VST's etc. The whole 'peaking less than halfway' is a tip I picked up from a couple pro engineers I have shadowed. My mixes have sounded better since doing this. much love.
Iron Keys ~ Franky Charm Producer / Songwriter http://soundcloud.com/ironkeys Windows Vista Premium SP2 32-Bit, Intel Core 2 duo 2.3/2.4, 4GB Ram, Sonar Producer 8 (8.3), M-Audio Audiophile 2496, Alesis M1 MkII, Carillon Control 49.
|