UM-3G opinions?

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
fac
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2427
  • Joined: 2004/06/15 10:08:48
  • Location: San Luis Potosi, Mexico
  • Status: offline
2010/11/10 00:01:50 (permalink)

UM-3G opinions?

My M-Audio Midisport 8x8/S is no longer supported under Vista/7, so I'm planning to replace it with two or three UM-3G's. Is anyone running 2 or 3 of these linked together? I'm using Sonar 7PE under Vista 32-bit and have quite a few rack synths I cannot currently use, so I'm kind of desperate. I need a simple and robust multi I/O MIDI solution.

http://facproductions.net

Lots of gear. Not enough time.
#1

2 Replies Related Threads
    Chappel
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2300
    • Joined: 2009/07/11 14:55:32
    • Location: California
    • Status: offline
    Re:UM-3G opinions? 2010/11/10 02:59:55 (permalink)
    I don't own one of these devices but I'm looking at the specs now and they seem designed to do what you are looking for. If you daisy-chain 3 units together (via USB) they will show up as nine independent midi devices in your recording software. Looks like a pretty nice design.
    #2
    lick4lick
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 37
    • Joined: 2003/12/04 21:29:17
    • Location: Berdoo Mountains California
    • Status: offline
    Re:UM-3G opinions? 2012/03/17 10:07:05 (permalink)
    I purchased a Cakewalk UM-3G to replace my old M-Audio 2X2 due to incompatibilities with Windows 7 and I couldn't be happier ... I had latency issues to begin with but found there was an update to the drivers and instantly the latency issues was resolved.  I'm running SONAR X1d.  I see the date of the posting ... but maybe this will help somebody else who may stumble upon it.
    #3
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1