markmann
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 253
- Joined: 2005/12/23 01:05:49
- Status: offline
UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
I bought the UAD Neve 1073 EQ and it's supposed to have an SE version also. I can see the 1073SE in the Cakewalk/VST/Powered Plugins folder, but it won't show up in the plugin manager. The Neve 1081SE does show up and I can use it in Sonar. Has anyone else tried to get 1073SE to work? I'm contacting UAD because it seems a little flakey that one would work and not the other.
Sonar 6.2, Athlon 4400x2, 4 UAD cards, Benchmark D/A, MOTU Traveler, Apogee Mini-me clock, Kontackt, MMV, ColorTone, HydraTone, Amplitube 2, Digital Performer, G5
|
LionSound
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3616
- Joined: 2003/12/04 08:07:03
- Location: Los Angeles
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/09 17:51:42
(permalink)
Its ok in my system. Try rescanning VST's? Also, when scanning UAD plugs just let it go all the way through without clicking on the pop-up windows ... when the scan is done, then close the UA option windows.
www.soundclick.com/lionsound FirstStrike 1.2 IS RELEASED! www.fsmod.com
|
markmann
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 253
- Joined: 2005/12/23 01:05:49
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/09 18:36:13
(permalink)
Thanks again Seth,
I uninstalled the UAD software and ran Sonar again so it scanned all the plugins. Then I reinstalled and upon scanning the UAD plugins again, Sonar recognized 1073SE. So it was a Sonar scanning problem on some level.
Sonar 6.2, Athlon 4400x2, 4 UAD cards, Benchmark D/A, MOTU Traveler, Apogee Mini-me clock, Kontackt, MMV, ColorTone, HydraTone, Amplitube 2, Digital Performer, G5
|
LionSound
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3616
- Joined: 2003/12/04 08:07:03
- Location: Los Angeles
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/09 19:08:04
(permalink)
cool :-) what do you think of the Neve plugs BTW? I think they sound great, but the EQ interfaces are taking a litle getting used to be me. I'm more used to the Sonitus style of EQ interface ... but man they sound great.
post edited by GC San Diego Seth - 2007/01/09 19:28:24
www.soundclick.com/lionsound FirstStrike 1.2 IS RELEASED! www.fsmod.com
|
Lay In Wait
Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1764
- Joined: 2005/09/12 23:59:19
- Location: Victoria B.C , Canada
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/09 19:34:34
(permalink)
but man they sound great. The Neve 1073 is awesome, I just love it on vocals. I havent demoed the the other two yet. Just got a UAD1 before Christmas, but had enough dough to get the 1073, LA2A and the Fairchild before the sale was up at the end of the year. So far Im lovin all of them  . I dont think I'll get the other Neve eq and comp until after I get at least 1more card, the 1073 is a little hungry. Markmann, glad to see you got it workin.
Windows 7 Pro 64bit, Core i7 920, Asus p6td deluxe, Sonar X1c PE, Motu 2408 mk3, Apogee Mini DAC, 3x UAD-1, Digimax FS, Motu Microlite, MCU, Tranzport, Nocturn. And more...
|
Qwerty69
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1435
- Joined: 2004/02/19 17:44:10
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/09 20:14:36
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: GC San Diego Seth
cool :-) what do you think of the Neve plugs BTW? They are FAN-FREAKING-TASTIC and make every other EQ sound like harsh digital rubbish. I LOVE them.  Q.
|
stratton
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1446
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:49:24
- Location: San Diego
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/09 21:34:21
(permalink)
They are FAN-FREAKING-TASTIC and make every other EQ sound like harsh digital rubbish. I LOVE them. I agree. They're great. I love them too. They make getting a sound and mix togther SO much easier. A notable exception to the digital harshness to which you refer is the PLParEQ3, which is a mighty fine, very smooth parametric. Outstanding.
|
markmann
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 253
- Joined: 2005/12/23 01:05:49
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/09 22:09:25
(permalink)
I see most everybody is enjoying these plugins, so here's my 2 cents since I finally got 1073SE working. I like 1073 better than 1081, but they're both good. So far I'm using 1073 on lead vocal only because it's so cpu intensive. I'm using 1073SE and 1081SE on things like loops and guitars (haven't gotten to drums yet). To me these SE versions are clearly superior to the Cambridge and in the quality area of the Pultec. And I really second that statement that they make getting a mix together easier. They clearly beat the USR stuff I own by far and the USR stuff is running at 64-bits into Sonar. Haven't compared them to the PLPeq yet but will soon.
Sonar 6.2, Athlon 4400x2, 4 UAD cards, Benchmark D/A, MOTU Traveler, Apogee Mini-me clock, Kontackt, MMV, ColorTone, HydraTone, Amplitube 2, Digital Performer, G5
|
stratton
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1446
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:49:24
- Location: San Diego
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/09 22:41:28
(permalink)
Well, I'm glad you got it working. My take on the 1073 vs. the 1081 is that if you want an aggresive, in your face EQ, then the 1073 is it. The 1081 seeems to be a lttle more refined, but still with loads of character. The PLParEQ3 doesn't have much in common with UA's Neve plugs. Apart from a very nice high end, it hasn't struck me as having a "sound". It's just a powerful, transparent EQ.
post edited by stratton - 2007/01/09 23:01:29
|
Billy Buck
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2101
- Joined: 2003/11/05 22:25:15
- Location: Atlanta, GA.
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/09 22:46:52
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: markmann
I see most everybody is enjoying these plugins, so here's my 2 cents since I finally got 1073SE working. I like 1073 better than 1081, but they're both good. So far I'm using 1073 on lead vocal only because it's so cpu intensive. I'm using 1073SE and 1081SE on things like loops and guitars (haven't gotten to drums yet). To me these SE versions are clearly superior to the Cambridge and in the quality area of the Pultec. And I really second that statement that they make getting a mix together easier. They clearly beat the USR stuff I own by far and the USR stuff is running at 64-bits into Sonar. Haven't compared them to the PLPeq yet but will soon.
The upsampling is the only technical difference between the full Neve plugins and the "SE" versions and it would take a very critical ear to tell them apart in a mix. For instance, the Neve 1073 upsamples to 176.4 kHz (for 44.1 or 88.2 kHz sessions) or 192 kHz (for 48 kHz or 96 kHz sessions) to get that last exacting detail of the modeled analog EQ. Here is a past UA webzine article describing the finite differences: http://www.uaudio.com/webzine/2006/july/index7.html In case you missed it there is an article in last months UA webzine detailing the differences between the 1073 & 1081: http://www.uaudio.com/webzine/2006/december/index.html
Win 10 Pro x64 | i7 4770k | ASUS Z87 Deluxe/Quad w/ TB 2.0 | 16GB Corsair RAM | Apollo Twin Duo USB | UAD Satellite Octo USB | UAD-2 Quad + UAD-2 Solo PCIe | SONAR Platinum x64 ∞ | REAPER 5 x64| TranzPort
|
Qwerty69
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1435
- Joined: 2004/02/19 17:44:10
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/10 02:23:54
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: stratton
My take on the 1073 vs. the 1081 is that if you want an aggresive, in your face EQ, then the 1073 is it. The 1081 seeems to be a lttle more refined, but still with loads of character.
Totally agreed. I've also been playing about using the 1081 on the bottom end and the 1073 on the top -- interesting combination... Q.
|
markmann
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 253
- Joined: 2005/12/23 01:05:49
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/12 15:57:56
(permalink)
Here is a past UA webzine article describing the finite differences:
http://www.uaudio.com/webzine/2006/july/index7.html Thanks Billy. I hadn't seen that although I did see the other one. I just got into the UAD stuff, so I've taken a hit or miss trip throught the webzine archives looking at interesting topics. But there's a lot over there at UAD including the forum which I have to spend some time on. You've given me two very helpful references in the past few days. Thanks
Sonar 6.2, Athlon 4400x2, 4 UAD cards, Benchmark D/A, MOTU Traveler, Apogee Mini-me clock, Kontackt, MMV, ColorTone, HydraTone, Amplitube 2, Digital Performer, G5
|
TheFingers 
Max Output Level: -58.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1669
- Joined: 2005/10/28 18:42:44
- Location: A warm canal.
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/12 16:08:28
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: markmann
I see most everybody is enjoying these plugins, so here's my 2 cents since I finally got 1073SE working. I like 1073 better than 1081, but they're both good. So far I'm using 1073 on lead vocal only because it's so cpu intensive. I'm using 1073SE and 1081SE on things like loops and guitars (haven't gotten to drums yet). To me these SE versions are clearly superior to the Cambridge and in the quality area of the Pultec. And I really second that statement that they make getting a mix together easier. They clearly beat the USR stuff I own by far and the USR stuff is running at 64-bits into Sonar. Haven't compared them to the PLPeq yet but will soon.
1081 on kick is excellent mud/box remover.
1973 "A" neck. I'd rather be playing Bass:
|
stratton
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1446
- Joined: 2003/11/06 16:49:24
- Location: San Diego
- Status: offline
RE: UAD 1073SE not showing up - Anybody else?
2007/01/12 17:38:48
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Qwerty69
ORIGINAL: stratton
My take on the 1073 vs. the 1081 is that if you want an aggresive, in your face EQ, then the 1073 is it. The 1081 seeems to be a lttle more refined, but still with loads of character.
Totally agreed. I've also been playing about using the 1081 on the bottom end and the 1073 on the top -- interesting combination...
Q.
Hmmm. That's worth a try.
|