Tried Neutron Today

Yep...Track Assistant is a really nice feature.
You may even find that what it suggests is just fine,
but, if not, you have a good starting point to being
your tweaks!

Fleer
Full of envy I am

Why are you talking like Yoda?

Fleer
Full of envy I am

That's fine. I'm full of it too.
 
Oh snap, Fleer said envy.

I wonder if something like this would be of any use to me given that I already have MAutoAnalyzer to identify frequency collisions. 

bapu

sharke
I wonder if something like this would be of any use to me given that I already have MAutoAnalyzer to identify frequency collisions. 

Well I would suspect probably not, but does MAutoAnalyzer also create an EQ curve based on what it found? That might be a tipping point since Neutron does (which of course you can tweak).

That may be helpful in some situations yes, although I have to say I think the whole area of identifying frequency collisions and applying curves to correct them is only part of the whole EQ story. Sometimes MAutoAnalyzer will identify a "hotspot" which to my ears isn't really doing the mix any harm. I think it's possible to get too obsessed with perfect separation, sometimes instruments share frequency ranges and that's OK.
 
When I first got MAutoAnalyzer I went a little nuts trying to "correct" every collision it identified. You end up chasing your tail. First of all, those collision hotspots are moving around all the time as the music plays. You might see a brief flash at 500Hz and then it moves to 1kHz for a second, and then 250Hz lights up. And secondly, you can lose your mind comparing one instrument to another and seeing different frequency clashes. Pretty soon you've got multiple EQ's and stupidly complex curves all over the place. The only time I use it now is when I have a really big problem with masking. And first and foremost, I try to avoid that by giving more thought to sound selection. Every now and then I will put three or four sounds together and they all sound perfectly distinct and balanced before I've inserted a single EQ. Doesn't happen very often but when it does it always reminds me of how little EQ you can get away with if you choose your sounds wisely. 

Much as I love MMultiAnalyzer, I don't find the collision display useful.
 
First of all, 95% of time the truly harmful frequency collisions are apparent without visual aids. It's akin to identifying pitch "problems" in Melodyne that weren't even audible until you could see them, and then assuming that fixing every last one of them will make your vocals sound better.
 
Second, not all collisions are necessarily problematic. Sometimes, you do it on purpose. Imagine a chef complaining "I can't taste the salt!".

Fleer
That's writing.
I talk like Vader.
I walk like a Wookie.
https://www.urbandictiona...=true&defid=416908

One of those is my favorite Bangles song.

Like living in a hell hole ...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a6XtEJtl2cg

yorolpal
My suggestion would be to go with the "amazing" results.  YMMV.
 
:-)
 

+1

BassDaddy
Ooooooooh kay

Kay? Edith's jealous.

Yoda you 2!

woooeeeeeemooooeeeee (as my fellow Wookie would say) !