matt41
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 50
- Joined: 2008/11/09 13:05:39
- Status: offline
USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
i have most of my libraries on an external hard drive for use by my home studio 7xl. that hard drive is usb 3.0 capable, so i bought a card to utilize usb 3.0. here are the results of my usb 3.0 trial: usb 3.0 is about 40% faster when reading from the external drive and writing on my internal drive (36 Mb/s with usb 3.0, 26 Mb/s with usb 2.0), but is 3 times faster when testing with HD Tach, which is a sequential read test, tho that speed may not be applicable to what i'm doing. when i use the usb 2.0, i still get the following, for a project that has 15 midi tracks with alot of automation (EWQL SO, dimension pro, kontakt 4, etc; my RAM keeps me from adding more tracks on this project): 1) projects load essentially at the same speed for both 2) the projects play without drop out 3) exporting the audio from all tracks is similar using both. if i have the success as listed above with a usb 2.0 external drive connection, does that mean i don't need usb 3.0 speed? or is there some scenario i have not considered when slightly more speed would make a difference. thanks.
|
Owen
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 136
- Joined: 2004/07/05 10:01:09
- Location: Mansfield, Ohio
- Status: offline
Re:USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
2011/02/01 20:34:41
(permalink)
According to something I read recently. USB3 reads faster than Firewire but writes slower than Firewire. They speculated that future updates of the technology might be more consistent.
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re:USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
2011/02/01 22:50:30
(permalink)
Here's something I saved that talks about USB 2, but I'm pretty sure it still applies for USB 3 (except that USB 3 is simply faster). It should explain why the Firewire results are still favorable at times though. FireWire vs. USB 2.0 Question: Which is faster Hi-Speed USB 2.0 or FireWire? Answer: In sustained throughput FireWire is faster than USB 2.0. Question: If Hi-Speed USB 2.0 is a 480 Mbps interface and FireWire is a 400 Mbps interface, how can FireWire be faster? Answer: Differences in the architecture of the two interfaces have a huge impact on the sustained throughput. FireWire vs. USB 2.0 - Architecture -
FireWire, uses a "Peer-to-Peer" architecture in which the peripherals are intelligent and can negotiate bus conflicts to determine which device can best control a data transfer -
Hi-Speed USB 2.0 uses a "Master-Slave" architecture in which the computer handles all arbitration functions and dictates data flow to, from and between the attached peripherals (adding additional system overhead and resulting in slower data flow control) FireWire vs. USB 2.0 Hard Drive Performance Comparison Read and write tests to the same IDE hard drive connected using FireWire and then Hi-Speed USB 2.0 show: Read Test: - 5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 33% faster than USB 2.0
- 160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 70% faster than USB 2.0
Write Test: - 5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 16% faster than USB 2.0
- 160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 48% faster than USB 2.0
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
gustabo
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2591
- Joined: 2009/01/05 17:32:38
- Status: offline
Re:USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
2011/02/01 23:02:17
(permalink)
Cakewalk by Bandlab - Win10 Pro x64 - StudioCat Platinum Studio DAW - 32 GB Ram - MOTU UltraLite-mk3 M-Audio Keystation 88ES - Akai MPD26 (hot-rodded) - Alesis DM10 - a few guitars, a few amps Novation Launch Control - Korg nanoKONTROL2 - PreSonus FaderPort - DAW Remote HD on iPad Adam A7X - Behritone C50A PreSonus Monitor Station v2 (controlling the mons) https://www.facebook.com/groups/sonarusergroup/
|
craigb
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 41704
- Joined: 2009/01/28 23:13:04
- Location: The Pacific Northwestshire
- Status: offline
Re:USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
2011/02/02 01:42:24
(permalink)
Now THAT'S funny! I had the above sent to me in an email - good to know it originated from such a quality website!
Time for all of you to head over to Beyond My DAW!
|
Owen
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 136
- Joined: 2004/07/05 10:01:09
- Location: Mansfield, Ohio
- Status: offline
Re:USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
2011/02/02 14:13:53
(permalink)
|
IK Obi
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1549
- Joined: 2011/02/22 20:25:48
- Location: Salt Lake City, UT
- Status: offline
Re:USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
2011/02/22 21:47:57
(permalink)
You should check out the article on USB 3.0 Vs Light Peak, Intels new interface. There is a reason the industry has been holding off on USB 3 for awhile... They're all waiting to see what Intel releases!
|
fireberd
Max Output Level: -38 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3704
- Joined: 2008/02/25 14:14:28
- Location: Inverness, FL
- Status: offline
Re:USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
2011/02/23 06:52:03
(permalink)
There is always something new in the works. How soon it will be avilable or how fast the industry will adopt it is another issue.
"GCSG Productions" Franklin D-10 Pedal Steel Guitar (primary instrument). Nashville Telecaster, Bass, etc. ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero M/B, i7 6700K CPU, 16GB Ram, SSD and conventional hard drives, Win 10 Pro and Win 10 Pro Insider Pre-Release Sonar Platinum/CbB. MOTU 896MK3 Hybrid, Tranzport, X-Touch, JBL LSR308 Monitors, Ozone 5, Studio One 4.1 ISRC Registered Member of Nashville based R.O.P.E. Assn.
|
jackn2mpu
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2765
- Joined: 2003/11/08 17:38:43
- Location: Soprano State
- Status: offline
Re:USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
2011/02/24 15:46:17
(permalink)
New Macbooks released today have Lightpeak which is now called Thunderbolt. So it's now out there.
|
jcschild
Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3409
- Joined: 2003/11/08 00:20:10
- Location: Kentucky y'all
- Status: offline
Re:USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
2011/02/24 18:02:51
(permalink)
and like USB3 lightpeak has no interfaces.. PCI bus was not saturated when PCIe came along (as far as interfaces go) Firewire didint need replacing but yeah lightpeak is cool..
Scott ADK Home of the Kentucky Fried DAW!
|
IK Obi
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1549
- Joined: 2011/02/22 20:25:48
- Location: Salt Lake City, UT
- Status: offline
Re:USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
2011/02/24 22:19:51
(permalink)
I think we're going to see great things with lightpeak! :D Super excited!
|
Rodar6
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 891
- Joined: 2007/05/24 18:02:57
- Location: Leicester UK
- Status: offline
Re:USB 3.0 Unnecessary?
2011/02/25 17:40:02
(permalink)
Yeah I'm looking forward to the audio devices that will be utilizing Lightpeak/Thunderbolt. I wonder how long it will be before we see the first Lightpeak/Thunderbolt audio device..will it be this year? On the downside they are probably gonna be over priced, no doubt in the same vein as SSD's are in comparison with spindle hard drives. Regards Rodders
"Expert in novice advice" Sonar PE 8.5.1 (pre -5,6,7,8) - Logic Pro Studio 9.1.6 - Windows 7 32bit - Mac OSX Snow Leopard - MacBook Pro 13" i7Core 2.7GHz Sandy Bridge, 8Gb Ram, Intel 520 SSD - Edirol UA-25 - Blue Woodpecker Ribbon - Rode NT5 Condenser - Shure SM57 --- Fender 52 AVRI Telecaster LH - Ovation Special Balladeer LH.
|