True Peak <--> RMS

Author
Baseman
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 41
  • Joined: 2008/05/05 05:50:19
  • Status: offline
2014/03/13 02:24:12 (permalink)

True Peak <--> RMS

Hi there:)
 
Problem:
 
I have had a band in Studio and I mastered the Songs with the new True Peak Standard, I think it sounds much better, warmer and for sure with more dynamic, not as harsh as when it is nailed to the ceiling, I never liked it!!
 
So this band was here a few years ago and at that time I mastered them to about -6 dB RMS, they wanted it like that:(
Now they'd like to have for a Demo Cd a Mix of short peaces from the old and the new Songs!
 
So far so good:)
 
I can't remember, but i think I mastered it with Boost 11, (-0,3 dB Peak), the new ones also with Boost 11, (- 0,5 dB)
 
Now with True Peak the new titles peaked at about -12 dB RMS, but for the old ones I have to reduce loudness for about 3 dB, they do peak at -9 dB RMS.
 
How can this be??  Same Limiter!! How can I master the new songs to -9 dB RMS without peaking at True Peak??
 
Does anybody know more about True Peak or perhaps any Brickwall Limiter to get the new songs to the same level as the old ones.
 
For now I reduced the level from the old ones, so they have a maximum -4 or -5 dB to 0!!
 
Thanks a lot:)
Heinz.
 
P.S. For sure I could master the old ones again, but I loaded the master backup in Sonar and it can't identify the whole plug ins, but they are there, and don't know which Version I've had installed at that time, Perhaps Sonar 8.5? :(
 
#1

11 Replies Related Threads

    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re: True Peak <--> RMS 2014/03/13 03:06:13 (permalink)
    You talk about mastering. I would think remix to get the levels more inline with your new aesthetic. I would drop Boost 11 and go with a much better limiter when you go to master. I like Concrete Limiter but there other ones that will work nearly as well. For a really good and simple metering plus level control I would look strongly at Klanghelm YUMT.
     
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ug5UQNg8F4k Take a look at that vid. Its very helpful.

    Best
    John
    #2
    Baseman
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41
    • Joined: 2008/05/05 05:50:19
    • Status: offline
    Re: True Peak <--> RMS 2014/03/13 06:11:18 (permalink)
    Hi:)
     
    OK, after analysing the files, here the correct Meters:
     
    Old mastered File:  -8 LUFS, True Peak -0,9,  RMS -8 dB
    New mastered File:  -11 LUFS, True Peak -1 dB, RMS -11 dB
     
    True Peaks are both OK, but I don't know how to get to the level of the old File without peaking True Peak:(
    What the hell am I doing wrong??
     
    OK, now that I've read that for Radio/TV Productions in Germany the Aim is to Master at about -23 LUFS and +- 3dB Peak, my Files are too loud, so it's not a problem, but I'm wondering what I have done to these old files to sound louder without peaking "True Peak"??
     
    @John
    I've Nugens VisLM, great Level Meter, so the problem is Boost11. Nomad Factorys Brickwall Limiter doesn't work either!
    post edited by Baseman - 2014/03/13 06:18:59
    #3
    Baseman
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41
    • Joined: 2008/05/05 05:50:19
    • Status: offline
    Re: True Peak <--> RMS 2014/03/13 06:26:06 (permalink)
    Ups, sorry:)
     
    Thanks for the link, John:))
    #4
    mettelus
    Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5321
    • Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
    • Location: Maryland, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: True Peak <--> RMS 2014/03/13 06:38:50 (permalink)
    My hunch is that the dynamic range that you mentioned in the OP is playing a big part of this. As you flatten out dynamic range you are driving RMS values higher, and the peak values are the ones "set in stone" by a limiter, etc. A "visual" explanation would be similar to a true square wave... RMS=peak, so as you flatten dynamic range the difference between peak and RMS begins to narrow.
     
    Have you gone back to the original files and mastered them to your new work flow, or are you trying to remaster the original masters? For the point of getting more dynamic range in older songs, I would step back to the mixes they came from.

    ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
    #5
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: True Peak <--> RMS 2014/03/13 12:10:46 (permalink)
    Baseman
    Old mastered File:  -8 LUFS, True Peak -0,9,  RMS -8 dB
    New mastered File:  -11 LUFS, True Peak -1 dB, RMS -11 dB
     
    ...what I have done to these old files to sound louder without peaking "True Peak"??
     



    Peak levels have little to do with the perception of loudness, which is more closely tied to average RMS values. The older files, with an average RMS of -8 dB, are going to sound louder than the newer ones averaging -11 dB RMS. The ratio of peak to RMS is called the crest factor.
     
    To bring the new file up to the same level you're going to have to lower the crest factor, sacrificing peak-to-RMS ratio for the sake of overall volume. That means squashing some peaks. You'll need to raise the average RMS by 3 dB, which necessitates lowering your highest peaks by the same amount.
     
    This is where the quality of the limiter comes into play (along with many other factors; it's not all about the limiter but that's a big subject that entire books have been written about). Boost 11 isn't a very smart limiter. It works OK in some situations, especially if the amount of limiting is small. But if you want to be able to turn up the average RMS levels (and proportionally turn peaks down) it helps to have a smart limiter that can do this as transparently as possible.
     
    I'd suggest taking a look at TB Barricade for a quality limiter that's very inexpensive. If you want to throw more money at it, Ozone would be an excellent choice. There are plenty of others, such as Voxengo Elephant and FabFilter Pro-L, but they require a fair degree of expertise to use them properly. Ozone makes it downright easy.


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #6
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re: True Peak <--> RMS 2014/03/13 12:17:48 (permalink)
    Dave the OP wants to do just the opposite. He likes the sound of the new mastered songs and wants to go back have the old ones sound similar. 

    Best
    John
    #7
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re: True Peak <--> RMS 2014/03/13 14:30:26 (permalink)
    What threw me off was when he asked "how can I master the new songs to -9 dB RMS?", leading me to assume he wanted the new songs louder to match the old ones. Re-reading the OP, I see that he's trying to reduce the old files but finding the peaks consequently reduced by 4-5 dB in the process.
     
    Heinz, your options may be limited. It depends on the original mix whether you'll be able to volume-match the two sets of files without reducing peak values in the old files. If you have a high crest factor, then it's just a matter of reducing it just enough to make the match, by simply raising the RMS less. But if your crest factor on the old files is low, you may have no choice but to lower everything, sacrificing peaks in the process.
     
    If that's the case, assuming you still have the original project, you might go back in and examine things like compression on drums. If you've got severe compression on kick and/or snare, you may be able to back off the compression ratio and restore some of your crest factor. 


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #8
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: True Peak <--> RMS 2014/03/13 20:17:51 (permalink)
    Can you go back a few years and pull out those mixes that were premastered that is.  Do you have those mixes before mastering?  Reason why you should never master at the time of the mix.  Because you never get to print that all important mix that is Pre Mastered.
     
    If you do have those original pre mastered mixes than put those files through the same and the newer or latest mastering chain. That way you can bring all the rms levels together and consistently.  It will also help (to some degree) to disguise the fact some of the tracks were done previously.
     
    If you don't have those premastered mixes from a few years ago than your only option is to lower the level of the whole track to match the newer mastered levels.  I have done that on a few ocassions when mastering tracks for clients that had come from a variety of sources.  It is not ideal but at least you can keep all the volume levels consistent.  The VU meter will keep everything in check on that front.
     
     
     

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #9
    southpaw3473
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 782
    • Joined: 2008/04/22 16:50:41
    • Location: Western MA
    • Status: offline
    Re: True Peak <--> RMS 2014/03/13 20:31:58 (permalink)
    John
    You talk about mastering. I would think remix to get the levels more inline with your new aesthetic. I would drop Boost 11 and go with a much better limiter when you go to master. I like Concrete Limiter but there other ones that will work nearly as well. For a really good and simple metering plus level control I would look strongly at Klanghelm YUMT.
     
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ug5UQNg8F4k Take a look at that vid. Its very helpful.


    +1 to everything John said. i have really come to rely on the Klanghelm VUs. That video is also great. It really helped explain the new LU metering

    We'll not risk another frontal assault-that rabbit's dynamite!!!

    Tommy Byrnes
    Sonar Platinum
    Win 10 Pro x64 AMD FX 8350 Eight-Core 4.00GHz/ ASRock 970 Extreme4/ 16 gigs RAM
    UA Apollo Firewire/UA 2 Quad Satellite/ Focusrite OctoPre/Makie Onyx1220i Mixer  
    THANK YOU!!!
    #10
    Cactus Music
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 8424
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 21:34:04
    • Status: offline
    Re: True Peak <--> RMS 2014/03/13 20:53:17 (permalink)
    +1 to what Jeff is saying. It is most unwise to master while outputing a mix. 
    Composing and writing
    Rehearsing, playing it live 
    Recording and tracking
    Overdubs and turd polishing
    Mixing 
    Mastering
    Replicating
    Marketing

    Johnny V  
    Cakelab  
    Focusrite 6i61st - Tascam us1641. 
    3 Desktops and 3 Laptops W7 and W10
     http://www.cactusmusic.ca/
     
     
    #11
    Baseman
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 41
    • Joined: 2008/05/05 05:50:19
    • Status: offline
    Re: True Peak <--> RMS 2014/03/14 12:52:25 (permalink)
    Hi there:)
     
    Thanks to all for answering, but I've decided to master the old Songs again, I like the Dynamic and the Sound much more than the Loud mastered old songs!!!!
    They are all mixed to -3 dB Peak and about -15 to -20 dB RMS, so it's very OK for me to Master them to -15 dB RMS or LUFS (it's nearly the same)  and do just a little Final Equing and BASTA:)
    Perhaps a Minimum of Compressing, and the Band will hear the Difference to the Loud Sounded Sh....! I hope so;)
     
    Thanks and have a nice day or night, wherever you are:)
    Heinz.
     
    #12
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1